Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real monad normalization, regularity, framing and charge

Statement

Let N≥2, k≥0, and equip V=Ck and W=CN with their standard Hermitian products. Let S4=HP1 and Z=PC(H2)=CP3 have the twistor projection π([v])=span⁡C(v,jv) and antiholomorphic involution σ([v])=[jv] specified in the preceding twistor definition, with j2=−1. Let E→S4 be a framed Hermitian bundle with a smooth unitary connection A, unitary framing at infinity, and FA+=(FA+∗gFA)/2=0 for the unit round metric and positive orientation specified in the twistor definition. Define qN(E,A)=−(8π2)−1∫S4tr⁡N(FA∧FA). Let E be its holomorphic Ward bundle, with underlying smooth bundle π∗E. A framed positive Ward bundle includes a nondegenerate holomorphic pairing b:E⊗σ∗E‾→OZ satisfying bσz(v,u)=bz(u,v)‾, whose induced form bz(s(z),t(σz)) is positive on H0(Lx,E∣Lx) for every real twistor line Lx, and a unitary framing on the infinity line L∞.

Assume its monad is the holomorphic complex

OZ(−1)⊗U→αOZ⊗S→βOZ(1)⊗U′,

with βα=0, locally split injective and surjective end maps, locally free middle cohomology ker⁡β/im⁡α, and dim⁡CU=dim⁡CU′=k, dim⁡CS=2k+N. Then the real monad is equivalent to a raw datum (B1,B2,I,J) on V=Ck, W=CN in exactly the convention

μC=[B1,B2]+IJ=0,μR=[B1,B1†]+[B2,B2†]+II†−J†J=0.

The tuple is stable when the vectors Bi1⋯BimI(w) span V, costable when no nonzero common B1,B2-invariant subspace lies in ker⁡J, and regular when both hold. Equivalently, the raw block map

Dz=(−B2+z2B1−z1IB1†−zˉ1B2†−zˉ2J†):V⊕V⊕W→V⊕V

is onto for every z=(z1,z2)∈C2. Its kernel projection connection on the finite stereographic chart is ∇=P d, where P is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡Dz; it extends over infinity, has the specified framing, and equals the Ward connection. Changes of normalized monad bases, meaning chain isomorphisms preserving the lifted pairing and infinity framing, induce exactly the simultaneous U(k) action on raw data, and inverse matrix extraction recovers the same U(k) orbit. With qN(E,A)=−(8π2)−1∫S4tr⁡N(FA∧FA) for the framed ASD connection A, the resulting charge is k=−qN(E,A)=⟨c2(E),[S4]⟩. The entrywise conjugation candidate is refuted by the recorded comparison lemma and is not used in the intrinsic real monad normalization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated Ward bundle and normalized monad; the exact raw ADHM moment-map convention; and the conditional real-block interface below.

[A1]

The exact intrinsic normal-form supplier takes a linear bundle monad on the fixed P3, with dimensions k,2k+N,k, N≥2, locally free middle bundle trivial on every real line, its positive nondegenerate holomorphic σ-Hermitian pairing and unitary framing at infinity. It asserts the precise raw polynomial α,β form, zero moment maps, stable-and-costable regularity, inverse extraction and exactly the simultaneous U(k) residual action. It retains compact rotation/framing chain factors and naturality on the stated first-order locally-free/base-change range, including k=0 and flat summands. These are the needed existence, positivity, uniqueness and family conclusions, not an equivalence with a historical displayed block. Positive real linear monad normal forms The exact first-order range additionally requires free H0(FA) with reduction base change, a direct-summand coefficient-image module with reduction base change, and triviality and section base change on each fixed real twistor line; positivity is required only on the reduction. These hypotheses are imposed and are not inferred for arbitrary ASD deformations or flat-summand rank jumps. Only this range and involution-preserving epsilon-to-r-epsilon maps are used.

[F1]

The preceding vanishing lemma reconstructs a three-term monad with dimensions k,2k+N,k from the Ward bundle. Conditional twistor vanishing and normalized monad reconstruction

[F2]

The exact raw moment maps, stability, costability and U(k) action are those in the local ADHM definition. ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels

[F3]

A normalized monad of these dimensions has ch⁡(E)=N−kH2 and, under the stated Ward pullback and orientation, k=−qN=⟨c2(E),[S4]⟩. Chern character and charge of the normalized twistor monad

[F4]

The framed determinant connection is flat and its framing gives the SU(N) reduction needed for the trace-normalized Chern-Weil comparison. Determinant flatness and charge normalization for framed U(N) ASD data, Characteristic forms represent topological characteristic classes over the reals

[F5]

The exact raw real monad, moment coefficients, regularity/rank equivalence, positive kernel projection, local ASD curvature and framing torus chain factors are proved directly, without the source substitution. Exact raw ADHM block, real monad and stereographic ASD projection

Proof

Given: the exact supplier interface [A1], together with [F1]–[F4].

1.1A1F2F5algebra

The entrywise-conjugation counterexample remains valid for the literal source equations; it is not a defect in the raw block supplied by [F5]. The source's displayed M also ends its first block row with P* despite declaring P of size k×N, so that entry has N rows rather than k in general. These displays cannot be substituted for an intrinsic real normal-form proof. Use exactly [A1]'s intrinsic existence and uniqueness conclusions.

1.2A1F2F5algebra

The reconstructed monad in [F1] is linear with locally free middle bundle, trivial on every real line, and has the positive Hermitian Ward pairing and unitary framing fixed in the definition. Its dimensions are those required by [A1]. Thus, assuming the exact supplier [A1], extract the raw tuple from its intrinsic normal form. Its monad composition vanishes, so [F5]'s polynomial identity makes both raw moment coefficients zero. Full fiber rank on each real line and [F5]'s Gram/rank equivalence identify the locus exactly with stable-and-costable regularity. The intrinsic unitary normalization and inverse-extraction clause in [A1] identify the remaining framed monad changes precisely with (B1,B2,I,J)↦(gB1g−1,gB2g−1,gI,Jg−1) for g∈U(k). The compact-rotation and framing chain maps are exactly those in [F5] and [A1]; first-order naturality is used only in [A1]’s locally-free/base-change range. No arbitrary analytic-family algebraization is inferred. No source-coordinate conjugation or nonexistent universal equivalence is invoked.

2.1A1F1F3F4F5step 1.2algebra∎

Conversely, the regular raw monad in [F5] is a global holomorphic bundle, trivial on every real line, with canonical positive reality: its pairing is induced by the standard Hermitian form on K and β(v)=α(σv)∗. It is well-defined on cohomology since ker⁡β(v) is orthogonal to im⁡α(σv), and on a real line its canonical representatives are ker⁡D with the positive restricted metric; at infinity it is W. Apply the proved local Ward construction to obtain a global framed unitary ASD connection. On the finite chart it equals P d: for a kernel representative v along a D=ker⁡(de) direction, β is constant, so its derivative lies in ker⁡β; the component of dv orthogonal to ker⁡D lies in im⁡a⊕im⁡b, and β=f(−λ2,λ1) forces that component to lie in im⁡(aλ1+bλ2)=im⁡α. It therefore vanishes in monad cohomology, leaving exactly P dv. Thus evaluation identifies the projection and Ward connections; the Ward construction supplies the smooth extension and framing at infinity. The normalization of [F3] with determinant reduction [F4] gives k=c2(E)[S4]=−qN. Under [A1], extraction and construction are inverse on U(k) orbits and framed Ward connections, proving the full claim under the exact normal-form, GAGA and coupled-vanishing hypotheses stated above.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources