How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every integer , the law has density
where is the polar surface measure on the unit sphere in . Consequently, almost surely, and its cumulative distribution function is continuous on and strictly increasing on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and an integer .
The Axiom of Choice implies Countable Choice, which is the hypothesis of the polar-coordinate theorem. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The law is the law of for with independent standard-normal coordinates. Chi-square laws, including zero degrees Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
A standard normal coordinate has density and total mass one. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one
Independent random elements have the finite product of their marginal laws. Independent random elements have product joint law
Tonelli permits integration of nonnegative functions on sigma-finite products, and product Lebesgue measure agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
For nonnegative Borel functions, polar coordinates give , with finite . Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
Measures are continuous from below on increasing sequences of measurable sets. Continuity from below for measures
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
By [F1]–[F3], the joint law of is the finite product of the standard-normal coordinate laws. On every measurable rectangle, Tonelli and [F4] show that this product has density relative to ; uniqueness of the finite product law extends the identity from rectangles to every Borel set.
For , [F1], step 1.1 and [F5] give by the substitution . The radial integral is finite near zero because , and the polar measure is finite by [F5].
The random variable is finite everywhere, so the events increase to the whole probability space as . By [F6], their probabilities tend to . If were zero, step 2.1 would give zero probability for every finite , a contradiction. Thus . Step 2.1 then gives the density on , and as its integral tends to zero; hence . Thus almost surely.
The density in step 3.1 is locally integrable at zero and continuous and positive for . Its integral over any interval is therefore positive, and its integral over a shrinking interval tends to zero. Thus the CDF is strictly increasing on and continuous at every positive ; step 2.1 also gives continuity at zero and no atom there. It is zero on .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Chi-square laws, including zero degrees
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
- Standard normal and normal laws
- The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice
- The standard normal density has total mass one
- Continuity from below for measures
- Independent random elements have product joint law
- On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Used by
- Rademacher errors show orthogonality alone gives neither independence nor exact t and F laws Counterexample
- Student t and Fisher F laws Definition
- A skewed finite-replicate law defeats a nominal Student interval Example
- Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports Lemma
- The standard Wishart inverse quadratic form has an exact Fisher law Lemma
- Exact confidence and prediction intervals in Gaussian regression Theorem
- Exact t and partial F inference in full-rank Gaussian regression Theorem
- Normal sample mean and residual are independent, giving the exact t pivot Theorem
- QR decomposition gives exact t and F pivots in the fixed Gaussian linear model Theorem
- The one-sample Hotelling statistic has an exact F law Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Aditya Guntuboyina, UC Berkeley Stat 201A Fall 2019, Lecture Notes, §§5.5–5.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yen-Chi Chen, UW STAT 512 Lecture 8: Linear Models and Multivariate Normal Distributions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dmitry Panchenko, MIT 18.443 Statistics for Applications, Fall 2003, Lecture 16 (standard reference, not scraped)