Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Repeated integration by parts gives ∣bn(F)∣≤2L5M5/(π5n5) for odd 2L-periodic C5 functions and ∣bn(G)∣≤2L4M4/(π4n4) for C4

Statement

Let L>0. Let F:R→R be odd and 2L-periodic of class C5 and let G:R→R be odd and 2L-periodic of class C4 (Sine coefficients, sine series and the odd periodic extension, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms); put

M5:=sup⁡R∣F(5)∣<+∞,M4:=sup⁡R∣G(4)∣<+∞.

Then for every integer n≥1, with the sine coefficients bn of Sine coefficients, sine series and the odd periodic extension,

∣bn(F)∣≤2L5M5π5n5,∣bn(G)∣≤2L4M4π4n4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The period L>0, the functions F,G and the bounds M5,M4; an integer n≥1.

[F2]

Boundary values: an odd 2L-periodic function W satisfies W(0)=0 and W(L)=W(−L)=−W(L), hence W(L)=0; its even-order derivatives are again odd 2L-periodic, so W′′(0)=W′′(L)=W′′′′(0)=W′′′′(L)=0 whenever these derivatives exist. Also sin⁡(nπ⋅0/L)=sin⁡0=0 and sin⁡(nπL/L)=sin⁡(nπ)=0, while cos⁡(0)=1 and cos⁡(nπ)=(−1)n (Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, Sine coefficients, sine series and the odd periodic extension).

Proof

technique · direct; integrate by parts five times (four times for $G$) and use the vanishing boundary values of the odd derivatives
1.1givenF1F2algebra

Put I0:=∫0LF(x)sin⁡(nπx/L)dx and Ij:=∫0LF(j)(x)⋅(sin⁡ if j even, cos⁡ if j odd)(nπx/L)dx for j=1,…,5. Applying [F1] successively, each integration by parts produces the boundary term [F(j)(x)⋅(±Lnπ)(the other trigonometric factor)]0L, which vanishes by [F2]: at j even the boundary factor is cos⁡, nonzero at the endpoints, but the multiplying derivative F(j) is odd, hence vanishes at 0 and L; at j odd the boundary factor is sin⁡, which vanishes at 0 and L. Therefore I0=LnπI1, I1=−LnπI2, I2=LnπI3, I3=−LnπI4, I4=LnπI5, and chaining, I0=(Lnπ)5I5.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra∎

Since ∣I5∣≤∫0L∣F(5)∣dx≤LM5, step 1.1 gives ∣bn(F)∣=2L∣I0∣≤2L(Lnπ)5LM5=2L5M5π5n5. The same computation with four integrations by parts and G(4) in place of F(5) gives ∣bn(G)∣≤2L4M4π4n4.

Remarks

  • The powers n−5 and n−4 are exactly the number of integrations by parts available; from Ck odd periodic functions one obtains O(n−k) (with the parity pattern of the boundary terms as used above). No sharpness is claimed.

  • The estimates are uniform in n, and their summands are summable; this is what permits the termwise differentiation of the string series in the companion theorem. The constant depends on L, on the sup norms and on the fixed exponent, not on n.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources