Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a path-connected locally path-connected base, a universal cover maps uniquely over the base to every connected covering, and any two universal covers are uniquely isomorphic

Statement

Let B be path-connected and locally path-connected. After basepoints over the same point are fixed, a universal cover of B admits a unique based continuous map over B to every connected covering of B; in particular any two universal covers of B are uniquely isomorphic over B.

The map to a connected covering is asserted here only as a continuous map over the base. The classical stronger form, that this map is itself a covering map, needs a surjectivity argument and evenly covered neighbourhoods for it, and is not established on this page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

A universal covering space of B is a covering map p:B~→B whose total space B~ is simply connected (def-covering-map-and-evenly-covered-neighbourhoods, def-simply-connected). (Universal covering spaces).

[F2]

Let Y be path-connected and locally path-connected, let f:(Y,y0)→(B,b0) be based, and let p:(E,e0)→(B,b0) be a covering. A based lift f~:(Y,y0)→(E,e0) exists if and only if f∗π1(Y,y0)⊆p∗π1(E,e0); when it exists it is unique. (Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces).

[F3]

Let Y be connected and let f,g:Y→E be lifts through the same covering of the same map Y→B. If f(y0)=g(y0) for some y0∈Y, then f=g. (Two lifts from a connected space that agree at one point agree everywhere).

[F4]

For a covering p:E→B, the total space E is locally path-connected if and only if the base B is locally path-connected. (Local path-connectedness lifts and descends along covering maps).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF4F2F1

Let the base be path-connected and locally path-connected and fix points over a common basepoint.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3

By [F1] the total space of a universal cover is simply connected, so its fundamental group is trivial and the subgroup condition of [F2] holds for any target covering. [F2] therefore supplies a based lift to any connected covering, and asserts that lift to be unique. What [F2] delivers is a continuous map over the base; it carries no covering-map conclusion, and no later step supplies one.

3.1step 2.1F3F1F4

Applying this in both directions between two universal covers and using uniqueness of lifts makes the composites identities.

4.1step 3.1∎

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources