Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kruskal model properties: smooth radial function, Lorentzian metric, four-region isometries, vacuum and Kretschmann scalar

Statement

Let K={(U,V):UV<1}×S2, r, gK and NK=∂U+∂V be the Kruskal model datum of mass parameter m∗ and Schwarzschild radius s=2GNm∗/c2>0 (The Kruskal model datum: domain, implicit radial function, metric and time orientation). Then:

(a) The radial function. The function φ(r):=−(r/s−1)er/s is a smooth strictly decreasing bijection of (0,∞) onto (−∞,1) with φ′(r)=−rs2er/s<0; consequently the relation φ(r(U,V))=UV defines exactly one function r:K→(0,∞), and this function is smooth. Moreover r(p)=s exactly when U(p)V(p)=0, and r(p)→0 corresponds to U(p)V(p)→1; the value r=0 is not attained on K.

(b) Lorentzian metric and time orientation. gK is the global smooth tensor of [L1] and is nondegenerate with inertia (3,1,0) at every point; hence (K,gK) is a smooth Lorentzian four-manifold of signature (−,+,+,+). The field NK=∂U+∂V satisfies gK(NK,NK)=−4s3re−r/s<0 and is a time orientation.

(c) The four regions and the isometries. The set {UV≠0} has four connected components. Let r∗ be the tortoise function of Smooth horizon-crossing extension of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in the advanced chart on the branch r>s and define Ψ+:M→K by Ψ+(x0,r,ω)=(−e−(x0−r∗(r))/(2s), e(x0+r∗(r))/(2s), ω). Then Ψ+ is a diffeomorphism of the exterior datum onto the component {U<0, V>0} and Ψ+∗gK=g. Similarly, on the branch 0<r<s with r∗=r+slog⁡(1−r/s) the map Ψ−(x0,r,ω)=(e(r∗(r)−x0)/(2s), e(r∗(r)+x0)/(2s), ω) is a diffeomorphism of the domain R×(0,s)×S2 (carrying the metric −f d(x0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 with f<0) onto the component {U>0, V>0} and pulls gK back to that metric. The map (U,V,ω)↦(−U,−V,ω) is an isometry of gK fixing r, exchanging the components {U<0,V>0}↔{U>0,V<0} and {U>0,V>0}↔{U<0,V<0}; hence every component of {UV≠0} is isometric to one of the two branches −f d(x0)2+f−1dr2+r2dΩ2 with f=1−s/r.

(d) Vacuum and Kretschmann scalar. The metric-selected connection of gK exists and is unique; its Ricci tensor, scalar curvature and Einstein tensor vanish identically on K, and its Kretschmann scalar equals RabcdRabcd=12s2/r6 at every point of K. In particular the curvature invariant is smooth on K and grows without bound as UV→1 (that is, as r↓0 at fixed angles), while it equals 12/s4 on the axes r=s.

(e) Scope. The statements are geometric. No maximality of the extension, no geodesic completeness, no uniqueness theorem and no global causal statement beyond those proved here are asserted. The manifold K contains a copy of the exterior datum and, on the components with UV>0, points at 0<r<s; the set {UV=1} is not part of K.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Kruskal model datum of mass parameter m∗ with s>0, the functions U,V, the metric gK and the field NK.

[L1]

The domain Ω={UV<1} is open in R2 and K=Ω×S2 is a smooth four-manifold without boundary. The global tensor is gK=−2s3e−r/sr−1(dU⊗dV+dV⊗dU)+r2ι∗γS2; in a spherical-polar chart its angular components are r2diag⁡(1,sin⁡2ϑ), while pole charts use the smooth round metric (The Kruskal model datum: domain, implicit radial function, metric and time orientation, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn, The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric). A smooth nondegenerate symmetric tensor with inertia (3,1,0) is Lorentzian (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model).

[L2]

The exterior datum has global angular term r2ι∗γS2 and base metric −f d(x0)2+f−1dr2 with f=1−s/r on r>s; on either tortoise branch, r∗′=1/f and r∗=r+slog⁡∣r/s−1∣ (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation, The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, Smooth horizon-crossing extension of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in the advanced chart).

[L3]

The advanced extension on Mext=R×(0,∞)×S2 has metric gext=−f dv2+2 dv dr+r2γS2, Ric⁡=S=G=0 and Kretschmann scalar 12s2/r6 for every r>0 (Smooth horizon-crossing extension of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in the advanced chart clauses (a), (d)). On either nonhorizon branch, the smooth map Φb(x0,r,ω)=(x0+r∗(r),r,ω) has inverse (v,r,ω)↦(v−r∗(r),r,ω), and dv=dx0+f−1dr gives Φb∗gext=−f d(x0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 directly. Thus its domain and curvature conclusion include 0<r<s, unlike the exterior-only suppliers.

[L4]

A smooth function on an open real interval with nonzero derivative at a point has a smooth local inverse there (Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space, n=1). For a bijection, these local inverses agree with its set-theoretic inverse. The mean value theorem gives strict decrease from a negative derivative on every compact subinterval (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)); a continuous strictly monotone function on an interval attains every value between its endpoint limits (A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values).

[L5]

Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space agreeing on a dense subset agree everywhere. The Ricci tensor and the Kretschmann scalar of a smooth nondegenerate metric are smooth tensor/scalar fields, so their components in every smooth chart are continuous (Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal, Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).

Proof

technique · establish the bijectivity and smoothness of the implicit radial function, verify the metric's matrix structure in the Kruskal chart, compute the two pullbacks explicitly, and transfer the vacuum and Kretschmann results by isometry and continuity
1.1L1L4L6algebra

(The radial function.) By [L6], φ(r)=(1−r/s)er/s is smooth with φ′(r)=−rs2er/s<0 for r>0, so φ is strictly decreasing by [L4], applied on every compact subinterval of (0,∞). Its limits are 1 as r↓0 and −∞ as r→∞: for x=r/s>1, the defining exponential series gives ex≥1+x, so (x−1)ex≥(x−1)(1+x)→∞. By [L4] its image is exactly (−∞,1), hence it is a bijection. Its derivative never vanishes; the smooth inverse-function theorem gives a smooth local inverse at each point of the image, and bijectivity makes those local inverses agree with the global inverse. Thus r=φ−1∘(UV) is defined and smooth on all of Ω, justifying clause (c) of the datum. The level relation gives r=s exactly when UV=0 and r↓0 as UV↑1. This proves (a).

1.2L1algebra

(The metric and time orientation, including the poles.) The base block of the global tensor [L1] in (U,V) is (0bb0) with b=−2s3e−r/s/r<0, so it is nondegenerate with one positive and one negative eigenvalue. The angular block r2γS2 is positive definite at every sphere point, including both poles. Thus the global metric has inertia (3,1,0). For NK=∂U+∂V, gK(NK,NK)=2b=−4s3e−r/s/r<0 everywhere, so it is a time orientation. This proves (b).

2.1L1L2L6step 1.1algebra

(The isometry with the exterior.) On Ω+={U<0,V>0} define U=−e−(x0−r∗)/(2s), V=e(x0+r∗)/(2s) with the branch r>s of r∗; then UV=−er∗/s=−(r/s−1)er/s by [L2] (since er∗/s=(r/s−1)er/s on r>s), so the function defined implicitly satisfies r(U,V)=r and the map Ψ+ is a diffeomorphism onto {U<0,V>0} with inverse (U,V,ω)↦(slog⁡(V/(−U)), r(U,V), ω). Differentiating, dU=−U2s(dx0−r∗′dr) and dV=V2s(dx0+r∗′dr), hence dU dV+dV dU=−UV2s2(dx0⊗dx0−r∗′2dr⊗dr). Substituting into gK and using sUVe−r/sr=−f and r∗′2=f−2, the pulled-back metric is −f d(x0)2+f−1dr2+r2dΩ2=g; this is the computation of Smooth horizon-crossing extension of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in the advanced chart restricted to the exterior. On the component {U>0,V>0} define instead U=e(r∗−x0)/(2s), V=e(r∗+x0)/(2s) with the branch r∗=r+slog⁡(1−r/s) of the interval (0,s); then UV=er∗/s=(1−r/s)er/s=−(r/s−1)er/s, so again r(U,V)=r, and dU dV+dV dU=UV2s2(dr∗2−dx0⊗dx0); the same substitution with r∗′=1/f (negative there) gives −f d(x0)2+f−1dr2+r2dΩ2 again, now with f<0. Finally the map (U,V,ω)↦(−U,−V,ω) leaves both UV and dU dV+dV dU unchanged and fixes r, gϑϑ and gφφ; it is therefore an isometry, and it exchanges the two components with UV<0 and the two with UV>0. This proves (c).

3.1step 2.1algebra

(The four connected components.) No connected subset of {UV≠0} can change the sign of either continuous nonzero coordinate. Step 2.1 and simultaneous sign reversal identify each sign region with R×J×S2, where J=(s,∞) or (0,s). These domains are path connected: interpolate the real and radial coordinates linearly; any two sphere points can be joined by normalized straight segments, inserting an intermediate unit coordinate vector not antipodal to either endpoint when needed (among the six signed coordinate vectors at most two are excluded). All segment normalizations have nonzero denominators. Hence each sign region is connected, and the four are exactly the components asserted in (c).

3.2L3L5step 1.1step 2.1algebra

(Vacuum and Kretschmann scalar.) By step 2.1, on every component with UV≠0 the metric is isometric to a branch of the spherical metric with f=1−s/r. By [L3] each branch is isometric to the corresponding open region of the advanced extension, whose curvature identities hold for all r>0. Uniqueness of the metric-selected connection transports it under these isometries, and therefore transports its curvature tensor and metric contractions. Thus Ric⁡=S=G=0 and the Kretschmann scalar is 12s2/r6 on both branches and their sign-reversed copies. These identities hold on the dense open subset D={UV≠0}×(S2∖{two poles}). The global metric is smooth and nondegenerate by step 1.2, so its Ricci tensor and Kretschmann scalar are smooth. In any smooth product chart their components are continuous and agree on the dense subset D with zero and with 12s2/r6, respectively; [L5] extends the identities over the axes and both poles. This proves (d), including K=12/s4 at r=s and K→∞ as UV→1. Clause (e) records the scope.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.2given∎

(Conclusion.) Steps 1.1-3.2 prove clauses (a)-(d) from the datum's definitions and the all-positive-radius advanced-extension supplier; the claims about maximality and completeness are explicitly not made, as recorded in (e).

Remarks

  • Why continuity suffices. The Ricci tensor and the Kretschmann scalar are defined from the metric by two derivatives. The global metric is smooth across the axes and in pole charts; the isometry calculations on the dense regular subset therefore extend the tensor identities by continuity. This establishes smoothness across r=s, not real analyticity.

  • The implicit relation in the source. The sources write UV=−(r/s−1)er/s in the form UV=(2GM−r)er/2GM/(2GM), which is the same identity with s=2GM; the extraction of r from UV uses only that the function is a strictly decreasing bijection of (0,∞) onto (−∞,1), as proved in step 1.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources