Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An equilateral-triangle rigid-material model: inertia matrix, principal axes, rotational term and the threefold-symmetry check

Physical scope

Under the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω of the inertia and kinetic-splitting suppliers, a worked rigid-material model: three equal point masses at the vertices of an equilateral triangle in reference coordinates centred at the triangle's centre. The example computes the model's body inertia matrix, its principal axes and moments, the rotational term of the kinetic splitting for a general motion, and the invariance of the inertia matrix under the threefold symmetry rotation. It is a model instance with declared numerical proportions of the parameters; no measured moment of inertia and no concrete physical body is asserted.

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω of [A1], as required by the inertia and kinetic-splitting suppliers. Adopt a rigid-material model of Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope whose reference mass distribution is the finite weighted sum of Dirac measures ν:=m0∑k=02δxk,xk:=a(cos⁡2πk3, sin⁡2πk3, 0)(k=0,1,2), with equal weights m0>0 in kilograms ([m0]=μ) and circumradius a>0 in metres ([a]=ℓ). Under Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework, the basis vectors and angles are dimensionless, the xk have length dimension, inertia entries and principal moments have dimension μℓ2, read in kilogram metres squared, and angular-velocity components ωj and the constant rate ϖ used below have dimension τ−1, read in radians per second with dimensionless radians and time in seconds. Rotational kinetic energy has dimension μℓ2τ−2, read in joules. The parameters are model data, not measurements. Here g(u,v):=⟨u,v⟩=∑j=13ujvj for u,v∈R3 is the Euclidean inner product (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn); a g-orthonormal pair u,v satisfies g(u,u)=g(v,v)=1 and g(u,v)=0. Then:

  1. ν is a centred mass distribution of total mass m=3m0 in the sense of Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix;
  2. the body inertia matrix is I=diag(3m0a22, 3m0a22, 3m0a2);
  3. the principal axes are e3 together with any g-orthonormal pair in the plane {ρ∈R3:ρ3=0}, and the principal moments are 3m0a22 (twice) and 3m0a2; the model is nondegenerate and I is invertible;
  4. for any motion of the model with body angular velocity ω=∑jωjej, the rotational term of Total momentum, kinetic-energy splitting and centre-of-mass angular momentum of a rigid-material motion is 12ωTIω=12⋅3m0a22(ω12+ω22)+12⋅3m0a2ω32;
  5. the threefold rotation S:=Rz(2π/3) satisfies SIST=I, so the inertia data of the equilateral triangle are invariant under the symmetry rotation of the shape, and the two equal transverse principal moments exhibit that symmetry: I restricts to the scalar 3m0a2/2 on the transverse plane.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω as specified in [A1]. The weights m0>0, the circumradius a>0, the points x0,x1,x2 displayed above, the measure ν and the mathematical notation of Mass distributions on R3: total mass, first moment and inertia matrix, The cross product in R3 and The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) is adopted: for every family (Xn)n∈N of nonempty sets there is f:N→⋃nXn with f(n)∈Xn for all n. It is the inherited premise of Inertia matrix, spatial inertia tensor, inertia tensor about a point and moment of inertia about an axis of a rigid-material model, Finiteness of the moments of a bounded finite Borel measure on R3, Principal axes and principal moments of the inertia data of a rigid-material model, axis moments and extremal values and Total momentum, kinetic-energy splitting and centre-of-mass angular momentum of a rigid-material motion, used for the general measurability/finiteness route invoked here; the explicit atomic computation does not establish the axiom.

[L1]

Dirac measures and their weighted sums (The Dirac set function at a point, A Dirac set function is a probability measure, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures are measures, Nonnegative scalar multiples and countable weighted sums of measures): ν is a measure on the Borel space of R3 with ν(E)=m0∑kδxk(E); it is finite and supported on the three points xk, hence bounded.

[L2]

Integration against a finite atomic measure (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, Integral over a measurable subset, Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral): for a nonnegative measurable f the integral is the supremum of integrals of simple minorants; the resulting finite-atomic formula is proved in step 1.1 below. Under [A1], Finiteness of the moments of a bounded finite Borel measure on R3 supplies the measurability and integrability of the coordinate and quadratic polynomials used in that formula.

[L3]

Model and inertia data (Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope, Inertia matrix, spatial inertia tensor, inertia tensor about a point and moment of inertia about an axis of a rigid-material model, Principal axes and principal moments of the inertia data of a rigid-material model, axis moments and extremal values): the body inertia matrix is I=I(ν)=∫(∥ρ∥22I3−ρρT) dν(ρ); its principal basis exists, the principal moment about ej is ∫∥ej×ρ∥22 dν, and the model is nondegenerate exactly when no line through the origin carries all the mass, in which case every principal moment is positive and I is invertible.

[L4]

The constant π>0 is defined by Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine; 2π is a common sine/cosine period by Pi is equivalently the first sine zero, twice the first cosine zero, and half the least common period, sine is positive on (0,π) by Pi is the first positive zero of sine, and cosine strictly decreases on [0,π] by Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine. The following finite sums are derived in step 1.2 using these facts and Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Laws of finite sums and finite products: ∑k=02cos⁡(2πk/3)=∑k=02sin⁡(2πk/3)=0, ∑kcos⁡2(2πk/3)=∑ksin⁡2(2πk/3)=32 and ∑kcos⁡(2πk/3)sin⁡(2πk/3)=0; further cos⁡(2π/3)=−12 and sin⁡(2π/3)=32.

[L5]

Coordinate rotations (The coordinate rotation matrices Rz(a) and Ry(a): values in SO(3), composition law, and derivatives): Rz(a)∈SO(3) for every real a, with the displayed entries in terms of cos⁡a and sin⁡a; Rz(a)Rz(b)=Rz(a+b).

[L6]

Matrix and norm algebra (The vector space Mm×n(F):=F m×n of m by n matrices over a field, with entrywise operations, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn): matrix products act on column vectors; ∥u×v∥22=∥u∥22∥v∥22−⟨u,v⟩2; e3×ρ=(−ρ2,ρ1,0) has squared norm ρ12+ρ22.

[L7]

Kinetic splitting (Total momentum, kinetic-energy splitting and centre-of-mass angular momentum of a rigid-material motion clause 3): under [A1], for every C2 motion of this centred model on its open time window, with body angular velocity defined by RTR′=[ω]× (Body and spatial angular velocity of a rigid-material motion, and the material velocity field), K=12m∥c′∥22+12ωTIω; the second term is the rotational kinetic energy.

Verification

technique · direct finite computation; verify the model data, the inertia matrix, the principal data and the symmetry invariant with explicit trigonometric sums
1.1L1L2algebra

Finite-atomic integration formula: let f be ν-integrable. If s=∑jajχEj is a nonnegative simple function, then ∫s dν=∑jajν(Ej)=∑jaj m0∑kδxk(Ej)=m0∑ks(xk) by [L1]; taking the supremum over simple 0≤s≤f and using the minorant s0:=∑kf(xk)χ{xk}≤f together with the bound ∫s dν=m0∑ks(xk)≤m0∑kf(xk) valid for every simple 0≤s≤f gives ∫f dν=m0∑kf(xk) for nonnegative f; the real case follows from f=f+−f− and linearity [L2], and the complex case by real/imaginary parts.

1.2L4algebra

Trigonometric values and sums: put θ=2π/3 and c=cos⁡θ. The period in [L4] gives cos⁡3θ=1. Repeated addition and the Pythagorean identity give cos⁡3θ=4c3−3c, hence (c−1)(2c+1)2=0. Since 0<θ<π and cosine strictly decreases on [0,π], c<cos⁡0=1, so c=−1/2. Positivity of sine and its squared value 1−c2=3/4 give sin⁡θ=3/2. The addition formulas now give (cos⁡2θ,sin⁡2θ)=(−1/2,−3/2). Together with (cos⁡0,sin⁡0)=(1,0) these three explicit pairs yield all five finite sums in [L4] by addition.

2.1step 1.1L1L4step 1.2algebra

The measure is a mass distribution: by [L1] it is finite and bounded with support {x0,x1,x2}, and ν(R3)=3m0∈(0,∞). Its first moment is ∫ρ dν=m0∑kxk=m0a(∑kcos⁡(2πk/3),∑ksin⁡(2πk/3),0)=0 by step 1.1 and [L4]: the reference coordinates are centred.

