Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Primitive anticanonical K3 bridges for the nonprimitive Fano cases

Statement

Assume AC and work over the complex numbers. If a smooth connected projective Fano n-fold has −K=rA=IB, where I is its maximal integral index and A,B are ample line bundles, then r divides I, A=(I/r)B and I≤n+1.

If Y is a smooth Picard-number-one Fano threefold with maximal index I≥2, Pic(Y)=ZB and −KY=IB, then |IB| is generated and a very general smooth T∈|IB| is K3 with Pic(T)=ZBT, integrally, and BT2=I B³. For I=2,B3=1 the threefold has the weighted sextic normal form and the K3 system is the double-plane system; no very-ampleness of |2B| is asserted in that case. In all other cases |IB| is very ample.

If M is a smooth Picard-number-one Fano fourfold with −KM=2A and A nonprimitive, then I=4, A=2B and (M,B) is the smooth quadric fourfold with its hyperplane polarization. A general Y∈|2B| is smooth, Pic(Y)=ZB, −KY=2B and B3=4. A very general T∈|2B|Y| is K3 with Pic(T)=ZBT and BT2=8. These choices can also satisfy any prescribed nonempty open transversality condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the smooth complex projective Fano varieties, Cartier decompositions and Picard-number hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Picard-one Fano index divisor is the integral generator proves Pic(Y)=ZB when the Picard number is one. Its proof of triviality of numerically trivial lines uses smooth adjoint vanishing and GRR and does not require Picard number one. Smooth Fano fundamental ladders and the high-degree embedding bridge (Proof 1.15–1.18 and 1.21–1.29) applies only at the MAXIMAL index and supplies smooth fundamental ladders, generation of B for threefold index at least three or index two degree at least two, and the degree-one del-Pezzo smooth elliptic ladder.

[F2]

K3 ample linear systems from Serre extensions and instability says that an ample L with L2≥6 has at most one primitive nef elliptic pencil of L-degree at most two. Failure of generation or very ampleness produces such a pencil, except for L2=8,L=2D,D2=2. Canonical section-ring lifting on K3 surfaces and Fano ladders includes the exact connected degree-zero quotient and the normal-generation/very-ampleness lift from an actual smooth canonical curve.

[F3]

Very general K3 sections in the specified Fano regimes have the primitive ambient Picard group applies to the complete very ample anticanonical system on a smooth threefold with Pic=ZB and H2,0=0, retaining the primitive B, not the generally nonprimitive anticanonical class. Its separate degree-one weighted double-plane branch applies to the normal form constructed below. The weighted degree one del Pezzo and double plane K3 ladder supplies its complete |2B| and K3 geometry. Ample divisor relative handles and primitive integral restriction gives integral H² restriction for the complete intersections below.

[F5]

A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite gives finiteness of the section morphism in step 2.3. A finite birational morphism onto a normal variety is an isomorphism then identifies the quadric, after its normality is checked there. The Axiom of Choice is the ambient premise throughout.

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

Every numerically trivial line N on a smooth Fano has χ(N)=χ(O)=1 by GRR, and −K+N is ample because all intersection numbers are unchanged. Adjoint vanishing makes its positive cohomology zero. A nonzero section of N has no nonzero effective divisor, since such a divisor has positive degree against an ample power. It trivializes N. In particular Pic has no torsion. Let g=gcd⁡(r,I), m=r/g,q=I/g. From mA=qB and coprimality, choose u,v with um+vq=1; C=uB+vA then satisfies mC=B,qC=A, using torsion-freeness. C is ample because mC=B is ample. Thus −K=ImC; maximality of I forces m=1. This proves r|I and A=(I/r)B. For P(t)=χ(O(tB)), vanishing gives P(0)=1 and the distinct roots −1,…,−(I−1). Its degree is n, so I≤n+1.

2.1givenF1F3F4step 1.1constructalgebra

For the threefold, Pic(Y)=ZB by F1, and I∈{2,3,4}. Write w=B3. If I=3,4, the Euler roots and Serre symmetry give w=2,1 respectively. If I=2, leave w≥1 unrestricted. For I≥3 or I=2,w≥2, F1 makes B generated, hence L=IB generated. Bertini supplies a smooth T∈|L|; connectedness follows from the ample-divisor supplier. Adjunction gives KT=O. The sequence 0→KY→OY→OT→0, adjoint vanishing on Y and Serre duality give H1(OT)=0, so T is K3. Moreover d=(L∣T)2=I3w is at least16 in these cases.

2.2F1F2F4step 1.1constructalgebra

It remains to justify all degree-one index-two threefolds, rather than assume they are weighted models. F1 supplies smooth D∈|B| with −KD=BD and a smooth genus-one Cin∣BD∣. Its line b=B∣C has degree one. A nonzero section x of b has divisor a single smooth point p. Curve RR gives h0(nb)=n for n≥1. Choose y∈H⁰(2b) outside xH⁰(b), and z∈H⁰(3b) outside xH⁰(2b). As rational functions y/x²,z/x³ they have exact pole orders two and three at p. Their monomials with z-exponent zero or one have distinct pole orders, all nonnegative integers except one; RR therefore makes them a basis in every degree after multiplying by the appropriate power of x. In degree six their single relation has nonzero z² and y³ coefficients (both have exact pole order six). Completing the square and translating y removes the z-linear and y² terms, giving z²+y³+a4 x⁴y+a6 x⁶. The same pole-order basis proves there are no further relations: the Hilbert series is (1−t⁶)/((1−t)(1−t²)(1−t³)).

2.3F1F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

For the fourfold, Pic(M)=ZB by F1, so nonprimitivity of A and step 1.1 force I=4,A=2B. Euler roots and symmetry give B4=2 and h0(M,B)=6, as in the explicit index-four Euler calculation in F1. The maximal-index ladder makes B generated. Its morphism φ:M→P⁵ has finite fibres: a positive-dimensional projective fibre contains a curve, on which B would have degree zero, contrary to ampleness. It is proper, hence finite by F5. Its image W is an integral nondegenerate fourfold hypersurface, and degree⁡(φ)deg⁡(W)=B4=2 by counting a general complete linear section. Nondegeneracy excludes a linear hypersurface, so deg⁡(W)=2 and deg⁡(φ)=1. An integral quadric has rank at least three and is normal: on an affine chart meeting its singular locus its ring has form R=C[u,v,z]/(uv+q(z)) with q≠0. The localizations at u and v are polynomial Laurent rings, hence integrally closed (Gauss's factor argument). The pair u,v is regular, and so are its powers; cancelling successively modulo these powers proves Ru∩Rv=R inside Frac(R). Every integral fraction lies in both localizations and hence in R. Smooth charts are already regular. F5 now makes φ an isomorphism. Since M is smooth, W is the smooth quadric Q⁴.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1constructalgebra

Here is the primitive Picard bridge before invoking Noether–Lefschetz. Put V=H0(Y,L), P=P(V) and U={(y,[s]):s(y)=0}. Surjective evaluation has vector-bundle kernel M, and U=PY(M). Its projective-space fibres have dimension at least two: the section morphism of an ample generated line has no positive-dimensional fibre, since any curve in one would have L-degree zero; hence its image has dimension three and h0(L)≥4. Taking fibre degree and then descending a degree-zero line by evaluation proves Pic(U)=p∗Pic(Y)+Zq∗OP(1). For K=C(P), any line bundle on the regular generic fibre TK extends to U: take the closure of a Cartier divisor representing it, which is Cartier since U is smooth. Its geometric restriction is consequently an integer multiple of BT. This conclusion concerns K-rational lines, not arbitrary geometric lines.

3.2F1F2F3F4step 2.2constructalgebra

Adjoint vanishing on Y and D gives H1(Y,nB)=H1(D,nBD)=0 for n≥0. The two smooth connected divisor sequences therefore identify their entire section rings, including degree zero, as successive quotients by regular degree-one sections. Lift x,y,z from C and add the two defining degree-one sections. Induction on degree using those quotients proves these five elements generate R(Y,B). Lift the elliptic degree-six relation and subtract the defining sections times lifted degree-five elements to make its image zero. Its quotient has exactly the Hilbert series of R(Y,B), so it is the only relation. Thus R(Y,B)=C[x0,x1,x2,y,z]/(F6), with weights1,1,1,2,3 and nonzero coefficients of z²,y³. Since B is ample, a sufficiently high very ample Veronese identifies Y with Proj of this ring. Complete the square in z and translate y by a quadratic form in the xi to obtain the exact weighted normal form of F3. The weighted ladder and its double-plane NL branch now give generation of |2B| and a very general K3 T with Pic(T)=ZBT and BT2=2. This proves the remaining threefold assertion without a del-Pezzo classification input.

4.1F1F2F4step 3.1constructalgebra

We first justify the scalar-field use of F2 on Ω=C(P)‾. Its actual Serre-extension proof works over any algebraically closed characteristic-zero field, as follows. For every finite configuration of surface, polarization, bundles, length-two obstruction, maps and trivializations occurring in that proof, choose a model over a field k⊂Ω finitely generated over Q. Smooth projectivity, ampleness (choose a very ample power and its finite presentation), and the trivialization of the canonical line descend after enlarging k. Choose an embedding k↪C; this is not required to fix the original constant field C. Cohomology commutes with these field extensions: a finite affine cover of a separated projective scheme has affine intersections, and tensoring its Cech complex by a field extension is exact, so preserves cohomology and its finite dimensions. The same argument on the finite locally free resolutions computes the Ext groups and duality maps used in the Serre construction. Thus H1(O)=0, the RR and Serre-duality identities, and ample-line vanishing transfer from the complex model. Intersection numbers are unchanged, since they are coefficients of the Euler polynomials of the finitely many line bundles and their tensor powers; hence every finite Hodge-index matrix inequality used in F2 transfers as well. The remaining extension, saturation, regular-local freeness, effectivity and pencil constructions in F2's Proof 1.1--11.1 are algebraic and are carried out over Ω itself. Eigenvalues exist because Ω is algebraically closed. This proves both the obstruction criterion and its uniqueness over Ω; it does not attempt to lift an elliptic pencil from a single special complex fibre. Suppose LT is not very ample on the geometric generic K3. Since d≥16, F2 gives a unique primitive nef elliptic pencil E with E2=0 and 1≤LT E≤2; its degree-eight exception is absent. Define E over a finite extension K'/K. The finite-flat norm, det⁡(f∗E) tensor det⁡(f∗O)−1, has geometric class [K':K]E, because every conjugate is the same unique pencil. Step 3.1 makes that class aBT for an integer a. Squaring gives a2BT2=0, hence a=0; intersecting with LT contradicts LT E>0. The projective-bundle extension and norm used here are the explicit constructions in the smooth-ladder supplier, Proof 22.1–29.1, with primitive B retained separately from L=IB; the scalar-field argument above supplies the criterion independently of a specialization-only assertion. Failure to separate a length-two scheme is detected by the universal evaluation map on the proper relative Hilbert scheme of length two. Therefore geometric-generic very ampleness yields a nonempty open set of smooth complex T with LT very ample.

5.1F1F2F3F4step 4.1constructalgebra

Choose such a T and a smooth curve Din∣LT∣. Its canonical line is LT∣D, and its complete canonical morphism is a closed immersion. F2's K3 ring lift gives normal generation of LT. Adjoint vanishing gives H1(Y,OY)=0, so its ambient lift gives normal generation and very ampleness of L on Y. Now F3 applies to |L| with primitive ambient generator B and H2,0(Y)=0. Thus very general T has Pic(T)=ZBT, and BT2=I w by intersection. The exceptional sets are countably many proper closed loci; a nonempty transversality open can be imposed simultaneously by the Baire conclusion already included in F3.

6.1F1F2F3F4step 5.1step 2.3constructalgebra∎

Choose Y∈|2B| generally. It is the smooth complete intersection of two quadrics in P⁵, with −KY=2BY and BY3=4. The relative-handle supplier along P⁵⊃Q⁴⊃Y gives H2(Y;Z)=Zc1(BY), since P⁵ has its usual one-cell-in-each-even-dimension filtration; it also gives H1(Y;Z)=0. Adjoint vanishing makes H1(Y,OY)=H2(Y,OY)=0. Threefold GAGA and the explicit Dolbeault/acyclic-resolution interfaces in F4 inject algebraic Pic(Y) into topological Pic(Y): for a topologically trivial line choose a smooth nonzero frame s, form its global closed (0,1)-form α=s−1 dbar s, solve α=dbar f by H1(OY)=0, and use exp⁡(−f)s as a holomorphic frame; full faithfulness algebraizes it and its inverse. Topological line classification identifies the target with H²(Y;Z). Since BY already maps to its generator, Pic(Y)=ZBY. Apply steps 2.1–5.1 to this index-two degree-four threefold. Its very general anticanonical K3 T has Pic(T)=ZBT and BT2=8. All choices can meet the prescribed nonempty transversality open. This proves the fourfold bridge.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources