Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The standard Wishart inverse quadratic form has an exact Fisher law

Statement

Assume AC. Let m≥p≥1, let W∼Wp(Ip,m), and let Z∼Np(0,Ip) be independent of W. Then W is positive definite almost surely and m−p+1pZTW−1Z∼Fp,m−p+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, integers m≥p≥1, W∼Wp(Ip,m), Z∼Np(0,Ip), and independence of W and Z.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the multivariate-normal and orthogonal-coordinate suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Wp(Σ,m) is the law of the sum of m independent Gaussian outer products; singular support is allowed by the stated convention. Wishart law by Gaussian outer products

[F2]

An independent standard-normal p×m matrix has full row rank almost surely when m≥p. A standard-normal matrix with at least as many columns as rows has full row rank almost surely

[F3]

An orthogonal transform preserves the independent standard-normal product law. Orthogonal transformations preserve the standard normal product law

[F4]

For a fixed orthogonal projection P of rank r and standard-normal g∈Rm, ∥(I−P)g∥2∼χm−r2. Orthogonal projections split a standard Gaussian into independent chi-square sums

[F5]

The law of a standard-normal squared norm with k coordinates is χk2, and the Fisher law is the ratio of independent scaled chi-square laws with positive degrees of freedom. Chi-square laws, including zero degrees Student t and Fisher F laws

[F6]

Positive-degree chi-square variables are positive almost surely. Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF

[F7]

Disjoint groups of an independent family remain independent, and measurable coordinatewise maps preserve independence. Independent random elements Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence

[F8]

Independent random elements have product joint law; nonnegative product integrals may be computed by Tonelli. Independent random elements have product joint law Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F9]

A self-adjoint idempotent is the orthogonal projection onto its image, and an orthogonal projection is the component map for V=W⊕W⊥. The orthogonal projection PWv is the W-component in V=W⊕W⊥ An endomorphism is an orthogonal projection exactly when it is idempotent and self-adjoint

[F10]

Every finite-dimensional inner-product space decomposes as a subspace plus its orthogonal complement, which has an orthonormal basis. For a subspace W of a finite-dimensional inner product space, V=W⊕W⊥ Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis

[F11]

Continuous Euclidean maps are Borel measurable under the countable-choice consequence of AC. Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F11algebra

By [F1], realize W=GGT with G=[g1∣⋯∣gm] and independent gj∼Np(0,Ip). For any square matrix A, extend inversion by setting J(A)=A−1 when det⁡A≠0 and J(A)=0 otherwise. This is Borel: the invertible matrices form an open set, inversion is continuous there, and the complementary branch is constant; [F11] supplies Euclidean Borel measurability. Thus J(GGT) is a Borel matrix-valued random element and agrees with W−1 whenever GGT is invertible. Since m≥p, [F2] makes G full row rank almost surely; hence for nonzero v, vTWv=∥GTv∥2>0 and W is invertible almost surely.

2.1F2F9F11step 1.1algebra

For p≥2, write the first row of G as g and the remaining p−1 rows as G2. The event E2={det⁡(G2G2T)≠0} is Borel. Define C†=(G2G2T)−1 on E2 and C†=0 on E2c, and put P=G2TC†G2; this is Borel by the same piecewise-inversion argument as in step 1.1. By [F2], E2 has probability one. On E2, direct multiplication gives PT=P and P2=P, and its image is the row space of G2, of dimension p−1; [F9] identifies it as an orthogonal projection. For p=1, use the empty-row convention G2=0, P=0. In either case define the Borel scalar Q=g(Im−P)gT on the whole matrix space. On the full-probability event that G has full row rank, the block matrix W=GGT=(ggTgG2TG2gTC) has invertible lower block C when p≥2, and solving Wx=e1 gives e1TW−1e1=(ggT−gG2TC−1G2gT)−1. Thus for p≥2 this Q equals (e1TW−1e1)−1 on the full-probability event. For p=1, W=ggT and the same identity reads Q=ggT=(e1TW−1e1)−1.

3.1F2F4F5F7F8F11step 2.1

The entries of G are independent standard normals, so its first row g is independent of the remaining rows G2 by [F7]. For each fixed full-row-rank value of G2, Im−P is an orthogonal projection of rank m−p+1. Therefore [F4] gives the section law Q∼χm−p+12 for every such G2; the p=1 case follows from [F5]. The matrix rank event is Borel because it is determined by continuous minors, and the extended map P(G2) is Borel by step 2.1. The exceptional set has probability zero by [F2]. Applying the product-law identity [F8] to these Borel sections shows that the unconditional law of the Borel extension Q=g(Im−P)gT is also χm−p+12.

4.1A1F3F5F6F7F8F10F11step 1.1step 3.1

For any fixed unit vector u∈Rp, [F10] supplies an orthogonal matrix U with Uu=e1. By [F3] and [F7], applying U to each independent column preserves their joint standard-normal product law; hence UWUT has the same law as W. Let h(t)=t−1 for t>0 and h(t)=0 otherwise. Since J(W)=W−1 almost surely by step 1.1 and W≻0 almost surely, h(uTJ(W)u) has the same law as Q in step 3.1 for every unit u, using the orthogonal invariance just proved. Set UZ=Z/∥Z∥ when Z≠0 and let UZ=e1 when Z=0. The map z↦Uz is Borel, and QZ:=h(UZTJ(W)UZ) is Borel because J and h are Borel; Z=0 is null by [F5]–[F6]. For Borel sets A,B, independence and the product law give P(∥Z∥2∈A,QZ∈B)=∫{z:∥z∥2∈A}PW(h(uzTJ(W)uz)∈B) dPZ(z), where uz=z/∥z∥ for z≠0 and u0=e1. The inner probability is the same for every unit uz, so this factors as P(∥Z∥2∈A)P(Q∈B). Thus QZ is independent of ∥Z∥2 and has the same χm−p+12 law as Q in step 3.1.

5.1F5F6step 4.1algebra∎

By [F5], ∥Z∥2∼χp2 and it is independent of QZ∼χm−p+12 by step 4.1. Therefore m−p+1pZTW−1Z=∥Z∥2/pQZ/(m−p+1) has law Fp,m−p+1 by the defining Fisher ratio; its denominator is positive almost surely by [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources