How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Location-scale normal laws have their stated mean and variance
Statement
Assume AC. For , , and a real random variable with law ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a standard normal random variable , and with law for and .
AC is required by the standard normal probability-law definition and the Gaussian even-moment supplier. The Axiom of Choice Standard normal and normal laws Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments
is the law with density , and is the law of under . Standard normal and normal laws
For a standard normal , . Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments
Cauchy–Schwarz gives , so the standard normal is integrable. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
A nonnegative measurable function of a random element has expectation equal to its integral against the law, allowing infinity; the same identity holds for a signed function once its composite is integrable. Change of variables for expectation
Expectation is linear, and variance is for square-integrable . Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
A pointwise-convergent sequence dominated by one integrable function has convergent integrals. Dominated convergence
The substitution is valid in the proper integral of the continuous normal density on a compact interval. Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
By [F2], . Since has a probability law by [F1], , and Cauchy–Schwarz [F3] gives ; hence is integrable. For each integer , is odd because is even; [F7] with therefore gives by [F4].
As the integer , pointwise and , which is integrable by step 1.1. Dominated convergence [F6] gives .
Put . Since , [F2] gives . The nonnegative clause of [F4] and the common law in [F1] give ; Cauchy–Schwarz [F3] with the constant then makes both and integrable. By [F1] and [F4], . Linearity [F5] and step 2.1 give . Applying the same change of variables to gives by [F2] and [F5]. When , the affine map is constant and the same equalities give variance zero.
Source notes
The moment calculation is supplied locally from the library's proved Gaussian even-moment result and the normal-law push-forward definition. The cited sources document the scale-as-standard-deviation convention used in the detection-limit model.
Depends on
- Standard normal and normal laws
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments
- Change of variables for expectation
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
- Dominated convergence
- Substitution: if $\varphi$ is differentiable on $[c,d]$ with $\varphi'$ integrable and $f$ is continuous on an interval containing $\varphi([c,d])$, then $\int_{\varphi(c)}^{\varphi(d)} f = \int_c^d (f\circ\varphi)\,\varphi'$
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Gaussian mean-field reverse KL underestimates correlated marginal variance Counterexample
- Sparse-gap truth causes empirical-Bayes credible-set undercoverage Counterexample
- Detection-limit assumptions and left-censored readings Example
- Gaussian integrand: exact Monte Carlo moments and asymptotic error Example
- Compactly supported Gaussian mixtures admit logarithmic-size finite approximations Lemma
- Hellinger entropy for compact-location normal mixtures in a scale band Lemma
- Posterior and marginal-likelihood formulas for the Gaussian sequence prior Lemma
- Posterior radius, bias and noise comparisons for empirical Bayes Lemma
- The mixture prior places local KL and log-square mass near a compact smooth truth Lemma
- Uniform marginal-score bounds by derivative integration Lemma
- Exact limits in the known-blank equal-variance normal model Theorem
- Expected mean squares in the balanced one-way normal random-effects model Theorem
- Ordinary bootstrap failure for nonsmooth and first-order-degenerate mean functionals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A Century of Excellence in Measurements, Standards, and Technology: A Chronicle of Selected NBS/NIST Publications 1901–2000, NIST SP 958, pp. 177–179 (printed pp. 164–166) (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. Cantwell (ed.), Eurachem Guide: The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods, 3rd ed. (2025), §5.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)