Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The plane wave as a generalized momentum eigenfunctional

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix d≥1, ℏ>0 and k∈Rd, and define on the Schwartz space S(Rd;C) of Schwartz space and its seminorms the conjugate-linear functional uk(φ):=∫Rdeik⋅x φ(x)‾ dx. Let F2 be the negative-sign 2π-normalized Fourier transform, F2ψ(ξ)=∫ψ(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx on L1(Rd;C) (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem). Then:

(a) uk is well defined, conjugate-linear and continuous in the Schwartz topology. Writing pα,0(φ)=sup⁡x∣xαφ(x)∣ for the seminorms of Schwartz space and its seminorms, one has the explicit bound ∣uk(φ)∣≤∫Rd∣φ(x)∣ dx≤Cd∑α∈{0,2}dpα,0(φ),Cd:=(∫R(1+t2)−1 dt)d<∞; moreover uk(φ)=F2(φ‾)(−k2π) for every φ;

(b) for every φ∈S(Rd;C) and every j∈{1,…,d}, with Pjφ:=−iℏ ∂jφ the componentwise momentum action on Schwartz classes, uk(Pjφ)=ℏkj uk(φ),uk(Pj2φ)=(ℏkj)2 uk(φ): the functional is a generalized eigenfunctional of every momentum component with eigenvalue ℏkj;

(c) there is no L2 class F∈L2(Rd;C) with uk(φ)=∫RdF(x)φ(x)‾ dx for all φ∈S(Rd;C); in particular the functions x↦eik⋅x and its nonzero scalar multiples are not elements of L2(Rd;C);

(d) the statements are purely mathematical: uk is a conjugate-linear functional on the Schwartz space, no normalizable class represents it, and no physical state, preparation or outcome probability is attached to it by this example.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice; d≥1; ℏ>0; k∈Rd; Schwartz classes φ,ψ∈S(Rd;C); the functional uk; the transform F2; a class F∈L2(Rd;C).

[L1]

Schwartz classes are integrable, and the transform is an automorphism. S(Rd;C)⊆L1(Rd;C) and F2 maps S bijectively onto itself, continuously in the Schwartz topology; on Schwartz classes the transform is the integral F2ψ(ξ)=∫ψ(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx (Schwartz space and its seminorms, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space, no choice beyond countable choice for the L2 extension).

[L2]

Fourier multipliers. For ψ∈S and any coordinate j, F2(∂jψ)(ξ)=2πiξjF2ψ(ξ) for almost every ξ; both sides are Schwartz functions, hence continuous, so the identity holds for every ξ (Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space).

[L3]

Modulus one. ∣eiθ∣=1 for real θ (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0), so ∣eik⋅x∣=1 for every x.

[L4]

Local test-function density. For every bounded open Ω⊆Rd, Cc∞(Ω;C) is dense in L2(Ω;C); consequently, if h∈L2(Ω) and ∫Ωhv‾=0 for every v∈Cc∞(Ω), then h=0 in L2(Ω), by continuity of the L2 pairing and density (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2, Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs). Integrals of nonnegative measurable functions on expanding boxes converge to the full integral (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[L5]

Product weight. The one-dimensional integral ∫R(1+t2)−1dt is finite, since its integrand is bounded by 1 on [−1,1] and by t−2 for ∣t∣≥1. Tonelli's theorem therefore gives ∫Rd∏j=1d(1+xj2)−1 dx=Cd<∞ (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Verification

technique · direct; identify the functional with the $L^{1}$ Fourier transform of the conjugate test class, use the Fourier multiplier identity for the eigenrelation, and use the density of test classes and the non-integrability of the constant modulus to rule out an $L^{2}$ representative

Given: The data of the example and [L1]-[L5].

1.1L1L3L5algebra

[Well-definedness and continuity] For φ∈S, [L3] gives ∣eik⋅x∣=1, and [L5] plus ∏j(1+xj2)=∑α∈{0,2}dxα gives ∫Rd∣φ(x)∣ dx≤Cd∑α∈{0,2}dpα,0(φ)<∞. Thus the defining integral is absolutely convergent and has the bound in (a). Since this bound is by a finite sum of defining Schwartz seminorms, uk is continuous in the Schwartz topology. Conjugate-linearity is immediate from the definition, and uk(φ)=∫φ(x)‾e−2πix⋅(−k/2π)dx=F2(φ‾)(−k/(2π)) by [L1]. This proves (a).

2.1step 1.1L1L2algebra

[Eigenrelation] Let φ∈S and put ψ:=φ‾, a Schwartz class. Since Pjφ‾=−iℏ∂jφ‾=iℏ ∂jφ‾=iℏ ∂jψ, one has uk(Pjφ)=∫eik⋅xPjφ‾ dx=iℏ∫eik⋅x∂jψ(x) dx=iℏ F2(∂jψ)(−k2π), where the last step evaluates the L1 transform at −k/(2π). By [L2], F2(∂jψ)(ξ)=2πiξjF2ψ(ξ) for every ξ, so at ξ=−k/(2π), uk(Pjφ)=iℏ⋅2πi(−kj2π)F2ψ(−k2π)=ℏkj uk(φ), using step 1.1. Applying the same identity to Pjφ (again a Schwartz class) gives uk(Pj2φ)=ℏkjuk(Pjφ)=(ℏkj)2uk(φ). This proves (b).

2.2step 1.1L3L4algebra

[No L2 representative] Suppose F∈L2 satisfies ∫Fφ‾=uk(φ) for all φ∈S, and put G:=e−ik⋅xF∈L2, a class of the same norm because the multiplier has modulus one [L3]. Multiplication by eik⋅x preserves the Schwartz class, since its derivatives are constant multiples of itself and Leibniz's rule expresses every derivative of the product as a finite sum of a polynomial times a derivative of φ. Replacing φ by eik⋅xφ in the assumed identity gives ∫G φ‾=∫F eik⋅xφ‾=uk(eik⋅xφ)=∫φ‾, so ∫(G−1)φ‾=0 for every φ∈S. For each n≥1 let Ωn:=(−n,n)d; the restriction (G−1)∣Ωn belongs to L2(Ωn) because G∈L2(Rd) and 1∈L2(Ωn). Its pairing with every v∈Cc∞(Ωn) is zero, so [L4] gives G=1 almost everywhere on Ωn. Since ⋃n≥1Ωn=Rd, it follows that G=1 almost everywhere on Rd. But then ∫Rd∣G∣2=∫Rd1=+∞ by monotone convergence on expanding boxes [L4], contradicting G∈L2. Hence no such F exists. For z≠0, ∣zeik⋅x∣=∣z∣ on a set of infinite Lebesgue measure, so no nonzero scalar multiple of the plane wave belongs to L2 either. This proves (c).

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

[Conclusion] Statement (d) records that only Schwartz classes and the functional uk were used; no normalizable class and no probability law is attached to uk by this example.

Remarks

  • The delta normalization is formal. The formal orthogonality symbol in dimension d is ∫Rdei(k−k′)⋅xdx=(2π)dδ(d)(k−k′), where δ(d) denotes evaluation at zero on Schwartz test functions on Rd. This denotes a distribution in k−k′, not a convergent integral or an L2 inner product of plane waves. The functional uk defined above is a different, precise object: its argument is a test function of x.
  • Why this is not a state. By clause (c), no element of L2 represents uk; the framework's state assignment requires a nonzero L2 class, so the plane wave is not a preparation, and no position or momentum probability density attaches to it. The example establishes the distributional eigenrelation only.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources