How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Momentum and quadratic acceleration — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Computational foundations: factorization, KL, and optimization
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Matrix Differentiation and First-order Spectral Perturbation
- Matrix Norms, Condition Numbers and Numerical Stability
- Metric Spaces
- Momentum and quadratic acceleration
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
An untuned heavy-ball recurrence diverges on a scalar quadratic
Example
Let be . Run heavy-ball momentum with , , and . For every integer , the resulting iterates are
so the iterate sequence is unbounded and does not converge to a real limit.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , heavy-ball parameters and , and initial values .
Heavy-ball momentum: for fixed parameters, .
Matrix quadratic forms have the expected first derivative and Hessian: for , the gradient is .
The reals are complete: with its usual order and field structure, is a complete ordered field.
Every complete ordered field is Archimedean: in every complete ordered field, for every element there is a canonical natural number whose field embedding satisfies .
Verification
Taking in [F2] gives . Substituting the parameters and this gradient into [F1] yields for every .
The characteristic polynomial is . Each geometric sequence and therefore satisfies the recurrence in step 1.1. The stated linear combination has and , so the recurrence and these initial values prove the displayed formula for all by induction.
For , factor the expression as . Since , the term in parentheses is at most , hence . Induction gives for . For any starting index and any real , put ; since is a complete ordered field by [F3], [F4] supplies a natural number , which we use under the usual embedding as an integer iteration index. Thus and . Every tail is therefore unbounded. If the sequence converged to a real , some tail would satisfy and hence , a contradiction.
A reported stochastic Nesterov experiment is empirical evidence
Example
Sutskever, Martens, Dahl, and Hinton report experiments on the Curves, MNIST, and Faces deep-autoencoder tasks using sigmoid networks, their sparse initialization, 750,000 parameter updates per trial, minibatches of size 200, and no regularization. They used a slowly increasing momentum schedule capped by and selected the best training learning rate for each schedule from . In Table 1, the Curves training squared error is for their Nesterov variant with and for the zero-momentum SGD baseline. The paper reports training errors only; this setup-specific empirical comparison supplies no general stochastic convergence rate or test-risk guarantee.
Example references
Nesterov accelerated gradient algorithm The deterministic algorithm evaluates the gradient at the look-ahead point; the reported experiment replaces the full gradient by a minibatch gradient.
Bottou, Curtis, and Nocedal, Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
The spectrum 1, 4, 9 gives tuned root factor one half
Example
Let , on , and . With and , tuned heavy-ball has , , and modal root factor at all three eigenvalues. Its endpoint characteristic polynomials are repeated-root polynomials. Gradient descent with step has modal multipliers , so its worst modal factor is .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The diagonal matrix , objective , initial vector , and the two fixed-step update rules.
Tuned heavy-ball has the minimax root factor on positive-definite quadratics: for , , the tuned parameters are and , with modal root factor .
Heavy-ball momentum: the update is .
Gradient descent: in fixed-step mode, the update is .
Matrix quadratic forms have the expected first derivative and Hessian: for , the gradient is .
Verification
The eigenvalues of are , so , , , and . Substitution into [F1] gives and .
Taking gives , so [F4] yields . Projecting [F2]'s update onto each standard coordinate gives polynomial . For it is ; for it is , whose roots are and have modulus ; for it is . Thus each root factor is , and the endpoint roots are repeated.
By [F3], gradient descent with has multiplier on an eigenvector of eigenvalue . The multipliers at are , whose largest absolute value is .