Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples show how gluing produces familiar and nonseparated schemes, why nilpotent structure survives beyond topology, where finite type and finite presentation diverge, and how a dense open immersion has full scheme-theoretic image in an integral target.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The projective line from two affine charts

Example

Let k be a field. Let U=Speck[t] and V=Speck[u]. Their principal opens D(t) and D(u) have coordinate rings k[t,t1] and k[u,u1]. The isomorphism ut1 glues U and V along these opens. With two charts there is no nontrivial triple-overlap cocycle; the resulting scheme is, by definition in this construction, the projective line Pk1; equivalently, the notation here names precisely this two-chart gluing.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The affine line with doubled origin

Example

Let k be a field. Glue two copies of Speck[t] by the identity on D(t). The two copies of every nonzero point are identified, but the two closed points defined by the maximal ideal (t) remain distinct. This is the affine line with doubled origin; it is retained as the standard later test case for separatedness.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Two infinitesimal structures at the origin

Example

Inside Speck[t], the ideals (t) and (t2) define Speck and Speck[t]/(t2). Both have the single-point support V(t), but the latter has a nonzero nilpotent class of t, so these are distinct closed subschemes.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Reduction of the dual-number point

Example

Let k be a field. For A=k[ϵ]/(ϵ2), the nilradical is (ϵ). Hence SpecAred=Spec(A/(ϵ))=Speck. The underlying space has one point before and after reduction, but only the former has a nonzero nilpotent.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A closed subset has many scheme structures

Statement refuted

A closed subset of an affine scheme determines its closed subscheme structure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k.

[F1]

Closed immersions into SpecA are classified, up to unique isomorphism over the target, by quotient rings A/I Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The ideals (t) and (t2) in k[t] have the same radical (t), so their quotient-spectrum closed immersions have the same underlying closed subset V(t).

given
2.1

The ring k[t]/(t) is reduced, whereas the nonzero class of t in k[t]/(t2) is nilpotent. Their quotient rings are therefore not isomorphic, so [F1] gives distinct closed subscheme structures with the same support.

F1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Affine n-space over an arbitrary base

Example

On S=SpecA, define ASn as SpecA[t1,,tn]. The structure map is finite type, generated by the n variables, and these constructions agree under localization of A, so glue over an arbitrary base. At n=0 the polynomial algebra is A and AS0=S.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

An infinite disjoint union is locally but not globally finite type

Statement refuted

Every locally finite-type morphism is finite type.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k.

[F1]

A finite-type morphism is locally of finite type and quasi-compact Locally finite type and finite type morphisms.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Let X=m1Ak1 and map it to Speck. Each component is an affine finite-type chart, so the map is locally of finite type.

given
2.1

The inverse image of the one-point base is covered by the open components, and no finite subfamily covers X. Thus the map is not quasi-compact; by [F1] it is not finite type.

F1step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Finite type need not mean finite presentation

Statement refuted

Every finite-type morphism is of finite presentation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Let k be a field, A=k[x1,x2,], and I=(x1,x2,). The ideal I is not finitely generated: a finite list of its elements involves only finitely many variables and cannot generate a later variable.

[F1]

A finite-type morphism is locally defined by finite-type ring maps Locally finite type and finite type morphisms.

[F2]

A locally finite-presentation morphism is locally defined by finitely presented ring maps Locally finite presentation morphisms.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The quotient map AA/I is generated as an A-algebra by the empty set, so it is of finite type and its affine scheme morphism is finite type.

F1given
2.1

The source is the single point corresponding to I. Every affine target neighbourhood contains some D(f) with fI. Modulo I, such an f is a nonzero scalar. The vector space I/I2 has basis given by the classes of the xi, and localization at f leaves it infinite-dimensional because f acts on it by that nonzero scalar. Hence If/If2(I/I2)f is not finitely generated over Af/Ifk, so If itself is not finitely generated. Thus AfAf/If is not finitely presented on any target neighbourhood of the source point. By [F2], the affine morphism is not locally of finite presentation and therefore not of finite presentation.

F2step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The scheme-theoretic image of a dense open immersion

Example

Let X be an integral scheme and let j:UX be a dense open immersion. Then the scheme-theoretic image of j is X itself. This does not assume that j is quasi-compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integral scheme X and a dense open immersion j:UX.

[F1]

Every nonempty affine open of an integral scheme is the spectrum of a domain Integral schemes.

[F2]

The scheme-theoretic image, when it exists, is the smallest closed subscheme through which the morphism factors Scheme-theoretic image.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Let ZX be a closed subscheme through which j factors, and let I be its ideal sheaf. On a nonempty affine open V=SpecA, every aI(V) restricts to zero on the dense open UV.

given
2.1

Choose a nonempty principal open D(f)UV. By [F1], A is a domain and f0; the equality a/1=0 in Af gives fna=0 for some n, hence a=0. Thus IV=0.

F1step 1.1choose
3.1

The same holds on every nonempty affine open, while the empty opens carry only the zero ideal. Hence I=0, so every closed factorization of j contains X itself. By [F2], the smallest such factorization is X.

F2step 2.1

Sources