How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Separated smooth-barrier tunnelling: the declared transmission coefficient is exp(-2S/h) up to explicit small-h and barrier-thickness errors
The separated smooth-barrier transmission statement for the declared WKB regime model: the declared transmission coefficient equals the exponential of minus twice the barrier WKB exponent per unit h, with the quantitative small-h and exponentially small correction bound of the cited theorem, and the physical exponent is (1/hbar) times the classical action integral over the forbidden region. The statement is conditional on a fixed compactly supported C^5 barrier with exactly two separated simple turning points; it excludes rectangular walls, coalescing turning points, barrier-top uniformity and resonant multiwell interference, and it asserts no detector, wave packet or measured transmission.
Statement
Adopt the declared WKB regime model of The declared WKB regime model: nondimensionalised line equation, turning points, phase integrals and the declared barrier transmission reading with its data and assume hypothesis (W2): has exactly two zeros on , both simple, is strictly positive on and strictly negative on . Put and let be the model's declared transmission coefficient of its clause (d). Then there are , an for , and a constant , both depending only on the model's barrier data and the fixed matching sections, such that whenever the denominator is positive; consequently In the physical variables of the line model, where and , one has by Nondimensionalisation of the one-dimensional stationary equation and of the WKB exponent clause (b) so the displayed leading factor is , the exponential of minus twice the classical action integral of the forbidden region in units of . The statement is conditional on the fixed compactly supported barrier with two separated simple turning points; rectangular walls, coalescing turning points, barrier-top uniformity and resonant multiwell interference are excluded, and is the declared scattering-current ratio of the model, not a detector response or a measured count; no wave packet, preparation, apparatus or sampling model is asserted. In particular, for each fixed barrier,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the WKB regime model and hypothesis (W2); the exponent ; the declared transmission coefficient of the model clause (d); the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Exact local connection data. Under (W3), the one-turn theorem supplies real exact decaying and growing solutions, normalized by dividing by their nonzero forbidden-side constants. On each fixed section away from the turn, their allowed-side values are respectively and , their forbidden-side values are respectively and , and the corresponding derivative estimates have the same control after scaling the derivative by . Here on the allowed side, on the forbidden side, and is the action from the turn divided by . This is Airy connection across a single simple turning point of the declared regime model, with envelope error control clauses (a)-(c), with reflection at a turn whose derivative is negative.
Exterior and interior coordinates. The potential profile is zero on neighborhoods of and , so there. At a fixed interior point , and the scaled state satisfies , where . These are algebraic identities.
Physical exponent identity. The exact nondimensionalisation lemma gives on compact subintervals strictly inside the forbidden interval; the identity extends to the turning endpoints by continuity of the square-root integrands (Nondimensionalisation of the one-dimensional stationary equation and of the WKB exponent clause (b)).
Proof
Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F3].
Throughout this proof, for scalars, vectors or matrices means a quantity whose absolute value or stated norm is bounded by as , where depends only on the fixed barrier data and the fixed sections, not on .
[Hypothesis matching] Under (W2), has one simple zero with positive derivative and one simple zero with negative derivative. Since is compactly supported and outside , ; choose with , so the fixed exterior points and lie in allowed intervals and near them. Fix the interior point . The intervals and contain respectively only the left and right simple turning point, so [F1] applies on each, with reflection of the coordinate on the right.
[Physical exponent] For , the closed interval lies strictly inside the forbidden region, so there and [F3] applies. Both square-root integrands extend continuously to the turning endpoints with value zero. Letting , the omitted endpoint integrals tend to zero because their integrands are continuous and bounded on compact intervals. Thus with , , as in the Statement.
[Exact scattering amplitudes and current ratio] Put and define for and for , extending each to by its Cauchy data. The first-order system for has continuous bounded coefficients on this compact interval for each fixed ; its Picard iterates converge uniformly, with the th iterate bounded by , and the same estimate proves uniqueness. Hence are exact solutions. Because is real, . The exterior waves have currents , , and . Thus at the left exterior there are unique coefficients with ; direct expansion of the two plane-wave currents cancels their cross terms and gives , so . The model's unique unit-incoming solution is , with and , hence . Also , so . This derives the exact normalization and the current-ratio formula used in clause (d) of the WKB model.
