Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 6 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Gaussian Orthogonal Decomposition and Quadratic Forms

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page develops the finite-dimensional Gaussian route from orthogonal changes of coordinates to independent chi-square components. It defines the positive-degree Student t and Fisher F laws, proves their CDF regularity, and derives the exact unknown-variance one-sample t pivot and fixed-design Gaussian regression t/F pivots. Choice assumptions are stated where the characteristic-function and Fourier-uniqueness route uses them; t and F denominators always have positive degrees of freedom.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Orthogonal transformations preserve the standard normal product law

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥1, let Z∼Nn(0,In) have independent standard-normal coordinates, and let U∈Rn×n satisfy UTU=In. Then UZ also has independent N(0,1) coordinates. Here In is the identity matrix and U is orthogonal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, Z∼Nn(0,In) with independent standard-normal coordinates, and an orthogonal matrix U.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed; the multivariate-normal characteristic-function and finite-Borel uniqueness suppliers below state this use explicitly. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

The Axiom of Choice implies Countable Choice, the stated hypothesis of the continuous-map measurability and Fourier-transform suppliers. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice

[F1]

The law Nn(m,Σ) is the Borel law with all linear projections normal; for Σ=In it is realized by independent standard-normal coordinates. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, the characteristic function of Nn(m,Σ) is exp⁡(i t⋅m−tTΣt/2). Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, the Fourier transform of a finite complex Borel measure on Rn is μ^(ξ)=∫e−2πix⋅ξ dμ(x); for the law of a Borel random vector its vector characteristic function is Eeit⋅X, and substituting ξ=−t/(2π) identifies the two transforms. Fourier transform of a finite complex Borel measure Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law

[F4]

Under the Axiom of Choice, finite complex Borel measures on Rn with equal Fourier transforms are equal. Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms

[F5]

Under Countable Choice, continuous maps between Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable, and a Borel random vector has a law by pushforward. Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable Law or distribution of a random element

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1A2F1F2F5algebra

Since UTU=In and U is square, U is invertible with inverse UT, so UUT=In. By [A2], Countable Choice holds. The continuous map x↦Ux is Borel measurable by [F5], so (UZ)−1(B)=Z−1(U−1(B)) is measurable for every Borel B⊆Rn. Thus UZ is a Borel random vector and has a law by [F5]. For each t∈Rn, [F1]–[F2] give EeitTUZ=exp⁡(−∥UTt∥2/2)=exp⁡(−∥t∥2/2)=EeitTZ; the middle equality follows from UUT=In.

2.1step 1.1A2F3F4F5

By [A2] and [F3], the equality in step 1.1 at every t is equality of the finite Borel Fourier transforms of the laws of UZ and Z. Both are probability measures, hence have finite total variation; [F4] therefore gives L(UZ)=L(Z).

3.1F1step 2.1∎

By [F1], the coordinates of Z are independent standard normals. Equality of joint laws in step 2.1 makes the coordinate law of UZ the same product law, so its coordinates are again independent N(0,1). This use of orthogonality depends on the Gaussian product law; no claim is made for arbitrary independent coordinates.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Chi-square laws, including zero degrees

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For an integer k≥1, let G=(G1,…,Gk) have law Nk(0,Ik), so its coordinates are independent N(0,1) random variables. The chi-square law with k degrees of freedom, denoted χk2, is the law of

Qk=∑j=1kGj2=∥G∥2.

For k=0, define χ02=δ0, the point mass at zero. This zero-degree law records a rank-zero projection only; it is not used as a denominator in a Student or Fisher ratio. The multivariate-normal characteristic-function theorem makes the definition independent of the chosen realization of G.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every integer k≥1, the law χk2 has density

fk(x)=ckxk/2−1e−x/21{x>0},ck=σk−1(Sk−1)2(2π)k/2>0,

where σk−1 is the polar surface measure on the unit sphere in Rk. Consequently, Qk>0 almost surely, and its cumulative distribution function is continuous on R and strictly increasing on (0,∞).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and an integer k≥1.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice implies Countable Choice, which is the hypothesis of the polar-coordinate theorem. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

The law χk2 is the law of ∥G∥2 for G∼Nk(0,Ik) with independent standard-normal coordinates. Chi-square laws, including zero degrees Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F2]

A standard normal coordinate has density ϕ(x)=(2π)−1/2e−x2/2 and total mass one. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one

[F3]

Independent random elements have the finite product of their marginal laws. Independent random elements have product joint law

[F4]

Tonelli permits integration of nonnegative functions on sigma-finite products, and product Lebesgue measure agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}

[F5]

For nonnegative Borel functions, polar coordinates give ∫Rkh(z) dz=∫0∞∫Sk−1h(rω)rk−1 dσk−1(ω) dr, with finite σk−1. Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma The polar surface set function on the unit sphere

[F6]

Measures are continuous from below on increasing sequences of measurable sets. Continuity from below for measures

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4

By [F1]–[F3], the joint law of G is the finite product of the standard-normal coordinate laws. On every measurable rectangle, Tonelli and [F4] show that this product has density ∏j=1kϕ(zj)=(2π)−k/2e−∥z∥2/2 relative to λk; uniqueness of the finite product law extends the identity from rectangles to every Borel set.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

For t>0, [F1], step 1.1 and [F5] give P(Qk≤t)=(2π)−k/2σk−1(Sk−1)∫0te−r2/2rk−1 dr=ck∫0txk/2−1e−x/2 dx by the substitution x=r2. The radial integral is finite near zero because k/2−1>−1, and the polar measure is finite by [F5].

3.1F1F5F6step 2.1

The random variable Qk=∥G∥2 is finite everywhere, so the events {Qk≤m} increase to the whole probability space as m→∞. By [F6], their probabilities tend to 1. If σk−1(Sk−1) were zero, step 2.1 would give zero probability for every finite t, a contradiction. Thus ck>0. Step 2.1 then gives the density on (0,∞), and as t↓0 its integral tends to zero; hence P(Qk=0)≤P(Qk≤t)→0. Thus Qk>0 almost surely.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The density in step 3.1 is locally integrable at zero and continuous and positive for x>0. Its integral over any interval (a,b)⊂(0,∞) is therefore positive, and its integral over a shrinking interval tends to zero. Thus the CDF is strictly increasing on (0,∞) and continuous at every positive x; step 2.1 also gives continuity at zero and no atom there. It is zero on (−∞,0].

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Orthogonal projections split a standard Gaussian into independent chi-square sums

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥1, let Z∼Nn(0,In), and let P∈Rn×n be an orthogonal projection of rank r, where 0≤r≤n. Then the random vectors PZ and (In−P)Z are independent, and

∥PZ∥2∼χr2,∥(In−P)Z∥2∼χn−r2.

The two squared norms are independent. The cases r=0 and r=n are included, with χ02=δ0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, Z∼Nn(0,In), and an orthogonal projection P of rank r.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the standard-normal construction and the finite-Borel uniqueness argument in the orthogonal-invariance theorem. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

The Axiom of Choice implies Countable Choice in the sequence-selection form required by the continuous-map measurability corollary. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable

[F1]

A real self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional inner-product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis. Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis

[F3]

An orthogonal change of coordinates preserves the independent standard-normal product law. Orthogonal transformations preserve the standard normal product law

[F4]

The law of a sum of k independent squared standard normals is χk2, with χ02=δ0. Chi-square laws, including zero degrees

[F5]

Disjoint groups from an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent, and measurable functions of independent random elements remain independent. Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent Independent random elements Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Regard P as a self-adjoint idempotent by [F2]. By [F1] it has an orthonormal eigenbasis. If v is an eigenvector with eigenvalue λ, then P2v=Pv gives λ2=λ, so λ∈{0,1}. Exactly r eigenvalues are 1, since the image of P is spanned by precisely those eigenvectors. Reorder the basis so its first r vectors have eigenvalue 1, and let U be the orthogonal matrix with these eigenvectors as columns. Then P=Udiag⁡(Ir,0)UT.

2.1step 1.1A2F3F5

By [A2], the continuous-map measurability corollary applies. The maps x↦UTx, the two coordinate-block maps with zero-padding, and x↦Ux are continuous and therefore Borel measurable. Their compositions with the Borel random vector Z are Borel random vectors; in particular, W=UTZ, PZ=U(W1,…,Wr,0,…,0)T, and (In−P)Z=U(0,…,0,Wr+1,…,Wn)T are random vectors. By [F3], W1,…,Wn are independent standard normals. The first r coordinates and the last n−r coordinates generate independent sigma-algebras by [F5]; applying their measurable coordinate-block maps and then U preserves independence. Thus PZ and (In−P)Z are independent.

3.1step 2.1A2F4F5algebra∎

Orthogonality of U preserves Euclidean norm. Therefore ∥PZ∥2=∑j=1rWj2 and ∥(In−P)Z∥2=∑j=r+1nWj2. The squared-norm maps are continuous, hence Borel measurable by [A2]. By [F4] their laws are χr2 and χn−r2, and their independence follows from step 2.1 because measurable functions of independent random vectors remain independent by [F5]. When a block is empty its sum is 0, so its law is χ02=δ0; the constant zero vector is independent of every random vector by [F5].

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Student t and Fisher F laws

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a positive integer k, take the product probability law of an independent standard normal G and an independent Qk∼χk2. The Student t law with k degrees of freedom, denoted tk, is the law of Tk={GQk/k,Qk>0,0,Qk≤0. For positive integers r,s, take independent Qr∼χr2 and Qs∼χs2. The Fisher F law with degrees (r,s), denoted Fr,s, is the law of Fr,s={Qr/rQs/s,Qs>0,0,Qs≤0. The displayed piecewise maps are defined on all of R2 and are Borel measurable: each quotient is continuous on its Borel positive-denominator region, and the value on the complementary Borel nonpositive-denominator region is constant. The positive-degree chi-square lemma proves that the denominators are positive almost surely, so these versions agree almost surely with the usual quotients. Zero degrees are excluded from both definitions.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every k≥1, the CDF of tk is continuous and strictly increasing on R, is symmetric about zero, and has limits 0 and 1 at −∞ and +∞. For every r,s≥1, the CDF of Fr,s is continuous on R, is zero on (−∞,0], and is strictly increasing on (0,∞) with limit 1 at +∞. Consequently, for each u∈(0,1) each law has exactly one u-quantile on its support.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, positive degrees of freedom, and the laws tk and Fr,s.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice covers the standard-normal law and implies the Countable Choice used in the normal-density supplier. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice

[F1]

A standard normal has the strictly positive continuous density ϕ(x)=(2π)−1/2e−x2/2 with total mass one. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡

[F2]

The CDF of a real random variable is FX(x)=P(X≤x). Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable

[F3]

Positive-degree chi-square variables are positive almost surely and have CDFs continuous and strictly increasing on (0,∞). Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF

[F4]

The t and F laws are ratios of independent normal and chi-square variables with positive degrees of freedom. Student t and Fisher F laws

[F5]

Dominated convergence passes limits through integrals with an integrable majorant. Dominated convergence

[F7]

Probabilities of increasing unions are the limits of the probabilities. Continuity from below for measures

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F7algebra

Let Φ be the standard-normal CDF. For x<y, [F1]–[F2] give Φ(y)−Φ(x)=∫xyϕ(z) dz>0. On every bounded interval ϕ is bounded, so ∣Φ(y)−Φ(x)∣≤M∣y−x∣ there and Φ is continuous. The events {G≤m} and {G>−m} increase to the whole space as integer m→∞; [F7] and total mass one give the CDF limits 1 and 0. Thus Φ is continuous and strictly increasing on R.

1.2F3F4F5F6

For x≤0, Fr,s(x)=0 because its ratio is positive almost surely. For x>0, conditioning on Qs=q>0 gives FFr,s(x)=∫(0,∞)Fχr2(xrq/s) dχs2(q). If xj→x>0, continuity of the inner chi-square CDF and [F5] give continuity of this integral. If 0<x<y, strict increase of the inner CDF on (0,∞) and positivity of Qs give a strict inequality between the two integrals. Dominated convergence as x↓0 and x→∞ gives limits 0 and 1. Hence the F CDF is continuous on R and strictly increasing on (0,∞).

2.1F3F4F5F6step 1.1

On the product space defining tk, condition on Qk=q>0. Independence and [F6] give Ftk(x)=∫(0,∞)Φ(xq/k) dχk2(q). If xj→x, the integrands converge pointwise and are bounded by 1, so [F5] makes Ftk(xj)→Ftk(x). If x<y, then Φ(yq/k)>Φ(xq/k) for every q>0 by step 1.1, and [F3] says this is a full-measure set; integrating gives Ftk(y)>Ftk(x). Dominated convergence as x→±∞ gives limits 1 and 0.

3.1F1F2F4F8step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

The law tk is symmetric: replacing G by −G preserves the product law in [F4] and sends Tk to −Tk. Continuity from step 2.1 therefore gives Ftk(0)=1/2 and Ftk(−x)=1−Ftk(x). For either law and any u∈(0,1), the CDF limits and continuity give points a<b in its support with F(a)<u<F(b); [F8] applied on [a,b] gives a point with CDF value u, and strict increase gives uniqueness. These unique points are the stated quantiles. In particular, for 0<α<1, q1−α/2>0 because Ftk(0)=1/2<1−α/2 and the CDF is strictly increasing.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Normal sample mean and residual are independent, giving the exact t pivot

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Use the experiment with data space (Rn,B(Rn)), parameter set R×(0,∞), and sampling law Pμ,σ2=N(μ,σ2)⊗n. Let n≥2, σ>0, and let X1,…,Xn be the independent coordinates of the observation. Define Xˉ=1n∑i=1nXi,S2=1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−Xˉ)2,S=S2. The map x↦xˉ is a statistic. The sample mean Xˉ and residual sum S2 are independent, (n−1)S2σ2∼χn−12,S>0 almost surely,T~:={Xˉ−μS/n,S>0,0,S=0∼tn−1. For every 0<α<1, the interval [Xˉ−qn−1(1−α/2)Sn, Xˉ+qn−1(1−α/2)Sn] has exact coverage 1−α, where qn−1(u) is the unique u-quantile of tn−1 established in Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, n≥2, σ>0, and an independent sample Xi∼N(μ,σ2).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed by the normal-law and orthogonal-invariance suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, the sequence-selection conclusion of the countable-choice lemma gives Countable Choice, the hypothesis of the continuous-map measurability corollary. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable

[F1]

The law N(μ,σ2) is the pushforward of N(0,1) by the map z↦μ+σz; measurable functions of independent random elements remain independent. Standard normal and normal laws Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence

[F2]

A statistic is a measurable data map; under Countable Choice, continuous maps between Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable. Statistics and estimators Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable

[F3]

For Z∼Nn(0,In) and a rank-r orthogonal projection P, PZ and (I−P)Z are independent and their squared norms have laws χr2 and χn−r2. Orthogonal projections split a standard Gaussian into independent chi-square sums

[F4]

The joint law of independent standard-normal coordinates is Nn(0,In), and each linear projection of that law is normal with the corresponding projected mean and variance. Independent random elements have product joint law Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F5]

Positive-degree chi-square denominators are positive almost surely; tk has a continuous symmetric CDF with unique quantiles, and its law is the piecewise ratio G/Qk/k set to zero when Qk=0, for independent G∼N(0,1) and Qk∼χk2. Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF Student t and Fisher F laws Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1A2F1F2F4

By [A2], Countable Choice holds, so [F2] applies to the linear continuous map x↦xˉ; hence it is a statistic on the stated Borel data space. Put Zi=(Xi−μ)/σ. The affine pushforward definition in [F1] gives each Zi∼N(0,1), and [F1] preserves their independence. Thus Z=(Z1,…,Zn)∼Nn(0,In) by [F4].

2.1step 1.1algebra

Define Zˉ=n−1∑i=1nZi, u=n−1/2(1,…,1)T, and P=uuT. Since uTu=1, P is a rank-one orthogonal projection. We have uTZ=n Zˉ and X−Xˉ(1,…,1)T=σ(In−P)Z. Therefore Xˉ=μ+σuTZ/n and S2=σ2∥(In−P)Z∥2/(n−1).

3.1A2F1F2F3F4algebrastep 2.1

By [F3], PZ and (In−P)Z are independent and Q:=∥(In−P)Z∥2∼χn−12. The continuous linear map z↦uTz is Borel by [A2] and [F2], and uTZ=uTPZ; the continuous squared-norm map on the complementary vector is likewise Borel. Thus G:=uTZ and Q are measurable functions of the independent vectors in [F3], so they are independent by [F1]. By [F4], G∼N(0,1).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F5algebra

The formulas in step 2.1 express Xˉ as an affine function of G and S2 as σ2Q/(n−1). Hence Xˉ and S2 are independent, (n−1)S2/σ2=Q∼χn−12, and S>0 almost surely by [F5].

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1F5algebra

The set {S>0} is Borel and the displayed quotient is continuous there; assigning 0 on {S=0} therefore makes T~ measurable. Since S=0 exactly when Q=0, step 2.1 gives T~=G/Q/(n−1) on {Q>0} and both versions are 0 on {Q=0}. The variables G and Q are independent with laws N(0,1) and χn−12, so [F5] gives T~∼tn−1.

6.1F5step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

Let q=qn−1(1−α/2). By [F5], the tn−1 CDF is continuous and symmetric, so Ftn−1(0)=1/2<1−α/2 and strict increase gives q>0; symmetry then gives Ftn−1(−q)=α/2. Step 5.1 therefore gives P(−q≤T~≤q)=1−α. On the full-probability event {S>0} from step 4.1, this event is exactly {μ lies in the displayed interval} by multiplying by S/n and rearranging. The events agree almost surely, so the interval has exact coverage 1−α.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

QR decomposition gives exact t and F pivots in the fixed Gaussian linear model

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix a deterministic matrix X∈Rn×p with n>p≥1 whose p columns are linearly independent. Use the experiment on (Rn,B(Rn)) indexed by (β,σ2)∈Rp×(0,∞), with observation Y=Xβ+ε and independent errors εi∼N(0,σ2). Define the least-squares statistic and residual sum of squares by β^=(XTX)−1XTY,PX=X(XTX)−1XT,RSSX=∥(In−PX)Y∥2,S2=RSSXn−p,S=S2. For every nonzero c∈Rp, T~c:={cTβ^−cTβScT(XTX)−1c,S>0,0,S=0∼tn−p,RSSXσ2∼χn−p2, and β^ is independent of RSSX, with S>0 almost surely.

For nested deterministic full and reduced design spaces WR⊂WU⊆Rn of dimensions p−q and p, where q is an integer and 1≤q≤p<n, let PR,PU be the orthogonal projections onto these spaces and define RSSR=∥(I−PR)Y∥2 and RSSU=∥(I−PU)Y∥2. Under the null hypothesis that the mean vector belongs to WR, F~:={(RSSR−RSSU)/qRSSU/(n−p),RSSU>0,0,RSSU=0∼Fq,n−p. The numerator and denominator chi-square contributions are independent. All t and F denominator degrees of freedom in the statement are positive.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, fixed full-rank design matrices as in the Statement, and independent normal errors of variance σ2>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the standard-normal construction and orthogonal-invariance theorem. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, the sequence-selection conclusion of the countable-choice lemma gives Countable Choice, the hypothesis of the continuous-map measurability corollary. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable

[F2]

Gram–Schmidt turns a finite independent list into an orthonormal list with the same successive spans. Gram–Schmidt turns every finite independent list into an orthonormal list with the same successive spans

[F4]

Standardizing N(0,σ2) coordinates gives independent standard normals; an orthogonal transformation preserves their joint law and independent coordinates remain independent in disjoint blocks. Standard normal and normal laws Orthogonal transformations preserve the standard normal product law Disjoint groups of an independent sigma-algebra family remain independent Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence

[F5]

The law of χk2 is the squared norm of k independent standard normals; for k≥1 it is positive almost surely. Chi-square laws, including zero degrees Positive-degree chi-square laws have a positive density and regular CDF

[F6]

The t law is the piecewise ratio of an independent normal and positive-degree chi-square variable, and the F law is the corresponding ratio of independent positive-degree chi-square variables; both are set to zero on denominator-zero sets, and their CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports. Student t and Fisher F laws Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports

[F7]

A statistic is a measurable data map, and under Countable Choice continuous Euclidean maps are Borel measurable. Statistics and estimators Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable

[F9]

If vectors a,b are orthogonal, then ∥a+b∥2=∥a∥2+∥b∥2. Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F2F3F10choosealgebra

By full column rank, the columns of X are linearly independent. Apply [F2] to obtain orthonormal columns of Q∈Rn×p with the same successive spans. Expressing each column of X in this basis gives X=QR, where R is upper triangular; its diagonal entries are the nonzero Gram–Schmidt residual norms, so R is invertible. Let W=col⁡X. The columns of X form a basis of W, so dim⁡W=p. By [F3], Rn=W⊕W⊥. The subspace W⊥ is finite-dimensional by [F10], and direct-sum dimension additivity in [F10] gives n=p+dim⁡W⊥, hence dim⁡W⊥=n−p. By [F3], choose an orthonormal basis of this complement with exactly n−p vectors as the columns of Q0; together with Q it forms an orthonormal basis [Q Q0] of Rn.

2.1A1A2F1F4F5F7step 1.1algebra

Set U=[Q Q0]. Then U is orthogonal. Standardizing the independent errors gives η=ε/σ with independent standard-normal coordinates, so [F4] makes UTη=(ZQ,Z0) a standard-normal product vector with independent coordinate blocks. Since X=QR and XTX=RTR, the normal-equation solution in [F1] is β^=R−1QTY=β+σR−1ZQ. Substituting X=QR and (RTR)−1=R−1R−T gives PX=QR(RTR)−1RTQT=Q[RR−1R−TRT]QT=QQT, because RR−1=Ip and R−TRT=Ip. Since U is orthogonal, In−PX=Q0Q0T. Thus (In−PX)Y=σQ0Z0, so RSSX/σ2=∥Z0∥2∼χn−p2 by [F5]. By [A2] and [F7], the linear maps defining β^ and Q0Z0, and the squared-norm map defining RSSX, are Borel; hence these quantities are measurable functions of the independent coordinate blocks and β^ is independent of RSSX by [F4]. The map defining β^ is linear and Borel, so it is a statistic for the stated experiment. The residual map and squared norm are continuous, so RSSX and S are continuous. The piecewise t version in the Statement is Borel: its quotient is continuous on the Borel set S>0 and its value on S=0 is constant. Its denominator has positive degree n−p, hence S>0 almost surely by [F5].

3.1A2F3F4F5F6step 2.1algebra

For c≠0, put v=R−Tc. Invertibility of R gives v≠0. Complete v/∥v∥ to an orthonormal basis of Rp by [F3]; applying [F4] to the resulting orthogonal matrix shows Gc=vTZQ/∥v∥∼N(0,1). Under [A2], the continuous linear map defining Gc is Borel. It is independent of Q0:=∥Z0∥2∼χn−p2, because ZQ and Z0 are independent blocks and Gc and the squared-norm map are measurable functions of those blocks. Since XTX=RTR, ∥v∥2=cTR−1R−Tc=cT(XTX)−1c. Thus on Q0>0 the displayed contrast ratio is Gc/Q0/(n−p); on Q0=0 its version T~c is zero. This is exactly the extension in the definition of tn−p, so [F5]–[F6] give T~c∼tn−p.

4.1A1A2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9F10step 1.1algebra∎

For the nested models, let WD=WU∩WR⊥. For u∈WU, its orthogonal decomposition relative to WR has a WR component and a remaining component in WU∩WR⊥=WD, because WR⊆WU. Thus [F3] gives WU=WR⊕WD and Rn=WU⊕WU⊥. All these subspaces are finite-dimensional by [F10]. Applying direct-sum dimension additivity in [F10] to the two decompositions gives p=(p−q)+dim⁡WD and n=p+dim⁡WU⊥, hence dim⁡WD=q and dim⁡WU⊥=n−p. Combining the orthogonal decompositions gives Rn=WR⊕WD⊕WU⊥, including the zero-dimensional WR case q=p. Choose orthonormal bases in these three spaces and concatenate them into an orthogonal matrix V. By [F4], the coordinates of VTε/σ in the three blocks are independent standard normals. Under the null, PR(Xβ)=PU(Xβ)=Xβ, so (I−PR)Y=(I−PR)ε=PWDε+PWU⊥ε and (I−PU)Y=(I−PU)ε=PWU⊥ε: here [F8] identifies I−PR=PWR⊥ and I−PU=PWU⊥, while the direct sum in [F3] splits the first projection into the two orthogonal components. The coordinate-block maps and the linear projections are continuous, and squared norms are continuous, so [A2] and [F7] make all these random vectors and real variables measurable. Orthogonality and [F9] give RSSR−RSSU=σ2∑j=1qGj2 and RSSU=σ2∑j=1n−pHj2, where the G and H coordinate blocks are independent standard-normal blocks. By [F5] these sums are independent σ2χq2 and σ2χn−p2 variables; both degrees are positive. The piecewise ratio F~ is Borel, since it is continuous on the Borel set RSSU>0 and constant on RSSU=0. Its value is the scaled ratio on QH:=∑j=1n−pHj2>0 and 0 when QH=0; by [F6] this is exactly the defined Fq,n−p version. The F denominator is positive almost surely by [F5], so F~∼Fq,n−p.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources