Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite multipole expansion with an absolute dipole-power error

Physical scope

Finite Taylor truncations of the retarded current moment and their far-field and radiated-power errors for smooth conserved volume sources supported in a fixed spatial ball. The first truncation is the electric-dipole term and has an explicit absolute source-time-variation error. No relative estimate at angular nodes, unconditional frequency or ka approximation, empirical measurement, point-source field, self-force or radiation-reaction claim is made.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the source, SI and retarded-field hypotheses of the preceding transverse-radiation theorem on a nondegenerate compact retarded-time interval K. Fix an integer N≥0. Define the Nth finite retarded-current Taylor coefficient by

JN(n,u):=∑k=0N1k! ck∫Ba(n⋅y)k ∂tk+1J(y,u) dy,

and define the source-scale remainder

RN(u):=aN+1(N+1)! cN+1∫Basup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣∂tN+2J(y,s)∣ dy.

The coefficient JN and the remainder RN both have units A m s−1. The supremum is finite and integrable in y. Let

AN(u):=sup⁡n∈S2∣JN(n,u)∣,P(u):=lim⁡r→∞∫S2r2n⋅S(rn,u+r/c) dΩ(n),

where P(u) exists by the preceding theorem. Then uniformly for n∈S2 and u∈K,

∣V(n,u)−JN(n,u)∣≤RN(u),

∣E(rn,u+r/c)−μ04πrn×(n×JN(n,u))∣≤ΓEr2+μ0RN(u)4πr(r≥2a),

∣P(u)−μ016π2c∫S2∣n×JN(n,u)∣2 dΩ(n)∣≤μ04πc(2AN(u)+RN(u))RN(u).

For N=0, J0(n,u)=p′′(u) for the time-dependent electric dipole moment p(u):=∫Bayρ(y,u) dy, and R0(u)=ac∫Basup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣Jtt(y,s)∣ dy. Consequently

∣P(u)−μ06πc∣p′′(u)∣2∣≤μ04πc(2∣p′′(u)∣R0(u)+R0(u)2).

Every finite truncation has its own explicit derivative remainder. No convergence of the infinite Taylor series and no relative error at an angular node are asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a,c,μ0>0, ε0=(μ0c2)−1; the smooth conserved spatially compact source of the preceding theorem; an integer N≥0; and the displayed source moments on the fixed time interval K.

[A1]

Assume ACω for the source integrals, surface integrals and the Banach-valued Taylor remainder supplier. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The preceding theorem proves that V(n,u)=∫BaJt(y,u+n⋅y/c) dy and that the exact retarded-time flux is μ016π2c∫S2∣n×V(n,u)∣2 dΩ. (Transverse far field with a uniform remainder)

[F2]

The time-dependent electric dipole moment is the fixed-time source moment p(u)=∫Bayρ(y,u) dy about the chart origin; its units are C m. (Total charge, dipole moment, Cartesian moments and traceless quadrupole of a static charge distribution (a))

[F3]

On a fixed compact measurable set, differentiation under the integral is valid for a smooth integrand; the divergence theorem gives ∫Ωdiv⁡F=∫∂ΩF⋅ν for a C1 field on a bounded C1 domain. (Differentiation under the integral sign over a compact measurable set and over a compact C1 surface, Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain)

[F4]

For a CN+1 curve f in the Banach space R3, Taylor's formula has an integral remainder, including negative increments; the norm of a Bochner integral is at most the integral of the norm. (Taylor expansion with integral remainder for Banach-valued curves, Bochner integral norm inequality)

[F5]

Factorials and finite sums use the canonical factorial and finite-sum definitions, with the standard finite-sum algebra. (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products)

[F6]

The Lebesgue integral is linear and satisfies ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣; the nonnegative integral is monotone. (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral)

[F7]

The cross product is bilinear; for n∈S2, ∣n×w∣≤∣w∣ and ∫S2∣n×w∣2 dΩ=(8π/3)∣w∣2. (The cross product in R3, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors, Zonal and quadratic sphere moments for the polar surface measure on S2 (d))

[F8]

Continuous functions on the compact products used below are bounded and uniformly continuous; a smooth function supported in B‾a and its derivatives vanish outside that ball. (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous)

Proof

technique · identify the dipole coefficient by differentiating its source moment and integrating continuity by parts, apply vector-valued Taylor's theorem pointwise in the source position, then propagate the absolute remainder through the transverse field and power formulas
1.1givenF1F2F3algebraA1

Dipole moment identities. The compact-ball verification in the preceding transverse-radiation theorem [F1] applies to the same a>0 and Countable Choice hypothesis: B‾a is closed and bounded, hence compact; it is Borel and Lebesgue measurable; and λ3(B‾a)≤λ3(B2a)<∞. Thus it is an admissible fixed integration set for [F3]. For each i∈{1,2,3} put pi(u)=∫Bayiρ(y,u) dy. Smoothness and vanishing of ρ,J for ∣y∣>a imply that ρ, Ji and their time derivatives vanish on ∂Ba. Thus the integrals of yiρ and yiρt over Ba agree with those over that compact measurable finite-measure set B‾a. Apply the set form of [F3] with integration set B‾a and parameter u to fi(y,u)=yiρ(y,u); its parameter derivative is yiρt(y,u), and both are continuous on a neighborhood of B‾a times any compact time interval. This gives pi′(u)=∫Bayiρt(y,u) dy. Fix R0>a and apply the divergence theorem to y↦yiJ(y,u) on BR0. The boundary flux is zero because J=0 near ∂BR0, while div⁡(yiJ)=Ji+yidiv⁡J. Using ρt=−div⁡J and the vanishing of the source outside Ba gives pi′(u)=∫BaJi(y,u) dy. For each i, the integrals of Ji and Ji,t over Ba agree with those over B‾a; the closed ball has the compactness, measurability and finite measure just verified using [F1]. Both integrands are continuous on a neighborhood of B‾a times any compact time interval. Apply the set form of [F3] on B‾a separately to each component Ji with parameter u; differentiating the preceding identity gives pi′′(u)=∫BaJi,t(y,u) dy. Collecting the three component identities yields p′′(u)=∫BaJt(y,u) dy.

1.2givenF6F8A1

Finiteness of the remainder. For fixed u, define gu(y):=max⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣∂tN+2J(y,s)∣. The maximum exists and is finite by [F8]. For y,y′∈B‾a, ∣gu(y)−gu(y′)∣≤sup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣∣∂tN+2J(y,s)∣−∣∂tN+2J(y′,s)∣∣≤sup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣∂tN+2J(y,s)−∂tN+2J(y′,s)∣. Uniform continuity in [F8] makes the last expression tend to zero as y′→y. Thus gu is continuous and bounded on B‾a, hence integrable on Ba; this proves that RN(u) is finite.

2.1step 1.2F1F4F5F6F8A1

Finite Taylor expansion. Fix n∈S2, u∈K, and y∈Ba, and put τ=n⋅y/c, so ∣τ∣≤a/c. Apply [F4] to the curve s↦Jt(y,s) with Taylor order N at u and increment τ. It gives Jt(y,u+τ)=∑k=0Nτkk!∂tk+1J(y,u)+RN+1(y),∣RN+1(y)∣≤∣τ∣N+1(N+1)!sup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣∂tN+2J(y,s)∣. Integrate this identity over Ba. Linearity identifies the left integral with V(n,u) and the polynomial integral with JN(n,u). The integral triangle inequality and ∣τ∣≤a/c then give ∣V(n,u)−JN(n,u)∣≤RN(u). Since JN is a finite polynomial in n with finite source moments, it is continuous on the compact sphere and AN(u)<∞.

3.1step 2.1F1F6F7algebraA1

Field remainder. By the transverse estimate of [F1], ∣E(rn,u+r/c)−μ04πrn×(n×V(n,u))∣≤ΓEr2. Subtract the same leading expression with V replaced by JN. The triangle inequality, ∣n×(n×w)∣=∣n×w∣≤∣w∣ from [F7], and step 2.1 give ∣E(rn,u+r/c)−μ04πrn×(n×JN(n,u))∣≤ΓEr2+μ04πr∣V(n,u)−JN(n,u)∣≤ΓEr2+μ0RN(u)4πr.

3.2step 2.1F1F6F7algebraA1

Power remainder. The exact flux formula [F1] and step 2.1 give, pointwise in n, ∣∣n×V∣2−∣n×JN∣2∣≤(∣n×V∣+∣n×JN∣) ∣n×(V−JN)∣≤(∣V∣+∣JN∣)RN. Since ∣V∣≤∣JN∣+RN by step 2.1, the right side is at most (2∣JN∣+RN)RN≤(2AN+RN)RN. Integrating over the sphere, whose area is 4π by [F7], and multiplying by μ0/(16π2c) gives the stated power error.

4.1step 1.1step 3.2F2F6F7algebraA1∎

Dipole specialization. At N=0, J0(n,u)=∫BaJt(y,u) dy=p′′(u) by step 1.1 and R0(u)=ac∫Basup⁡∣s−u∣≤a/c∣Jtt(y,s)∣ dy by its definition. It is independent of n; the exact sphere moment [F7] therefore gives μ016π2c∫S2∣n×p′′(u)∣2 dΩ=μ016π2c8π3∣p′′(u)∣2=μ06πc∣p′′(u)∣2. Substitution in step 3.2 gives the displayed absolute dipole-power error. It gives no relative bound when the leading amplitude vanishes.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources