Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A genus-two compact surface gives a cocompact Fuchsian group

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let a1,…,a6∈C be distinct, put P(x)=∏j=16(x−aj) and let X0={(x,y)∈C2:y2=P(x)} be the affine hyperelliptic curve, completed at infinity by the two charts constructed in step 1.2. Then the completed space X is a compact connected Riemann surface, and the projection π:X→C^,(x,y)↦x,∞±↦∞, is a proper holomorphic map of degree 2 whose branch values are exactly the six numbers a1,…,a6, each carrying a single point of ramification index 2, while the value ∞ is unramified. Consequently:

  1. X is a compact Riemann surface of genus 2;
  2. X has hyperbolic universal-covering type: its holomorphic universal cover p:X~→X is biholomorphic to D;
  3. writing ψ:X~→D for a biholomorphism and Γ:=ψDeck⁡(p)ψ−1≤Aut⁡(D), the transported map Ψ:=p∘ψ−1:D→X is a covering whose deck group is exactly Γ; the group Γ is torsion-free, and it is discrete for the compact-open topology on Aut⁡(D); it acts on D freely and properly discontinuously, and D/Γ is homeomorphic to X;
  4. X is a cocompact Fuchsian quotient.

Here a subgroup of Aut⁡(D) is called Fuchsian when it acts on D freely and properly discontinuously; its quotient is cocompact when that quotient is compact. No examples-page item and no Gauss-Bonnet theorem is consumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; distinct a1,…,a6∈C; P(x)=∏j=16(x−aj) and uj(x)=P(x)/(x−aj); the affine curve X0={(x,y)∈C2:y2=P(x)} with the projection π0(x,y)=x; the Riemann sphere C^ with its two standard charts; Q(t)=∏j=16(1−ajt); the completed space X=X0∪{∞+,∞−} with the two charts at infinity of step 2.1 and the projection π equal to π0 on X0 and sending ∞± to ∞; and a choice of ε>0 with Q≠0 on ∣t∣<ε together with a holomorphic square root ρ of Q on that disc.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice): every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. It is used only through the genus interface [F13] and the existence and type assertions of the holomorphic universal cover [F14], both of which assume it; every selection made in the construction below is finite or explicit.

[F1]

Riemann surfaces, holomorphic maps and biholomorphisms (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains): a Riemann surface is a nonempty connected Hausdorff second-countable space with a holomorphic atlas whose charts are homeomorphisms onto plane domains and whose transitions are holomorphic in both directions; a map of Riemann surfaces is holomorphic when its chart expressions are holomorphic; a biholomorphism is a bijective holomorphic map with holomorphic inverse, and it is in particular a homeomorphism.

[F2]

The holomorphic implicit function theorem (The holomorphic implicit function theorem): if F is holomorphic near (a,b), F(a,b)=0, and the partial derivative of F in the second variable does not vanish at (a,b), then near (a,b) the zero set of F is the graph w=φ(z) of a unique holomorphic φ, and F(z,w)=0 exactly when w=φ(z); the same statement holds with the roles of the variables exchanged.

[F3]

Local logarithm and square root (A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm): a nowhere-vanishing holomorphic function h on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm L with exp⁡L=h; then ρ:=exp⁡(L/2) is holomorphic with ρ2=h.

[F4]

The Riemann sphere and its charts (The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity): the standard charts are ϕ0(z)=z on C^∖{∞} and ϕ∞ with ϕ∞(z)=1/z for z∈C× and ϕ∞(∞)=0; on the overlap the transition is w↦1/w, holomorphic on C×.

[F5]

The sphere as a topological sphere (Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere): stereographic projection Σ:C^→S2, with S2={(x,y,t)∈R3:x2+y2+t2=1}, is a homeomorphism.

[F6]

The sphere is connected (Sn is simply connected for every n≥2, Simply connected topological spaces): S2 is simply connected, hence nonempty and path connected, hence connected.

[F8]

Connectedness tools (If A is connected and A⊆B⊆A‾ then B is connected; in particular the closure of a connected set is connected, A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property, A subset of R is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets): a set squeezed between a connected set and its closure is connected, so closures of connected sets are connected; continuous images of connected sets are connected; a subset of R is connected exactly when it is order-convex, so [0,2π] is connected; and a two-point space such as {1,−1} is disconnected, being the union of its two nonempty open singletons.

[F9]

Path connectivity (The exterior of a closed disc in the plane is path-connected, Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component): for every real R≥0 and centre c the exterior {z∈C:∣z−c∣>R} is path connected, hence connected; and a path-connected space is connected.

[F10]

Ramification (Local power-map normal form on Riemann surfaces, Ramification index, ramification order and branch value): for a nonconstant holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces there are centred charts with expression z↦ze, the exponent e=ex(f) is the ramification index, the index equals the order ord⁡x(f−f(x)) of the centred expression in any charts, and ex(f)=1 exactly when f is a local biholomorphism at x.

[F11]

Degree of a proper map (Degree of a proper holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces): for a proper nonconstant holomorphic map f between connected Riemann surfaces the weighted fibre count d=∑x∈f−1(y)ex(f) is a positive finite integer independent of y.

[F12]

Riemann-Hurwitz (Riemann–Hurwitz formula for compact Riemann surfaces): for a nonconstant holomorphic map f:X→Y of compact connected Riemann surfaces, 2g(X)−2=d(2g(Y)−2)+∑x∈X(ex−1).

[F13]

Genus and classification (Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface, Topological classification of compact Riemann surfaces): under the Axiom of Choice every compact Riemann surface is homeomorphic to #gT2 for exactly one g≥0, where #0T2=S2; that number is the genus, and g=0 holds exactly for the sphere.

[F14]

Universal cover, type and the compact-genus corollary (Spherical, parabolic and hyperbolic universal-covering types, The genus of a compact Riemann surface determines its uniformization type): under the Axiom of Choice a connected Riemann surface has a holomorphic universal cover p:X~→X, every deck transformation is biholomorphic, and X~ is biholomorphic to exactly one of C^, C, D, the occurring model being the universal-covering type (spherical, parabolic, hyperbolic); and a compact Riemann surface of genus at least 2 has hyperbolic type, so its holomorphic universal cover is biholomorphic to D.

[F15]

Free and properly discontinuous actions (Free and properly discontinuous group actions): an action of a group G on a space Y by homeomorphisms is free when no nonidentity element fixes a point, and properly discontinuous when for every compact K⊆Y only finitely many g∈G satisfy gK∩K≠∅.

[F16]

Coverings, sheets and deck transformations (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings, Universal covering spaces, On a connected covering space, a deck transformation is determined by one point and the deck action is free): a covering map is a continuous surjection every point of whose base has an evenly covered neighbourhood U whose preimage is a disjoint union of open sheets each mapped homeomorphically onto U; a universal covering is a covering with simply connected total space; deck transformations are the homeomorphisms over the base and form a group acting by evaluation; and for a covering with connected total space two deck transformations agreeing at one point are equal, so the deck group acts freely.

[F17]

The uniformization interface (Deck transformations preserve the hyperbolic metric): for a connected Riemann surface of hyperbolic universal-covering type with a uniformization (p,ψ), where p:X~→X is its holomorphic universal covering and ψ:X~→D is a biholomorphism, every h∈Deck⁡(p) is a biholomorphism of X~ and the conjugate γh:=ψ∘h∘ψ−1 is an automorphism of D.

[F18]

Deck transitivity on fibres (For a path-connected locally path-connected semilocally simply connected base, the deck group of a universal cover is isomorphic to the fundamental group): for a path-connected, locally path-connected, semilocally simply connected base the deck group of a universal cover is isomorphic to the fundamental group, the isomorphism carrying a loop class to the deck transformation that moves the chosen point of the fibre to the corresponding lifted endpoint; consequently the deck group acts transitively on every fibre.

[F19]

Disc automorphisms (Every automorphism of the disc is a rotated Blaschke factor, The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors): a holomorphic map f:D→D is an automorphism of D if and only if there are a∈D and θ∈R with f(z)=eiθφa(z)=eiθa−z1−a‾ z(z∈D).

[F20]

Mobius transformations (Möbius transformations of the Riemann sphere, Nonidentity Möbius transformations are parabolic or conjugate to a dilation, with the projective trace invariant): a Mobius transformation is a map z↦(az+b)/(cz+d) with ad−bc≠0, extended to C^; a nonidentity Mobius transformation is either parabolic, with one fixed point, and then conjugate to z↦z+1, or has two fixed points and is conjugate to z↦λz for some λ∈C×∖{1}; and for any representing matrix A the quantity τ(M)=tr⁡(A)2/det⁡A is independent of the representative, equals λ+2+λ−1 in the dilation normal form and equals 4 in the translation normal form.

[F21]

The compact-open topology (The compact-open topology on C(X,Y) for a metric domain X, with subbasis S(K,V)={f:f[K]⊆V}, For a metric domain and a metric target the compact-open topology on C(X,Y) is the topology of compact convergence, The topology of compact convergence on C(X,Y) for metric X and Y: uniform convergence on each compact subset of X): on the set C(D,D) of continuous maps the compact-open topology, generated by the sets S(K,V)={f:f[K]⊆V} over compact K and open V, is the same topology as the topology of compact convergence, for which the sets BL(g,δ)={f:d(f(x),g(x))<δ for every x∈L} over compact L⊆D and δ>0 form a neighbourhood base at g.

[F22]

Quotient topology and homeomorphisms (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection, Characteristic properties: a map into a space with the initial topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, a map out of a space with the final topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, and the two topologies are respectively the coarsest and the finest making that family continuous, Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological): for a surjection q:Y→Z the quotient topology on Z is the final topology of q, so a subset of Z is open exactly when its preimage under q is open in Y and a map k:Z→W is continuous exactly when k∘q is continuous; a continuous bijection whose inverse is continuous, equivalently a continuous bijection which is an open map, is a homeomorphism.

Proof technique: direct.

Verification

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

The affine curve and its local parameters. Let F(x,y):=y2−P(x) and let (x0,y0)∈X0. The gradient (−P′(x),2y) does not vanish at (x0,y0): if y0≠0 this is read off the second component, while if y0=0 then P(x0)=0, so x0=aj for a unique j and −P′(aj)=−∏k≠j(aj−ak)≠0 because the six roots are distinct. By [F2] the curve is therefore locally a graph over a coordinate: where y0≠0 there are discs A∋x0, B∋y0 and a holomorphic η:A→B with X0∩(A×B)={(x,η(x)):x∈A}, and at (aj,0) there are discs Aj∋aj, Bj∋0 and a holomorphic ψj:Bj→Aj with X0∩(Aj×Bj)={(ψj(y),y):y∈Bj}. The maps x↦(x,η(x)) and y↦(ψj(y),y) are homeomorphisms onto their images, with inverses given by the holomorphic coordinate functions x and y, so the two families of charts are compatible in both directions [F1]. Moreover uj is holomorphic near aj with uj(aj)=P′(aj)≠0, so from y2=P(ψj(y))=(ψj(y)−aj)uj(ψj(y)) one obtains ψj(y)−aj=y2wj(y) with wj:=1/(uj∘ψj) holomorphic near 0 and wj(0)=1/P′(aj)≠0. Hence the projection π0(x,y)=x has, in the chart with parameter y at (aj,0) and the centred target chart z↦aj+z, the expression y↦y2wj(y), of order 2 at 0, while at a point with y≠0 its expression in the chart with parameter x is z↦z.

1.2F9given

The complement of the six roots is path connected. Let V:=C∖{a1,…,a6} and fix R>max⁡{1/ε,1+max⁡j∣aj∣}. For x∈V with ∣x∣≤R, choose a direction θ different from the at most six directions toward the roots. The segment of length 3R from x in that direction avoids the roots and ends in E:={z∈C:∣z∣>R}, since its endpoint has modulus at least 3R−∣x∣≥2R>R. If ∣x∣>R, then x∈E already. The set E is path connected by [F9] and is contained in V, so any two points of V can be joined in V by paths through E. Hence V is path connected and connected.

2.1F3F4givenalgebra

Completion at infinity. Put t:=1/x and v:=y/x3, so that on X0 with x≠0 the equation y2=P(x) reads v2=P(x)/x6=Q(t)=∏j=16(1−ajt), and Q(0)=1. Choose ε>0 with Q(t)≠0 for ∣t∣<ε; by [F3] there is a holomorphic L on that disc with exp⁡L=Q, and ρ:=exp⁡(L/2) satisfies ρ2=Q and ρ(0)≠0. Add two points ∞+ and ∞− to X0 and declare t↦(t,+ρ(t)),t↦(t,−ρ(t))(∣t∣<ε), to be charts at them. For t≠0 the corresponding point of the first chart is (x,y)=(1/t,ρ(t)t−3), and y2=t−6ρ(t)2=t−6Q(t)=P(1/t)=P(x), so it lies in X0; the two charts are glued to the affine charts of step 1.1 by the transition maps t=1/x, v=y/x3 and their inverses x=1/t, y=v/t3, holomorphic on t≠0. Thus X:=X0∪{∞+,∞−} carries the atlas of steps 1.1 and 2.1, and towards the chart ϕ∞ of [F4] the projection π has at ∞± the expression t↦t. Moreover for every R>1/ε the points of X with ∣x∣>R, equivalently with t=1/x satisfying 0<∣t∣<1/R, are exactly the points of the two chart images with t≠0, and their second coordinates are ±x3ρ(1/x).

2.2F3F8F16step 1.1step 1.2

The punctured affine curve is a connected two-sheeted cover of V. Put Z:={(x,y)∈X0:x∈V}. For x∈V one has P(x)≠0, so by [F3] there are a disc D(x,r)⊆V and a holomorphic square root ρx of P on it; the two maps z↦(z,±ρx(z)) are local inverses of π0, and they exhibit π0−1(D(x,r)) as the disjoint union of two open sets each mapped homeomorphically onto D(x,r). Hence π0:Z→V is a covering of degree 2 [F16], so it is continuous and open, and Z is Hausdorff and second countable as a subspace of C2. Suppose Z were disconnected, say Z=Z1⊔Z2 with the Zi nonempty, open and closed. Over each small evenly covered disc, each of the two connected sheets lies wholly in one of the clopen Zi, so the number of sheet points in Zi is locally constant on V. Thus the images π0(Zi) are nonempty, open and closed in the connected space V (step 1.2), hence equal to V; and since each fibre of π0 consists of exactly two points, one over each Zi, the restriction π0∣Z1 is a bijection onto V with local continuous inverse, hence a homeomorphism. Its inverse provides a continuous s:V→C with s(x)2=P(x) for all x∈V. Fix 0<ε1<min⁡k≠1∣a1−ak∣ and, by [F3], a holomorphic ρ on D(a1,ε1) with ρ2=u1; there u1 is holomorphic and nowhere zero. Define c(θ):=a1+(ε1/2)eiθ, w(θ):=(ε1/2)1/2eiθ/2, so w(θ)2=c(θ)−a1, and g(θ):=s(c(θ))/(w(θ)ρ(c(θ))) for θ∈[0,2π]. Then g(θ)2=P(c(θ))(c(θ)−a1)u1(c(θ))=1, so g maps the connected interval [0,2π] continuously into {1,−1} [F8]; a continuous image of a connected set is connected while {1,−1} is disconnected, so g is constant [F8]. But s(c(2π))=s(c(0)), ρ(c(2π))=ρ(c(0)) and w(2π)=−w(0), so g(2π)=−g(0)≠g(0), a contradiction. Hence Z is connected.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1

The completed space is Hausdorff and second countable, and π is holomorphic for the atlas. Distinct points of X0 are separated by the Hausdorff topology of C2, the affine charts being restrictions of the coordinate projections; the two points ∞+ and ∞− are separated because their chart values at t=0 are ρ(0) and −ρ(0), which are distinct and give disjoint chart images. A point (x0,y0)∈X0 with R>max⁡{∣x0∣,1/ε} and an infinity point are separated by the open sets {∣x∣<R}∩X0 and the image under the relevant chart of the disc ∣t∣<1/R, which is disjoint from the first by step 2.1. Hence X is Hausdorff. A countable base of the topology of X is obtained from a countable base of the open subspace X0, which is second countable as a subspace of C2, together with the images under the two chart maps of a countable base of the disc ∣t∣<ε; these sets are open and every open subset of X is the union of its intersections with the three open pieces X0 and the two chart images, so X is second countable. The chart expressions of π are holomorphic: z↦z and y↦ψj(y) on the affine charts of step 1.1 and t↦t on the two charts at infinity of step 2.1. Consequently, once X is known to be connected, it is a Riemann surface with this atlas and π is a nonconstant holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces [F1].

3.2F7step 1.1step 2.1

The completed space is compact. Fix R>1/ε. The set K:={(x,y)∈X0:∣x∣≤R} is the intersection of the closed set X0 with the closed cylinder {∣x∣≤R} in C2, hence closed; on it ∣y∣2=∣P(x)∣≤∏j(R+∣aj∣), so it is bounded in C2, hence compact [F7]. The image of the closed disc ∣t∣≤1/R under each of the two charts at infinity is compact, being a continuous image of a compact set [F7], and it contains the corresponding point ∞±; by step 2.1 every point of X with ∣x∣>R lies in one of these two images. Therefore X=K∪(image of the +-chart)∪(image of the −-chart) is a finite union of compact subsets, hence compact.

4.1F1F8step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

The completed space is connected. By step 2.2 the set Z is connected and contained in X0. Every point of X0∖Z, namely each (aj,0), is a limit point of Z: in the chart y↦(ψj(y),y) of step 1.1 the points with 0<∣y∣<δ have x=ψj(y)=aj+y2wj(y)≠aj, so they lie in Z, and they tend to (aj,0) as y→0. Hence X0 lies between the connected set Z and its closure, so X0 is connected [F8]. Likewise each ∞± is a limit point of X0: the points of its chart with 0<∣t∣<δ belong to X0 by step 2.1 and tend to ∞± as t→0; hence X lies between the connected set X0 and its closure, so X is connected [F8]. By step 3.1, X is a Riemann surface.

5.1F10step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1

The ramification points of π are the six branch points. At a point (x0,y0)∈X0 with y0≠0 the chart of step 1.1 has local parameter x and the chart expression of π towards ϕ0 is z↦z, so the ramification index is 1 there, by the description of the index as an order [F10]. Over each aj the only point of X is (aj,0), because y2=P(aj)=0 forces y=0; in the chart with local parameter y and the centred target chart at aj the expression of π is y↦y2wj(y) with wj(0)≠0 (step 1.1), whose order at 0 is 2, so e(aj,0)(π)=2 [F10]. At ∞± the chart expression towards ϕ∞ is t↦t (step 2.1), so the index is 1 and ∞ is not a branch value. Hence the branch values of π are exactly the six distinct numbers a1,…,a6, each with exactly one preimage, of index 2, and every other value has all its preimages of index 1.

6.1F7F11step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1

π is proper of degree two. By steps 3.1 and 4.1 the space X is a Riemann surface and π:X→C^ is nonconstant holomorphic. For compact K⊆C^ the preimage π−1(K) is closed in X, because π is continuous and K is closed in the Hausdorff space C^; being a closed subset of the compact space X (step 3.2), it is compact [F7]. So π is proper, and the degree theorem [F11] applies. For b∈C∖{a1,…,a6} the fibre is π−1(b)={(b,P(b)),(b,−P(b))}, two distinct points, each of index 1 by step 5.1, so d=deg⁡π=2.

7.1F5F6F7F12F13step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1

The genus is two. By steps 3.2, 4.1 and 6.1 the map π is a nonconstant holomorphic map of degree 2 between compact connected Riemann surfaces, so Riemann-Hurwitz [F12] gives 2g(X)−2=2(2g(C^)−2)+∑x∈X(ex(π)−1). By step 5.1 the ramification points are exactly the six points (aj,0), each with index 2, while all other points, namely the affine points with y≠0 and the two points ∞±, have index 1; hence the sum equals 6. The sphere C^ is compact, being homeomorphic to the closed bounded subset S2 of R3 [F5, F7], and connected [F6]; and g(C^)=0, because C^≅S2=#0T2 and the genus is the unique handle number [F13]. Therefore 2g(X)−2=2(0−2)+6=2, that is g(X)=2.

8.1A1F14F17step 7.1

Hyperbolic type and the uniformization. By step 7.1 the surface X is a compact Riemann surface of genus 2, so the compact-genus corollary [F14], whose choice hypothesis is covered by [A1], gives that X has hyperbolic universal-covering type: its holomorphic universal cover p:X~→X satisfies X~≅D [F14], and fixing a biholomorphism ψ:X~→D gives a uniformization (p,ψ) [F14]. By [F17] the conjugate γh:=ψ∘h∘ψ−1 is an automorphism of D for every h∈Deck⁡(p), and Γ:=ψDeck⁡(p)ψ−1={γh:h∈Deck⁡(p)} is a subgroup of Aut⁡(D), isomorphic to Deck⁡(p).

9.1F16step 8.1

The transported covering, its deck group, and freeness. Define Ψ:=p∘ψ−1:D→X. A homeomorphism of the total space carries evenly covered neighbourhoods to evenly covered neighbourhoods, so Ψ is a covering map, with the same evenly covered sets as p [F16]. A homeomorphism h of D satisfies Ψ∘h=Ψ exactly when p∘ψ−1hψ=p, that is exactly when ψ−1hψ∈Deck⁡(p), that is exactly when h∈Γ; hence Deck⁡(Ψ)=Γ. Since D is connected, deck transformations of Ψ agreeing at one point are equal, so Deck⁡(Ψ)=Γ acts freely on D [F16].

10.1F15F16step 9.1

The action of Γ is properly discontinuous. Let K⊆D be compact. Use the family of all evenly covered coordinate-disc neighbourhoods U and smaller open neighbourhoods W whose compact closures lie in U. Finitely many Wi cover Ψ(K). For each i, the set K∩Ψ−1(W‾i) is closed in K, hence compact; the sheets over Ui cover it, so only finitely many sheets meet it. Denote these by Si. If γK∩K≠∅, write γx=y with x,y∈K and choose i with Ψ(x)=Ψ(y)∈Wi. The sheets V,V′∈Si containing x,y are over the same Ui, and γ maps V onto V′ because it is a deck transformation. Two deck transformations mapping V onto V′ agree at the unique point of V above any fixed base point, hence agree everywhere by [F16]. Therefore at most ∑i∣Si∣2 elements of Γ move K to meet itself, so the action is properly discontinuous [F15].

10.2F16F21step 9.1

Γ is discrete. Fix z0∈D. For each γ∈Γ choose an evenly covered neighbourhood of Ψ(z0) and its sheet V containing γ(z0). The compact-open set S({z0},V) is a neighbourhood of γ. If γ′∈Γ also lies in it, then γ′(z0) and γ(z0) lie in the same sheet and fibre, so injectivity on the sheet makes these values equal. Deck rigidity [F16] gives γ′=γ. Every element of Γ is therefore isolated in the compact-open topology.

10.3F19F20step 9.1algebra

Γ is torsion-free. Let γ∈Γ with γm=id for some m≥1; we show γ=id. By [F19] there are a∈D and θ∈R with γ=eiθφa, where φa(z)=(a−z)/(1−a‾ z); written as a quotient of linear polynomials this exhibits γ as a Mobius transformation [F20]. Assume γ≠id; the classification [F20] gives two alternatives. In the parabolic alternative γ is conjugate to z↦z+1, so γm is conjugate to z↦z+m≠id, contradicting γm=id. In the other alternative γ has two fixed points and is conjugate to z↦λz with λ∈C×∖{1}; then γm=id forces λm=1, so ∣λ∣=1, λ≠1, and the invariant τ(γ)=tr⁡(A)2/det⁡A of any representing matrix A equals λ+2+λ−1=2+2Re⁡λ, which lies in [0,4) [F20]. The matrix A=(−eiθeiθa−a‾1) represents γ, and tr⁡A=1−eiθ, det⁡A=−eiθ(1−r2) with r:=∣a∣<1, so τ(γ)=(1−eiθ)2−eiθ(1−r2)=4sin⁡2(θ/2)1−r2. Hence 4sin⁡2(θ/2)<4(1−r2), that is r2<cos⁡2(θ/2); writing c:=cos⁡(θ/2) we have r<∣c∣. If a=0 then γ(z)=−eiθz fixes 0∈D, contradicting the freeness of the action of Γ (step 9.1); so a≠0 and r>0. The fixed points of γ solve γ(z)=z, that is a‾ z2−(1+eiθ)z+eiθa=0; substituting z=eiθ/2w and dividing by eiθ turns this into a‾ w2−2cw+a=0, and multiplying by a gives r2w2−2acw+a2=0, whose roots are w=a(c±s)/r2 with s:=(c2−r2)1/2>0 real. Hence z±=eiθ/2a(c±s)/r2 are the two fixed points of γ, and ∣z±∣=∣c±s∣/r. Since c2−s2=r2>0, one has s<∣c∣ and the two numbers c±s have the same sign. Thus min⁡{∣z+∣,∣z−∣}=(∣c∣−s)/r. Moreover ∣c∣2−s2=r2, so (∣c∣−s)/r=r/(∣c∣+s)<1. Hence one of the fixed points lies in D, contradicting freeness (step 9.1).

10.4F18F22step 3.2step 9.1

D/Γ is homeomorphic to X and compact. Let q:D→D/Γ be the quotient map of the action of Γ and give D/Γ the quotient topology [F22]. For γh∈Γ one has Ψ(γhz)=p(ψ−1ψhψ−1z)=p(hψ−1z)=p(ψ−1z)=Ψ(z), so Ψ is Γ-invariant and induces a map Φ:D/Γ→X with Φ∘q=Ψ; by the characteristic property of the quotient topology Φ is continuous [F22]. It is surjective because Ψ is. It is injective: if Ψ(z)=Ψ(z′), then ψ−1z and ψ−1z′ lie in one fibre of p, and the deck group of the universal cover acts transitively on each fibre [F18], so ψ−1z′=hψ−1z for some h∈Deck⁡(p) and hence z′=γhz, that is q(z′)=q(z). The map Ψ is open: if O⊆D is open and w=Ψ(u)∈Ψ(O), choose an evenly covered U∋w with sheet V∋u; then V∩O is open and Ψ(V∩O) is open in U, hence in X, and contains w. Consequently for every open O⊆D/Γ the set Φ(O)=Ψ(q−1(O)) is open in X [F22], since q is surjective; so the continuous bijection Φ is a homeomorphism [F22]. Therefore D/Γ≅X is compact by step 3.2, that is, Γ is cocompact.

11.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1step 8.1step 9.1step 10.1step 10.2step 10.3step 10.4∎

Conclusion. Steps 3.1 to 4.1 exhibit X as a compact connected Riemann surface (steps 3.2 and 4.1). Step 6.1 shows that the projection π:X→C^ is a proper holomorphic map of degree 2; step 5.1 identifies its branch values as the six numbers a1,…,a6, each with a single point of index 2 and with ∞ unramified; and step 7.1 computes g(X)=2. By step 8.1 the surface X has hyperbolic universal-covering type, with uniformization Ψ:D→X whose deck group is Γ≤Aut⁡(D) (step 9.1). The group Γ acts freely (step 9.1) and properly discontinuously (step 10.1), so it is Fuchsian in the sense of the Example; it is torsion-free (step 10.3) and discrete for the compact-open topology (step 10.2); and D/Γ≅X is compact (step 10.4), so the quotient is cocompact. This proves all the assertions of the Example.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

206 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources