Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 5 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Delta Functors and Universality — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples keep the abstract delta-functor axioms tied to the concrete derived-functor constructions already on disk. They show how long exact sequences, dimension shifting, and universality are used in practice, and they also isolate the main failure mode: exactness alone is not enough without naturality of the connecting maps.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Homology as a homological delta functor

Example

Fix an abelian category A. For chain complexes in A that vanish in negative degrees, the family Hn:Ch0(A)A,n0, together with the usual connecting morphisms of homology, is a homological delta functor.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian category A and its abelian category of nonnegatively graded chain complexes.

[L1]

This page's concrete homology family is the candidate homological delta functor (The homological delta-functor carried by homology of complexes).

[L2]

Homology of complexes satisfies the exactness and naturality axioms (Homology of complexes satisfies the delta-functor naturality and exactness laws).

[L3]

A homological delta functor is exactly such a family of additive functors with natural connecting maps (Homological delta functor).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Restrict the integer-indexed homology family of [L1] to complexes that vanish in negative degrees. This full subcategory is closed under kernels and cokernels degreewise, hence is abelian, and its short exact sequences have H1=0.

L1given
2.1

The exactness and naturality axioms required in [L3] are supplied by [L2]; step 1.1 makes the integer-indexed long sequence terminate as H0(C)0. Therefore the restricted family is a homological delta functor indexed by n0.

L2L3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The trivial delta functor of an exact functor

Example

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.

If A and B are abelian categories and F:AB is exact, then the delta functor concentrated in degree 0, T0=F,Tn=0 for n>0, with zero connecting maps, is a universal homological delta functor; likewise the cohomological family T0=F,Tn=0 for n>0 with zero connecting maps is universal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exact functor F between abelian categories.

[L1]

An exact base functor has precisely these trivial universal delta functors (An exact base functor has the trivial universal delta functor).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The displayed homological and cohomological families are exactly the two families identified in [L1].

L1given
2.1

Therefore both are universal delta functors.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

One dimension shift along a projective presentation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.

Let P be supplied projective resolution data on a class D of objects of A, let F:AB be additive and right exact, and let 0KQA0 be a short exact sequence in D with Q projective. Then for every n>1 the connecting map of the derived long exact sequence gives an isomorphism LnPF(A)  Ln1PF(K).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A short exact sequence 0KQA0 in D with Q projective and an integer n>1.

[L1]

The left derived functors form a homological delta functor (Left derived functors form a homological delta functor).

[L2]

Positive left derived functors vanish on projective objects (Positive left derived functors vanish on projective objects).

[L3]

When the outer maps in the exact segment vanish, the connecting map is an isomorphism (Dimension shift for a homological delta functor effaced in the middle).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the given short exact sequence yields an exact segment LnPF(Q)LnPF(A)nLn1PF(K)Ln1PF(Q).

L1givenconstruct
2.1

Since QD is projective and n>1, [L2] gives LnPF(Q)=Ln1PF(Q)=0. Therefore [L3] turns the connecting map in step 1.1 into the displayed isomorphism.

L2L3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

One dimension shift along an injective copresentation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.

Let I be supplied injective resolution data on a class D of objects of A, let F:AB be additive and left exact, and let 0AJC0 be a short exact sequence in D with J injective. Then for every n>1 the connecting map gives an isomorphism RIn1F(C)  RInF(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A short exact sequence 0AJC0 in D with J injective and an integer n>1.

[L1]

The right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor).

[L2]

Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects (Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects).

[L3]

Vanishing of the adjacent injective terms makes the connecting map an isomorphism (Dimension shift for a cohomological delta functor effaced in the middle).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the given short exact sequence yields an exact segment RIn1F(J)RIn1F(C)n1RInF(A)RInF(J).

L1givenconstruct
2.1

Since JD is injective and n>1, [L2] gives RIn1F(J)=RInF(J)=0. Hence [L3] makes the connecting map in step 1.1 an isomorphism.

L2L3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Extending a degree-zero natural transformation

Example

Let S=(Sn,S) be a homological delta functor, let T=(Tn,T) be an effaceable homological delta functor, and let u0:S0T0 be a natural transformation. For an object A, choose an effacement 0KPpA0 with T1(p)=0. Then the degree-one component of the universal extension is the unique map u1(A):S1(A)T1(A) satisfying 1Tu1(A)=u0(K)1S, and this map is independent of the chosen effacement and compatible with the connecting morphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A degree-zero natural transformation u0:S0T0 and a chosen effacement of one object A.

[L1]

One dimension shift defines the next-degree component from the chosen effacement (A partial morphism of delta functors extends through one dimension shift).

[L2]

The resulting component is independent of the effacing morphism and commutes with connecting maps (The effacement extension is independent of the effacing morphism, The effacement extension commutes with connecting morphisms).

[L3]

Derived-functor universality is built from exactly this extension mechanism (Derived functors are universal delta functors).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The defining equation for u1(A) is exactly the homological case of [L1] with n=1.

L1given
2.1

Item [L2] removes dependence on the chosen effacement and supplies the required compatibility with connecting morphisms, so the map from step 1.1 is the correct first higher component of the universal extension. This is the degree-one pattern used abstractly in [L3].

L2L3step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A nonnatural choice of connecting maps does not form a delta functor

Statement refuted

A family of additive functors together with arbitrary exact connecting maps is automatically a homological delta functor.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The ordinary homology delta functor on complexes and one short exact sequence whose connecting morphism is nonzero.

[L1]

A homological delta functor requires both exactness and naturality of the connecting maps (Homological delta functor).

[L2]

Homology of complexes is a genuine homological delta functor (Homology of complexes satisfies the delta-functor naturality and exactness laws).

[L3]

There is a concrete short exact sequence of complexes with nonzero connecting morphism (A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map).

Counterexample

1.1

Start with the homology delta functor from [L2]. Keep every functor Hn unchanged and keep every connecting map unchanged except on one chosen short exact sequence with nonzero connector from [L3], where replace by . Each individual long exact sequence remains exact.

L2L3givenconstruct
2.1

Choose a distinct isomorphic copy of the cone sequence in [L3], and alter the connector on only the original sequence. The chosen isomorphism of short exact sequences induces isomorphisms on the two homology groups. Before the alteration, naturality identifies the two routes around the connecting square with the same map ±1:ZZ. After changing exactly one connector to its negative, the two routes are opposite maps ±1 and 1, which are unequal over Z. Hence this naturality square fails, and [L1] shows that the altered family is not a homological delta functor.

L1L2L3step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Two universal delta functors and their unique isomorphism

Example

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.

Let A and B be abelian categories, suppose A has enough projectives, and let F:AB be additive and right exact. If P and Q are two supplied projective resolution data on all objects of A, then the two universal homological delta functors (LnPF)n0and(LnQF)n0 are uniquely isomorphic. After choosing the standard natural identifications L0PFFL0QF, the isomorphism is the unique one whose degree-zero component corresponds to idF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two supplied projective resolution data P and Q on all objects of A for the same right exact functor F.

[L1]

Each of the two derived constructions is a universal homological delta functor (Derived functors are universal delta functors).

[L2]

Two universal delta functors with the same degree-zero term are uniquely isomorphic (Universal delta functors extending the same degree-zero functor are uniquely isomorphic).

[L3]

For every supplied projective resolution datum, the zeroth left derived functor is naturally isomorphic to the original right exact functor (Left derived functors form a homological delta functor).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], both (LnPF) and (LnQF) are universal homological delta functors, and [L3] supplies their natural degree-zero identifications with F.

L1L3given
2.1

Choose the natural degree-zero identifications with F from step 1.1. Applying [L2] yields the unique isomorphism of delta functors whose degree-zero part corresponds under those identifications to idF; its higher components are then forced.

L2step 1.1

Sources