Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Punctured Disks, Mapping Classes, and Point Pushing — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These four entries make the companion page's abstractions concrete: two explicit computations with the same base configuration on the disk, and two counterexamples delimiting the boundary and puncture conventions in the definitions.

The first example builds the standard positive half twist as an actual homeomorphism of the disk. For adjacent punctures qi,qi+1 with midpoint mi, an angular half rotation on the smaller disk about mi containing the two points, tapered smoothly to the identity across the outer collar of the support disk Ui and run over time t↦πt scaled to the unit interval, is a boundary-fixed orientation-preserving homeomorphism; its two marked points trace anticlockwise semicircles exchanging qi and qi+1, the resulting point motion is braid-isotopic to the published diamond half twist, and under the braid–mapping-class identification of the companion page the class is [Hi]=Ψ([σi]), the standard positive generator. The computation is choice-free apart from the identification it consumes, and it uses the explicit formulas for σi so that the sign convention is the published one.

The second example computes a point push. With n=2, h=112, q1=−112, q2=112, the clockwise loop γ(t)=q1+2h u(t) with u(t)=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt is a based loop of the once-punctured disk Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1} at q2, and its ordered lift is homotoped rel endpoints to the clockwise rigid rotation loop [u(t)q1,u(t)q2] by an explicit linear interpolation of the two coordinates. A second explicit interpolation, together with a sign analysis of second coordinates, identifies the inverse square of the raw slice of σ1 with that rigid rotation loop, so that the inverse-endpoint boundary map sends it to Ψ([σ1]2)=[H1]2: clockwise pushing produces the positive pure two-strand full twist, the square of the standard half twist, and pushing counterclockwise produces its inverse. No injectivity of Push⁡2 is used or asserted.

The two counterexamples isolate the conventions that are easy to misread. The clockwise rigid 2π rotation gives a nontrivial loop of unordered two-point configurations: the invariant u({x,y})=((x−y)/∣x−y∣)2 sends it to a loop of degree −2. A boundary-fixed lift of this loop has an inverse endpoint f representing the positive full twist, while an isotopy that preserves the boundary only setwise joins f to the identity. Thus its boundary-fixed mapping class becomes trivial when that boundary condition is relaxed. And setwise preservation of Qn does not define the pure subgroup: the supported positive half twist preserves the marked set but exchanges qi and qi+1, and no isotopy through setwise-preserving homeomorphisms can change that discrete permutation, so it is a nonpure class for n≥2. Both counterexamples consume the companion page's identification and therefore state the Axiom of Choice where they invoke it.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

A supported half-twist homeomorphism

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2 and fix an adjacent index 1≤i≤n−1, with h=14(n+1), base points qj=((2j−n−1)h,0), midpoint mi=qi+(h,0) and support disc Ui=B(mi,32h) as in The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite. This example writes out explicitly the supported half rotation H of the adjacent pair:

  1. with the standard smooth step function σ define θ(r):=σ((11h8−r)/h8) for r≥0, so that θ is smooth with values in [0,1], equals 1 for r≤5h4 and equals 0 for r≥11h8, and set, for x∈D2 and s∈I, Hs(x):=mi+R(πs θ(∥x−mi∥2))(x−mi), where R(α) denotes rotation about the origin by the angle α;
  2. every Hs is a homeomorphism of D2 with inverse (r,φ)↦(r,φ−πsθ(r)) in polar coordinates about mi, the family (s,x)↦Hs(x) is continuous, H0 is the identity, and Hs fixes pointwise the complement of the closed disc of radius 11h8 about mi, a set contained in Ui⊆int⁡D2; in particular every Hs fixes ∂D2 pointwise and no point outside Ui is moved;
  3. the two punctures move as Hs(qi)=mi+h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs),Hs(qi+1)=mi+h(cos⁡πs,sin⁡πs), the unordered pair traversing the anticlockwise semicircle of radius h about mi from {qi,qi+1} at s=0, through {mi±(0,h)} at s=12, to {qi+1,qi} at s=1, while every other base point is fixed throughout; consequently H1 preserves Qn setwise and lies in Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn), and s↦[Hs(Qn)] is a based loop of Cn(int⁡D2) at [Qn];
  4. the raw slice loop S(σi) of the standard positive half twist is homotopic to this based loop relative to {0,1}, through the explicit interpolation of step 3.1 below.

Since the braid-to-mapping-class isomorphism sends [σi] to the class of the homeomorphism constructed from exactly this collar data (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes), the homeomorphism H1 represents the standard positive braid generator: its class is Ψ([σi]) in Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the natural number n≥2, the adjacent index 1≤i≤n−1, the base configuration Qn=(q1,…,qn) with spacing h=14(n+1), the midpoint mi=qi+(h,0), the support disc Ui=B(mi,32h), the standard smooth step function σ, the rotation matrix R(α), and the half twist σi of The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite.

[F1]

qj=((2j−n−1)h,0), mi=qi+(h,0)=((2i−n)h,0), the support disc Ui has radius 32h, contains qi and qi+1 at distance exactly h from mi, contains no other base point, every other base point has distance at least 3h from mi, and Ui⊆int⁡D2; the half twist is (σi)i=mi+ρ, (σi)i+1=mi−ρ and (σi)k=qk otherwise, where ρ(0)=(−h,0), ρ(12)=(0,−h), ρ(1)=(h,0) and ∥ρ∥2≤h (The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F2]

Under AC the composite Ψ=δ∘(ι∗C)−1∘Φ is a group isomorphism from the geometric braid group Gn at Qn to Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2), and for 1≤i≤n−1 the image of the standard positive geometric half twist σi is the mapping class of the explicit boundary-fixed homeomorphism Hi supported in the support disc Ui and exchanging qi and qi+1 (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes).

[F3]

The standard smooth step function σ is smooth, takes values in [0,1], equals 0 on (−∞,0] and equals 1 on [1,∞) (The standard smooth step function).

[F4]

Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn)={ f:f∣∂D2=id⁡, f(Qn)=Qn setwise } is a topological group in the compact-open topology and Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2)=π0 of it; a path in it transposes to an isotopy of D2, and a homeomorphism of the disc fixing ∂D2 pointwise lies in it exactly when it preserves Qn setwise (Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[F5]

sin⁡(π/2)=1, cos⁡(π/2)=0, sin⁡π=0, cos⁡π=−1, and sin⁡(x+π)=−sin⁡x, cos⁡(x+π)=−cos⁡x for every real x (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[F6]

The functions sin⁡ and cos⁡ are differentiable on R and therefore continuous, with sin⁡0=0 and cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

[F7]

Cn(int⁡D2)=Fn(int⁡D2)/Sn with quotient map pn, which is continuous and surjective, and points are written [x] (Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F3

The collar function. By [F3] the function σ is smooth on R with values in [0,1], equals 0 on (−∞,0] and equals 1 on [1,∞); the argument r↦(11h8−r)/h8 is smooth and affine on [0,∞) with 11h8−r≥h8⋅1, that is r≤5h4, exactly when σ is evaluated at an argument at least 1, and 11h8−r≤0, that is r≥11h8, exactly when it is evaluated at an argument at most 0. Hence θ(r)=σ((11h8−r)/h8) is smooth on [0,∞) with values in [0,1], equals 1 for r≤5h4 and equals 0 for r≥11h8.

2.1F1F4F5F6F7step 1.1

The half rotation, its support and its point motions. Write r(x):=∥x−mi∥2 and αs(x):=πsθ(r(x)) for x∈D2 and s∈I, so that Hs(x)=mi+R(αs(x))(x−mi); the scalar αs(x) is a continuous function of (s,x) because θ is smooth, and the entries of R are cos⁡ and sin⁡ of that scalar, so Hs(x) depends continuously on (s,x) by [F6], and also R is a rotation, hence preserves norms and is injective. In polar coordinates x=mi+(ucos⁡φ,usin⁡φ) with u=r(x) one has Hs(x)=mi+(ucos⁡(φ+πsθ(u)),usin⁡(φ+πsθ(u))) and the map (u,φ)↦(u,φ−πsθ(u)) is a two-sided inverse, so each Hs is a bijection of D2 continuous in both directions, that is a homeomorphism, and its inverse is as displayed. By step 1.1, θ(r(x))=0 whenever r(x)≥11h8, so Hs(x)=x for every x outside the closed disc of radius 11h8 about mi; that closed disc is contained in the open disc Ui of radius 32h because 118<32, and Ui⊆int⁡D2 by [F1], so every Hs fixes ∂D2 pointwise and fixes every point outside Ui; moreover H0=id⁡ because α0=0 and R(0) is the identity. For the marked points, [F1] gives r(qi)=r(qi+1)=h≤5h4, so θ=1 there and, using the definition of R as rotation about the origin and the shift formulas of [F5] with x=0 and x=π respectively, Hs(qi)=mi+R(πs)(−h,0)=mi+h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs),Hs(qi+1)=mi+R(πs)(h,0)=mi+h(cos⁡πs,sin⁡πs); the two moving points are always distinct because their difference is 2h(cos⁡πs,sin⁡πs)≠0, and every other base point qk has r(qk)≥3h>11h8 by [F1], hence is fixed for all s. By [F5] one has H1(qi)=mi+h(1,0)=qi+1 and H1(qi+1)=mi+(−h,0)=qi, while all other base points are fixed, so H1 preserves Qn setwise and by [F4] lies in Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn); the pair {Hs(qi),Hs(qi+1)}={mi±h(cos⁡πs,sin⁡πs)} traverses the anticlockwise semicircle of radius h about mi from {qi,qi+1} at s=0, through {mi±(0,h)} at s=12, to {qi+1,qi} at s=1, and s↦Hs(Qn) is a continuous path in Fn(int⁡D2) with [H0(Qn)]=[Qn]=[H1(Qn)], so s↦[Hs(Qn)] is a based loop of Cn(int⁡D2) at [Qn] by [F7].

3.1F1F5F7step 2.1

Interpolation to the published diamond half twist. Let ρ be the diamond path of [F1], so that the raw slice loop of the half twist is S(σi)(s)=[mi+ρ(s),mi−ρ(s)] with all other coordinates equal to qk, and let wr(s):=(1−r)ρ(s)+r h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) for (r,s)∈I×I, a continuous map. For 0<s<1 the second coordinate of ρ(s) is −2sh for s≤12 and 2h(s−1) for s≥12 by [F1], both strictly negative, while the second coordinate of h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) is −hsin⁡πs, strictly negative because sin⁡πs>0; hence the convex combination wr(s) has strictly negative second coordinate and does not vanish. At s=0 one has ρ(0)=(−h,0)=h(−cos⁡0,−sin⁡0) and at s=1 one has ρ(1)=(h,0)=h(−cos⁡π,−sin⁡π) by [F1] and [F5], so wr(0)=(−h,0)≠0 and wr(1)=(h,0)≠0 for every r. Also ∥ρ(s)∥2≤h and ∥h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs)∥2=h, so ∥wr(s)∥2≤h and the unordered pairs {mi±wr(s)} lie in Ui⊆int⁡D2. Therefore the formula Hint(r,s):=[mi+wr(s), mi−wr(s), qk (k∉{i,i+1})] defines a continuous map I×I→Cn(int⁡D2), as the composite of a continuous ordered tuple with the continuous quotient map of [F7], whose every slice is collision-free: the two moving points differ by 2wr(s)≠0 and have distance at most h from mi, while every other base point has distance at least 3h from mi by [F1]. At r=0 the slice is the raw slice loop S(σi) of [F1] and at r=1 it is the loop s↦[Hs(Qn)] of step 2.1, because h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) is the moving coordinate computed there; both loops start and end at [Qn], so Hint is a path homotopy relative to {0,1} from S(σi) to the based loop of step 2.1.

4.1F2F8step 2.1step 3.1

The class of the supported half rotation. By [F2], available under the present hypothesis of the Axiom of Choice [F8], the isomorphism Ψ sends the class of the standard positive half twist to the class of the explicit boundary-fixed homeomorphism Hi built in that item from the collar function θ and the rotation formula displayed in step 2.1, which is literally the homeomorphism H1 of step 2.1 and from [F1] has the same supplied data mi, qi, qi+1; hence Ψ([σi])=[H1] in Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2), and H1 is a homeomorphism of D2 fixing ∂D2 pointwise and exchanging the two adjacent punctures, supported in the disc Ui. Independently, step 3.1 exhibits the based loop s↦[Hs(Qn)] as path-homotopic relative to {0,1} to the raw slice of the standard positive half twist, so the explicit time-one map H1 represents the standard positive braid generator. ∎

Remarks

  • The construction is the punctured-disc picture of the half twist: a rigid rotation by π of the pair about its midpoint, with the angle tapered to zero across the collar 5h4≤r≤11h8 so that the homeomorphism is the identity in a neighbourhood of ∂D2 and of all the other punctures.
  • The point paths are semicircles of radius h; the interpolation carried out in step 3.1 replaces them by the diamond path of the published half twist without ever letting the two points meet, so the combinatorial half twist and the geometric rotation define the same braid class.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Point pushing one puncture around another

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and take n=2, so that h=112, q1=(−h,0)=−112, q2=(h,0)=112 and the point-pushing domain is the once-punctured disc Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1} (Point pushing the last puncture, Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk). Holding q1 fixed, let the marked point q2 travel once around q1 clockwise along the circle of radius 2h:

γ(t):=q1+(q2−q1)(cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt)=−h+2h u(t),u(t):=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt,t∈I.

This example computes the point push of the last puncture around the first. The result is

Push⁡2([γ])=Ψ([σ1]2)=[H1]2,

the positive pure two-strand full twist: the square of the standard positive half twist σ1 of The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite, equivalently the square of the class of its explicit supported half rotation H1 of Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes. Reversing the direction of the loop, that is pushing q2 counterclockwise around q1, gives the inverse class Push⁡2([γ]−1)=[H1]−2. The computation is carried out with the inverse-endpoint boundary map δ of Boundary map from point motions, so it is the clockwise loop that produces the positive full twist; the class is pure because point pushing takes values in the pointwise stabiliser.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the number n=2 with h=112, the base configuration Q2=(q1,q2) with q1=(−h,0), q2=(h,0) and midpoint m1=q1+(h,0)=(0,0), the point-pushing domain Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1}, the unit complex number u(t)=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt, the loop γ(t)=q1+2h u(t), and the standard positive half twist σ1 with its explicit supported half rotation H1.

[F1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice and n≥1. A based loop γ of Yn=int⁡D2∖{q1,…,qn−1} at qn has ordered lift Lγ(t)=(q1,…,qn−1,γ(t)), a based loop of Fn(int⁡D2) at Qn; with γˉ:=pn∘Lγ and δ the inverse-endpoint boundary map of Boundary map from point motions, the point-push class Push⁡n([γ]):=δ([γˉ]) is a well-defined element of Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) depending only on [γ], the assignment Push⁡n:π1(Yn,qn)→PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is a group homomorphism whose values are pure classes, and no injectivity is asserted (Point pushing the last puncture).

[F2]

The base configuration is qj=((2j−n−1)h,0) with h=14(n+1); for n=2 this is h=112, q1=(−h,0), q2=(h,0) and m1=q1+(h,0)=(0,0), and the support disc U1=B(m1,32h) contains q1 and q2 and no other base point. The standard positive half twist is the tuple of motions (σ1)1(t)=m1+ρ(t), (σ1)2(t)=m1−ρ(t), where ρ(t)=(2th−h,−2th) for 0≤t≤12 and ρ(t)=(2th−h,2th−2h) for 12≤t≤1, so that ρ(0)=(−h,0), ρ(12)=(0,−h), ρ(1)=(h,0), ∥ρ(t)∥2≤h and ρ(t)≠0 for all t (The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F3]

Under the Axiom of Choice the composite Ψ=δ∘(ι∗C)−1∘Φ is a group isomorphism from the geometric braid group G2 at Q2 onto Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2), and for 1≤i≤n−1 it sends the standard positive half twist σi to the class of an explicit boundary-fixed homeomorphism Hi supported in the support disc Ui that exchanges qi and qi+1 (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes).

[F4]

Gn is a group under the stacking product [γ][β]=[γ⋆β] and Φ is built from its inverse-slicing isomorphism; raw slicing [β]↦[S(β)], with S(β) the unordered configuration slice of the braid β, is a bijection onto π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[Qn]) that reverses products, and Φ([β])=(ι∗C[S(β)])−1 (Geometric braid classes and the unordered configuration fundamental group).

[F5]

The open-to-closed inclusion induces a group isomorphism ι∗C:π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[q])→π1(Cn(D2),[q]) at every configuration q of interior points (The interior-disc and closed-disc configuration spaces are homotopy equivalent).

[F6]

δ([α])=[g(1)−1] for a lift g of α with g(0)=id⁡, and δ is a well-defined group homomorphism π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[Qn])→Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) (Boundary map from point motions, Point-motion boundary map is a homomorphism).

[F7]

For composable paths the concatenation is (α∗β)(s)=α(2s) for s≤12 and (α∗β)(s)=β(2s−1) for s≥12; the product [α][β]=[α∗β] traverses α first and β second, π1(X,x0) is a group under it, and the reversed loop αˉ(s)=α(1−s) satisfies [αˉ]=[α]−1 (Based loops and the fundamental group, Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation).

[F8]

Fn(X) is the subspace of pairwise distinct tuples in Xn, and Cn(X)=Fn(X)/Sn carries the quotient topology of the surjective quotient map pn, with classes written [x]; two tuples define the same class exactly when their coordinate sets agree. The disc is D2={z∈C:∣z∣≤1} with the subspace topology of C≅R2 and Euclidean norm ∥⋅∥2, and the base points are q1=−h, q2=h under this identification (Ordered configuration spaces Fn(X), Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X), Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[F9]

sin⁡0=0 and cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine); sin⁡π=0, cos⁡π=−1, sin⁡(x+π)=−sin⁡x and cos⁡(x+π)=−cos⁡x for every real x (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi); sin⁡2x+cos⁡2x=1, hence ∣sin⁡x∣≤1 and ∣cos⁡x∣≤1, and sin⁡(−x)=−sin⁡x, cos⁡(−x)=cos⁡x (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); sin⁡x>0 for 0<x<π (Pi is the first positive zero of sine); and sin⁡ and cos⁡ are 1-Lipschitz on R, hence continuous (Sine and cosine are 1-Lipschitz on R).

[F10]

For complex numbers z,w one has ∣z∣≥0, ∣z∣=0⇔z=0, zzˉ=∣z∣2, ∣zw∣=∣z∣ ∣w∣ and ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣; addition V×V→V and scalar multiplication K×V→V are continuous on every normed space (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive, Vector addition and scalar multiplication are continuous in a normed space).

[F11]

A group isomorphism is a bijective group homomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

[F12]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F8F9F10

The clockwise loop. For t∈I put u(t):=cos⁡2πt−isin⁡2πt and γ(t):=q1+2h u(t). Then γ is continuous, because t↦2πt is continuous, sin⁡ and cos⁡ are continuous by [F9], and the field operations of C are continuous by [F10]; further ∣u(t)∣2=u(t)u(t)‾=cos⁡22πt+sin⁡22πt=1 by [F9] and [F10], so ∣u(t)∣=1, and with q1=−h, q2=h of [F8] this gives ∣γ(t)−q1∣=∣2h u(t)∣=2h and ∣γ(t)∣≤∣q1∣+2h=3h=14<1; similarly u(0)=1 and u(1)=cos⁡2π−isin⁡2π=1 by [F9], the latter since sin⁡2π=sin⁡(0+2π)=−sin⁡(0+π)=0 and cos⁡2π=cos⁡(0+2π)=−cos⁡(0+π)=1, so γ(0)=q1+2h=q2=γ(1). Hence γ is a continuous based loop of Y2=int⁡D2∖{q1} at q2, because γ(t)≠q1 and γ(t)∈int⁡D2 for every t.

1.2F2F4F7F8F9F10

The rigid rotation loop is the inverse square of the sliced half twist. Put α:=S(σ1)−1, the reversed raw slice loop of the standard positive half twist; by [F2] and [F4] its underlying unordered loop is s↦S(σ1)(1−s)=[ρ(1−s),−ρ(1−s)], a loop at [Q2] since {ρ(1),−ρ(1)}={q2,q1}={ρ(0),−ρ(0)}, and by [F7] its class is [α]=[S(σ1)]−1. Let P(t):=−ρ(1−2t) for 0≤t≤12 and P(t):=ρ(2−2t) for 12≤t≤1, a continuous path with P(0)=−ρ(1)=q1, P(12)=−ρ(0)=q2, P(1)=ρ(0)=q1 and ∣P(t)∣≤h by [F2]; a direct substitution of the definitions shows that (P(t),−P(t)) is exactly the ordered lift of α∗α from Q2: on [0,12] the pair is (−ρ(1−2t),ρ(1−2t)), the lift of the reversed slice from Q2, and on [12,1] it is (ρ(2−2t),−ρ(2−2t)), the continuation of that lift from the swapped tuple (−ρ(0),ρ(0))=(h,−h)=(ρ(1),−ρ(1)) of [F2]. Let Q(t):=−h u(t)=u(t)q1, so that (Q(t),−Q(t)) is the ordered lift of ρ− by [F8], and consider the linear interpolation Wr(t):=(1−r)P(t)+r Q(t), (r,t)∈I×I, which is continuous by [F9] and [F10]. It never vanishes: at t=0 and t=1 one has P=Q=q1, so Wr=q1≠0; at t=12 one has u(12)=cos⁡π−isin⁡π=−1 and Q(12)=−h u(12)=h=q2=P(12) by [F9] and [F2]; and for 0<t<12 both P(t) and Q(t) have second coordinate strictly positive, while for 12<t<1 both have second coordinate strictly negative. Indeed the second coordinate of ρ(u) is −2uh for u≤12 and 2h(u−1) for u≥12 by [F2], which is strictly negative for 0<u<1, so P has second coordinate strictly positive for 0<t<12 and strictly negative for 12<t<1, while Q(t)=−hcos⁡2πt+ihsin⁡2πt has second coordinate hsin⁡2πt, positive for 0<t<12 by [F9] and negative for 12<t<1 by [F9] since sin⁡2πt=−sin⁡(2πt−π) with 0<2πt−π<π. Moreover ∣Wr(t)∣≤(1−r)∣P(t)∣+r∣Q(t)∣≤h by [F10], so (Wr(t),−Wr(t)) is a continuous family in F2(int⁡D2) whose initial tuple is (Wr(0),−Wr(0))=(q1,q2) and whose terminal tuple is (Wr(1),−Wr(1))=(q1,q2), independently of r; hence it is a path homotopy relative to {0,1} from the ordered lift of α∗α to the ordered lift of ρ−, and passing to C2(int⁡D2) by [F8] gives [α∗α]=[ρ−], that is [S(σ1)]−2=[α]2=[α∗α]=[ρ−] by [F7].

2.1F1F8F12step 1.1

The ordered lift and the push. The tuple Lγ(t)=(q1,γ(t)) has pairwise distinct coordinates, since γ(t)≠q1 for all t, and both coordinates in int⁡D2, so Lγ is a continuous loop in F2(int⁡D2) with Lγ(0)=(q1,q2)=Lγ(1); hence γˉ:=p2∘Lγ is a based loop of C2(int⁡D2) at [Q2] by [F8], and [F1], available under the present hypothesis of the Axiom of Choice [F12], gives Push⁡2([γ])=δ([γˉ])∈PMod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2).

3.1F1F8F9F10step 2.1

Homotopy to the rigid rotation loop. Define x1s(t):=−h((1−s)+s u(t)) and x2s(t):=x1s(t)+2h u(t) for (s,t)∈I×I, and let ρ−(t):=[u(t)q1, u(t)q2] be the clockwise rigid rotation loop of the two marked points. The pair (x1s(t),x2s(t)) is continuous in (s,t) by [F9] and [F10], lies in F2(int⁡D2) because x2s(t)−x1s(t)=2h u(t)≠0 and because ∣x1s(t)∣≤h((1−s)+s∣u(t)∣)=h and ∣x2s(t)∣≤3h=14<1 by [F10], and it satisfies x1s(0)=x1s(1)=−h and x2s(0)=x2s(1)=h, so the initial and terminal tuples are (q1,q2) for every s; at s=0 the pair is (−h,−h+2h u(t))=(q1,γ(t))=Lγ(t), and at s=1 it is (−h u(t),h u(t))=(u(t)q1,u(t)q2), the ordered lift of ρ− from Q2. Hence (s,t)↦(x1s(t),x2s(t)) is a path homotopy relative to {0,1} in F2(int⁡D2) from Lγ to the ordered lift of ρ−, and composing with the quotient map p2 of [F8] gives a path homotopy relative to {0,1} from γˉ to ρ− in C2(int⁡D2); therefore [γˉ]=[ρ−] in π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2]).

4.1F1F3F4F5F6F11step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2

The push is the positive full twist. By [F4] and [F5] and [F11], Ψ([σ1])=δ((ι∗C)−1Φ([σ1]))=δ((ι∗C)−1((ι∗C[S(σ1)])−1))=δ([S(σ1)]−1), because the inverse of a group isomorphism preserves inverses; by [F3] this value is [H1], so δ([S(σ1)]−2)=δ([S(σ1)]−1)2=[H1]2 by the homomorphism property of [F6]. Combining with steps 2.1, 3.1 and 1.2, Push⁡2([γ])=δ([γˉ])=δ([ρ−])=δ([S(σ1)]−2)=[H1]2, and [H1]2=Ψ([σ1])2=Ψ([σ1]2)=Ψ([σ1⋆σ1]) by [F3], [F4], [F11], the class of the square of the standard positive half twist; this class is pure, as it is a point push by [F1].

5.1F1F2F7step 3.1step 4.1∎

The counterclockwise push is the inverse. The loop γ−(t):=γ(1−t) is the reversed loop γˉ of [F7] at q2, so [γ−]=[γ]−1 in π1(Y2,q2); since Push⁡2 is a group homomorphism by [F1], Push⁡2([γ]−1)=Push⁡2([γ])−1=[H1]−2 by step 3.1, and the traces t↦q1+2h u(1−t) of q2 under the reversed loop are the counterclockwise parametrisation of the same circle: pushing q2 counterclockwise around q1 gives the inverse of the positive two-strand full twist.

Remarks

  • The two directions are distinguished by the inverse-endpoint convention: by step 1.2 the clockwise loop is the inverse square of the raw slice of σ1, and the inverse-endpoint boundary map turns that inverse into the positive full twist. Reversing the loop therefore inverts the class.
  • The computation is the n=2 case of the point-pushing picture of Farb and Margalit, where pushing the marked point along a loop in the surface drags the rest of the surface and produces the corresponding mapping class; no injectivity of Push⁡2 is used or asserted, and the class is identified with the braid-side full twist through the braid-mapping-class isomorphism.
  • Nothing in the argument selects a lift or a representative: the loop, its ordered lift and the homotopies are given by explicit formulas, and the Axiom of Choice enters only through the point-pushing definition and the braid-mapping-class isomorphism it consumes.
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Setwise boundary preservation kills a nontrivial braid

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: in the two-punctured disc the boundary convention does not affect isotopy classes. Precisely: if a homeomorphism f of D2 fixes ∂D2 pointwise and preserves Q2 setwise, and f is isotopic to the identity through homeomorphisms that preserve ∂D2 and Q2 setwise, then f is already isotopic to the identity through homeomorphisms that fix ∂D2 pointwise and preserve Q2 setwise; equivalently, the assignment that views a pointwise-boundary isotopy class as a setwise-boundary isotopy class would be injective.

The witness is the positive full twist of the two punctures. Let ρ−(t):=[e−2πitq1, e−2πitq2] be the clockwise rigid full rotation loop in the unordered configuration space C2(int⁡D2) (Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)), and let P:I→Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2) be a lift of ρ− whose initial homeomorphism is the identity, which exists because evaluation on the marked set is a fibration (Evaluation is a numerable bundle and Hurewicz fibration). Then f:=P1−1 fixes ∂D2 pointwise and preserves Q2 setwise, and:

  1. [f] is not the identity of Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2); it is the class Ψ([σ1]2) of the square of the standard positive half twist σ1, the positive full twist (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes, The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite);
  2. the formula Gt(x):=Pt−1(e−2πitx) defines an isotopy from id⁡ to f whose every time preserves ∂D2 and Q2 setwise.

So one and the same homeomorphism of the pair (D2,Q2) is isotopic to the identity through setwise-boundary homeomorphisms and is not isotopic to the identity rel ∂D2: the boundary circle must be fixed pointwise, not merely preserved.

What is and is not claimed. Only the passage from a setwise-boundary isotopy to a pointwise-boundary one is refuted, and it is refuted by one explicit class, the positive full twist. Nothing here asserts that the setwise-boundary relation fails to be an equivalence relation, nor that any class other than this full twist becomes trivial, nor any statement about the punctured plane or the sphere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the closed unit disc D2⊆C with boundary circle ∂D2, the base configuration Q2=(q1,q2) with h=112, q1=(−h,0), q2=(h,0) and midpoint m1=(0,0), the groups E=Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2) and F=Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Q2), the loop ρ−(t)=[e−2πitQ2] in C2(int⁡D2), and a lift P:I→E of ρ− with P0=id⁡.

[F1]

Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2)=π0(F) is the set of isotopy classes rel ∂D2 of homeomorphisms that fix ∂D2 pointwise and preserve Q2 setwise; E and F carry the compact-open topology, which on D2 is uniform convergence, the group operations are continuous, and a path in E transposes to an isotopy of D2 (Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[F2]

Under AC the evaluation map ev⁡:E→C2(int⁡D2), ev⁡(g):=[g(Q2)], is a Hurewicz fibration with fibre exactly F over [Q2]; in particular every path in the base lifts to a path in E with any prescribed initial point (Evaluation is a numerable bundle and Hurewicz fibration, A fibration has path lifting and homotopy lifting relative to a subspace).

[F3]

δ([α])=[α~(1)−1] for a lift α~ of α with α~(0)=id⁡, and δ is a well-defined group homomorphism π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2])→Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2) (Boundary map from point motions, Point-motion boundary map is a homomorphism).

[F4]

δ is a group isomorphism, hence injective (Evaluation boundary isomorphism for the disk).

[F5]

Ψ=δ∘(ι∗C)−1∘Φ is a group isomorphism from the geometric braid group G2 at Q2 to Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2), where Φ is the inverse-slicing isomorphism of [F6], and Ψ sends the class of the standard positive half twist σ1 to the class of its explicit supported half rotation (Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes, The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F6]

At the shared base configuration Qn the geometric braid-isotopy classes form a group Gn with stacking product [γ][β]=[γ⋆β]; raw slicing [β]↦[S(β)] is a bijection onto π1(Cn(int⁡D2),[Qn]) and satisfies [S(γ⋆β)]=[S(β)][S(γ)], so that Φ([β])=(ι∗C[S(β)])−1 is a group isomorphism onto π1(Cn(D2),[Qn]) (Geometric braid classes and the unordered configuration fundamental group).

[F7]

The inclusion-induced map ι∗C:π1(C2(int⁡D2),[q])→π1(C2(D2),[q]) is an isomorphism for every interior configuration q (The interior-disc and closed-disc configuration spaces are homotopy equivalent).

[F8]

C2(int⁡D2)=F2(int⁡D2)/S2 with quotient map p2, points written [x], and two ordered configurations lie in the same orbit exactly when their underlying coordinate sets agree (Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)). In formulas below, {x,y} used as a point of C2 abbreviates the orbit [x,y] via this bijection; it is not a literal equality of an orbit of tuples with a subset of the disc.

[F9]

A continuous map on a space X that is constant on the fibres of a quotient map q:X→Y factors uniquely through q by a continuous map on Y (For a quotient map q:X→Y, a map out of Y is continuous iff its composite with q is; a continuous map on X constant on the fibres of q factors uniquely through q; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map).

[F10]

π1(S1,(1,0))≅Z, and under this isomorphism the loop t↦(cos⁡2πnt,sin⁡2πnt) corresponds to n, for every n∈Z (The trigonometric loops give π1({(x,y):x2+y2=1},(1,0))≅Z).

[F11]

For composable paths (α∗β)(s)=α(2s) for s≤12 and =β(2s−1) for s≥12; the product [α][β]=[α∗β] traverses α first and β second, and the reversed loop represents the inverse class (Based loops and the fundamental group).

[F12]

For a continuous map u the assignment u∗([α])=[u∘α] is a well-defined group homomorphism (Induced fundamental-group maps are well defined, functorial and invariant under based homotopy).

[F13]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, and it is what makes the evaluation map of [F2] a fibration whose paths lift (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

1.1F8F11

The full rotation loop in the unordered configuration space. For t∈I put ρ−(t):=[e−2πitq1, e−2πitq2]∈C2(int⁡D2). The two coordinates are distinct and both of modulus ∣qj∣=h=112<1, so the tuple (e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2) lies in F2(int⁡D2) for every t, and the map t↦(e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2) is continuous because complex multiplication is; hence ρ− is a well-defined continuous path in C2(int⁡D2) with ρ−(0)=[Q2]=ρ−(1), since e0=e−2πi=1. So ρ− is a based loop at [Q2], and its class lies in π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2]), the group of [F11].

1.2F8F9

The quotient test map. Define u~:F2(int⁡D2)→S1 by u~(x1,x2):=((x1−x2)/∣x1−x2∣)2, a map into the unit circle, since x1≠x2 on the ordered configuration space and the difference, the modulus, division by a positive modulus and squaring are continuous. Swapping the two coordinates replaces x1−x2 by −(x1−x2), so u~(x2,x1)=(−(x1−x2)/∣x1−x2∣)2=u~(x1,x2): the map is constant on the S2-orbits. By [F9] applied to the quotient map p2:F2(int⁡D2)→C2(int⁡D2) there is a unique continuous u:C2(int⁡D2)→S1 with u([x1,x2])=u~(x1,x2) for every ordered pair; in particular u({x,y})=((x−y)/∣x−y∣)2 is well defined as a function of the unordered pair.

1.3F5F6F8F11

The sliced half twist and the explicit half-turn loop. Let S(σ1) be the unordered slice of the standard positive half twist, so that S(σ1)(s)=[σ1(s)]=[m1+ρ(s), m1−ρ(s)] for s∈I; with m1=(0,0) this is the unordered pair {ρ(s),−ρ(s)}, and the reversed path is S(σ1)−1(s)=S(σ1)(1−s)={ρ(1−s),−ρ(1−s)}, a loop at [Q2] because ρ(0)=(−h,0) and ρ(1)=(h,0) give {ρ(1),−ρ(1)}={q2,q1}=[Q2]={ρ(0),−ρ(0)}. Put α(s):={h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs), −h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs)}={±he−πis} for s∈I, again a loop at [Q2]. First, the concatenation α∗α is the loop t↦[e−2πitQ2]: for t≤12 one has (α∗α)(t)=α(2t)={±e−2πith}={e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2}, and for t≥12 one has (α∗α)(t)=α(2t−1)={±e−πi(2t−1)h}={±e−2πith}, the middle pair being unchanged because the sign eπi=−1 is absorbed by ±. Second, S(σ1)−1 is path-homotopic to α relative to {0,1}: the interpolation wr(s):=(1−r)ρ(1−s)+r h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) satisfies w0(s)=ρ(1−s) and w1(s)=h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs), and it never vanishes, because for 0<s<1 the second coordinate of ρ(1−s) is −2(1−s)h for s≥12 and −2sh for s≤12, both strictly negative, the second coordinate −hsin⁡πs of h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) is strictly negative, so the convex combination has strictly negative second coordinate, while at s=0 and s=1 the two endpoints coincide and equal (h,0) and (−h,0); since ρ(1−s) has modulus at most h and h(cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) has modulus exactly h, every wr(s) has modulus at most h<1 and the unordered pairs {wr(s),−wr(s)} lie in C2(int⁡D2) and depend continuously on (r,s).

2.1step 1.1F1F2F8F13

The lift and its endpoint. By [F2], which is available under the Axiom of Choice [F13], the loop ρ− of step 1.1 lifts to a continuous path P:I→E with P0=id⁡ and ev⁡(Pt)=ρ−(t) for all t; put f:=P1−1. Since ev⁡(P1)=ρ−(1)=[Q2], the homeomorphism P1 lies in the fibre F of [F2], so f∈F and its class [f] lies in Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2)=π0(F) by [F1]; as the inverse of an element of E, the homeomorphism f fixes ∂D2 pointwise, and it preserves Q2 setwise because P1 does. For every t the tuples Pt(Q2) and e−2πitQ2 have the same image under ev⁡, hence lie in the same S2-orbit, so by [F8] their underlying coordinate sets agree: Pt({q1,q2})={e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2} as sets. Applying Pt−1 to the rotated set gives Pt−1({e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2})={q1,q2}. No commutation with rotation is assumed.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2F10F12

The rotation loop is not nullhomotopic. For every t one has u(ρ−(t))=u~(e−2πitq1,e−2πitq2)=(e−2πit(q1−q2)/∣q1−q2∣)2; since q1−q2=(−2h,0) is a negative real number, (q1−q2)/∣q1−q2∣=−1, so u(ρ−(t))=(−e−2πit)2=e−4πit=(cos⁡2π(−2)t, sin⁡2π(−2)t). By [F10] the class of this loop in π1(S1,(1,0)) corresponds to −2, which is not zero, so [u∘ρ−] is not the identity. Since u∗ is a group homomorphism with u∗([ρ−])=[u∘ρ−] by [F12], a class [ρ−] equal to the identity would give the identity here; hence [ρ−]≠1 in π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2]).

2.3step 1.3F11

The rotation loop is the inverse square of the sliced half twist. By step 1.3 the loop α satisfies [S(σ1)−1]=[α], and the concatenation α∗α is the loop t↦[e−2πitQ2] of step 1.1, so in the group π1(C2(int⁡D2),[Q2]) of [F11] one has [ρ−]=[α∗α]=[α][α]=[S(σ1)−1]2=[S(σ1)]−2.

3.1step 2.1F1

The setwise isotopy from the identity to the full twist. Put Rt(x):=e−2πitx and Gt:=Pt−1∘Rt. The map (t,x)↦Gt(x) is continuous: t↦Pt−1 is a continuous path by [F1], its joint evaluation is continuous, and (t,x)↦(t,Rt(x)) is continuous. Every Gt is a homeomorphism of D2 with inverse Rt−1∘Pt. On the boundary Pt−1 is the identity, so Gt acts there as Rt and preserves ∂D2 setwise. Step 2.1 gives Gt({q1,q2})=Pt−1(Rt({q1,q2}))={q1,q2}, so the marked set is preserved at every time. Since R0=R1=id⁡ and P0=id⁡, we have G0=id⁡ and G1=P1−1=f. This is the required setwise-boundary isotopy.

3.2step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3F3F4F5F6F7

The witness is the nontrivial positive full twist. By [F3] and step 2.1 the boundary map evaluates on the rotation loop as δ([ρ−])=[P1−1]=[f], and δ is injective by [F4], so step 2.2 gives [f]≠[id⁡] in Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2). Moreover [f]=Ψ([σ1]2), the positive full twist: writing [σ1]2=[σ1⋆σ1], [F6] gives Φ([σ1]2)=(ι∗C[S(σ1⋆σ1)])−1=(ι∗C[S(σ1)]2)−1 and [S(σ1⋆σ1)]=[S(σ1)]2, while [F7] makes ι∗C an isomorphism and hence (ι∗C)−1((ι∗C[S(σ1)]2)−1)=([S(σ1)]2)−1=[S(σ1)]−2; since Ψ=δ∘(ι∗C)−1∘Φ by [F5], this yields Ψ([σ1]2)=δ([S(σ1)]−2)=δ([ρ−])=[f] by step 2.3, with Ψ([σ1]) the class of the positive half twist by [F5].

4.1step 3.1step 3.2

Conclusion. The homeomorphism f=P1−1 fixes ∂D2 pointwise and preserves Q2 setwise, and by step 3.1 it is isotopic to the identity through homeomorphisms preserving ∂D2 and Q2 setwise, but by step 3.2 it is not isotopic to the identity rel ∂D2, where it represents the positive full twist Ψ([σ1]2). So the pointwise-boundary and setwise-boundary conventions do not define the same isotopy classes: the assignment that views a pointwise-boundary class as a setwise-boundary class sends the nontrivial class [f] to the class of the identity, and the refuted claim fails. ∎

Remarks

  • The rotating isotopy is exactly the boundary rotation that the definition of Mod⁡(D2,Q2;∂D2) forbids: Gt preserves the boundary circle setwise but moves every boundary point except at t=0 and t=1, so it is not a path in E and cannot witness an isotopy rel ∂D2.
  • Nontriviality of the witness is detected purely configuration-theoretically: the squared normalized difference of the two marked points is a well-defined continuous function on the unordered configuration space and turns the rigid full rotation into a loop of degree two. The same computation exhibits the difference between the boundary-fixed disc and the punctured plane, where the analogous rotation would be an ambient isotopy.
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Setwise puncture preservation does not imply purity

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: for the punctured disc, preserving the marked set Qn setwise is the same as being pure. Precisely: every homeomorphism f of D2 that fixes ∂D2 pointwise and satisfies f({q1,…,qn})={q1,…,qn} is isotopic rel ∂D2 through homeomorphisms preserving Qn setwise at every time to a homeomorphism that fixes every qi individually, so that PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2)=Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2); equivalently, every class of the setwise stabiliser is a pure class.

The witness is the explicit supported positive half twist H1 of A supported half-twist homeomorphism. For n≥2 and an adjacent index i, the class of H1 lies in Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) but not in PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2): the homeomorphism H1 fixes ∂D2 pointwise and preserves Qn setwise, yet it exchanges qi and qi+1 and fixes all other marked points, so it induces the transposition of i and i+1 rather than the identity permutation of the marked set.

What is and is not claimed. What fails is exactly the implication "setwise preservation ⇒ purity" and the resulting equality of the two groups. Nothing here asserts that the transposition is the only permutation that can occur, and nothing here computes an isotopy invariant beyond the permutation of the marked set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the natural number n≥2, the adjacent index 1≤i≤n−1, the base configuration Qn=(q1,…,qn), and the explicit homeomorphism H1 of A supported half-twist homeomorphism with its collar function and support disc Ui.

[F1]

The explicit half rotation H of the example satisfies: every Hs is a homeomorphism of D2 fixing ∂D2 pointwise and fixing every point outside the support disc Ui; on the two adjacent punctures Hs(qi)=mi+h(−cos⁡πs,−sin⁡πs) and Hs(qi+1)=mi+h(cos⁡πs,sin⁡πs); every other base point is fixed throughout; and at s=1 the two moving punctures are exchanged, so H1 preserves Qn setwise and lies in Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn) (A supported half-twist homeomorphism).

[F2]

Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Q^n) denotes the subgroup of homeomorphisms fixing ∂D2 pointwise and every marked point, and PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is its set of path components; the inclusion of the pointwise stabiliser into the setwise stabiliser induces an injection, so PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is identified with the subgroup of Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) consisting of the classes whose permutation of Qn is trivial; the permutation induced by a representative is locally constant along a path in the setwise stabiliser, because each strand s↦fs(qj) is continuous and lands in the finite discrete set {q1,…,qn} (Pure boundary-fixed mapping classes).

[F3]

Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn) is the setwise stabiliser of Qn in the boundary-fixing group, on ∂D2 each element fixes the circle pointwise, each f in it has a unique permutation π(f)∈Sn with f(qj)=qπ(f)(j−1)+1 for 1≤j≤n, using the identification κ(j)=j−1 of point labels with {0,…,n−1}, and Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is its set of isotopy classes, two elements being isotopic exactly when they are joined by a path in this stabiliser (Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[F4]

The standard positive half twist σi is a braid whose endpoint permutation exchanges the point labels i and i+1, that is, it is the transposition (i−1 i) in Sn; this is not the identity permutation (The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite, The finite symmetric group Sn, one-line notation, and cycle notation).

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

1.1F1F2F3F4F5

The witness and the permutation it induces. By [F1], which is available under the standing Axiom of Choice [F5], the homeomorphism H1 fixes ∂D2 pointwise, fixes every point outside Ui, and satisfies H1(qi)=qi+1, H1(qi+1)=qi, and H1(qk)=qk for k∉{i,i+1}, so H1 preserves the marked set Qn setwise and its unique permutation π(H1)∈Sn of [F3] is the transposition (i−1 i) on {0,…,n−1} (exchanging point labels i and i+1), which differs from the identity permutation by [F4]; in particular H1 does not fix every marked point individually, and H1 is a member of the setwise stabiliser but not of the pointwise stabiliser of [F2].

1.2F2F3

The permutation is an isotopy invariant. Let s↦fs be any path in Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn), so that it is an isotopy rel ∂D2 from f0 to f1; for each label j the map s↦fs(qj) is continuous and takes values in the finite set {q1,…,qn}, which is discrete in the subspace topology, hence is constant on the connected interval I; therefore each π(fs) is defined and independent of s, and every representative of the isotopy class of f0 induces the same permutation π(f0).

2.1F2F4step 1.1step 1.2

The class is not pure. Since H1 lies in the setwise stabiliser, its class [H1] lies in Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) by [F3], and by step 1.2 every representative of [H1] induces the transposition of i and i+1 on the marked set; this permutation is not trivial by [F4], so by the identification of [F2] the class [H1] is not an element of PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2).

3.1step 2.1F2

Conclusion. Step 1.1 exhibits a homeomorphism fixing ∂D2 pointwise that preserves Qn setwise without fixing its points, and step 2.1 shows that its isotopy class lies outside PMod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2); hence setwise preservation of the punctures does not imply purity, not even for a single representative class, and the two subgroups of Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) are distinct whenever n≥2, with PMod⁡ the strict subgroup of classes of trivial permutation. ∎

Remarks

  • The witness is the geometric half twist: the isotopy class of the positive braid generator σi acts on the marked set by a transposition, while the boundary-fixed pure subgroup is by definition the part of the mapping class group acting trivially. The distinction is visible already for n=2, where the only non-identity permutation is the transposition realised by the half twist.
  • The discreteness of the permutation is what makes the counterexample robust: no isotopy rel ∂D2 can convert the transposition into the identity, because the strands would have to leave the marked set, which the setwise condition forbids.

Sources