2.2A1step 1.1L3L4step 1.2algebra

Inertia matrix: by step 1.1 and [L3], I=∫(∥ρ∥22I3−ρρT)dν(ρ)=m0∑k(∥xk∥22I3−xkxkT)=m0(3a2I3−∑kxkxkT), because ∥xk∥2=a for every k. The matrix ∑kxkxkT has entries a2∑kcos⁡2(2πk/3), a2∑kcos⁡(2πk/3)sin⁡(2πk/3) and a2∑ksin⁡2(2πk/3) in the plane and zero in the third row and column, so by [L4] it equals diag(3a22,3a22,0). Hence I=m0 diag(3a2−3a22, 3a2−3a22, 3a2), which is the displayed matrix of clause 2.

3.1A1step 2.2L3L4L6algebra

Principal data: the displayed matrix is diagonal, so Ie1=3m0a22e1, Ie2=3m0a22e2 and Ie3=3m0a2e3: e3 is a principal axis with moment 3m0a2, and every g-orthonormal pair in the plane {ρ∈R3:ρ3=0} is a pair of principal axes with the common moment 3m0a22. The integral identities are checked directly: ∫∥e3×ρ∥22 dν=m0∑k((xk)12+(xk)22)=m0⋅3a2=3m0a2 and ∫∥e1×ρ∥22 dν=m0∑k((xk)22+(xk)32)=m0⋅3a22 by [L4] and [L6], in agreement with the diagonal entries by clause 2.

4.1A1step 3.1L3L4step 1.2algebra

Nondegeneracy and invertibility: no line through the origin contains two of the points xk, because their arguments modulo π are 0,π3,2π3 (using [L4]), which are pairwise distinct; hence for every line L through the origin at least two of the three points lie outside L and ν(R3∖L)≥2m0>0. The model is therefore nondegenerate, and by clause (d) of [L3] all principal moments are positive (as they visibly are) and I is invertible.

4.2A1L7step 3.1L3algebra

Rotational term: by clause (b) of [L3] and clause 2, for a motion with body angular velocity ω=∑jωjej the quadratic form is ωTIω=∑jIjωj2=3m0a22(ω12+ω22)+3m0a2ω32; multiplying by 12 and citing clause 3 of Total momentum, kinetic-energy splitting and centre-of-mass angular momentum of a rigid-material motion for the reading of the term as the rotational kinetic energy gives clause 4. In particular a rotation about the symmetry axis e3 with rate ϖ has rotational term 32m0a2ϖ2, and a rotation about an in-plane principal axis has term 34m0a2ϖ2.

4.3step 2.2step 3.1L5L6algebra

Symmetry check: S=Rz(2π/3) is the rotation of the reference plane that carries xk to xk+1 for k=0,1,2 (indices modulo 3): its matrix acts on a(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0) as a(cos⁡(θ+2π3),sin⁡(θ+2π3),0) by the addition formulas and [L5]. Since S is orthogonal and preserves norms, SIST=m0(3a2I3−∑k(Sxk)(Sxk)T)=m0(3a2I3−∑kxk+1xk+1T)=I by step 2.2, the preservation of norms and the relabelling of the finite sum. Thus SI=IS, and the invariance of the inertia data under the threefold symmetry is exhibited; on the plane {ρ∈R3:ρ3=0}, where S acts as the rotation by 2π3, the matrix I is scalar, which is exactly the equality of the two transverse principal moments in step 3.1.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2step 4.3given∎

Interpretation: the model is a rigid-material model with three equal point masses whose reference shape is symmetric under the threefold rotation; its inertia matrix, principal axes, principal moments and rotational term have been computed, and the symmetry invariance of the inertia matrix checked. The numbers are proportions of the model parameters m0 and a; no measured moment of inertia and no concrete physical body is asserted, and the statements are conditional on the model of Adoption of the rigid-material model branch: reference mass distribution, rigid placements, orientation and scope.

Remarks

  • The threefold symmetry and the equal transverse moments. The equality SI=IS of step 4.3 is the model's version of the general fact that a symmetry rotation of a mass distribution is a symmetry of its inertia data; here it is verified in a finite computation. It does not by itself prove that every axisymmetric body has equal transverse moments; that statement would require an argument relating the invariance of the measure to the inertia integral beyond the finite check performed here.

  • Reading the numbers. The principal moment about the symmetry axis exceeds either transverse moment by the factor 2 in this configuration: 3m0a22 against 3m0a2. This is a property of the chosen shape, not a general law, and it illustrates that the three principal moments need not be distinct.

  • Empirical status. The parameters m0 and a are model data; the example asserts no measured values and no claim that any actual rigid body has this mass distribution.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources