How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Delta Functors and Universality — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Derived Functors
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology - Examples
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Sequences and Limits
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
2 · Summary
These examples keep the abstract delta-functor axioms tied to the concrete derived-functor constructions already on disk. They show how long exact sequences, dimension shifting, and universality are used in practice, and they also isolate the main failure mode: exactness alone is not enough without naturality of the connecting maps.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Homology as a homological delta functor
Example
Fix an abelian category . For chain complexes in that vanish in negative degrees, the family together with the usual connecting morphisms of homology, is a homological delta functor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian category and its abelian category of nonnegatively graded chain complexes.
This page's concrete homology family is the candidate homological delta functor (The homological delta-functor carried by homology of complexes).
Homology of complexes satisfies the exactness and naturality axioms (Homology of complexes satisfies the delta-functor naturality and exactness laws).
A homological delta functor is exactly such a family of additive functors with natural connecting maps (Homological delta functor).
Verification
Restrict the integer-indexed homology family of [L1] to complexes that vanish in negative degrees. This full subcategory is closed under kernels and cokernels degreewise, hence is abelian, and its short exact sequences have .
The exactness and naturality axioms required in [L3] are supplied by [L2]; step 1.1 makes the integer-indexed long sequence terminate as . Therefore the restricted family is a homological delta functor indexed by .
The trivial delta functor of an exact functor
Example
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.
If and are abelian categories and is exact, then the delta functor concentrated in degree , with zero connecting maps, is a universal homological delta functor; likewise the cohomological family with zero connecting maps is universal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An exact functor between abelian categories.
An exact base functor has precisely these trivial universal delta functors (An exact base functor has the trivial universal delta functor).
Verification
The displayed homological and cohomological families are exactly the two families identified in [L1].
Therefore both are universal delta functors.
One dimension shift along a projective presentation
Example
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.
Let be supplied projective resolution data on a class of objects of , let be additive and right exact, and let be a short exact sequence in with projective. Then for every the connecting map of the derived long exact sequence gives an isomorphism
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A short exact sequence in with projective and an integer .
The left derived functors form a homological delta functor (Left derived functors form a homological delta functor).
Positive left derived functors vanish on projective objects (Positive left derived functors vanish on projective objects).
When the outer maps in the exact segment vanish, the connecting map is an isomorphism (Dimension shift for a homological delta functor effaced in the middle).
Verification
By [L1], the given short exact sequence yields an exact segment
Since is projective and , [L2] gives . Therefore [L3] turns the connecting map in step 1.1 into the displayed isomorphism.
One dimension shift along an injective copresentation
Example
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.
Let be supplied injective resolution data on a class of objects of , let be additive and left exact, and let be a short exact sequence in with injective. Then for every the connecting map gives an isomorphism
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A short exact sequence in with injective and an integer .
The right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor).
Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects (Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects).
Vanishing of the adjacent injective terms makes the connecting map an isomorphism (Dimension shift for a cohomological delta functor effaced in the middle).
Verification
By [L1], the given short exact sequence yields an exact segment
Since is injective and , [L2] gives . Hence [L3] makes the connecting map in step 1.1 an isomorphism.
Extending a degree-zero natural transformation
Example
Let be a homological delta functor, let be an effaceable homological delta functor, and let be a natural transformation. For an object , choose an effacement with . Then the degree-one component of the universal extension is the unique map satisfying and this map is independent of the chosen effacement and compatible with the connecting morphisms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A degree-zero natural transformation and a chosen effacement of one object .
One dimension shift defines the next-degree component from the chosen effacement (A partial morphism of delta functors extends through one dimension shift).
The resulting component is independent of the effacing morphism and commutes with connecting maps (The effacement extension is independent of the effacing morphism, The effacement extension commutes with connecting morphisms).
Derived-functor universality is built from exactly this extension mechanism (Derived functors are universal delta functors).
Verification
The defining equation for is exactly the homological case of [L1] with .
Item [L2] removes dependence on the chosen effacement and supplies the required compatibility with connecting morphisms, so the map from step 1.1 is the correct first higher component of the universal extension. This is the degree-one pattern used abstractly in [L3].
A nonnatural choice of connecting maps does not form a delta functor
Statement refuted
A family of additive functors together with arbitrary exact connecting maps is automatically a homological delta functor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ordinary homology delta functor on complexes and one short exact sequence whose connecting morphism is nonzero.
A homological delta functor requires both exactness and naturality of the connecting maps (Homological delta functor).
Homology of complexes is a genuine homological delta functor (Homology of complexes satisfies the delta-functor naturality and exactness laws).
There is a concrete short exact sequence of complexes with nonzero connecting morphism (A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map).
Counterexample
Start with the homology delta functor from [L2]. Keep every functor unchanged and keep every connecting map unchanged except on one chosen short exact sequence with nonzero connector from [L3], where replace by . Each individual long exact sequence remains exact.
Choose a distinct isomorphic copy of the cone sequence in [L3], and alter the connector on only the original sequence. The chosen isomorphism of short exact sequences induces isomorphisms on the two homology groups. Before the alteration, naturality identifies the two routes around the connecting square with the same map . After changing exactly one connector to its negative, the two routes are opposite maps and , which are unequal over . Hence this naturality square fails, and [L1] shows that the altered family is not a homological delta functor.
Two universal delta functors and their unique isomorphism
Example
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.
Let and be abelian categories, suppose has enough projectives, and let be additive and right exact. If and are two supplied projective resolution data on all objects of , then the two universal homological delta functors are uniquely isomorphic. After choosing the standard natural identifications , the isomorphism is the unique one whose degree-zero component corresponds to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two supplied projective resolution data and on all objects of for the same right exact functor .
Each of the two derived constructions is a universal homological delta functor (Derived functors are universal delta functors).
Two universal delta functors with the same degree-zero term are uniquely isomorphic (Universal delta functors extending the same degree-zero functor are uniquely isomorphic).
For every supplied projective resolution datum, the zeroth left derived functor is naturally isomorphic to the original right exact functor (Left derived functors form a homological delta functor).
Verification
By [L1], both and are universal homological delta functors, and [L3] supplies their natural degree-zero identifications with .
Choose the natural degree-zero identifications with from step 1.1. Applying [L2] yields the unique isomorphism of delta functors whose degree-zero part corresponds under those identifications to ; its higher components are then forced.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 `Derived Functors`
- Romyar Sharifi, Homological Algebra
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.12: Cohomological delta-functors
- Alexandre Grothendieck, Some aspects of homological algebra (Barr translation)