Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stationary functional need not be a minimum

Physical scope

Worked computation in the smooth finite-region field action with the box region and no source: the stationary configuration of the adopted model is a saddle of the indefinite quadratic functional, with explicit compact variations of both signs and arbitrarily small magnitude. Excluded: any claim about physical fields or measurements, minimality of the adopted action, and applicability beyond the declared region and functional.

Example

Assume Countable Choice, inherited from the field-action measure suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); no additional choice is used. Work in Smooth finite-region Maxwell action, compact variations and the fixed-endpoint particle functional with the coordinate box U=(−1,1)4 lying compactly inside the chosen laboratory chart, constants c,μ0>0, ε0=(μ0c2)−1 (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values) and j=0.

(a) [Coordinate and physical forms] With x0=ct, set Ut:={(t,x):(ct,x)∈U}=(−1/c,1/c)×(−1,1)3. The exact field dictionary gives

S[A]=12cμ0∫U(∣E∣2/c2−∣B∣2)dλ=12∫Ut(ε0∣E∣2−∣B∣2/μ0)dt d3x.

Also S[λA]=λ2S[A] for every real λ.

(b) [Stationarity] A=0 is stationary: the actual first-variation coefficient of Compact variations of the quadratic field functional: first variation and the coefficient equation is −μ0−1Fμν∂μhν+jνhν, and the action variation is c−1 times its integral. Both terms vanish at F=0, j=0.

(c) [Positive direction] Choose θ∈Cc∞(U) with ∇xθ≢0. Set the covariant components h0=θ, hi=0, equivalently the contravariant variation h0=−θ, hi=0. Then E=c∇xθ, B=0, and

S[h]=12cμ0∫U∣∇xθ∣2dλ>0.

(d) [Negative directions with a fixed compact support] Choose nonzero nonnegative smooth bumps η,φ,ψ2,ψ3∈Cc∞((−1/2,1/2)) using Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization. Extend them by zero to R. For integers N≥1 define the contravariant variation with only its second spatial component nonzero:

h(N)2(x)=η(x0)φ(Nx1)ψ2(x2)ψ3(x3).

All supports lie in one fixed compact subset of U. Writing fN=h(N)2, its fields are E=−c(∂0fN)e2 and B=−(∂3fN)e1+(∂1fN)e3. Define finite constants, with all one-dimensional integrals over (−1,1),

CE=(∫η′2)(∫φ2)(∫ψ22)(∫ψ32),CB=(∫η2)(∫φ′2)(∫ψ22)(∫ψ32)>0,

C3=(∫η2)(∫φ2)(∫ψ22)(∫ψ3′2)≥0.

Exact substitution and Fubini give

∫U∣E∣2/c2 dλ=CE/N,∫U∣B∣2dλ=CBN+C3/N,

S[h(N)]=12cμ0(CE−C3N−CBN)⟶−∞.

Thus a fixed sufficiently large N supplies one negative direction h−; the direction h+ of (c) is positive. For nonzero λ, their rescalings keep their respective signs, and each action tends to zero in absolute value as λ→0. A single fixed negative direction is not claimed to change sign under rescaling.

(e) [Every usual neighbourhood] Fix those two directions before rescaling. For each derivative multi-index, every compact-set supremum of a derivative of λh± is ∣λ∣ times the finite supremum for that fixed smooth compactly supported direction. Thus both tend to zero in the usual Ck, smooth compact-convergence and fixed-support and LF test-function topologies (Fixed support test function frechet space, Test function topology) (and in any usual function-space topology with continuous scalar multiplication). Every such neighbourhood of zero therefore contains configurations of positive and negative action, arbitrarily small in magnitude. The stationary zero is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum. This is a computation in the declared smooth finite-region model, not a claim about actual fields or measurements; other sources or boundary/variation restrictions require their own analysis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice ACω; the field-action definition with U=(−1,1)4, smooth A,j on an open neighbourhood N of U‾, constants c,μ0>0, ε0=(μ0c2)−1 and the source-free case j=0; the component and invariant dictionaries of the electromagnetic two-form; and the test-function class Cc∞(U;R4).

[F1]

The field action is S[A]=c−1∫U[−(4μ0)−1FμνFμν+jνAν]dλ with Fμν=∂μAν−∂νAμ, compactly supported smooth variations and the stationarity predicate (Smooth finite-region Maxwell action, compact variations and the fixed-endpoint particle functional).

[F2]

The compact-variation lemma states: S[A] of the lemma is a finite real number; its first variation at A in the direction h is ∫U(−κ−1Fμν∂μhν+Jνhν)dλ; and A is stationary if and only if ∂μFμν=−κJν on U for every ν (Compact variations of the quadratic field functional: first variation and the coefficient equation).

[F3]

The observer decomposition of the electromagnetic two-form gives 12FμνFμν=∣B∣2−∣E∣2/c2 (The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current (b)).

[F4]

The component dictionary is F0i=−Ei/c, Fij=ϵijkBk, F0i=Ei/c, Fi0=−Ei/c, with η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) (The electromagnetic two-form, its observer decomposition and the four-current (a)).

[F5]

The electric constant is ε0:=(μ0c2)−1, so ε0μ0c2=1 (Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values).

[F6]

The laboratory chart has x0=ct, so the chart image of the laboratory region is cI×Ω and constant-t slices correspond to fixed x0/c (Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields).

[F7]

In ZF, for compact K⊆Ω⊆Rn with Ω open there is χ∈Cc∞(Ω) with 0≤χ≤1 and χ=1 on a neighbourhood of K (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization).

[F8]

Substitution: if ϕ:[c,d]→R is differentiable with ϕ′ integrable and f is continuous on an order-convex set containing ϕ([c,d]), then ∫ϕ(c)ϕ(d)f=∫cd(f∘ϕ)ϕ′ (Substitution: if φ is differentiable on [c,d] with φ′ integrable and f is continuous on an interval containing φ([c,d]), then ∫φ(c)φ(d)f=∫cd(f∘φ) φ′).

[F9]

Under Countable Choice, a bounded Borel real function on a nondegenerate box that is Riemann integrable is Lebesgue integrable with the same integral; in particular this applies to smooth compactly supported integrands (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands).

[F10]

Fubini's theorem for L1 functions on a sigma-finite product: the multiple integral equals the iterated integrals (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F11]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F14]

For nonnegative measurable f≤g one has ∫f≤∫g, and for c>0, ∫cf=c∫f (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F15]

Assume Countable Choice: if a continuous g:U→Rm on an open U satisfies ∫Vg dλn=0 for every ball V compactly contained in U, then g=0 on U (Localization: vanishing integrals or fluxes force a continuous function to vanish).

[F16]

If G:[a,b]→R is continuous, differentiable on (a,b), and f is a Riemann-integrable extension of G′ from (a,b), then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[F17]

For compact K⊆Ω the fixed-support seminorms are pm(φ)=max⁡∣α∣≤msup⁡x∈K∣∂αφ(x)∣ (Fixed support test function frechet space).

[F18]

In the test-function topology a seminorm satisfies q(av)=∣a∣q(v), and zero-neighbourhoods contain finitely many bounds q<ε (Test function topology).

[F19]

Countable Choice ACω is the statement that every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F20]

For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[F21]

The adopted field sector states that a smooth field is dynamically admissible exactly when it is stationary for the field action under all compactly supported smooth variations (Adopt stationary Maxwell action as alternative physical formulation (i)).

[F22]

Verification

technique · direct; substitute the component dictionary into the box action, compute the first variation at zero, and exhibit one positive and one fixed-support negative direction whose rescalings stay in every usual neighbourhood of zero
1.1givenF1F3F4F5F6F8F9F10F11

In the source-free case j=0, [F3] turns the density of [F1] into −(4μ0)−1FμνFμν=∣E∣2/(2μ0c2)−∣B∣2/(2μ0), so linearity of the integral gives S[A]=(2cμ0)−1∫U(∣E∣2/c2−∣B∣2)dλ; writing the time coordinate as t=x0/c multiplies the one-dimensional time integral by c and carries (−1,1) to (−1/c,1/c) by [F6] and [F8], while the spatial coordinates are unchanged, so S[A]=12∫Ut(ε0∣E∣2−∣B∣2/μ0)dt d3x by [F5]; and since A↦F(A) is linear in A and S is quadratic in F, F(λA)=λF(A) gives S[λA]=λ2S[A] for every real λ.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

At A=0 one has F(A)=0 and j=0, so the first-variation coefficient −μ0−1Fμν∂μhν+jνhν of [F2] vanishes identically for every h∈Cc∞(U;R4); the action variation is c−1 times its integral by [F1] and [F2], hence every compact first variation of S at A=0 is zero and A=0 is stationary.

3.1step 2.1F4F7F14F15algebra

By [F7] with Ω=U and K={(0,0,0,0)} there is χ∈Cc∞(U) with 0≤χ≤1 and χ=1 near the origin; then θ:=x1χ lies in Cc∞(U) and ∂1θ(0)=χ(0)+0⋅∂1χ(0)=1, so ∇xθ≢0. With covariant components h0=θ, hi=0 the dictionary [F4] gives F0i=−∂iθ, hence E=c∇xθ and B=0; step 1.1 then gives S[h]=(2cμ0)−1∫U∣∇xθ∣2dλ. The integrand g:=∣∇xθ∣2 is continuous, nonnegative and nonzero at the origin; if ∫Ug dλ=0, then for every ball V compactly contained in U monotonicity [F14] would give ∫Vg≤∫Ug=0 with ∫Vg≥0, so [F15] would force g=0 on U, a contradiction; hence ∫Ug>0 and S[h]>0, one positive direction.

4.1step 3.1F4F7F12F13F22

Apply [F7] with Ω=(−1/2,1/2) and K={0} four times (or once, taking all four bumps equal) to obtain nonzero nonnegative η,φ,ψ2,ψ3∈Cc∞((−1/2,1/2)), extended by zero to R; define fN(x):=η(x0)φ(Nx1)ψ2(x2)ψ3(x3) for integers N≥1 and let h(N) have h(N)2=fN and all other contravariant components 0. Since supp⁡φ(N⋅)⊆(−1/(2N),1/(2N))⊆(−1/2,1/2), every h(N) is smooth with support in the fixed compact set K∗=[−1/2,1/2]4⊂U by [F22]. The product and chain rules [F12] and [F13] give ∂0fN=η′(x0)φ(Nx1)ψ2ψ3, ∂1fN=Nη(x0)φ′(Nx1)ψ2ψ3 and ∂3fN=η(x0)φ(Nx1)ψ2ψ3′; since fN=h(N)2 and h(N)0=h(N)1=h(N)3=0, the dictionary [F4] gives E=−c(∂0fN)e2 and B=−(∂3fN)e1+(∂1fN)e3.

5.1step 4.1F8F9F10F11F14F15F16algebra

Because all integrands below are smooth with support in the fixed compact subset K∗⊂U, [F9] lets each Lebesgue integral be computed as the equal Riemann integral, and Fubini [F10] together with linearity [F11] factors each product of one-variable functions into a product of one-dimensional integrals: ∫U∣E∣2/c2 dλ=∫(η′)2⋅∫φ(Nx1)2dx1⋅∫ψ22⋅∫ψ32 and ∫U∣B∣2dλ=∫η2⋅∫φ(Nx1)2dx1⋅∫ψ22⋅∫ψ3′2+∫η2⋅∫(Nφ′(Nx1))2dx1⋅∫ψ22⋅∫ψ32. By [F8] with the affine map y=Nx1 on [−1,1], ∫−11φ(Nx1)2dx1=N−1∫−NNφ(y)2dy=N−1∫−11φ(y)2dy, the last equality because φ vanishes outside (−1/2,1/2); the same identity holds for φ′. Hence ∫U∣E∣2/c2 dλ=CE/N and ∫U∣B∣2dλ=CBN+C3/N with the stated constants, and CB>0: if φ′ vanished identically then [F16] would make φ constant on R, hence zero by compact support, contradicting the nonzero choice, so φ′2 is a continuous nonnegative nonzero square, and together with the nonzero bumps η,ψ2,ψ3 the same argument as in step 3.1 with [F14] and [F15] gives each of the four one-dimensional integrals in CB strictly positive.

6.1step 5.1F1F3F20algebra

Step 1.1 with j=0 and [F3] expresses S[h(N)]=(2cμ0)−1∫U(∣E∣2/c2−∣B∣2)dλ, so step 5.1 gives S[h(N)]=(2cμ0)−1((CE−C3)/N−CBN); since CB>0, the bound (CE−C3)/N−CBN≤∣CE−C3∣−CBN for N≥1 tends to −∞ by [F20], proving the stated limit. To fix one negative direction, choose N≥1 with CBN>(CE−C3)/N: if CE−C3≤0 every N works, while if CE−C3>0 then ε:=CB/(CE−C3)>0 and [F20] provides n≥1 with 1/n<ε, that is n>(CE−C3)/CB; setting N:=n gives CBN>CE−C3≥(CE−C3)/N because N≥1. For that fixed N0 one has S[h(N0)]<0, giving one fixed-support negative direction h−:=h(N0).

7.1step 3.1step 6.1F17F18algebra

For every real λ the scaling law of step 1.1 gives S[λh+]=λ2S[h+] and S[λh−]=λ2S[h−], so the signs of the two directions are preserved for nonzero λ and both action magnitudes tend to 0 as λ→0. In the fixed-support space [F17] each seminorm satisfies pm(λh)=∣λ∣pm(h) by definition of the maximum and supremum, and in the LF topology [F18] every seminorm satisfies q(λh)=∣λ∣q(h) and a zero-neighbourhood contains finitely many bounds q<ε; hence λh±→0 in both topologies, and in any usual topology with continuous scalar multiplication the map λ↦λh± is continuous at 0. Therefore every such zero-neighbourhood contains configurations λh+ with S>0 and λh− with S<0, with ∣S∣=λ2∣S[h±]∣ arbitrarily small: the stationary configuration 0 is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum.

8.1givenstep 7.1F19F21∎

Every object above is smooth and compactly supported in the box U, all integrals are the declared finite-region Lebesgue integrals, and the arguments used exactly [F7], [F8], [F9], [F14], [F15], [F16] and [F20]; Countable Choice [F19] enters only through the measure interface of [F9] and [F15], as inherited from the field-action sector. The computation concerns the adopted functional [F21] and asserts nothing about physical fields, measurements, existence of stationary configurations beyond the exhibited zero, or any other region or variation class.

Source notes

Landau–Lifshitz §27 (printed pp. 68-69, with eqs. (27.4)-(27.6) on p. 69) ties the sign of (∂A/∂t)2 to a minimum requirement for Sf; the exact computation above shows that with the framework's adopted sign and normalisation the stationary point of the source-free box functional is a saddle rather than a minimum, so the source's minimum wording is not adopted. Tong §5.5.3 (printed p. 125) expands the action to ∫dtd3x (ε0E2/2−B2/(2μ0)) and reads the electric term as kinetic and the magnetic term as potential; the explicit compact variations of this example are the framework's own witnesses and are not a numbered result of either source.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources