How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite square well: root conditions, simplicity and the bound-state count
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , and put . Let be for and for , and let with of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals. Then:
(a) is self-adjoint on ;
(b) root conditions. with is an eigenvalue of if and only if, writing , and (so that and ), the pair satisfies Every such eigenvalue is simple, and its eigenfunction is, up to a nonzero scalar, on continued by outside in the even case and on continued by outside in the odd case;
(c) range of energies. There are no eigenvalues and no eigenvalues ; hence all eigenvalues of lie in and are given by (b);
(d) bound count. The number of negative eigenvalues of equals and more precisely the equations of (b) have exactly one solution in each interval , , whose left endpoint satisfies , and no solution in elsewhere; the solutions are alternatively of even type ( even) and odd type ( odd).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , the potential (bounded measurable real, , support ), and the operator on .
is bounded, measurable and real. In clause (b) of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, take , and ; the resulting free operator is on . Clause (c) then gives that is self-adjoint on this domain and has real spectrum.
If with , then its representative is globally and is on each open interval where is constant; there holds classically. Indeed have locally absolutely continuous representatives and the equation gives the continuous representative of on each such interval (Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative). The real exponential and sine/cosine derivative formulas used below are supplied by The exponential function is smooth and and Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives; the constant-coefficient solution classifications are proved in steps 1.3 and 2.1. The same regular-IVP supplier gives uniqueness for the central initial-value problem after translating it to a compact interval (Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence).
For , . In particular, , with equality exactly when a.e. and , since the difference is the sum of the two nonnegative quantities and .
Proof
[Self-adjointness] This is [F1].
[Energies are excluded] Let with and . By [F3], and this is at least . Thus and equality holds in the lower bound, so . The absolutely continuous representative of an function with derivative zero is constant on every bounded interval by [F2], hence is a single constant on ; the only constant in is . This contradicts , so .
[Parity and matching] Let , , , so . On an exterior interval the classical equation is . Put ; then , so and . Integrating shows that every solution is . The condition removes the growing term on each exterior half-line, leaving multiples of on and on . On the equation is . The matrix mapping to the value and derivative of at any has determinant , so choose to match the data of any solution there. The difference solves with zero data at ; differentiating shows this quantity is constant, hence . Thus every interior solution is . The potential is even, so the reflection operator commutes with on and maps every eigenspace to itself. Eigenspaces are at most one-dimensional: the solutions decaying as form a one-dimensional space (), and the transfer through is invertible by the just-proved initial-data representation, so at most one direction matches the decaying solution at . Hence : every eigenfunction is even or odd. For an even eigenfunction, on and for ; matching and at gives which eliminates and gives . For an odd eigenfunction, on and outside; matching gives and , i.e. . Conversely, if either condition holds with , , then the indicated piecewise function is , piecewise , satisfies on each constant-potential interval and decays exponentially. Its restrictions and their first derivatives are square-integrable, and its piecewise classical second derivative is square-integrable because the central interval is bounded and the exterior pieces decay exponentially. To verify the global weak derivatives, integrate against a compactly supported smooth test function separately on , and : the boundary terms cancel at for the first derivative because is continuous, and for the second derivative because matches there. Thus the piecewise first and second derivatives are the global weak derivatives and belong to , so by One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals. It is nonzero and therefore an eigenfunction. This proves (b).
[Monotone branches] For put , a strictly decreasing continuous function. Define on each interval the function Each is strictly increasing on : for even, because with even lies in a range where ; for odd, with and . Moreover, and for every .
[Energies are excluded] Let with and . By [F2], on the classical equation is with (and when ). If , the classification proved in step 1.3 applies with and gives . The identity and the antiderivatives of , and give as . Thus membership forces , so on . If , every solution of is affine, and an affine function vanishes identically, so again there. The same argument on shows outside . The global representative then has , and on it solves with these terminal data. After translating to a compact interval, uniqueness in Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence makes it vanish identically, so , a contradiction. Hence , and with step 1.2, .
[Existence and uniqueness of roots] Fix with , and consider on , a strictly increasing continuous function. Near the left endpoint, while (since the left endpoint is ), so there; put . If , the one-sided limit as makes near that endpoint, including when ; no value of at its pole is taken. If , then is interior to the branch, is well defined, and as , again giving . Hence by the intermediate value theorem has a zero, and strict monotonicity makes it unique and interior. If instead , then on never holds, so no root. On each the other parity expression is negative and cannot equal . At branch endpoints the matching equations of step 1.3 either require a pole denominator to be nonzero or give a zero left side, again excluding a root with . Since covers except the endpoints, these are all roots in ; the number of with is , which is (d).
[Assembly] By steps 1.2, 2.1 and 1.3 every negative eigenvalue has one of the two root forms, with simple eigenspace, and by step 2.2 the roots are exactly the described ones with the stated count. Steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1 and 2.2 give (a)-(d).
Depends on
One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals
Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative
Endpoint trace bound and decay of H1 functions
Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
The complex exponential by its power series
The addition formulas for complex trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives
The exponential function is smooth and
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors
Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Axiom of Choice
Integration by parts and the endpoint-vanishing space on intervals
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 9.7, Corollary 9.43 p. 219 (finiteness background for short-range negative spectra; the square-well roots and exact count are proved locally)
- J. Binney and D. Skinner, The Physics of Quantum Mechanics, Section 5.1 pp. 75-77, equations (5.3)-(5.8) (even/odd square-well matching; the potential is shifted by -U here, and threshold counting is proved locally)