Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Boundary restriction and the surgery detector

Statement

Assume full AC and let K⊂S3 be a smooth oriented knot with exterior EK, meridian μ, and preferred longitude λ. Restriction to the peripheral torus induces an algebraic map from the character variety of EK to that of the torus. Every one-dimensional peripheral eigenvalue image component is contained in the zero set of the ordinary A-polynomial, while isolated image points are not treated as curve factors. For a primitive pair (p,q)∈Z2 (with q=0 denoting the meridional slope), a representation ρ:π1(EK)→SL2(C) descends to the filling that kills p[μ]+q[λ] exactly when ρ(μ)pρ(λ)q=I2. If the peripheral matrices are simultaneously diagonalizable with eigenvalues (M,L) on a common eigenline, this matrix condition is equivalent to MpLq=1; without that diagonalizability, the eigenvalue equation is only necessary and the matrix relation must be checked.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the marked knot exterior and peripheral basis, a finite presentation of its group, a representation, and coprime integers p,q.

[F1]

The boundary inclusion induces restriction on representations; evaluation of each fixed peripheral word is regular in matrix entries because inverse letters in SL2(C) are adjugate polynomials (The SL2 representation variety is affine). This restriction is equivariant under simultaneous conjugation, and the character variety is the affine categorical quotient (SL2 character variety and peripheral eigenvalues; Finite generation of invariants and the affine categorical quotient).

[F2]

The ordinary A-polynomial defines the reduced union of one-dimensional components of the peripheral eigenvalue image; zero-dimensional image components are omitted (The ordinary knot A-polynomial; Boundary eigenvalue curve elimination for the A-polynomial).

[F3]

Dehn filling kills the primitive slope p[μ]+q[λ] and glues a solid torus (Oriented slopes and knot Dehn filling).

[F4]

Seifert–van Kampen identifies the filled fundamental group with the pushout of the exterior and attached solid-torus groups (Seifert–van Kampen identifies the fundamental group with a group pushout; A group pushout is the quotient of a free product by the amalgamating relations).

[F5]

A deformation retraction induces mutually inverse isomorphisms on fundamental groups at each basepoint of the retract (A retract induces an injection on fundamental groups, and a deformation retract induces an isomorphism).

[F6]

The fundamental group of the quotient circle is isomorphic to (Z,+) by the degree map (Deg⁡:π1(R/Z,[0])→(Z,+) is an isomorphism); the based homeomorphism [t]↦e2πit identifies it with the unit circle.

[A1]

Full AC implies countable choice, the hypothesis of the collar theorem (The Axiom of Choice; AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F7]

Under countable choice, a smooth manifold with boundary has a smooth collar; a collar is a product embedding of the boundary with a half-open interval whose image is a neighbourhood (Collar neighborhood theorem; Smooth collars of a manifold boundary).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Inclusion of the boundary torus into the exterior gives a homomorphism of fundamental groups. Precomposing a representation with this homomorphism is polynomial in matrix entries, so it is a regular map of representation varieties and is equivariant for simultaneous conjugation.

1.2F5F6construct

Write the attached solid torus as V=D2×S1, let A={0}×S1, and base at (0,1). The retraction r(z,w)=(0,w) and inclusion i:A↪V satisfy r∘i=id⁡A, and the homotopy ((z,w),t)↦((1−t)z,w) from id⁡V to i∘r fixes the basepoint. By [F5] and [F6], π1(V,(0,1))≅π1(S1,1)≅Z.

1.3A1F4F7construct

By [A1] and [F7], the exterior boundary has a collar; V has its product collar. Thickening the two pieces across opposite halves of the gluing collar gives an open cover of the filled manifold whose sets retract to EK and V and whose intersection retracts to the torus. These spaces are path connected, so [F4] identifies the filled fundamental group as their pushout.

2.1F1step 1.1

Pullback along this equivariant map sends conjugation-invariant regular functions to conjugation-invariant regular functions, hence induces the algebraic restriction morphism on affine categorical quotients.

2.2F3step 1.2step 1.3constructalgebra

Since μ,λ commute, the primitive class p[μ]+q[λ] is represented by μpλq. It maps to the identity in π1(V) because it is the meridian. Complete (p,q) to a unimodular basis of Z2 by Bézout; the complementary class has longitude coefficient ±1 on ∂V, hence maps to a generator of π1(V) by step 1.2. The pushout from step 1.3 identifies this generator with the image of the complementary class in π1(EK) and imposes only the relation μpλq=1. Eliminating the generator gives π1(EK(p/q))≅π1(EK)/⟨ ⁣⟨μpλq⟩ ⁣⟩.

3.1F2step 2.1

By [F2], the defining equation of the reduced curve union vanishes on each of its one-dimensional image components. The definition takes only those components, so an isolated image point outside their union is not added as a curve factor.

3.2step 2.2algebra

A homomorphism from this quotient is exactly a homomorphism from π1(EK) that kills μpλq. Since ρ(μ) and ρ(λ) commute, this condition is the matrix equation ρ(μ)pρ(λ)q=I2.

4.1givenstep 3.2algebra∎

If the two peripheral matrices are simultaneously diagonalized, their product of powers is diag⁡(MpLq,(MpLq)−1), which is the identity exactly when MpLq=1. For a merely triangular pair, the diagonal entries still give this necessary equation, but they do not determine the off-diagonal entries of the product; the matrix relation remains the exact test.

Diagram

The square records the Seifert–van Kampen pushout from step 1.3. The top arrows are induced by the two boundary inclusions, and the bottom arrows are induced by the gluing into the filled manifold. The diagram summarizes the group maps; the numbered proof establishes the pushout and does not rely on the drawing.

¼1(TK)¼1(EK)¼1(V)»=Z¼1(EK(p=q))iEiVqEqV

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources