Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Density Estimation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples calculate the pointwise constants for the Gaussian kernel, show how a positive finite bandwidth convolves a Gaussian density with extra Gaussian noise, and compute the nonvanishing boundary bias for a uniform density on [0,1].

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Gaussian-kernel moments and pointwise constants

Example

For d≥1, take the standard Gaussian kernel Kd(u)=(2π)−d/2e−∥u∥2/2. Its second-moment matrix is μjk=δjk and ∥Kd∥22=(4π)−d/2, where δjk is 1 for j=k and 0 otherwise. Thus, under the pointwise theorem hypotheses, Ef^h(x)−f(x)=12h2Δf(x)+o(h2),Var⁡(f^h(x))=f(x)nhd(4π)−d/2+o((nhd)−1). Here Δf=∑j=1d∂jjf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, the kernel Kd above, and a density/sample satisfying the hypotheses of Pointwise second-order bias of the KDE and Pointwise variance of the KDE.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The nonnegative plane Gaussian integral is ∫R2e−(x2+y2)d(x,y)=π (The plane Gaussian integral equals π by polar coordinates).

[F2]

Tonelli factors nonnegative integrals of products on Euclidean product spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

Under ACω, nonnegative C1 substitutions obey change of variables (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F4]

Fubini factors absolutely integrable products on sigma-finite product spaces (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F7]

The exponential dominates each fixed polynomial at infinity (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

[F8]

The pointwise bias and variance expansions hold with their stated regularity and bandwidth conditions (Pointwise second-order bias of the KDE, Pointwise variance of the KDE).

[F9]

Integrals of nonnegative functions pass to increasing-domain limits (Monotone convergence for the integral).

Verification

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F5F6F7F9

Put I=∫Re−t2dt. Tonelli [F2] and [F1] give I2=∫R2e−(x2+y2)d(x,y)=π. Since I≥0, I=π. Let ϕ(t)=(2π)−1/2e−t2/2. The substitution s=t/2 in [F3] then gives ∫ϕ=1. By [F5], ϕ′(t)=−tϕ(t). Integration by parts [F6] gives ∫0Rtϕ(t)dt=ϕ(0)−ϕ(R). By [F7], ϕ(R)→0 and Rϕ(R)→0, so ∫∣t∣ϕ(t)dt=2ϕ(0)<∞. Oddness then gives ∫tϕ(t)dt=0. Integration by parts [F6] on [−R,R] also yields ∫−RRt2ϕ(t)dt=∫−RRϕ(t)dt−[tϕ(t)]−RR. As R→∞, Rϕ(R)→0 by [F7] (put s=R2/4 and use R≤2s for R≥2), and the right side tends to 1, so ∫t2ϕ(t)dt=1 by [F9].

2.1step 1.1F1F2F4algebra

Since Kd(u)=∏j=1dϕ(uj), repeated use of Tonelli [F2] shows ∫Kd=1. Fubini [F4], the one-dimensional moments from step 1.1, and absolute integrability give μjj=1 and μjk=0 for j≠k. Also ∫Kd(u)2du=(2π)−d∏j=1d∫Re−uj2duj=(2π)−dπd/2=(4π)−d/2.

3.1step 2.1F8algebra∎

Substituting μjk=δjk and ∥Kd∥22=(4π)−d/2 into [F8] yields the two displayed leading terms. The Gaussian kernel is nonnegative and integrates to one by step 2.1, so A nonnegative normalized kernel estimate integrates to one also confirms that each finite estimate is a density.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Finite-bandwidth Gaussian smoothing

Example

Let τ>0 and fτ(x)=(2πτ2)−d/2exp⁡ ⁣(−∥x∥22τ2),Kd(u)=(2π)−d/2e−∥u∥2/2. For every fixed bandwidth h>0, Ef^h(x)=(2π(τ2+h2))−d/2exp⁡ ⁣(−∥x∥22(τ2+h2)). Thus the expected estimate is the centered Gaussian density with covariance (τ2+h2)Id, and at x=0 it is strictly smaller than f(0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d,n≥1, τ,h>0, iid observations with density fτ, and kernel Kd.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The KDE formula and density-based sample model (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Expectations are integrals against the sample law, which has density f (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F3]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on integrable functions (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F4]

The nonnegative plane Gaussian integral is ∫R2e−(x2+y2)d(x,y)=π (The plane Gaussian integral equals π by polar coordinates).

[F5]

Tonelli permits factoring nonnegative product integrals (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F6]

Under ACω, affine C1 substitutions obey the nonnegative change-of-variables formula (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

Verification

1.1givenA1F4F5F6algebra

Put I=∫Re−t2dt. Tonelli [F5] and [F4] give I2=π, so I=π. Scaling by s=t/2 with [F6] yields ∫(2π)−1/2e−t2/2dt=1; repeated Tonelli gives ∫Kd=1. Since fτ(x)=τ−dKd(x/τ), [F6] with x=τu gives ∫fτ=1.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3F6step 1.1

By [F1] and [F2], expectation of one KDE summand is integration of its Gaussian kernel against fτ. The summand is bounded for fixed h, hence integrable. The integrand is nonnegative; using [F6] with T(u)=x−hu changes variables to ∫Kd(u)fτ(x−hu)du. All summands have this expectation, so linearity [F3] gives Ef^h(x)=∫RdKd(u)fτ(x−hu)du. The integral is finite because both Gaussian densities are bounded and integrable.

3.1step 1.1A1F4F5F6algebrastep 2.1

In the integrand of step 2.1, combine exponents using ∥u∥2+τ−2∥x−hu∥2=τ2+h2τ2∥u−hxτ2+h2∥2+∥x∥2τ2+h2. The remaining translated Gaussian integral is (2πτ2/(τ2+h2))d/2 by [F4], [F5], and affine scaling [F6]. Multiplying the normalizing constants gives the displayed formula.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

At x=0, Ef^h(0)=(2π(τ2+h2))−d/2<(2πτ2)−d/2=f(0), because h>0. Therefore a finite positive bandwidth has nonzero bias in this example.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Gaussian KDE boundary bias for a uniform density

Example

In one dimension, choose the Borel density version f=1[0,1] and the standard Gaussian kernel K(u)=(2π)−1/2e−u2/2. At the support boundary x=0, Ef^h(0)=∫−1/h0K(u)du⟶12(h↓0), while the chosen target value is f(0)=1. Hence the uncorrected estimator has limiting bias −1/2 at the boundary. The smoothness hypotheses of the pointwise second-order bias theorem fail at x=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d=1, iid observations with chosen density version f=1[0,1], kernel K(u)=(2π)−1/2e−u2/2, bandwidth h>0, and evaluation point x=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The estimator is f^h(x)=(nh)−1∑iK((x−Xi)/h) (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Expectation is integration against the sample law, which has density f (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F3]

Expectation is linear on integrable variables (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F4]

The nonnegative plane Gaussian integral is ∫R2e−(x2+y2)d(x,y)=π (The plane Gaussian integral equals π by polar coordinates).

[F6]

Nonnegative integrals pass through increasing limits (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F7]

Under ACω, affine C1 substitutions obey nonnegative change of variables (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

Verification

1.1givenA1F4F5F7F8algebra

The function f=1[0,1] is a Borel density version: [F8] gives λ1([0,1])=1. Put I=∫Re−t2dt. Tonelli [F5] and [F4] give I2=π, so I=π. Scaling with [F7] shows ∫R(2π)−1/2e−t2/2dt=1. Since this kernel is even, ∫−∞0K(u)du=1/2.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3F7step 1.1

By [F1]–[F3] and the density formula, each summand is integrable because K is bounded and the sample law is a probability measure. Thus Ef^h(0)=h−1∫01K(−t/h)dt. Apply [F7] on R to T(u)=−hu and g(t)=1[0,1](t)K(−t/h). It gives ∫01K(−t/h)dt=h∫−1/h0K(u)du, so the displayed expectation equals ∫−1/h0K(u)du.

3.1step 1.1F6step 2.1

Along any sequence hm↓0, the intervals [−1/hm,0] increase to (−∞,0]. Monotone convergence [F6] and the half-mass calculation in step 1.1 give ∫−1/hm0K(u)du⟶∫−∞0K(u)du=12.

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra∎

The density version was chosen with f(0)=1, so step 3.1 gives Ef^h(0)−f(0)→−1/2. The selected density is discontinuous at 0, so this calculation does not satisfy the smooth interior-point theorem's hypotheses.

Sources