[Exterior-to-turning-point basis conversion] Let on the allowed sides, , , and define the outward phases [F1, algebra] so . Divide the exact local decaying and growing solutions from [F1] by their nonzero forbidden-side constants and call them . At , put . The fixed-section value and derivative errors in [F1] are : there is fixed, , and . The Airy derivative asymptotics and chain rule give for the normalized allowed-side forms because the amplitude derivative contributes only at a fixed section. Hence, after the displayed scaling of , The exact exterior outgoing plane wave satisfies for some , since it has the same constant amplitude and phase derivative there. The leading basis matrix and its determinant are and . Since the entries of are uniformly bounded and the exact matrix is , for all sufficiently small it is invertible with uniformly bounded inverse; solving its exact two-component system yields coefficients . Equality of Cauchy data and ODE uniqueness then give This derives the incoming/outgoing coefficient formulas from the explicit matrices.
[Interior Wronskian] Put on the barrier and [step 1.4, F1, F2, algebra] Both are positive. At use the common state . The normalized forbidden-side value and slope forms of [F1] give Indeed and at the fixed point. Differentiating only the explicit leading forbidden envelopes gives The last terms are because and is fixed there; the derivative error from [F1] has the same scaled order. Thus the value and slope vector errors above are indeed without differentiating an unspecified error term. Since , expand it using the exact identities of step 1.4. The determinant is . The leading vectors in each mixed determinant coincide, so those terms are and ; relative to these are at most and . The term is . After including the coefficients from step 1.4 and the phases , this yields All constants depend only on the fixed barrier data and sections; no exponentially ill-conditioned matrix is inverted.
[Quantitative transmission error] Write the relative error in step 2.1 as ; then with and after enlarging a fixed constant. Because , , so whenever , [step 1.3, step 2.1, algebra] Choose with large enough to dominate the fixed matching errors in steps 1.4-2.1; after increasing as needed, this is the quantitative bound of the Statement with . It implies and for the fixed barrier.
[Scope] The proof uses only the declared smooth compactly supported profile, its two separated simple turning points, the local Airy connections and the exact boundary-defined scattering solution. It uses no rectangular wall, coalescing or multiple turn, barrier-top uniformity, resonant multiwell, wave packet, detector, apparatus or sampling assumption. Thus the claimed exclusions and scope hold.
Remarks
- Convention note. The cited tunnelling theorem is stated in the nondimensional convention standard in this run's controlled-dynamics mathematics, in which the second-order equation carries the small parameter and the factors are numerical; the identification of [F3] makes that convention exact for the model's dimensionless equation. The physical exponent identity of the statement is then supplied by the nondimensionalisation lemma and involves no approximation.
- The exponential is only the leading factor. The statement controls the correction by ; in particular the prefactor of the exponential is for a smooth barrier, and no statement about rectangular profiles (whose prefactor can differ) is made.
Depends on
The declared WKB regime model: nondimensionalised line equation, turning points, phase integrals and the declared barrier transmission reading
Nondimensionalisation of the one-dimensional stationary equation and of the WKB exponent
Airy connection across a single simple turning point of the declared regime model, with envelope error control
Two-turn barrier tunnelling error
Liouville turning-point transformation
Stable weighted Airy Volterra connection
WKB explicit error
Airy envelopes and asymptotic coefficients
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- R. Fitzpatrick, Quantum Mechanics (University of Texas at Austin, author-hosted course text), Sections 5.3-5.6 printed and PDF pages 64-75: 5.3 Square Potential Barrier p. 64, 5.4 WKB Approximation p. 70, 5.5 Cold Emission p. 72, 5.6 Alpha Decay p. 73 (barrier penetration and the WKB tunnelling exponent)
- F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions (1974), Chapter 11 (connection formulas and barrier penetration for second-order equations with two turning points; standard monograph), consulted through the NIST DLMF Airy survey