How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stationarity of the phase-space action is equivalent to Hamilton's equations, and hyperregular elimination recovers the Lagrangian action
Statement
Let , let be open and nonempty, let be of class , let , and suppose that for a path ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral) with for all the phase action
is defined, the integrand being continuous (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation , A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, The Euclidean inner product on ). Then:
- for every variation pair with and with in the domain of for small ,
- is stationary (the displayed derivative vanishes for every such variation) if and only if Hamilton's equations hold on :
- (elimination) let in addition be a hyperregular chart with inverse branch and Hamiltonian (The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity), such that the phase domain of contains the points below. For every curve with in the domain of , put . Then , where is the action of ; consequently is stationary for if and only if is stationary for the phase action.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The phase function , a path , the phase action , and admissible variation pairs with .
Differentiation under the integral sign on a compact rectangle (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral): the one-parameter integrand has continuous partial derivative in the parameter, so the derivative passes through the integral. Integration by parts (If are differentiable on with integrable, then ) applies to the term componentwise with , , and yields , because the boundary term vanishes by ; the integral is linear (Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ).
The bumps of Explicit twice differentiable bumps detect nonzero values of continuous functions: a continuous scalar coefficient on that is nonzero at some interior point admits a bump supported in with . Such bumps, multiplied by the standard basis vectors of the - and -components, give the admissible variations used below.
Hyperregular elimination (The Hamiltonian on an inverse Legendre branch: differential, equivalence with the Euler-Lagrange equation, and the energy identity): on the inverse branch , , and solves Hamilton's equations iff solves the Euler–Lagrange equation with ; in the replacement the inverse relation gives , so
Stationarity for the Lagrangian action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler–Lagrange expression (Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression, A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations); differentiability and integrability conventions are those of Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, Absolute value in an ordered field.
Proof
Clause 1: the parameter derivative of the integrand is , continuous in ; by [F1] the derivative of is the integral of this expression. Integrating the term by parts and collecting the coefficients of and gives the displayed formula.
Clause 2, forward direction: if Hamilton's equations hold, then and identically, so the integral of step 1.1 vanishes for every admissible variation; thus is stationary.
Clause 2, converse: assume stationary. First take and let run through the bumps of [F2] in a single component. Step 1.1 gives for every such bump, hence the continuous function vanishes on and, by continuity, on ; as was arbitrary, on . Now take and let run through bumps in a single component (admissible, since these vanish near the endpoints): step 1.1 gives , hence on . This proves clause 2.
Clause 3: for a curve and , the path is and [F3] gives . Therefore the phase action along this path equals the Lagrangian action, and the two stationarity notions correspond: by clause 2, is stationary for iff it solves Hamilton's equations; by [F3] this holds iff solves the Euler–Lagrange equation with ; and by [F4] this holds iff is stationary for .
Remarks
-
The identification in clause 3 is made on the actual inverse branch: the path in phase space is the Legendre image of the Lagrangian path, so no dynamical assumption such as is built into the statement; the elimination uses the inverse relation of the hyperregular chart, which is exactly the hypothesis under which the branch exists globally.
-
The phase action has free endpoints and fixed endpoints. This is why the -variations require no boundary condition and the -variations do: the boundary term produced by integrating vanishes precisely because vanishes at the endpoints, while no corresponding term arises from .
Depends on
A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations
The Legendre map of a time-dependent Lagrangian: regularity and hyperregularity
The Hamiltonian on an inverse Legendre branch: differential, equivalence with the Euler-Lagrange equation, and the energy identity
Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression
Explicit twice differentiable bumps detect nonzero values of continuous functions
Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral
If are differentiable on with integrable, then
Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
The Euclidean inner product on
Absolute value in an ordered field
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Cline, Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics (2nd edition, University of Rochester River Campus Libraries, open textbook, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), Sections 9.2-9.4 (Hamilton's Principle of Stationary Action; Lagrangian; Application of Hamilton's Action Principle to Mechanics)
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos), Section 4.1.5 'The Principle of Least Action' (the variational principle in phase space), printed page 87