How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transitive systems of imprimitivity and their normalized measure class
Definition
A system of imprimitivity on a standard Borel -space (Systems of imprimitivity for a Borel -space, Standard Borel spaces) is transitive when is -equivariantly isomorphic to a homogeneous space with closed, the isomorphism carrying the Borel structure of (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Left and right cosets and of a subgroup, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous); hence then is second-countable locally compact, the action on is the left-coset action, and the stabilizer of the identity coset is . For a transitive system one fixes the base identification .
Assume AC for the following normalized-measure existence and uniqueness assertions: a normalized representative is a strongly quasi-invariant Radon measure on built from a rho-function (Rho-function for a closed subgroup, Quasi-invariant Radon measure on G/H, Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes). The normalized homogeneous measure class is the unique class of nonzero quasi-invariant Radon measures on ; the system is called transitive on .
Well-definedness. The equivariant-isomorphism clause is a condition on the given system and selects the conjugacy class of : if is the image of the identity coset under a -equivariant Borel isomorphism, then by the computation (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup); conversely a homogeneous space for second-countable locally compact and closed is a standard Borel -space with Borel action (Second-countable locally compact Hausdorff spaces are Polish, and homogeneous quotients are standard Borel, Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)). The normalized class exists and is unique: the rho-function theorem supplies a full-support strongly quasi-invariant Radon representative (Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes), two rho-functions give representatives in the same class (their densities are positive continuous), and every nonzero -finite quasi-invariant Borel measure is equivalent to (Haar null classes and Borel descent on a homogeneous space); in particular the class does not depend on the chosen rho-function, on the normalization of Haar measure, or on the choice of the base-point identification. Consumers that use only the definitional term transitive do not consume the normalized-measure existence assertion.
The definition names no choice; AC is used exactly by the quoted rho-function and Haar-lift suppliers for existence and uniqueness of the normalized class.
Depends on
- Systems of imprimitivity for a Borel $G$-space
- Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
- Standard Borel spaces
- Quasi-invariant Radon measure on G/H
- Left and right cosets $gH$ and $Hg$ of a subgroup
- Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)
- Second-countable locally compact Hausdorff spaces are Polish, and homogeneous quotients are standard Borel
- Existence of rho-functions and quotient measure classes
- Rho-function for a closed subgroup
- Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous
- Second countability: an at most countable basis for the topology
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- The Axiom of Choice
- Haar null classes and Borel descent on a homogeneous space
Used by
- Mackey little-group reduction for an abelian normal subgroup Corollary
- A nontransitive system with two orbits is not classified by one stabilizer Counterexample
- Unitary equivalence of systems of imprimitivity and of the induced representations Definition
- Finite transitive G-sets recover the stabilizer-induction classification Example
- Little groups for the real ax+b group and its orientation-preserving subgroup Example
- The regular translation system on L²(ℝⁿ): position, momentum and trivial stabilizer Example
- An induced representation carries a canonical system of imprimitivity on G/H Lemma
- Spectral multiplicity model of a transitive system of imprimitivity Lemma
- The imprimitivity reconstruction map is isometric and intertwining Lemma
- The stabilizer acts unitarily on an imprimitivity fibre Lemma
- Mackey's imprimitivity theorem Theorem
- Uniqueness in the imprimitivity theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. W. Mackey, Imprimitivity for Representations of Locally Compact Groups I, PNAS 35 (1949) 537-545 (Internet Archive capture of the PubMed Central scan) (standard reference, not scraped)
- V. S. Sunder, Notes on the Imprimitivity Theorem (ISIBangalore/IMSc lecture notes, 22 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)