Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Top normal classes vanish for Euclidean embeddings

Statement

Assume AC. Let j:Mm↪Rm+k be a smooth embedding of a closed smooth manifold, with m≥1 and k≥1, and let νj be its rank-k normal bundle. Then wˉk(TM)=wk(νj)=0in Hk(M;F2). If νj is integrally oriented, then also e(νj)=0in Hk(M;Z). Together with rank vanishing, wˉi(TM)=0 for every i≥k. Thus a nonzero top normal class obstructs embedding in codimension k, even though rank alone permits that class for an immersion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth embedding j:Mm↪Rm+k of a closed smooth manifold with m≥1, k≥1, its normal bundle νj of rank k, and AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Under ACω (hence under AC) the embedding gives a rank-k stable normal inverse (νj,φ) of M, where νj=j∗TRm+k/dj(TM) is the normal quotient (An embedding into Euclidean space gives a rank-(n-m) stable normal inverse); if νj is integrally oriented it is an oriented rank-k bundle in the sense of the Thom interface.

[F2]

Let Φ be a compatible tubular chart for νj with a metric h and radius ρ (existing under countable choice, hence under AC); its collapse is a based continuous map c:(Rm+k)+→Th⁡h(νj) sending the tube to the disk-sphere quotient model and every other point to the basepoint. The zero section s:M→D(νj) followed by the quotient map q:D(νj)→Th⁡h(νj) is the based zero section z=q∘s, and on M the collapse satisfies c∘j=z (Pontryagin–Thom collapse with specified normal data).

[F3]

For either coefficient ring R=F2 or R=Z with a supplied integral orientation, the normalized Thom class u∈Hk(D(νj),S(νj);R) corresponds under the quotient identification to a class u∈Hk(Th⁡h(νj);R) of positive degree, and the quotient-map pullback q∗(u) is the relative-to-absolute image of the relative Thom class; hence z∗(u)=s∗q∗(u)=e(νj), the Euler class of Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class, which by The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class equals wk(νj) for R=F2, while for R=Z it is the oriented Euler class (Thom class and Thom isomorphism: the AT interface, Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class, The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class).

[F4]

Since m≥1 and k≥1, one has 0<k<N for N=m+k, so the one-point compactification has Hk((RN)+;R)=0 for R=Z and R=F2 (Positive intermediate cohomology of compactified Euclidean space vanishes). Cohomology is contravariantly functorial, so f∗(0)=0 and (c∘j)∗=j∗c∗ (Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial).

[F5]

A closed smooth manifold is a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space of CW homotopy type over which every smooth bundle, in particular νj, is numerable (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type); this places M and νj in the scope of the Thom interface and of the mod-two Euler class theorem.

[F6]

For the stable normal inverse (νj,φ) one has w(νj)=w(TM)−1, so wk(νj)=wˉk(TM); also wi(νj)=0 for i>k because νj has rank k (The normal Stiefel-Whitney class is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent class, Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5

Let u denote the normalized Thom class of νj in degree k, in the relative model, and also its image in Hk(Th⁡h(νj);R) under the quotient identification of [F3]; the degree k is positive and the Thom space is based, so the reduced and ordinary descriptions agree in this degree. Pulling back along the collapse gives c∗u∈Hk((Rm+k)+;R), which is zero by [F4] since 0<k<m+k; the interface and the mod-two Euler theorem apply to νj because the closed manifold is a suitable base by [F5].

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

By [F2] the collapse satisfies c∘j=z; functoriality [F4] gives z∗u=(c∘j)∗u=j∗c∗u=j∗0=0in Hk(M;R). The composite z=q∘s is the zero section followed by the quotient map, so by [F3] z∗u=s∗q∗u=e(νj). Hence e(νj)=0 in Hk(M;R) for the chosen coefficient ring: for R=Z this is the oriented Euler class, and for R=F2 the mod-two Euler class.

3.1F1F3F6step 2.1

For R=F2, the published identification e2(νj)=wk(νj) of [F3] gives wk(νj)=0 in Hk(M;F2), and by [F1] and [F6] this class equals wˉk(TM). For R=Z with νj integrally oriented, step 2.1 gives the oriented Euler vanishing e(νj)=0.

4.1F3F6step 3.1∎

Finally, for every i>k the rank convention gives wi(νj)=0 because rank⁡νj=k, so by [F6] wˉi(TM)=wi(νj)=0 for all i>k; together with the degree-k vanishing of step 3.1 this gives wˉi(TM)=0 for every i≥k. In particular a nonzero top normal class in degree k is an obstruction to embedding in codimension exactly k, in contrast with the rank test, which only sees the classes of degree >k for immersions. The argument uses AC through the Thom interface and the embedding normal-bundle lemma; orientation is needed only for the integral Euler clause, and no Poincaré duality or ambient fundamental class is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources