Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global bounded no-slip Leray–Hopf existence

Statement

Let Ω⊂R3 be bounded and open, assume the Axiom of Choice, let ν>0, and let u0∈H for the bounded closure spaces defined above when Ω≠∅. For Ω=∅, use the same closure formulas: H1 is the finite product of scalar W1,2 spaces, H01 is the H1 closure of compactly supported smooth vector fields, Dσ={a∈Cc∞(Ω;R3):div⁡a=0}, and H,V are its L2 and H01 closures. Thus H01=H=V={0} in this case. There exists u∈Cw([0,∞);H)∩L∞(0,∞;H)∩Lloc2(0,∞;V) with u(0)=u0 and ∥u(t)−u0∥H→0 as t↓0, satisfying for every compactly time-supported C1 map ϕ:[0,∞)→V, ∫0∞ ⁣[(u,∂tϕ)+(u⊗u,∇ϕ)−ν(∇u,∇ϕ)]dt+(u0,ϕ(0))=0. It also satisfies ∥u(t)∥22+2ν∫0t∥∇u∥22ds≤∥u0∥22(t≥0), and there is a full-measure set S⊂(0,∞) such that for every s∈S∪{0} and t≥s, ∥u(t)∥22+2ν∫st∥∇u∥22dτ≤∥u(s)∥22. The conclusion is a velocity result for the specified unforced closure-space formulation; it asserts no uniqueness, smoothness, pressure regularity, or boundary trace beyond membership in H01. Here (u⊗u):∇ϕ=∑i,juiuj∂jϕi and ∇u:∇ϕ=∑i,j∂jui∂jϕi. For a matrix field A, (div⁡A)i=∑j∂jAij.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded open Ω⊂R3, the closure spaces H,V, Axiom of Choice, viscosity ν>0, and u0∈H.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice and The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): AC applies to all families, hence also supplies Countable Choice for the Fourier supplier [F7] and the countable selections in [F8]; AC is also assumed here for the Sobolev completeness and separability suppliers.

[F1]

Bounded no-slip solenoidal closure spaces: H is the L2 closure and V the H01 closure of compact smooth divergence-free fields.

[F2]

Countable smooth solenoidal basis for bounded closure spaces: there are smooth compactly supported solenoidal ej whose finite span is dense in both H and V.

[F3]

No-slip compactness and bounded-mode tails: the H projections ΠK onto the first basis vectors obey ∥(I−ΠK)a∥H≤δK∥a∥V, with δK→0.

[F4]

Elementary zero-boundary L6 and L4 interpolation: energy-bounded fields satisfy u∈L8/3(0,T;L4) and the nonlinear form defines an L4/3(0,T;V∗) functional.

[F5]

Weak time continuity and energy spaces: CwH means continuity of every fixed H pairing; the stated Bochner spaces use strongly measurable representatives.

[F6]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative sums and time integrals interchange, including the a.e. convergence argument from a summable sequence of Lt2H errors.

[F7]

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: under Countable Choice, scalar L2 on a finite time interval, identified with a periodic interval up to endpoints, is separable by a countable Fourier family.

[F8]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): countable coefficient diagonalizations and the choice of a summable-error subsequence are allowed.

[F9]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous vector field on an open subset of R×Rm that is locally Lipschitz in the state has a unique local solution through every initial point, and any two such solutions agree on each common interval containing that initial time. In particular, on a closed cylinder with state radius r and time radius h, a bound ∥F∥≤B, a state-Lipschitz constant LF, hB≤r, and hLF<1 give the stated local solution.

[F10]

Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms and Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure: scalar W1,2 and its test-function closure are defined for all open sets, including the empty set, where they consist only of the zero class.

Proof

1.1givenF5F10algebra

If Ω=∅, [F10] and the closure formulas in the Statement give H01=H=V={0}. These are complete separable real Hilbert spaces with their zero pairings, so [F5] applies. Necessarily u0=0; define the actual map u(t)=0 for every t≥0. Every fixed H pairing is the constant zero function, so u∈Cw([0,∞);H). The constant zero simple map proves strong measurability in H and V, and every required L∞ or local L2 norm is zero. The initial value and strong trace are immediate. Every test curve into V is zero, so the tested identity is 0=0; both energy inequalities likewise reduce to 0≤0. Taking S=(0,∞) gives the required full-measure restart set. This proves every assertion in the empty case directly, without an orthonormal sequence or a Galerkin ODE on a zero-dimensional target. Henceforth suppose Ω≠∅, so the nonempty-domain closure, basis and compactness suppliers [F1]–[F4] apply.

1.2givenA1F2F9algebra

Let (ej) be the basis from [F2], and set uN=∑j=1Naj(t)ej with initial value the H-projection of u0. Solve (uN′,ei)H+∫Ω(uN⋅∇)uN⋅ei dx+ν(∇uN,∇ei)=0,i≤N. Because the ej are real and H-orthonormal, the displayed system has identity mass matrix and is an autonomous polynomial ODE a′=FN(a) on RN. Its open time-state domain is R×RN; it is continuous and its derivative is bounded on every closed coefficient ball, giving a Lipschitz bound there by integration along line segments. Hence [F9] gives its unique local solution. Pairing with uN and summing the equations cancels the transport term because div⁡uN=0 and ∫(uN⋅∇)uN⋅uN=∫div⁡(uN∣uN∣2/2)=0 for its compact support. Thus ∥uN(t)∥22+2ν∫st∥∇uN∥22dτ=∥uN(s)∥22. The overlap uniqueness in [F9] glues all local solutions through the initial value on their interval union. The energy identity bounds the coefficient vector of this maximal solution for nonnegative times; FN is bounded on that closed ball, so the curve is uniformly Lipschitz in time. A finite positive endpoint would therefore have a limit a∗∈RN. The local solution supplied by [F9] at that endpoint and state joins to the old one with matching derivative FN(a∗), producing a C1 extension and contradicting maximality. Hence uN is forward global.

2.1givenF2F5F8step 1.2

For fixed i and N≥i, integration by parts and the energy bound give ∣(uN′(t),ei)∣≤∥∇ei∥∞∥uN(t)∥22+ν∥∇ei∥2∥∇uN(t)∥2. Integrating from s to t and applying Cauchy–Schwarz bounds coefficient increments by Ci∣t−s∣+Di∣t−s∣1/2, uniformly in N on each finite horizon. Diagonal extraction over the countable basis and integer horizons gives uniformly convergent coefficient curves. Their finite sums define for every t a bounded H element; approximation of an arbitrary H test by finite basis sums proves weak continuity as in [F5].

3.1givenF2F6F7F8step 2.1

For each integer m≥1, the energy equality bounds uN in the separable Hilbert space Xm=L2(0,m;V). Completeness follows by selecting from a Cauchy sequence a subsequence with summable Xm-norm differences, applying [F6] to obtain pointwise summability in complete V, and then using the L2 triangle inequality for convergence. Separability follows by approximating strongly measurable maps by finite-valued simple maps, their scalar indicators by the countable Fourier span from [F7], and their values by a countable dense subset of V from [F2]. In any separable Hilbert space, a bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence: diagonalize coordinates in a countable orthonormal basis; finite squared sums bound the limiting coordinates, their square-summable series defines a vector, and finite-basis approximation plus the uniform norm bound gives convergence against every vector. Apply this successively on m=1,2,… to nested subsequences of the coefficient-convergent sequence from step 2.1, and take the diagonal subsequence. It converges weakly in every Xm. The limits agree on overlapping horizons: for each basis vector ej from [F2], the map w↦(w,ej)H is continuous from V to R, so the induced map Xm→L2(0,m) preserves weak convergence, while step 2.1 gives strong L2 convergence of that coefficient to its fixed uniform limit. Uniqueness of weak limits identifies the coefficient of each Xm limit with that same curve; the countable basis then identifies the H-valued limits almost everywhere. Thus one u∈Lloc2(0,∞;V) is obtained on all finite horizons.

4.1givenF3F6F8step 2.1step 3.1

On each integer horizon m, [F3] gives ∫0m∥(I−ΠK)uN(t)∥22dt≤δK2∫0m∥uN(t)∥V2dt, uniformly in N. The weak limit in step 3.1 has the same tail bound: restriction and I−ΠK:L2(0,m;V)→L2(0,m;H) are bounded linear maps, and the Hilbert norm is weakly lower semicontinuous. For each fixed K, the first K coefficients converge uniformly by step 2.1. Choose K to make both uN and u tails small in L2(0,m;H), then pass to the limit in the finitely many coefficients; this proves strong convergence in L2(0,m;H) for every m. A further diagonal subsequence can be chosen with ∥uNj−u∥L2(0,j;H)2≤2−j. For each fixed m, Tonelli [F6] gives ∑j≥m∥uNj(t)−u(t)∥H2<∞ for almost every t∈(0,m). Intersecting these full-measure sets over integer m gives a single full-measure set S⊂(0,∞) on which uNj(t)→u(t) strongly in H. The identity ∥uNj⊗uNj−u⊗u∥L1((0,m)×Ω)≤(∥uNj∥L2((0,m)×Ω)+∥u∥L2((0,m)×Ω))∥uNj−u∥L2((0,m)×Ω) then gives strong tensor convergence on every finite horizon.

5.1givenF2F4step 2.1step 4.1

For a test field taking values in a fixed finite span of the ej, the Galerkin identity is exact for all sufficiently large N. Uniform coefficient convergence passes the time and initial terms, strong tensor convergence from step 4.1 passes the transport term, and weak convergence in L2V passes viscosity. To pass to any compactly supported C1 curve ϕ:[0,∞)→V, let QK be the V-orthogonal projection onto span⁡(e1,…,eK). It is a contraction and converges strongly to the identity by [F2]; finite nets of the compact images of ϕ and ϕt make this convergence uniform in time. The nonlinear error is bounded by the uniform Lt4/3V∗ norm from [F4] times ∥ϕ−QKϕ∥Lt4V; the time and viscosity errors tend to zero by the L∞H and L2V bounds. Thus the full weak identity holds.

6.1givenA1F1F5F6F9step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

For each fixed t, convergence of the finite coefficients gives ∥u(t)∥22≤lim inf⁡N∥uN(t)∥22. Weak convergence in L2V restricted to any [s,t] gives lower semicontinuity of the gradient integral there. At s=0, uN(0)→u0 strongly, so passing the Galerkin equality proves the initial energy inequality for every t. At every time s in the full-measure set from step 4.1, uN(s)→u(s) strongly; passing the same equality on [s,t] gives the restart inequality for every t≥s. Coefficient convergence gives u(t)⇀u0 as t↓0, and the initial energy inequality gives the norm limsup; the Hilbert identity then gives strong convergence to u0. Together the Galerkin, compactness, weak-limit, and energy arguments prove the stated existence, with the finite-dimensional local existence and continuation supplied by [F9].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources