Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coarea and invariant measure on compact regular energy shells

Statement

Assume AC. Let n≥1, let O⊂R2n be open with its canonical symplectic form, let H∈C2(O,R), and let J⊂R be open. Suppose ∇H≠0 on H−1(J) and H−1(K) is compact in O for every compact K⊂J. Define μE by Regular energy shell and weighted area measure. Then for every nonnegative Borel f compactly supported in H−1(J), ∫Of(x) dx=∫JμE(f) dE. For every E∈J with nonempty shell ΣE=H−1({E}), 0<μE(1)<∞, and μ^E=μE/μE(1) is a probability measure. Let ϕt be a Hamiltonian flow map defined as a diffeomorphism on a full compact energy band containing ΣE and preserving that band. Then μ^E is invariant under ϕt for every such regular E. Critical levels and noncompact bands are outside this statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The regular-band data, the weighted-area definition, and the complete Hamiltonian flow on the particular band.

[A1]

AC is adopted; O⊂R2n is open, H∈C2, ∇H≠0 on H−1(J), and compact energy intervals have compact inverse images in O.

[A2]

The nonnegative Borel function is compactly supported in H−1(J). For invariance, ϕt is a diffeomorphism on a compact band, maps it onto itself, and is the Hamiltonian flow of H.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice and Regular energy shell and weighted area measure: AC is the standing hypothesis of the change-of-variables supplier; the candidate shell integral is the sum over a supplied graph partition, and graph area in a chart has density 1+∣∇h∣2 dz.

[F2]

The Euclidean implicit function theorem with derivative formula: if one partial derivative of H is nonzero, a neighborhood of that level is a C1 graph xi=h(z,E) with ∂Eh=1/∂iH.

[F3]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: a C1 injective change of variables with nonzero Jacobian transforms a nonnegative Lebesgue integral by the absolute Jacobian.

[F5]

Write x=(q,p)∈Rn×Rn. For the canonical form ω=∑jdqj∧dpj, the C1 field associated to H∈C2 is XH=(∇pH,−∇qH), so ιXHω=dH. Here its flow means the C1 local family solving ∂sϕs(x)=XH(ϕs(x)), ϕ0(x)=x, with inverse ϕ−s on its flow domains. The volume and energy invariance needed here are proved locally in step 1.2 at this C2 regularity, rather than taken from a smooth-only supplier.

[F6]

Dominated convergence: a common integrable chart bound justifies continuity in E of compactly supported shell integrals.

[F8]

Finite measures agreeing on a generating pi-system and on the whole space are equal: two finite measures that agree on a generating pi-system and have equal total mass agree on the generated sigma-algebra.

Proof

Given: [A1]–[A2] and the geometric and measure interfaces [F1]–[F8].

1.1A1A2F2F4construct

Let C be a compact energy band containing the support of f. At each x∈H−1(C), some coordinate derivative ∂iH(x) is nonzero. By [F2] a neighborhood is parameterized by the remaining coordinates z and energy E, with xi=h(z,E). Compactness gives a finite cover by such charts. Refine the cover by finitely many balls whose closures lie in chart domains and whose smaller concentric balls cover H−1(C). Choose standard smooth bump functions ψa supported in the larger balls and positive on the smaller balls, and let Ψ=∑aψa. Its minimum on H−1(C) is positive. Choose a smooth scalar cutoff η that is zero below one quarter of this minimum and one above one half of it. Then χa=η(Ψ)ψa/Ψ, extended by zero where Ψ=0, is smooth, supported in its chart, and the sum is one near H−1(C).

1.2A1A2F3F5algebra

At the stated C2 regularity, XH in [F5] has continuous first derivatives. Along every flow curve, ddsH(ϕs(x))=∑j(HqjHpj−HpjHqj)(ϕs(x))=0. Differentiating its integral equation ϕs(x)=x+∫0sXH(ϕu(x)) du in x gives Js=I+∫0sDXH(ϕu(x))Ju du, where Js=Dxϕs(x); on each compact flow segment the C1 derivatives are continuous, so difference quotients pass through this finite integral. Thus ∂sJs=DXH(ϕs(x))Js. Differentiating the determinant by multilinearity in its columns gives ∂sdet⁡Js=(tr⁡DXH)(ϕs(x))det⁡Js. Indeed Js is invertible by the inverse flow, and the sum of determinants with one column replaced by DXH times that column is det⁡Js tr⁡(Js−1DXHJs)=det⁡Js tr⁡DXH. Equality of the continuous mixed second derivatives of H gives tr⁡DXH=∑j(∂qj∂pjH−∂pj∂qjH)=0. Since det⁡J0=1, det⁡Js=1 throughout the flow domain; [F3] then gives Lebesgue-volume preservation. Both invariances therefore hold for the entire C2 scope of this item.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

In each chart, the map (z,E)↦(z,ha(z,E)) is injective after shrinking the chart, and its absolute Jacobian is ∣∂Eha∣=∣∂iH∣−1. By [F3] and Tonelli [F4], ∫Of(x)χa(x) dx=∫J∫f(z,ha(z,E))χa(z,ha(z,E))∣∂iH∣−1 dz dE. Implicit differentiation gives ∂zjha=−∂jH/∂iH, so the graph area density is 1+∣∇zha∣2 dz=∣∇H∣∣∂iH∣ dz. The inner integral is therefore the corresponding chart contribution to the candidate μE(f) in [F1]. Sum the finitely many charts and use ∑aχa=1 on the support to obtain the asserted coarea identity.

2.2A1F1F2step 1.1algebra

On overlaps, if one graph parameterization is obtained from another by a C1 coordinate change ψ, its Gram matrix is transformed by G↦(Dψ)⊤G(Dψ). Taking determinants shows the area density changes by ∣det⁡Dψ∣, exactly the ordinary chart Jacobian. Implicit differentiation gives 1+∣∇h∣2/∣∇H∣=∣∂iH∣−1, so the chart contributions define the same measure independent of the partition and equal ∫ΣEg∣∇H∣−1dAE. Each shell is a closed subset of compact H−1({E}), hence compact. A finite collection of graph charts with ∇H bounded away from zero on that compact level gives finite area and hence μE(1)<∞. If the shell is nonempty, one graph chart contains an open patch; its coordinate domain has positive (2n−1)-dimensional measure and the continuous density ∣∇H∣−1dAE/dz is positive there, so μE(1)>0.

3.1A1A2F1F5F6step 1.2step 2.1

Fix a compact band and a compactly supported continuous test g on it. For a continuous compactly supported scalar function q on J, the coarea identity from step 2.1 and the Hamiltonian volume/energy invariance from step 1.2 give ∫Jq(E)μE(g∘ϕt) dE=∫Oq(H(x))g(ϕtx) dx=∫Oq(H(x))g(x) dx=∫Jq(E)μE(g) dE. The second equality is the change of variables by the volume-preserving diffeomorphism ϕt; H∘ϕt=H keeps the energy weight fixed. For each test g, both functions of E in the outer integrals are continuous locally: use the finite chart representation in step 2.1, compact chart support, the positive lower bound for ∣∇H∣, and dominated convergence [F6]. Their difference integrates to zero against every compactly supported continuous q. If the continuous difference were nonzero at one energy, it would keep one strict sign on a neighborhood; a nonnegative continuous bump q supported there would make the integral nonzero. Thus μE(g∘ϕt)=μE(g) for every E in the band.

4.1F5F6F7step 2.2step 3.1

Fix a closed subset F of a nonempty shell. If F=∅, both measures assign it zero. Otherwise let χ be a continuous compactly supported cutoff equal to one on the compact shell; the same finite-ball bump construction used in 1.1 supplies it. In the ambient band set gn(x)=χ(x)max⁡{0,1−n dist⁡(x,F)}. By [F7], gn is continuous, 0≤gn≤1, and its restriction to ΣE converges pointwise to 1F. Because ϕt maps the shell onto itself, gn∘ϕt converges there to 1ϕt−1F. Apply step 3.1 to each gn and use dominated convergence [F6] for the finite shell measure from step 2.2; this gives μE(ϕt−1F)=μE(F) for every closed F⊆ΣE. Closed sets form a pi-system generating the shell Borel sigma-algebra, and both μE and its pushforward have the same finite total mass because ϕt maps the shell onto itself.

5.1F8step 2.2step 4.1∎

By [F8], agreement on closed sets and equality of total masses imply that μE equals its pushforward on every Borel subset of ΣE. Divide by 0<μE(1)<∞ from step 2.2. Hence the normalized regular-shell probability is invariant for each such E, not merely almost every energy.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources