How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Top normal classes vanish for Euclidean embeddings
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a smooth embedding of a closed smooth manifold, with and , and let be its rank- normal bundle. Then If is integrally oriented, then also Together with rank vanishing, for every . Thus a nonzero top normal class obstructs embedding in codimension , even though rank alone permits that class for an immersion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth embedding of a closed smooth manifold with , , its normal bundle of rank , and AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Under (hence under AC) the embedding gives a rank- stable normal inverse of , where is the normal quotient (An embedding into Euclidean space gives a rank-(n-m) stable normal inverse); if is integrally oriented it is an oriented rank- bundle in the sense of the Thom interface.
Let be a compatible tubular chart for with a metric and radius (existing under countable choice, hence under AC); its collapse is a based continuous map sending the tube to the disk-sphere quotient model and every other point to the basepoint. The zero section followed by the quotient map is the based zero section , and on the collapse satisfies (Pontryagin–Thom collapse with specified normal data).
For either coefficient ring or with a supplied integral orientation, the normalized Thom class corresponds under the quotient identification to a class of positive degree, and the quotient-map pullback is the relative-to-absolute image of the relative Thom class; hence , the Euler class of Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class, which by The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class equals for , while for it is the oriented Euler class (Thom class and Thom isomorphism: the AT interface, Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class, The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class).
Since and , one has for , so the one-point compactification has for and (Positive intermediate cohomology of compactified Euclidean space vanishes). Cohomology is contravariantly functorial, so and (Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial).
A closed smooth manifold is a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space of CW homotopy type over which every smooth bundle, in particular , is numerable (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type); this places and in the scope of the Thom interface and of the mod-two Euler class theorem.
For the stable normal inverse one has , so ; also for because has rank (The normal Stiefel-Whitney class is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent class, Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation).
Proof
Let denote the normalized Thom class of in degree , in the relative model, and also its image in under the quotient identification of [F3]; the degree is positive and the Thom space is based, so the reduced and ordinary descriptions agree in this degree. Pulling back along the collapse gives , which is zero by [F4] since ; the interface and the mod-two Euler theorem apply to because the closed manifold is a suitable base by [F5].
By [F2] the collapse satisfies ; functoriality [F4] gives The composite is the zero section followed by the quotient map, so by [F3] . Hence in for the chosen coefficient ring: for this is the oriented Euler class, and for the mod-two Euler class.
For , the published identification of [F3] gives in , and by [F1] and [F6] this class equals . For with integrally oriented, step 2.1 gives the oriented Euler vanishing .
Finally, for every the rank convention gives because , so by [F6] for all ; together with the degree- vanishing of step 3.1 this gives for every . In particular a nonzero top normal class in degree is an obstruction to embedding in codimension exactly , in contrast with the rank test, which only sees the classes of degree for immersions. The argument uses AC through the Thom interface and the embedding normal-bundle lemma; orientation is needed only for the integral Euler clause, and no Poincaré duality or ambient fundamental class is used.
Depends on
- Positive intermediate cohomology of compactified Euclidean space vanishes
- Pontryagin–Thom collapse with specified normal data
- Thom class and Thom isomorphism: the AT interface
- Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class
- The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class
- The normal Stiefel-Whitney class is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent class
- An embedding into Euclidean space gives a rank-(n-m) stable normal inverse
- Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type
- Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial
- The Axiom of Choice
- Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John W. Milnor and James D. Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (standard reference, not scraped)