Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite square well: root conditions, simplicity and the bound-state count

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let a>0, U>0, m,ℏ>0 and put K:=2mU/ℏ>0. Let V:R→R be V(x)=−U for ∣x∣≤a and V(x)=0 for ∣x∣>a, and let Hψ:=−ℏ22mψ′′+Vψ,D(H):=H2(R), with H2 of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals. Then:

(a) H is self-adjoint on H2(R);

(b) root conditions. E∈R with −U<E<0 is an eigenvalue of H if and only if, writing E=−ε, κ:=2mε/ℏ and k:=2m(U−ε)/ℏ (so that k,κ>0 and k2+κ2=K2), the pair (k,κ) satisfies ktan⁡(ka)=κ(even case)or−kcot⁡(ka)=κ(odd case). Every such eigenvalue is simple, and its eigenfunction is, up to a nonzero scalar, x↦cos⁡(kx) on (−a,a) continued by ce−κ∣x∣ outside in the even case and x↦sin⁡(kx) on (−a,a) continued by c sgn⁡(x)e−κ∣x∣ outside in the odd case;

(c) range of energies. There are no eigenvalues E≤−U and no eigenvalues E≥0; hence all eigenvalues of H lie in (−U,0) and are given by (b);

(d) bound count. The number of negative eigenvalues of H equals ⌈2aKπ⌉, and more precisely the equations of (b) have exactly one solution k in each interval (nπ2a,(n+1)π2a), n≥0, whose left endpoint satisfies nπ2a<K, and no solution in (0,K) elsewhere; the solutions are alternatively of even type (n even) and odd type (n odd).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a,U,m,ℏ>0, K=2mU/ℏ, the potential V (bounded measurable real, ∣V∣≤U, support [−a,a]), and the operator H on D(H)=H2(R).

[F1]

V is bounded, measurable and real. In clause (b) of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, take d=1, c=4π2ℏ22m=2π2ℏ2m and b=0; the resulting free operator is H0=−ℏ22mD2 on D(H0)=H2(R). Clause (c) then gives that H=H0+MV is self-adjoint on this domain and has real spectrum.

[F2]

If Hψ=Eψ with ψ∈H2(R), then its H2 representative is globally C1 and is C2 on each open interval where V is constant; there −ℏ22mψ′′+Vψ=Eψ holds classically. Indeed ψ,ψ′ have locally absolutely continuous representatives and the equation gives the continuous representative of ψ′′ on each such interval (Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative). The real exponential and sine/cosine derivative formulas used below are supplied by The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡ and Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives; the constant-coefficient solution classifications are proved in steps 1.3 and 2.1. The same regular-IVP supplier gives uniqueness for the central initial-value problem after translating it to a compact interval (Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence).

[F3]

For ψ∈H2(R), ⟨Hψ,ψ⟩=ℏ22m∥ψ′∥22−U∫[−a,a]∣ψ∣2≥ℏ22m∥ψ′∥22−U∥ψ∥22. In particular, ⟨Hψ,ψ⟩≥−U∥ψ∥22, with equality exactly when ψ′=0 a.e. and ∫[−a,a]∣ψ∣2=∥ψ∥22, since the difference is the sum of the two nonnegative quantities ℏ22m∥ψ′∥22 and U∫R∖[−a,a]∣ψ∣2.

Proof

1.1F1

[Self-adjointness] This is [F1].

1.2F2F3algebra

[Energies E≤−U are excluded] Let Hψ=Eψ with ∥ψ∥L2=1 and E≤−U. By [F3], E=⟨Hψ,ψ⟩=ℏ22m∥ψ′∥22+∫[−a,a]V∣ψ∣2 and this is at least −U. Thus E=−U and equality holds in the lower bound, so ∥ψ′∥2=0. The absolutely continuous representative of an H1 function with derivative zero is constant on every bounded interval by [F2], hence is a single constant on R; the only constant in L2(R) is 0. This contradicts ∥ψ∥2=1, so E>−U.

1.3F2algebra

[Parity and matching] Let E=−ε∈(−U,0), κ=2mε/ℏ, k=2m(U−ε)/ℏ, so k2+κ2=K2. On an exterior interval the classical equation is ψ′′=κ2ψ. Put g=ψ′−κψ; then g′=−κg, so (eκxg)′=0 and g=Ce−κx. Integrating (e−κxψ)′=Ce−2κx shows that every solution is Aeκx+Be−κx. The L2 condition removes the growing term on each exterior half-line, leaving multiples of e−κx on x>a and eκx on x<−a. On (−a,a) the equation is ψ′′=−k2ψ. The matrix mapping (A,B) to the value and derivative of Acos⁡(kx)+Bsin⁡(kx) at any x0 has determinant k≠0, so choose A,B to match the data of any solution there. The difference w solves w′′=−k2w with zero data at x0; differentiating ∣w′∣2+k2∣w∣2 shows this quantity is constant, hence w=0. Thus every interior solution is Acos⁡(kx)+Bsin⁡(kx). The potential is even, so the reflection operator (Πψ)(x)=ψ(−x) commutes with H on H2 and maps every eigenspace to itself. Eigenspaces are at most one-dimensional: the solutions decaying as x→−∞ form a one-dimensional space c eκx (x<−a), and the transfer through (−a,a) is invertible by the just-proved initial-data representation, so at most one direction matches the decaying solution at +∞. Hence Πψ=±ψ: every eigenfunction is even or odd. For an even eigenfunction, ψ(x)=Acos⁡(kx) on (−a,a) and ψ(x)=Be−κ∣x∣ for ∣x∣>a; matching ψ and ψ′ at a gives Acos⁡(ka)=Be−κa,−Aksin⁡(ka)=−κBe−κa, which eliminates A,B and gives ktan⁡(ka)=κ. For an odd eigenfunction, ψ(x)=Asin⁡(kx) on (−a,a) and ψ(x)=Bsgn⁡(x)e−κ∣x∣ outside; matching gives Asin⁡(ka)=Be−κa and Akcos⁡(ka)=−κBe−κa, i.e. −kcot⁡(ka)=κ. Conversely, if either condition holds with k,κ>0, k2+κ2=K2, then the indicated piecewise function is C1, piecewise C2, satisfies Hψ=Eψ on each constant-potential interval and decays exponentially. Its restrictions and their first derivatives are square-integrable, and its piecewise classical second derivative is square-integrable because the central interval is bounded and the exterior pieces decay exponentially. To verify the global weak derivatives, integrate against a compactly supported smooth test function separately on (−∞,−a), (−a,a) and (a,∞): the boundary terms cancel at ±a for the first derivative because ψ is continuous, and for the second derivative because ψ′ matches there. Thus the piecewise first and second derivatives are the global weak derivatives and belong to L2(R), so ψ∈H2(R) by One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals. It is nonzero and therefore an eigenfunction. This proves (b).

1.4F2algebra

[Monotone branches] For k∈(0,K) put κ(k):=K2−k2>0, a strictly decreasing continuous function. Define on each interval Bn:=(nπ2a,(n+1)π2a) the function Ln(k):={ktan⁡(ka),n even,−kcot⁡(ka),n odd. Each Ln is strictly increasing on Bn: for n even, Ln′(k)=tan⁡(ka)+kasec⁡2(ka)>0 because ka∈(nπ/2,(n+1)π/2) with n even lies in a range where tan⁡(ka)>0; for n odd, Ln(k)=−kcot⁡(ka) with cot⁡(ka)<0 and Ln′(k)=−cot⁡(ka)+kacsc⁡2(ka)>0. Moreover, lim⁡k→(nπ2a)+Ln(k)=0+ and lim⁡k→((n+1)π2a)−Ln(k)=+∞ for every n≥0.

2.1step 1.2step 1.3F2algebra

[Energies E≥0 are excluded] Let Hψ=Eψ with ψ≠0 and E≥0. By [F2], on (a,∞) the classical equation is ψ′′=−k02ψ with k0=2mE/ℏ≥0 (and ψ′′=0 when E=0). If E>0, the classification proved in step 1.3 applies with k=k0 and gives ψ(x)=Acos⁡(k0x)+Bsin⁡(k0x). The identity ∣ψ∣2=∣A∣2cos⁡2(k0x)+∣B∣2sin⁡2(k0x)+2Re⁡(AB‾)sin⁡(k0x)cos⁡(k0x) and the antiderivatives of cos⁡2, sin⁡2 and sin⁡cos⁡ give ∫aX∣ψ∣2=∣A∣2+∣B∣22(X−a)+O(1) as X→∞. Thus L2 membership forces A=B=0, so ψ=0 on (a,∞). If E=0, every solution of ψ′′=0 is affine, and an affine L2 function vanishes identically, so again ψ=0 there. The same argument on (−∞,−a) shows ψ=0 outside [−a,a]. The global C1 representative then has ψ(a)=ψ′(a)=0, and on (−a,a) it solves ψ′′=−2m(E+U)ℏ2ψ with these terminal data. After translating (−a,a) to a compact interval, uniqueness in Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence makes it vanish identically, so ψ=0, a contradiction. Hence E<0, and with step 1.2, E∈(−U,0).

2.2step 1.4algebra

[Existence and uniqueness of roots] Fix n≥0 with nπ2a<K, and consider Fn:=Ln−κ on Bn∩(0,K), a strictly increasing continuous function. Near the left endpoint, Ln→0+ while κ>0 (since the left endpoint is <K), so Fn<0 there; put rn=(n+1)π/(2a). If rn≤K, the one-sided limit Ln(k)→+∞ as k↑rn makes Fn>0 near that endpoint, including when rn=K; no value of Ln at its pole is taken. If K<rn, then K is interior to the branch, Ln(K)>0 is well defined, and κ(k)→0 as k↑K, again giving Fn>0. Hence by the intermediate value theorem Fn has a zero, and strict monotonicity makes it unique and interior. If instead nπ2a≥K, then k<K on Bn never holds, so no root. On each Bn the other parity expression is negative and cannot equal κ>0. At branch endpoints the matching equations of step 1.3 either require a pole denominator to be nonzero or give a zero left side, again excluding a root with κ>0. Since {Bn:n≥0} covers (0,∞) except the endpoints, these are all roots in (0,K); the number of n≥0 with nπ2a<K is ⌈2aK/π⌉, which is (d).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3step 2.2∎

[Assembly] By steps 1.2, 2.1 and 1.3 every negative eigenvalue has one of the two root forms, with simple eigenspace, and by step 2.2 the roots are exactly the described ones with the stated count. Steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1 and 2.2 give (a)-(d).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources