Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed-form diagonalization in Landau gauge

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, m,ℏ>0, and real q,B with qB≠0. On L2(R2;C) close the nonnegative form qB[u]=12m(∥−iℏ∂xu∥22+∥(−iℏ∂y−qBx)u∥22),u∈Cc∞(R2;C). Put ωc=∣qB∣/m, En=ℏωc(n+12), and let (ψn)n≥0 be the complete normalized eigenfunctions of the one-dimensional oscillator with mass m, frequency ωc, and action constant ℏ in its exact self-adjoint oscillator realization. For Schwartz u define Fyu(x,k)=(2π)−1/2∫Re−ikyu(x,y) dy, and use its unitary L2 extension. Put x0(k)=ℏk/(qB) and (Uu)(ξ,k)=Fyu(ξ+x0(k),k). Then U is unitary from L2(Rx,y2) onto L2(Rξ,k2). Writing Uu(ξ,k)=∑n=0∞fn(k)ψn(ξ),fn∈L2(Rk), the form closure domain and value are exactly D(q‾B)={u:∑n=0∞En∥fn∥L2(k)2<∞},q‾B[u]=∑n=0∞En∥fn∥L2(k)2. Thus the form is the diagonal oscillator form with an unrestricted L2(k) degeneracy factor; it asserts no finite-area state count.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, m,ℏ>0, qB≠0, the form qB, and the oscillator eigenfamily (ψn) with energies En.

[F1]

The magnetic form on Cc∞ is the form of Magnetic quadratic-form data with d=2, A=(0,Bx) and V=0.

[F2]

The 2π-frequency Fourier transform on L1 has kernel e−2πiyξ (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes), and its extension to L2 is unitary (Plancherel theorem). The wave-number convention in the Statement is the unitary rescaling Fyg(k)=(2π)−1/2g^(k/(2π)); for Schwartz g it satisfies Fy(−i∂yg)=kFyg by integration by parts, and Fourier transform preserves Schwartz space (Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space). The Euclidean L2 product identification and Fubini apply (Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}), Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product); the integration-by-parts identity used for the derivative multiplier is Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions.

[F3]

For ωc>0, let Hosc be the exact self-adjoint oscillator realization in Oscillator scaling and exact realization. It has complete orthonormal basis (ψn), eigenvalues En, and domain D(Hosc)={g:∑n=0∞En2∣⟨g,ψn⟩∣2<∞}. On its polynomial-Gaussian core it has differential expression L=−ℏ2∂ξ2/(2m)+mωc2ξ2/2; in particular, Lψn=Enψn on that core.

[F4]

Translation of one Lebesgue variable preserves its integral, and integration by parts holds for smooth compactly supported functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions).

[F5]

Smooth compactly supported cutoffs equal to one on expanding balls and with first derivatives bounded by C/R are obtained by rescaling the standard smooth step function (The standard smooth step function).

[F6]

Tonelli's theorem permits integration of the nonnegative oscillator energy series term by term over (ξ,k) with Lebesgue measure (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F7]

For every finite p and dimension, compactly supported smooth functions are dense in Lp(Rd); in particular this holds for L2(Rk) (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F8]

The weighted sequence space in the Statement is complete: it is L2 on N0×Rk for the sigma-finite measure (n,k)↦En d#(n) dk, and L2 of any measure space is Hilbert under Countable Choice (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F9]

On any measure space, measurable complex-valued functions converging almost everywhere and bounded in modulus by a single nonnegative measurable L1 function converge in integral (indeed in L1). Dominated convergence

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the unitary Fourier, product-space, and oscillator suppliers; Dependent Choice is an exact hypothesis of the absolutely-continuous integration-by-parts supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions).

Proof

1.1givenA1F2F4construct

On the dense tensor core a(x)b(y) with a,b∈S(R), Fy is the identity on the first factor and the unitary Fourier transform on the second, by [F2] and the Euclidean L2 product identification in [F2]. It extends uniquely to a unitary on L2(R2). For each k, translation x=ξ+x0(k) preserves the x-integral by [F4]; Fubini then shows that Wg(ξ,k)=g(ξ+x0(k),k) is an isometry with inverse W−1h(x,k)=h(x−x0(k),k). Hence U=WFy is unitary.

2.1givenA1F2F3F4F6step 1.1algebra

Let u∈Cc∞(R2) and write F(ξ,k)=Uu(ξ,k). For each fixed k, F(⋅,k) is smooth and compactly supported in ξ. Plancherel in y, the derivative identity in [F2], and the substitution x=ξ+x0(k) give qB[u]=∫R2(ℏ22m∣∂ξF∣2+(qB)22mξ2∣F∣2)dξ dk. For a compactly supported smooth g(ξ), put Lg=−ℏ2g′′/(2m)+mωc2ξ2g/2∈L2. Integrating by parts twice on a finite interval containing the support of g gives ⟨Lg,ψn⟩=En⟨g,ψn⟩, since Lψn=Enψn and the boundary terms vanish. Completeness and Parseval therefore give ∑n=0∞En2∣⟨g,ψn⟩∣2=∥Lg∥22<∞. The exact domain characterization in [F3] now implies g∈D(Hosc), and its diagonal action gives Hoscg=Lg. Hence ⟨Hoscg,g⟩=∑n=0∞En∣⟨g,ψn⟩∣2. Integration by parts also identifies the left side with 12m(ℏ2∥g′∥22+(qB)2∥ξg∥22). Apply this identity to F(⋅,k) for almost every k. Tonelli [F6] permits integrating the nonnegative series, so the displayed core form is the coefficient form on every transformed core vector.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F9step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

For N<∞ and f0,…,fN∈Cc∞(Rk), FN(ξ,k)=∑n=0Nfn(k)ψn(ξ) has inverse U−1FN(x,y)=12π∑n=0N∫Reikyfn(k)ψn ⁣(x−ℏkqB)dk. Write v:=U−1FN. The integrands have compact k-support and are Schwartz in x uniformly there by the Hermite form in [F3]; differentiating under the integral and integrating by parts in k show rapid decay in y, so the inverse is Schwartz. Define χR(x,y)=∏s∈{x,y}σ(2−s/R)σ(2+s/R), using [F5]. These cutoffs are one on [−R,R]2, vanish outside [−2R,2R]2, and have ∣∇χR∣≤C/R. For each covariant derivative, ΠjA(χRv)=χRΠjAv−iℏ(∂jχR)v. Take integer R≥1. The step-function bounds in [F5] give 0≤χR≤1, and for every fixed (x,y), χR(x,y)=1 once R≥max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}, so χR→1 pointwise. Since v is Schwartz and A=(0,Bx) is linear, Π1Av=−iℏ∂xv and Π2Av=−iℏ∂yv−qBxv are Schwartz and belong to L2(R2). For each w∈{v,Π1Av,Π2Av}, the functions ∣(χR−1)w∣2 are measurable, tend pointwise to zero, and are bounded by the single measurable L1 majorant ∣w∣2. Applying [F9] on the Lebesgue measure space R2 gives ∥(χR−1)w∥2→0. The derivative-cutoff term separately satisfies ∥ℏ(∂jχR)v∥2≤Cℏ∥v∥2/R→0. Thus the displayed product identity and the triangle inequality give ∥ΠjA(χRv−v)∥2→0 for both j, as well as ∥χRv−v∥2→0. The form identity of step 2.1 also holds for Schwartz functions: the Fourier and shear maps preserve Schwartz regularity, and for each Schwartz g(ξ) one has Lg∈L2; its integration-by-parts pairings with the polynomial-Gaussian ψn have vanishing boundary terms at both infinities. The same Parseval calculation and exact diagonal operator-domain criterion in [F3] therefore give g∈D(Hosc) and the same oscillator energy identity. All resulting nonnegative energies can again be integrated by [F6]. Apply this extended identity to the Schwartz difference χRv−v. Its weighted coefficient norm squared is exactly 12m∑j=12∥ΠjA(χRv−v)∥22, which tends to zero by the preceding bounds. Since χRv∈Cc∞, each FN therefore lies in the weighted-norm closure of the transformed original core, without assuming closability in advance. Finite coefficient families are dense in the weighted target: truncate its convergent nonnegative series, then approximate the remaining finitely many L2(k) coefficients by Cc∞(k) using [F7].

4.1F1F2F3F8step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Let KE be the coefficient space {(fn):∑nEn∥fn∥22<∞} with squared norm ∑nEn∥fn∥22, and let J:KE↪L2(N0×R,d# dk) be the identity inclusion. Step 2.1 maps the transformed core isometrically into KE. Since En≥E0=ℏωc/2>0, J is continuous and injective, with ∥Jf∥22≤E0−1∑nEn∥fn∥22. The coefficient map is unitary on the underlying L2 space by [F2] and [F3]. Thus qB[u]≥E0∥u∥22 on the core. For every ε>0, qB[u]≤qB[u]+ε∥u∥22≤(1+ε/E0)qB[u], so each shifted form norm is equivalent to qB[u]1/2. Suppose a core sequence is Cauchy in qB[u]1/2 and tends to zero in L2. Its weighted coefficient image converges in KE to some f; unweighted L2 convergence and continuity of J give Jf=0. Injectivity of J gives f=0, so qB[u]→0 along that sequence. The equivalence above then gives convergence to zero in the defining shifted form norm, proving closability of the core form. By [F8] the target is complete, so the isometric image of the form completion is closed there. Step 3.1 places a dense subspace of that target in the image; hence the image is the whole weighted space and the form closure is exactly the stated one.

Remarks

The diagram records the unitary changes of representation used in the proof; the argument establishes each arrow and does not rely on the diagram.

L2(R2x;y)L2(R2x;k)L2(R2»;k)L2(Rk;`2(N0))FyWH

Here H is the coefficient map F↦(⟨F(⋅,k),ψn⟩)n≥0, which is unitary by the complete oscillator basis. The linear Landau potential is unbounded, so no bounded-coefficient H2 realization is invoked.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources