Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hydrogen ground normalization

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let γ>0, a0:=2/γ, and let ψ100(x):=(γ38π)1/2e−r/a0(x=rΩ, r=∣x∣), the ground vector of C=−Δ−γ/∣x∣ on exactly D(C)=H2(R3;C), as directly proved below under CC. This example re-verifies, by elementary one-variable integration, that:

(a) ∥ψ100∥L2=1;

(b) ψ100∈D(C) and Cψ100=−γ24ψ100, as checked by differentiating e−r/a0 directly;

(c) the radial law p(r)=4r2a0−3e−2r/a0 integrates to 1 and has mean 3a0/2;

(d) the exact same constants arise from the closed form of the Laguerre polynomial L0(1)=1, so the normalization is a special case of the general polynomial-exponential solution.

Verification

Given: γ>0, α=γ/2=1/a0, ψ100=Ne−α∣x∣ with N=(γ3/(8π))1/2, p(r)=4r2a0−3e−2r/a0 and Countable Choice. Use the first-variable-linear L2 inner product. Define T=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 on its maximal domain; the CC Sobolev Fourier characterization identifies D(T)=H2.

[F1] Y00=1/4π and σ(S2)=4π; the polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure holds (Sphere ONB, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F3] The unitary Fourier and exact Sobolev/domain interfaces under CC are Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms and Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms. Hardy gives ∥u/r∥2≤2∥∇u∥2 on H1 (Three-dimensional Hardy bound (c)). Smooth Sobolev density, divergence, Cauchy–Schwarz, Tonelli and dominated convergence are Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), Vector forms: the boundary integrals of fn and of n×F, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product and Dominated convergence. The exact adjoint/symmetry definitions are Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Adjoint of a densely defined operator; CC double orthogonal complement follows from Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace. The realization and ground domain are proved locally below, with no AC-bearing Coulomb theorem as a hidden logical premise.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

[Normalization] By polar coordinates and [F2], ∥ψ100∥22=N24π∫0∞r2e−2αrdr=(γ3/2)2/γ3=1.

1.2F3givenalgebra

[Free maximal realization without arbitrary choice] For the real multiplier t(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2, truncate any g∈L2 to gn=1{t≤n}g to prove density of D(Mt). It is symmetric because t is real. If g∈D(Mt∗) with adjoint value h, testing against every L2 function supported in {t≤n} gives h=tg there. These sets increase to all space, so tg=h∈L2 and D(Mt∗)=D(Mt). Thus Mt and its unitary conjugate T are self-adjoint, with D(T)=H2 by [F3]. For z∉R, R0(z)=F2∗M(t−z)−1F2 is the actual two-sided inverse, since t/(t−z) is bounded and (T−z)R0(z)=I, R0(z)(T−z)=I on D(T).

2.1step 1.2F3algebra

[Hardy relative bound and Neumann realization] Put Bu=−γu/r for u∈H2. By [F3] and Fourier Cauchy–Schwarz, ∥Bu∥2≤2γ∥∇u∥2≤2γ∥Tu∥21/2∥u∥21/2≤ε∥Tu∥2+γ2ε−1∥u∥2 for every ε>0. Choose Y>16γ2 and ε=1/4. The exact free multipliers give ∥TR0(±iY)∥≤1, ∥R0(±iY)∥≤1/Y, and hence ∥BR0(±iY)∥<1/2. The operator series ∑j≥0(−BR0(±iY))j converges in norm, and R0(±iY)(I+BR0(±iY))−1 maps into D(T) and is the two-sided inverse of C∓iY for C=T+B on H2. This proves surjectivity of both nonreal signs with the exact factor order.

2.2step 1.1F1F2algebra

[Radial law and moments] By [F1], p(r)=r2∫S2∣ψ100(rΩ)∣2dσ=4a0−3r2e−2r/a0. By [F2], its integral is 4a0−32/(2/a0)3=1 and its first moment is 4a0−36/(2/a0)4=3a0/2.

3.1step 2.1algebra

[Exact adjoint domain] C is densely defined and symmetric because both T and the real multiplication B are symmetric on H2. Let y∈D(C∗), fix z=iY, and let x=(C−z)−1(C∗−z)y∈D(C). Then (C∗−z)(y−x)=0. Since ran⁡(C−z‾)=L2, adjoint pairing shows ker⁡(C∗−z)={0}; consequently y=x∈D(C). Thus D(C∗)=D(C)=H2 and C=C∗, not merely a formally symmetric differential expression. All constructions are explicit sequences/truncations or single-vector existential arguments under CC.

4.1step 3.1F1F2F3algebra

[Weak H2 domain of the actual exponential] On r>0 let f=e−αr and Ωi=xi/r. Its classical derivatives are ∂if=−αfΩi and ∂j∂if=α2fΩiΩj−αf(δij−ΩiΩj)/r. Each is in L2(R3): the first derivatives are bounded times an exponential and second derivatives are bounded by 2α2f+2αf/r, with ∫01r2/r2 dr<∞ and exponential tails. These are also the weak derivatives on all space. Indeed, integrate against a compactly supported smooth test function over r>δ and let δ↓0; each inner-sphere boundary term has magnitude bounded by a constant times its area 4πδ2, because f and its first derivatives are bounded. It tends to zero, and the volume integrals converge since the displayed derivatives are locally integrable. Thus no origin-supported delta term is present and f∈H2, even though it is not classically differentiable at zero. Summing the weak second derivatives gives −Δf=(−α2+2α/r)f almost everywhere; hence Cf=−α2f because γ=2α. Multiplication by N preserves the domain and gives the claimed eigenvalue −γ2/4.

5.1step 4.1F3algebra

[The level is the ground level, locally] For a compactly supported smooth v, integrate div⁡Ω=2/r on punctured balls; the inner flux of ∣v∣2Ω is O(δ2) and vanishes. Expanding the square gives ∥∇v+αΩv∥22=∥∇v∥22+α2∥v∥22−2α∫∣v∣2/r. By H1 smooth density and the Hardy inequality, all these terms extend continuously to H1: for example ∫∣v∣2/r≤∥v/r∥2∥v∥2. For v∈D(C)=H2, Fourier pairing then gives ⟨Cv,v⟩+α2∥v∥22=∥∇v+αΩv∥22≥0. Thus C≥−α2. For any real λ<−α2, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥(C−λ)v∥2≥(−α2−λ)∥v∥2; self-adjointness makes its range closed, and the orthogonal complement of the range is ker⁡(C−λ)={0}, so its range is all L2 and its inverse is bounded. Such λ is outside the spectrum. Step 4.1 supplies an eigenvector at the lower bound, so this is a ground vector. No negative-spectrum theorem or AC spectral calculus is needed.

5.2step 1.1step 4.1F1F2algebra

[Degree-zero Laguerre identity without Kummer dependence] The degree-zero generalized Laguerre polynomial is L0(a)(s)=1: equivalently the degree-zero normalized solution of sv′′+(a+1−s)v′=0 is v≡1. In the reduced l=0 equation −u′′−γu/r=−α2u, substitution u=re−αrv(2αr) produces sv′′+(2−s)v′=0 since γ=2α. Its degree-zero normalized solution L0(1)=1 therefore gives exactly u=re−αr. Normalization supplies u10=2a0−3/2re−r/a0 and ψ100=u10Y00/r with the same constant as step 1.1. This is the claimed special polynomial-exponential case; it does not invoke a general radial completeness theorem.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 2.2step 5.2∎

[Conclusion] Steps 1.1, 4.1, 2.2 and 5.2 prove (a)–(d), and steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 prove its exact self-adjoint realization, step 4.1 proves the weak ground-vector domain, and step 5.1 proves the ground lower bound under CC alone.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources