Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Curvature components and the vanishing of the Ricci and Einstein tensors of the Schwarzschild exterior metric

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be the Schwarzschild exterior datum of mass parameter m∗, Schwarzschild radius s=2GNm∗/c2 and f(r)=1−s/r (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation), with metric-selected connection ∇ and curvature data Rabcd, Rabcd, Ric⁡ab, S, Gab (Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class, Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields, The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors). In every spherical-polar product chart (x0,r,ϑ,φ), writing f′=dfdr=s/r2 and f′′=d2fdr2=−2s/r3:

(a) Curvature components. All nonzero components of the lowered curvature tensor, up to the symmetries of The algebraic symmetries of the curvature tensor and the symmetry of the Ricci and Einstein tensors, are

R0101=f′′2,R0202=rff′2,R0303=rff′sin⁡2ϑ2,

R1212=−rf′2f,R1313=−rf′sin⁡2ϑ2f,R2323=r2(1−f)sin⁡2ϑ.

Every component whose index pairs do not coincide as unordered pairs, and every component with an index repeated inside a pair, vanishes.

(b) Ricci tensor. The Ricci tensor has the diagonal components

Ric⁡00=f(f′′2+f′r),Ric⁡11=−1f(f′′2+f′r),

Ric⁡22=1−f−rf′,Ric⁡33=(1−f−rf′)sin⁡2ϑ,

and all mixed components Ric⁡ab with a≠b vanish.

(c) Vanishing for the model. For f(r)=1−s/r one has f′′2+f′r=0 and 1−f−rf′=0; consequently

Ric⁡ab=0,S=0,Gab=0

on the regular angular locus and, as tensor identities, on all of M by smoothness and density. In particular the Schwarzschild exterior metric is a Ricci-flat metric, and G=0 holds as an identity of smooth tensor fields.

(d) The curvature does not vanish. The model is not locally flat. The global base-field contraction R0101:=g(R(∂0,∂r)∂r,∂0) equals −s/r3 on the regular angular locus, hence everywhere by smoothness and density. It is therefore nowhere zero even though the Ricci and Einstein tensors vanish identically.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Schwarzschild exterior datum, its metric and connection, a spherical-polar product chart (x0,r,ϑ,φ) with 0<ϑ<π, and the functions f(r)=1−s/r, f′=s/r2, f′′=−2s/r3.

[L1]

On a spherical-polar product chart the metric components are g00=−f, g11=f−1, g22=r2, g33=r2sin⁡2ϑ, off-diagonal components vanish, and the inverse components are g00=−f−1, g11=f, g22=r−2, g33=r−2sin⁡−2ϑ (The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising); all components and all Christoffel symbols are independent of x0 and φ.

[L2]

The nonzero Christoffel symbols of ∇ in the chart are Γ001=Γ010=f′/(2f), Γ100=ff′/2, Γ111=−f′/(2f), Γ122=−rf, Γ133=−rfsin⁡2ϑ, Γ212=Γ221=1/r, Γ233=−sin⁡ϑcos⁡ϑ, Γ313=Γ331=1/r and Γ323=Γ332=cot⁡ϑ (Christoffel symbols of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in product charts).

[L3]

In the chart, Rabcd=∂cΓadb−∂dΓacb+∑e(ΓaceΓedb−ΓadeΓecb), and R is a smooth tensor field whose components transform under changes of chart. Tensor vanishing and contractions are intrinsic; the component formulas in (a)-(b) are computed separately in each spherical-polar product chart with the same metric form (Tensoriality of the curvature, its coordinate formula and its point-normal metric formula clauses (a)-(b), The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors clause (b)).

[L4]

The lowered curvature satisfies Rabcd=−Rbacd=−Rabdc=Rcdab and the first Bianchi identity Rabcd+Racdb+Radbc=0; the Ricci tensor, scalar curvature and Einstein tensor are Ric⁡bd=gacRabcd, S=gbdRic⁡bd and Gab=Ric⁡ab−12Sgab, with Ric⁡ab=Ric⁡ba (The algebraic symmetries of the curvature tensor and the symmetry of the Ricci and Einstein tensors clauses (a)-(d), The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors clause (c)).

[L5]

The model function satisfies f′=s/r2, f′′=−2s/r3, so f′′/2+f′/r=0 and 1−f−rf′=1−(1−s/r)−s/r=0 (The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set, Rational powers ar of a positive base); in the chart domain r>s>0 and sin⁡ϑ>0.

Proof

technique · exhaust the independent curvature components by the curvature symmetries and a finite pair-index table, contract to Ricci, and extend the resulting smooth tensor identities from the dense polar-chart locus to the poles
1.1L2L3L4

(Exhaustive pair-index table.) By [L4], a lowered component with a repeated index inside either pair vanishes, and the two skew-symmetries and pair exchange reduce all other components to a symmetric 6×6 array indexed by the six choices 01,02,03,12,13,23. Substitution of every pair-pair choice into [L3] gives this complete array; entries below the diagonal equal their transposes, and reversing the order within either pair changes the sign: [L2, L3, L4] 01020312132301f′′/20000002rff′/2000003rff′sin⁡2ϑ/200012−rf′/(2f)0013−rf′sin⁡2ϑ/(2f)023r2(1−f)sin⁡2ϑ Thus all fifteen unequal-pair entries are explicitly zero; the six diagonal entries are computed in steps 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1. This exhausts the 21 independent pair-pair entries and, by [L4], every curvature component.

1.2L2L3algebra

(The 01 and 23 components.) For R0101=g00R0101: by [L3], [L2] and ∂0Γ011=0, R0101=−∂1Γ001+Γ001Γ111−Γ010Γ001=−∂1(f′/(2f))−(f′)24f2−(f′)24f2=−f′′2f+(f′)22f2−(f′)22f2=−f′′2f, and multiplication by g00=−f gives R0101=f′′/2. For R2323=g22R2323: R2323=∂2Γ233+Γ221Γ133−Γ233Γ323=(sin⁡2ϑ−cos⁡2ϑ)−fsin⁡2ϑ+cos⁡2ϑ=(1−f)sin⁡2ϑ, using [L2]; hence R2323=r2(1−f)sin⁡2ϑ.

1.3L2L3algebra

(The 02 and 12 components.) For R0202=g00R0202: R0202=Γ001Γ122=−(rf′)/2 by [L2] and [L3] (all remaining terms contain a vanishing symbol or a ∂0-derivative), so R0202=(−f)(−rf′/2)=rff′/2. For R1212=g11R1212: R1212=∂1Γ122+Γ111Γ122−Γ122Γ212=−(f+rf′)+rf′2+f=−rf′2, using [L2], hence R1212=f−1(−rf′/2)=−rf′/(2f).

2.1L2L3step 1.1algebra

(The remaining 03 and 13 components.) From [L2]-[L3], R0303=Γ001Γ133=−(rf′sin⁡2ϑ)/2, so R0303=g00R0303=rff′sin⁡2ϑ/2. Also R1313=∂1Γ133+Γ111Γ133−Γ133Γ313=−(rf′sin⁡2ϑ)/2, hence R1313=g11R1313=−rf′sin⁡2ϑ/(2f). These verify the final two diagonal entries of the table in step 1.1.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1L4

(Mixed and zero components.) The fifteen unequal-pair entries are exactly the off-diagonal entries of the exhaustive array in step 1.1. Every component with a repeated index inside a pair vanishes by [L4]; all remaining sign and order variants are determined by its skew-symmetries and pair exchange. Thus clause (a) is exhaustive.

4.1step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1L4L1algebra

(Contraction to the Ricci tensor.) By [L4] and clause (a), Ric⁡00=g11R1010+g22R2020+g33R3030=f⋅f′′2+1r2⋅rff′2+1r2sin⁡2ϑ⋅rff′sin⁡2ϑ2=f(f′′2+f′r). Similarly Ric⁡11=g00R0101+g22R2121+g33R3131=−f′′2f−f′2rf−f′2rf=−1f(f′′2+f′r), Ric⁡22=g00R0202+g11R1212+g33R3232=−rf′2−rf′2+(1−f)=1−f−rf′, and Ric⁡33=g00R0303+g11R1313+g22R2323=−rf′sin⁡2ϑ2−rf′sin⁡2ϑ2+(1−f)sin⁡2ϑ=(1−f−rf′)sin⁡2ϑ. For a mixed pair, say (0,1), every term gaaRa0a1 of [L4] contains a component with unequal index pairs or a repeated index, which vanishes by step 3.1; hence Ric⁡01=0, and all mixed components vanish likewise. This is clause (b).

5.1L3L4L5step 4.1algebra

(Specialisation and the Einstein tensor.) For f=1−s/r the identities of [L5] give f′′/2+f′/r=0 and 1−f−rf′=0. Clause (b) therefore gives Ric⁡=0 on the dense open regular angular locus M∘=R×(s,∞)×(S2∖{two poles}). The Ricci tensor is smooth on all of M by [L3]; in any chart about a pole its components are continuous and vanish on the dense subset from M∘, hence vanish at the pole too. Thus Ric⁡=0 globally. Its contractions then give S=0 and G=0 by [L4]. This proves (c).

6.1L1L3L5step 1.1algebra∎

(Nonvanishing curvature.) On M∘, the 01 entry of step 1.1 and f′′=−2s/r3 give the global base-field contraction g(R(∂0,∂r)∂r,∂0)=−s/r3. This contraction is continuous on M and equals the smooth function −s/r3 on the dense subset M∘, so the identity holds everywhere. Since s,r>0, the contraction is nowhere zero and therefore the curvature tensor is nowhere zero. This proves (d).

Remarks

  • What is proved and what is not. The computation proves the tensor identities Ric⁡=0, S=0, G=0 on the exterior domain. It does not assert that g is a solution of the framework's field law: that reading requires the field law and the vacuum prescription and is the content of the exterior vacuum-model theorem of this page. It also does not assert that the Schwarzschild metric is the only Ricci-flat metric or the only spherically symmetric one; uniqueness statements are the local Birkhoff theorem of this page.

  • The curvature invariant. Contracting the components of clause (a) against the inverse metric gives the Kretschmann scalar of the model, a computation performed separately in the curvature-and-Kretschmann lemma of this page; the result 12s2/r6 is finite at r=s and diverges as r↓0, the basis of the singularity discussion of this page.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources