Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separated smooth-barrier tunnelling: the declared transmission coefficient is exp(-2S/h) up to explicit small-h and barrier-thickness errors

Physical scope

The separated smooth-barrier transmission statement for the declared WKB regime model: the declared transmission coefficient equals the exponential of minus twice the barrier WKB exponent per unit h, with the quantitative small-h and exponentially small correction bound of the cited theorem, and the physical exponent is (1/hbar) times the classical action integral over the forbidden region. The statement is conditional on a fixed compactly supported C^5 barrier with exactly two separated simple turning points; it excludes rectangular walls, coalescing turning points, barrier-top uniformity and resonant multiwell interference, and it asserts no detector, wave packet or measured transmission.

Statement

Adopt the declared WKB regime model of The declared WKB regime model: nondimensionalised line equation, turning points, phase integrals and the declared barrier transmission reading with its data V,m,ℏ,ℓ,E⋆,W,λ,h and assume hypothesis (W2): W−λ has exactly two zeros ξa<ξb on R, both simple, is strictly positive on (ξa,ξb) and strictly negative on R∖[ξa,ξb]. Put S:=∫ξaξbW(ξ)−λ dξ>0, and let T(h) be the model's declared transmission coefficient of its clause (d). Then there are h0>0, an ε(h)≤C1h for 0<h<h0, and a constant 0≤C0<∞, both depending only on the model's barrier data (W,λ,ℓ,E⋆) and the fixed matching sections, such that ∣T(h) e2S/h−1∣≤C0[ε(h)+e−2S/h]1−C0[ε(h)+e−2S/h] whenever the denominator is positive; consequently T(h)=e−2S/h(1+O(ε(h)+e−2S/h)). In the physical variables of the line model, where V(ℓξ)=E⋆W(ξ) and E=E⋆λ, one has by Nondimensionalisation of the one-dimensional stationary equation and of the WKB exponent clause (b) Sh=1ℏ∫xaxb2m(V(x)−E) dx,xa=ℓξa, xb=ℓξb, so the displayed leading factor is e−2S/h=exp⁡(−2ℏ∫xaxb2m(V−E) dx), the exponential of minus twice the classical action integral of the forbidden region in units of ℏ. The statement is conditional on the fixed compactly supported C5 barrier with two separated simple turning points; rectangular walls, coalescing turning points, barrier-top uniformity and resonant multiwell interference are excluded, and T(h) is the declared scattering-current ratio of the model, not a detector response or a measured count; no wave packet, preparation, apparatus or sampling model is asserted. In particular, for each fixed barrier, lim⁡h↓0T(h) e2S/h=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the WKB regime model and hypothesis (W2); the exponent S; the declared transmission coefficient T(h) of the model clause (d); the Axiom of Countable Choice.

[F1]

Exact local connection data. Under (W3), the one-turn theorem supplies real exact decaying and growing solutions, normalized by dividing by their nonzero forbidden-side constants. On each fixed section away from the turn, their allowed-side values are respectively 2p−1/2(sin⁡Θ+O(h)) and p−1/2(cos⁡Θ+O(h)), their forbidden-side values are respectively ρ−1/4e−A(1+O(h)) and ρ−1/4eA(1+O(h)), and the corresponding derivative estimates have the same O(h) control after scaling the derivative by h. Here p=λ−W on the allowed side, ρ=W−λ on the forbidden side, and A is the action from the turn divided by h. This is Airy connection across a single simple turning point of the declared regime model, with envelope error control clauses (a)-(c), with reflection at a turn whose derivative is negative.

[F2]

Exterior and interior coordinates. The potential profile W is zero on neighborhoods of ξ−=−L and ξ+=L, so p∞=λ>0 there. At a fixed interior point ξ0∈(ξa,ξb), ρ(ξ0)=W(ξ0)−λ>0 and the scaled state Y0(u)=(ρ(ξ0)1/4u(ξ0),hρ(ξ0)−1/4u′(ξ0))T satisfies det⁡(Y0(u),Y0(v))=hW(u,v), where W(u,v):=uv′−u′v. These are algebraic identities.

[F3]

Physical exponent identity. The exact nondimensionalisation lemma gives S/h=ℏ−1∫xaxb2m(V(x)−E) dx on compact subintervals strictly inside the forbidden interval; the identity extends to the turning endpoints by continuity of the square-root integrands (Nondimensionalisation of the one-dimensional stationary equation and of the WKB exponent clause (b)).

Proof

technique · direct; match the exact exterior waves to explicitly displayed Airy bases at both turning points, expand their interior Wronskian without inverting exponentially separated columns, and then convert its modulus to the transmitted current ratio

Given: the data of the statement and [F1]-[F3].

Throughout this proof, O(h) for scalars, vectors or matrices means a quantity whose absolute value or stated norm is bounded by Ch as h↓0, where C depends only on the fixed barrier data and the fixed sections, not on h.

1.1F1givenalgebra

[Hypothesis matching] Under (W2), W−λ has one simple zero ξa with positive derivative and one simple zero ξb with negative derivative. Since W is compactly supported and W−λ<0 outside [ξa,ξb], λ>0; choose L with supp⁡W⊂(−L,L), so the fixed exterior points ξ−=−L and ξ+=L lie in allowed intervals and W=0 near them. Fix the interior point ξ0=(ξa+ξb)/2. The intervals [ξ−,ξ0] and [ξ0,ξ+] contain respectively only the left and right simple turning point, so [F1] applies on each, with reflection of the coordinate on the right.

1.2F3givenalgebra

[Physical exponent] For 0<δ<(ξb−ξa)/2, the closed interval [ξa+δ,ξb−δ] lies strictly inside the forbidden region, so W−λ>0 there and [F3] applies. Both square-root integrands extend continuously to the turning endpoints with value zero. Letting δ↓0, the omitted endpoint integrals tend to zero because their integrands are continuous and bounded on compact intervals. Thus Sh=1h∫ξaξbW−λ dξ=1ℏ∫xaxb2m(E⋆W(x/ℓ)−E⋆λ) dx=1ℏ∫xaxb2m(V(x)−E) dx, with xa=ℓξa, xb=ℓξb, as in the Statement.

1.3givenalgebra

[Exact scattering amplitudes and current ratio] Put p∞=λ and define fL(ξ)=p∞−1/2e−ip∞ξ/h for ξ≤−L and fR(ξ)=p∞−1/2eip∞ξ/h for ξ≥L, extending each to [−L,L] by its Cauchy data. The first-order system for (u,u′) has continuous bounded coefficients on this compact interval for each fixed h>0; its Picard iterates converge uniformly, with the nth iterate bounded by Mn(2L)n/n!, and the same estimate proves uniqueness. Hence fL,fR are exact solutions. Because W−λ is real, Jh′=hIm⁡(∣u′∣2+(W−λ)∣u∣2/h2)=0. The exterior waves have currents Jh(fR)=1, Jh(fL)=−1, and W(fL,fL‾)=2i/h. Thus at the left exterior there are unique coefficients Ain,Aout with fR=AinfL‾+AoutfL; direct expansion of the two plane-wave currents cancels their cross terms and gives Jh(fR)=∣Ain∣2−∣Aout∣2=1, so Ain≠0. The model's unique unit-incoming solution is fR/Ain, with t=1/Ain and r=Aout/Ain, hence T=∣Ain∣−2. Also W(fL,fR)=AinW(fL,fL‾), so Ain=hW(fL,fR)/(2i). This derives the exact normalization and the current-ratio formula used in clause (d) of the WKB model.

1.4F1algebra

[Exterior-to-turning-point basis conversion] Let p(ξ)=λ−W(ξ) on the allowed sides, σ−=−1, σ+=1, and define the outward phases [F1, algebra] Θ−(ξ)=1h∫ξξap(s) ds+π4,Θ+(ξ)=1h∫ξbξp(s) ds+π4, so Θj′=σjp/h. Divide the exact local decaying and growing solutions from [F1] by their nonzero forbidden-side constants and call them dj,gj. At ξj∈{ξ−,ξ+}, put Yj(u)=(p∞1/2u(ξj),hp∞−1/2u′(ξj))T. The fixed-section value and derivative errors in [F1] are O(h): there ζj(ξj)≠0 is fixed, εh≤Ch, and h/∣ζj(ξj)∣3/2=O(h). The Airy derivative asymptotics and chain rule u′=a′w+aζ′w′ give for the normalized allowed-side forms hp−1/2gj′=−σjsin⁡Θj+O(h),hp−1/2dj′=2σjcos⁡Θj+O(h), because the amplitude derivative contributes only hp−1/2(p−1/2)′=O(h) at a fixed section. Hence, after the displayed scaling of u′, Yj(gj)=(cos⁡Θj−σjsin⁡Θj)+O(h),Yj(dj)=2(sin⁡Θjσjcos⁡Θj)+O(h). The exact exterior outgoing plane wave satisfies Yj(fj)=γj(eiΘj,iσjeiΘj)T for some ∣γj∣=1, since it has the same constant amplitude and phase derivative there. The leading basis matrix and its determinant are Mj0=(cos⁡Θj2sin⁡Θj−σjsin⁡Θj2σjcos⁡Θj),det⁡Mj0=2σj, and Mj0(1,i/2)T=(eiΘj,iσjeiΘj)T. Since the entries of (Mj0)−1 are uniformly bounded and the exact matrix is Mj=Mj0+O(h), for all sufficiently small h it is invertible with uniformly bounded inverse; solving its exact two-component system yields coefficients (αj,βj)=γj(1,i/2)T+O(h). Equality of Cauchy data and ODE uniqueness then give fL=γL[(1+O(h))ga+(i/2+O(h))da],fR=γR[(1+O(h))gb+(i/2+O(h))db]. This derives the incoming/outgoing coefficient formulas from the explicit matrices.

2.1step 1.4F1F2algebra

[Interior Wronskian] Put ρ(ξ)=W(ξ)−λ>0 on the barrier and [step 1.4, F1, F2, algebra] Aa=1h∫ξaξ0ρ dξ,Ab=1h∫ξ0ξbρ dξ,A=Aa+Ab=S/h. Both Aa,Ab are positive. At ξ0 use the common state Y0(u)=(ρ(ξ0)1/4u(ξ0),hρ(ξ0)−1/4u′(ξ0))T. The normalized forbidden-side value and slope forms of [F1] give Y0(ga)=eAa[(1,1)T+O(h)],Y0(da)=e−Aa[(1,−1)T+O(h)], Y0(gb)=eAb[(1,−1)T+O(h)],Y0(db)=e−Ab[(1,1)T+O(h)]. Indeed Aa′=ρ/h and Ab′=−ρ/h at the fixed point. Differentiating only the explicit leading forbidden envelopes gives hρ−1/4(ρ−1/4e±Aa)′=e±Aa(±1−hρ′4ρ3/2),hρ−1/4(ρ−1/4e±Ab)′=e±Ab(∓1−hρ′4ρ3/2). The last terms are O(h) because ρ(ξ0)>0 and ρ′ is fixed there; the derivative error from [F1] has the same scaled order. Thus the value and slope vector errors above are indeed O(h) without differentiating an unspecified error term. Since det⁡(Y0(u),Y0(v))=hW(u,v), expand it using the exact identities of step 1.4. The gagb determinant is −2eA(1+O(h)). The leading vectors in each mixed determinant coincide, so those terms are O(h)eAa−Ab and O(h)e−Aa+Ab; relative to eA these are at most O(h)e−2Ab and O(h)e−2Aa. The dadb term is O(e−A). After including the coefficients from step 1.4 and the phases ∣γLγR∣=1, this yields hW(fL,fR)=−2γLγReA[1+O(h)+O(e−2A)]. All constants depend only on the fixed barrier data and sections; no exponentially ill-conditioned matrix is inverted.

3.1step 1.3step 2.1algebra

[Quantitative transmission error] Write the relative error in step 2.1 as δh=O(h+e−2A); then ∣Ain∣2e−2A=∣1+δh∣2=1+ηh with ηh∈R and ∣ηh∣≤C0[h+e−2A] after enlarging a fixed constant. Because T=∣Ain∣−2, Te2A=(1+ηh)−1, so whenever 1−C0[h+e−2A]>0, [step 1.3, step 2.1, algebra] ∣Te2A−1∣≤C0[h+e−2A]1−C0[h+e−2A]. Choose ε(h)=C1h with C1 large enough to dominate the fixed matching errors in steps 1.4-2.1; after increasing C0 as needed, this is the quantitative bound of the Statement with A=S/h. It implies T=e−2S/h(1+O(ε(h)+e−2S/h)) and lim⁡h↓0Te2S/h=1 for the fixed barrier.

4.1F1step 1.3step 2.1given∎

[Scope] The proof uses only the declared smooth compactly supported profile, its two separated simple turning points, the local Airy connections and the exact boundary-defined scattering solution. It uses no rectangular wall, coalescing or multiple turn, barrier-top uniformity, resonant multiwell, wave packet, detector, apparatus or sampling assumption. Thus the claimed exclusions and scope hold.

Remarks

  • Convention note. The cited tunnelling theorem is stated in the nondimensional convention standard in this run's controlled-dynamics mathematics, in which the second-order equation carries the small parameter h and the factors m,ℏ are numerical; the identification of [F3] makes that convention exact for the model's dimensionless equation. The physical exponent identity of the statement is then supplied by the nondimensionalisation lemma and involves no approximation.
  • The exponential is only the leading factor. The statement controls the correction by ε(h)+e−2S/h; in particular the prefactor of the exponential is 1+O(ε) for a smooth barrier, and no statement about rectangular profiles (whose prefactor can differ) is made.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources