Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and structure of the simple affine VOA quotient

Statement

For a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra g with long roots normalized to squared length 2 and a positive integer ℓ, the universal affine vertex algebra Vℓ(g) has a unique maximal proper vertex-algebra ideal Jℓ. The quotient Vℓ(g)/Jℓ is a simple conformal vertex algebra of CFT type with its noncritical Sugawara conformal vector, and its full untwisted affine Kac–Moody action is the irreducible highest-weight module of highest weight ℓΛ0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional complex simple g, its long-root-normalized invariant form, and ℓ∈Z>0.

[F1]

Simple positive-integral-level affine vertex operator algebra names Lℓ(g) as the quotient by its unique maximal proper ideal; this lemma proves that this defining quotient exists and has the claimed structure. Universal affine vertex algebras exist at every complex level supplies the state-field map on Vℓ(g), generated by the currents Jx(z)=∑n∈Zxnz−n−1.

[F2]

PBW basis of the universal affine vacuum module gives the basis of ordered negative-current monomials on 1; their degree is the sum of the positive integers in their mode indices.

[F3]

Degree derivation and full untwisted affine algebra extends the central current algebra by d with [d,xn]=nxn. Affine node-zero fundamental weight defines Λ0 by Λ0∣h=0, Λ0(c)=1, and Λ0(d)=0.

[F4]

Sugawara modes and their normal ordering and Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level define the local Sugawara modes at ℓ+h∨≠0 and prove their Virasoro bracket on restricted modules. Sugawara modes act on affine currents with weight one gives [Lm,xn]=−nxm+n, and Mode translation descends to the affine vacuum module gives [T,xn]=−nxn−1.

[F5]

Loop and affine GCM presentations are isomorphic identifies the full current algebra plus degree derivation with the untwisted affine Kac–Moody algebra; Kac moody verma module has a unique simple quotient gives the unique simple highest-weight quotient.

[F6]

Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type requires a Virasoro conformal vector with L−1=T, nonnegative integer grading, finite-dimensional graded pieces, and vacuum grade 0 only.

[F7]

Universal affine vacuum module uses the inducing character specified by The affine vacuum character exists at every complex level: g[t] kills 1 and c acts as ℓ.

[F8]

The universal affine vacuum module is restricted proves that every fixed vector of Vℓ(g) is killed by all sufficiently large positive current modes.

[F9]

Vertex algebra in the state–field convention supplies vacuum/creation, so v(−1)1=v; Mutually local creative generators determine a state–field map proves that the state-field map respects field nth products; Formal distributions and fields on a vector space defines those products by the two formal-residue expansions.

[F10]

Module for an ordinary vertex algebra supplies the module Jacobi identity and mode stability. Its residue coefficient formula for modes of an nth product is the finite-sum identity used in step 4.1.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5F7givenalgebra

By [F2], Vℓ(g) is spanned by PBW monomials x−n11⋯x−nrr1 with every ni≥1. Give such a monomial degree n1+⋯+nr. The empty monomial is the unique degree-zero basis vector, and each fixed degree has finitely many monomials because g is finite dimensional and there are finitely many ordered compositions of that degree. Thus Vℓ=⨁n≥0Vn with V0=C1 and finite-dimensional Vn. To extend the induced module to the full affine algebra, use the derivation D(xn)=nxn, D(c)=0 from [F3]. For n≥0, D(xn)=nxn∈g[t], so D preserves p=g[t]⊕Cc. Extend D to the tensor algebra by the Leibniz rule; it preserves every relation xy−yx−[x,y] because D is a Lie derivation, so it descends to a derivation DU of U(Lg‾). By [F7], the vacuum character χℓ is zero on g[t] and has χℓ(c)=ℓ. Thus χℓ(DU(a))=0 for each generator of U(p), and the derivation and character rules give it for every a∈U(p). The formula d(u⊗1):=DU(u)⊗1 respects ua⊗1=u⊗χℓ(a), since the difference is u⊗χℓ(DU(a))=0; hence it is well-defined. It has d1=0 and [d,xn]=nxn. On the PBW monomial above, d acts by −(n1+⋯+nr), so the full affine Cartan acts on 1 by c↦ℓ, d↦0, and h↦0. The action of g[t] kills 1 by [F7], so under the loop/GCM identification in [F5] it is an affine highest vector of weight ℓΛ0 by [F3].

2.1F1F2F3F4F6F8F9step 1.1givenalgebra

Put q=ℓ+h∨, which is nonzero because ℓ>0 and the normalized dual Coxeter number is positive. For currents A(z)=Jxa(z) and B(z)=Jxa(z), the state-field product identity [F9] and the residue definition in [F9] give Y(xa(−1)xa(−1)1,z)=Res⁡x ⁣(ιx,z(x−z)−1A(x)B(z)−ιz,x(x−z)−1B(z)A(x)). Expanding the first binomial as ∑j≥0zjx−j−1 selects precisely the negative modes of A, while the second expansion −∑j≥0xjz−j−1, with its preceding minus sign, selects the nonnegative modes of A to the right of B. Thus this field is :Jxa(z)Jxa(z): in the stated normal-order convention. The Sugawara state ω=12q∑axa(−1)xa(−1)1 therefore has exactly the field whose coefficients are the Lm of [F4]. Restrictedness follows from [F8], so [F4] gives the Virasoro relations. At mode m=−1, [F4] says [L−1,xn]=−nxn−1, the same commutator as T in [F3]. Both operators kill 1, and the negative-current PBW monomials span; induction on their length gives L−1=T. Similarly L01=0 from normal ordering and [L0,x−n]=nx−n, so L0 acts by the PBW degree from step 1.1. This is a CFT-type conformal structure in the sense of [F6].

3.1F6F9step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Every vertex-algebra ideal is L0-invariant and therefore graded: a vector has only finitely many homogeneous components, and polynomial interpolation in its distinct integer L0-eigenvalues extracts each component while staying in the ideal. A proper ideal has zero intersection with V0: if it contains a nonzero scalar multiple of 1, it contains 1, and then 1(−1)v=v for every v∈V by the vacuum-field axiom, forcing the ideal to be all of V. The sum of all proper ideals, interpreted as finite sums of their elements, is again an ideal and still has zero degree-zero component, hence is proper. Call this sum Jℓ. It contains every proper ideal, so it is the unique maximal proper ideal. The quotient has no proper nonzero ideal and is simple; its inherited grading has nonnegative degrees, finite-dimensional pieces, and degree-zero space C1.

4.1F1F2F5F10step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

The ideal Jℓ is stable under every current mode because currents are vertex states. Conversely, let U⊆Vℓ be stable under every current mode. For states a,b, the module Jacobi residue formula [F10] gives ((a(r)b)M)(m)v=∑j≥0(−1)j(rj)a(r−j)Mb(m+j)Mv−(−1)r∑j≥0(−1)j(rj)b(m+r−j)Ma(j)Mv. For fixed v, both sums are finite by lower truncation of the rightmost field in each term. Each PBW state is built recursively as a(−n)b with a a current state and n≥1; induction on PBW length therefore shows every mode of every state preserves U, so U is a vertex ideal. Hence the simple quotient in step 3.1 is simple for the full affine current action and, with the d-action from step 1.1, for the full affine algebra. Its vacuum is a highest vector of weight ℓΛ0 by step 1.1. By [F5], the unique simple highest-weight module of that weight is the quotient. This proves the affine-module identification in the Statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources