How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hydrogen ground normalization
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , and let the ground vector of on exactly , as directly proved below under CC. This example re-verifies, by elementary one-variable integration, that:
(a) ;
(b) and , as checked by differentiating directly;
(c) the radial law integrates to and has mean ;
(d) the exact same constants arise from the closed form of the Laguerre polynomial , so the normalization is a special case of the general polynomial-exponential solution.
Verification
Given: , , with , and Countable Choice. Use the first-variable-linear inner product. Define on its maximal domain; the CC Sobolev Fourier characterization identifies .
[F1] and ; the polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure holds (Sphere ONB, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
[F2] For : , , , ; each follows from the derivative of and the fundamental theorem with vanishing boundary terms (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , The exponential function is smooth and , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
[F3] The unitary Fourier and exact Sobolev/domain interfaces under CC are Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Hardy gives on (Three-dimensional Hardy bound (c)). Smooth Sobolev density, divergence, Cauchy–Schwarz, Tonelli and dominated convergence are Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), Vector forms: the boundary integrals of and of , Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for , Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product and Dominated convergence. The exact adjoint/symmetry definitions are Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Adjoint of a densely defined operator; CC double orthogonal complement follows from Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace. The realization and ground domain are proved locally below, with no AC-bearing Coulomb theorem as a hidden logical premise.
[Normalization] By polar coordinates and [F2], .
[Free maximal realization without arbitrary choice] For the real multiplier , truncate any to to prove density of . It is symmetric because is real. If with adjoint value , testing against every function supported in gives there. These sets increase to all space, so and . Thus and its unitary conjugate are self-adjoint, with by [F3]. For , is the actual two-sided inverse, since is bounded and , on .
[Hardy relative bound and Neumann realization] Put for . By [F3] and Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz, for every . Choose and . The exact free multipliers give , , and hence . The operator series converges in norm, and maps into and is the two-sided inverse of for on . This proves surjectivity of both nonreal signs with the exact factor order.
[Radial law and moments] By [F1], . By [F2], its integral is and its first moment is .
[Exact adjoint domain] is densely defined and symmetric because both and the real multiplication are symmetric on . Let , fix , and let . Then . Since , adjoint pairing shows ; consequently . Thus and , not merely a formally symmetric differential expression. All constructions are explicit sequences/truncations or single-vector existential arguments under CC.
[Weak domain of the actual exponential] On let and . Its classical derivatives are and . Each is in : the first derivatives are bounded times an exponential and second derivatives are bounded by , with and exponential tails. These are also the weak derivatives on all space. Indeed, integrate against a compactly supported smooth test function over and let ; each inner-sphere boundary term has magnitude bounded by a constant times its area , because and its first derivatives are bounded. It tends to zero, and the volume integrals converge since the displayed derivatives are locally integrable. Thus no origin-supported delta term is present and , even though it is not classically differentiable at zero. Summing the weak second derivatives gives almost everywhere; hence because . Multiplication by preserves the domain and gives the claimed eigenvalue .
[The level is the ground level, locally] For a compactly supported smooth , integrate on punctured balls; the inner flux of is and vanishes. Expanding the square gives . By smooth density and the Hardy inequality, all these terms extend continuously to : for example . For , Fourier pairing then gives . Thus . For any real , Cauchy–Schwarz gives ; self-adjointness makes its range closed, and the orthogonal complement of the range is , so its range is all and its inverse is bounded. Such is outside the spectrum. Step 4.1 supplies an eigenvector at the lower bound, so this is a ground vector. No negative-spectrum theorem or AC spectral calculus is needed.
[Degree-zero Laguerre identity without Kummer dependence] The degree-zero generalized Laguerre polynomial is : equivalently the degree-zero normalized solution of is . In the reduced equation , substitution produces since . Its degree-zero normalized solution therefore gives exactly . Normalization supplies and with the same constant as step 1.1. This is the claimed special polynomial-exponential case; it does not invoke a general radial completeness theorem.
[Conclusion] Steps 1.1, 4.1, 2.2 and 5.2 prove (a)–(d), and steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 prove its exact self-adjoint realization, step 4.1 proves the weak ground-vector domain, and step 5.1 proves the ground lower bound under CC alone.
Depends on
Plancherel theorem
Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms
Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers
Three-dimensional Hardy bound
Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
Vector forms: the boundary integrals of and of
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Dominated convergence
Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace
Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators
Adjoint of a densely defined operator
Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
Sphere ONB
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Sphere integrals in angle coordinates
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
The exponential function is smooth and
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for
The space as the quotient by null functions
Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 10.4 pp. 229-235 (Theorem 10.9 and the explicit ground state R_{0,0} at p. 232)
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics (Cappella Archive), Section 8.1 pp. 186-193 (radial wavefunctions, radial probability densities and expectation values of the hydrogen ground state)