Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Location-scale normal laws have their stated mean and variance

Statement

Assume AC. For m∈R, σ≥0, and a real random variable X with law N(m,σ2), E[X]=m,Var⁡(X)=σ2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a standard normal random variable Z, and X with law N(m,σ2) for m∈R and σ≥0.

[A1]

AC is required by the standard normal probability-law definition and the Gaussian even-moment supplier. The Axiom of Choice Standard normal and normal laws Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments

[F1]

N(0,1) is the law with density ϕ(x)=e−x2/2/2π, and N(m,σ2) is the law of x↦m+σx under N(0,1). Standard normal and normal laws

[F2]

For a standard normal Z, E[Z2]=1. Gaussian even moments for Brownian increments

[F3]

Cauchy–Schwarz gives E∣Z∣≤(E[Z2])1/2, so the standard normal is integrable. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables

[F4]

A nonnegative measurable function of a random element has expectation equal to its integral against the law, allowing infinity; the same identity holds for a signed function once its composite is integrable. Change of variables for expectation

[F5]

Expectation is linear, and variance is E[(X−E[X])2] for square-integrable X. Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space

[F6]

A pointwise-convergent sequence dominated by one integrable function has convergent integrals. Dominated convergence

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F7algebra

By [F2], E[Z2]=1. Since Z has a probability law by [F1], E[12]=1, and Cauchy–Schwarz [F3] gives E∣Z∣≤1; hence Z is integrable. For each integer n≥1, xϕ(x) is odd because ϕ is even; [F7] with u=−x therefore gives E[Z1{∣Z∣≤n}]=∫−nnxϕ(x) dx=0 by [F4].

2.1step 1.1F3F6

As the integer n→∞, Z1{∣Z∣≤n}→Z pointwise and ∣Z1{∣Z∣≤n}∣≤∣Z∣, which is integrable by step 1.1. Dominated convergence [F6] gives E[Z]=0.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3F4F5algebra∎

Put W=m+σZ. Since W2≤2m2+2σ2Z2, [F2] gives E[W2]<∞. The nonnegative clause of [F4] and the common law in [F1] give E[X2]=E[W2]<∞; Cauchy–Schwarz [F3] with the constant 1 then makes both X and W integrable. By [F1] and [F4], E[X]=E[m+σZ]. Linearity [F5] and step 2.1 give E[X]=m+σE[Z]=m. Applying the same change of variables to (X−m)2 gives Var⁡(X)=E[(X−m)2]=σ2E[Z2]=σ2 by [F2] and [F5]. When σ=0, the affine map is constant and the same equalities give variance zero.

Source notes

The moment calculation is supplied locally from the library's proved Gaussian even-moment result and the normal-law push-forward definition. The cited sources document the scale-as-standard-deviation convention used in the detection-limit model.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources