Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Point pushing one puncture around another

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and take n=2, so that h=112, q1=(−h,0)=−112, q2=(h,0)=112 and the point-pushing domain is the once-punctured disc Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1} (Point pushing the last puncture, Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk). Holding q1 fixed, let the marked point q2 travel once around q1 clockwise along the circle of radius 2h:

γ(t):=q1+(q2−q1)(cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt)=−h+2h u(t),u(t):=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt,t∈I.

This example computes the point push of the last puncture around the first. The result is

Push⁡2([γ])=Ψ([σ1]2)=[H1]2,

the positive pure two-strand full twist: the square of the standard positive half twist σ1 of The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite, equivalently the square of the class of its explicit supported half rotation H1 of Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes. Reversing the direction of the loop, that is pushing q2 counterclockwise around q1, gives the inverse class Push⁡2([γ]−1)=[H1]−2. The computation is carried out with the inverse-endpoint boundary map δ of Boundary map from point motions, so it is the clockwise loop that produces the positive full twist; the class is pure because point pushing takes values in the pointwise stabiliser.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the number n=2 with h=112, the base configuration Q2=(q1,q2) with q1=(−h,0), q2=(h,0) and midpoint m1=q1+(h,0)=(0,0), the point-pushing domain Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1}, the unit complex number u(t)=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt, the loop γ(t)=q1+2h u(t), and the standard positive half twist σ1 with its explicit supported half rotation H1.

[F1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice and n≥1. A based loop γ of Yn=int⁡D2∖{q1,…,qn−1} at qn has ordered lift Lγ(t)=(q1,…,qn−1,γ(t)), a based loop of Fn(int⁡D2) at Qn; with γˉ:=pn∘Lγ and δ the inverse-endpoint boundary map of Boundary map from point motions, the point-push class Push⁡n([γ]):=δ([γˉ]) is a well-defined element of Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) depending only on [γ], the assignment Push⁡n:π1(Yn,qn)→PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is a group homomorphism whose values are pure classes, and no injectivity is asserted (Point pushing the last puncture).

[F2]

The base configuration is qj=((2j−n−1)h,0) with h=14(n+1); for n=2 this is h=112, q1=(−h,0), q2=(h,0) and m1=q1+(h,0)=(0,0), and the support disc U1=B(m1,32h) contains q1 and q2 and no other base point. The standard positive half twist is the tuple of motions (σ1)1(t)=m1+ρ(t), (σ1)2(t)=m1−ρ(t), where ρ(t)=(2th−h,−2th) for 0≤t≤12 and ρ(t)=(2th−h,2th−2h) for 12≤t≤1, so that ρ(0)=(−h,0), ρ(12)=(0,−h), ρ(1)=(h,0), ∥ρ(t)∥2≤h and ρ(t)≠0 for all t (The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F3]

Under the Axiom of Choice the composite Ψ=δ∘(ι∗C)−1∘Φ is a group isomorphism from the geometric braid group G2 at Q2 onto Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2), and for 1≤i≤n−1 it sends the standard positive half twist σi to the class of an explicit boundary-fixed homeomorphism Hi supported in the support disc Ui that exchanges qi and qi+1 (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes).

[F4]

Gn is a group under the stacking product [γ][β]=[γ⋆β] and Φ is built from its inverse-slicing isomorphism; raw slicing [β]↦[S(β)], with S(β) the unordered configuration slice of the braid β, is a bijection onto π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[Qn]) that reverses products, and Φ([β])=(ι∗C[S(β)])−1 (Geometric braid classes and the unordered configuration fundamental group).

[F5]

The open-to-closed inclusion induces a group isomorphism ι∗C:π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[q])→π1(Cn(D2),[q]) at every configuration q of interior points (The interior-disc and closed-disc configuration spaces are homotopy equivalent).

[F6]

δ([α])=[g(1)−1] for a lift g of α with g(0)=id⁡, and δ is a well-defined group homomorphism π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[Qn])→Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) (Boundary map from point motions, Point-motion boundary map is a homomorphism).

[F7]

For composable paths the concatenation is (α∗β)(s)=α(2s) for s≤12 and (α∗β)(s)=β(2s−1) for s≥12; the product [α][β]=[α∗β] traverses α first and β second, π1(X,x0) is a group under it, and the reversed loop αˉ(s)=α(1−s) satisfies [αˉ]=[α]−1 (Based loops and the fundamental group, Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation).

[F8]

Fn(X) is the subspace of pairwise distinct tuples in Xn, and Cn(X)=Fn(X)/Sn carries the quotient topology of the surjective quotient map pn, with classes written [x]; two tuples define the same class exactly when their coordinate sets agree. The disc is D2={z∈C:∣z∣≤1} with the subspace topology of C≅R2 and Euclidean norm ∥⋅∥2, and the base points are q1=−h, q2=h under this identification (Ordered configuration spaces Fn(X), Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X), Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[F9]

sin⁡0=0 and cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine); sin⁡π=0, cos⁡π=−1, sin⁡(x+π)=−sin⁡x and cos⁡(x+π)=−cos⁡x for every real x (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi); sin⁡2x+cos⁡2x=1, hence ∣sin⁡x∣≤1 and ∣cos⁡x∣≤1, and sin⁡(−x)=−sin⁡x, cos⁡(−x)=cos⁡x (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); sin⁡x>0 for 0<x<π (Pi is the first positive zero of sine); and sin⁡ and cos⁡ are 1-Lipschitz on R, hence continuous (Sine and cosine are 1-Lipschitz on R).

[F10]

For complex numbers z,w one has ∣z∣≥0, ∣z∣=0⇔z=0, zzˉ=∣z∣2, ∣zw∣=∣z∣ ∣w∣ and ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣; addition V×V→V and scalar multiplication K×V→V are continuous on every normed space (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, Vector addition and scalar multiplication are continuous in a normed space).

[F11]

A group isomorphism is a bijective group homomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

[F12]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F8F9F10

The clockwise loop. For t∈I put u(t):=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt and γ(t):=q1+2h u(t). Then γ is continuous, because t↦2πt is continuous, sin⁡ and cos⁡ are continuous by [F9], and the field operations of C are continuous by [F10]; further ∣u(t)∣2=u(t)u(t)‾=cos⁡22πt+sin⁡22πt=1 by [F9] and [F10], so ∣u(t)∣=1, and with q1=−h, q2=h of [F8] this gives ∣γ(t)−q1∣=∣2h u(t)∣=2h and ∣γ(t)∣≤∣q1∣+2h=3h=14<1; similarly u(0)=1 and u(1)=cos⁡2π−isin⁡2π=1 by [F9], the latter since sin⁡2π=sin⁡(0+2π)=−sin⁡(0+π)=0 and cos⁡2π=cos⁡(0+2π)=−cos⁡(0+π)=1, so γ(0)=q1+2h=q2=γ(1). Hence γ is a continuous based loop of Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1} at q2, because γ(t)≠q1 and γ(t)∈int⁡D2 for every t.

1.2F2F4F7F8F9F10

The rigid rotation loop is the inverse square of the sliced half twist. Put α:=S(σ1)−1, the reversed raw slice loop of the standard positive half twist; by [F2] and [F4] its underlying unordered loop is s↦S(σ1)(1−s)=[ρ(1−s),−ρ(1−s)], a loop at [Q2] since {ρ(1),−ρ(1)}={q2,q1}={ρ(0),−ρ(0)}, and by [F7] its class is [α]=[S(σ1)]−1. Let P(t):=−ρ(1−2t) for 0≤t≤12 and P(t):=ρ(2−2t) for 12≤t≤1, a continuous path with P(0)=−ρ(1)=q1, P(12)=−ρ(0)=q2, P(1)=ρ(0)=q1 and ∣P(t)∣≤h by [F2]; a direct substitution of the definitions shows that (P(t),−P(t)) is exactly the ordered lift of α∗α from Q2: on [0,12] the pair is (−ρ(1−2t),ρ(1−2t)), the lift of the reversed slice from Q2, and on [12,1] it is (ρ(2−2t),−ρ(2−2t)), the continuation of that lift from the swapped tuple (−ρ(0),ρ(0))=(h,−h)=(ρ(1),−ρ(1)) of [F2]. Let Q(t):=−h u(t)=u(t)q1, so that (Q(t),−Q(t)) is the ordered lift of ρ− by [F8], and consider the linear interpolation Wr(t):=(1−r)P(t)+r Q(t), (r,t)∈I×I, which is continuous by [F9] and [F10]. It never vanishes: at t=0 and t=1 one has P=Q=q1, so Wr=q1≠0; at t=12 one has u(12)=cos⁡π−isin⁡π=−1 and Q(12)=−h u(12)=h=q2=P(12) by [F9] and [F2]; and for 0<t<12 both P(t) and Q(t) have second coordinate strictly positive, while for 12<t<1 both have second coordinate strictly negative. Indeed the second coordinate of ρ(u) is −2uh for u≤12 and 2h(u−1) for u≥12 by [F2], which is strictly negative for 0<u<1, so P has second coordinate strictly positive for 0<t<12 and strictly negative for 12<t<1, while Q(t)=−hcos⁡2πt+ihsin⁡2πt has second coordinate hsin⁡2πt, positive for 0<t<12 by [F9] and negative for 12<t<1 by [F9] since sin⁡2πt=−sin⁡(2πt−π) with 0<2πt−π<π. Moreover ∣Wr(t)∣≤(1−r)∣P(t)∣+r∣Q(t)∣≤h by [F10], so (Wr(t),−Wr(t)) is a continuous family in F2(int⁡D2) whose initial tuple is (Wr(0),−Wr(0))=(q1,q2) and whose terminal tuple is (Wr(1),−Wr(1))=(q1,q2), independently of r; hence it is a path homotopy relative to {0,1} from the ordered lift of α∗α to the ordered lift of ρ−, and passing to C2(int⁡D2) by [F8] gives [α∗α]=[ρ−], that is [S(σ1)]−2=[α]2=[α∗α]=[ρ−] by [F7].

2.1F1F8F12step 1.1

The ordered lift and the push. The tuple Lγ(t)=(q1,γ(t)) has pairwise distinct coordinates, since γ(t)≠q1 for all t, and both coordinates in int⁡D2, so Lγ is a continuous loop in F2(int⁡D2) with Lγ(0)=(q1,q2)=Lγ(1); hence γˉ:=p2∘Lγ is a based loop of C2(int⁡D2) at [Q2] by [F8], and [F1], available under the present hypothesis of the Axiom of Choice [F12], gives Push⁡2([γ])=δ([γˉ])∈PMod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2).

3.1F1F8F9F10step 2.1

Homotopy to the rigid rotation loop. Define x1s(t):=−h((1−s)+s u(t)) and x2s(t):=x1s(t)+2h u(t) for (s,t)∈I×I, and let ρ−(t):=[u(t)q1, u(t)q2] be the clockwise rigid rotation loop of the two marked points. The pair (x1s(t),x2s(t)) is continuous in (s,t) by [F9] and [F10], lies in F2(int⁡D2) because x2s(t)−x1s(t)=2h u(t)≠0 and because ∣x1s(t)∣≤h((1−s)+s∣u(t)∣)=h and ∣x2s(t)∣≤3h=14<1 by [F10], and it satisfies x1s(0)=x1s(1)=−h and x2s(0)=x2s(1)=h, so the initial and terminal tuples are (q1,q2) for every s; at s=0 the pair is (−h,−h+2h u(t))=(q1,γ(t))=Lγ(t), and at s=1 it is (−h u(t),h u(t))=(u(t)q1,u(t)q2), the ordered lift of ρ− from Q2. Hence (s,t)↦(x1s(t),x2s(t)) is a path homotopy relative to {0,1} in F2(int⁡D2) from Lγ to the ordered lift of ρ−, and composing with the quotient map p2 of [F8] gives a path homotopy relative to {0,1} from γˉ to ρ− in C2(int⁡D2); therefore [γˉ]=[ρ−] in π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2]).

4.1F1F3F4F5F6F11step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2

The push is the positive full twist. By [F4] and [F5] and [F11], Ψ([σ1])=δ((ι∗C)−1Φ([σ1]))=δ((ι∗C)−1((ι∗C[S(σ1)])−1))=δ([S(σ1)]−1), because the inverse of a group isomorphism preserves inverses; by [F3] this value is [H1], so δ([S(σ1)]−2)=δ([S(σ1)]−1)2=[H1]2 by the homomorphism property of [F6]. Combining with steps 2.1, 3.1 and 1.2, Push⁡2([γ])=δ([γˉ])=δ([ρ−])=δ([S(σ1)]−2)=[H1]2, and [H1]2=Ψ([σ1])2=Ψ([σ1]2)=Ψ([σ1⋆σ1]) by [F3], [F4], [F11], the class of the square of the standard positive half twist; this class is pure, as it is a point push by [F1].

5.1F1F2F7step 3.1step 4.1∎

The counterclockwise push is the inverse. The loop γ−(t):=γ(1−t) is the reversed loop γˉ of [F7] at q2, so [γ−]=[γ]−1 in π1(Y2,q2); since Push⁡2 is a group homomorphism by [F1], Push⁡2([γ]−1)=Push⁡2([γ])−1=[H1]−2 by step 3.1, and the traces t↦q1+2h u(1−t) of q2 under the reversed loop are the counterclockwise parametrisation of the same circle: pushing q2 counterclockwise around q1 gives the inverse of the positive two-strand full twist.

Remarks

  • The two directions are distinguished by the inverse-endpoint convention: by step 1.2 the clockwise loop is the inverse square of the raw slice of σ1, and the inverse-endpoint boundary map turns that inverse into the positive full twist. Reversing the loop therefore inverts the class.
  • The computation is the n=2 case of the point-pushing picture of Farb and Margalit, where pushing the marked point along a loop in the surface drags the rest of the surface and produces the corresponding mapping class; no injectivity of Push⁡2 is used or asserted, and the class is identified with the braid-side full twist through the braid-mapping-class isomorphism.
  • Nothing in the argument selects a lift or a representative: the loop, its ordered lift and the homotopies are given by explicit formulas, and the Axiom of Choice enters only through the point-pushing definition and the braid-mapping-class isomorphism it consumes.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources