Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Planar dielectric interface with prescribed free surface charge

Physical scope

The explicit planar dielectric-interface calculation: continuity of the tangential electric field and the normal displacement jump eps2 E_2n - eps1 E_1n = sigma_f (with E_2n=(eps1/eps2)E_1n+sigma_f/eps2) for two homogeneous linear dielectrics at rest, with the magnetic companions n.B=0 and n x H=0 when K_f=0. A local conditional field computation; no global configuration, no existence statement and no empirical claim.

Example

Let the laboratory frame, coordinates (x,y,z) and units be those of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields and Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, and let S={z=0}∩Ω be a stationary planar interface with unit normal n=ez pointing from the side Ω−=Ω∩{z<0} to the side Ω+=Ω∩{z>0}. Suppose each half-space carries a homogeneous linear dielectric at rest in the laboratory frame in the elementary branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch: constants ε1,ε2∈(0,∞) with D=ε1E on Ω− and D=ε2E on Ω+. Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and let E,B,D,H be locally integrable, C1 off the plane and jointly one-sided C1 up to it on every compact test cylinder, as in the joint branch of Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H. Assume locally the four distributional macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources, with volume sources ρv,Jv continuous off the plane and locally integrable across it, free charge ρf=ρv+σfδS for a constant σf∈R in C m−2, and free current Jf=Jv (no free sheet current). Here the plane distribution is defined locally by ⟨δS,ψ⟩=∫ψ(x,y,0,t) dx dy dt for compactly supported tests on the laboratory region; no global compactness of this plane is asserted. These are the local planar counterparts of the compact-interface hypotheses in Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H. Write Ej t, Ej n for the tangential and normal parts of the one-sided trace Ej and Dj (j=1 on Ω−, j=2 on Ω+), defined by Ejn:=n⋅Ej and Ejt:=Ej−Ejnn, with the analogous definitions for Dj and Bj (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn). Then:

(a) [Tangential field] n×[E]=0, i.e. E2t=E1t: the tangential electric field is continuous across the interface.

(b) [Normal displacement] n⋅[D]=σf, i.e. ε2E2n−ε1E1n=σf, hence E2n=ε1ε2E1n+σfε2.

(c) [No free sheet charge] If σf=0, then ε2E2n=ε1E1n and E2n=ε1ε2E1n: the normal component is scaled by the positive ratio ε1/ε2, so E2n and E1n have the same sign (and vanish together). Precisely, E2n=E1n if and only if (ε1−ε2)E1n=0: equality holds when the normal field is zero even for unequal permittivities; if E1n≠0, it holds exactly when ε1=ε2. A free surface charge σf≠0 modifies the normal condition as displayed and is not silently set to zero.

(d) [Magnetic companions] n⋅[B]=0 and, with Kf=0, n×[H]=0; for nonmagnetic media with H=μ0−1B on both sides this gives B2n=B1n and B2t=B1t.

(e) [Scope] A local interface computation under the stated model hypotheses: it solves the electric jump relations against the linear constitutive relations on the two sides and asserts no global field configuration, no existence of the fields, no constitutive law beyond the declared branch and no empirical claim.

Verification

technique · local compact-test interface integration by parts on the plane followed by substitution of the constitutive relations

Given: The planar configuration, regularity, sources and assumed local distributional equations of the Example, with ACω; the fields are identified with their regular distributions and the plane functional is ⟨δS,ψ⟩=∫ψ(x,y,0,t) dx dy dt (Distribution, Distributional derivative, Test function space d of an open set).

[A1] The constitutive relations: D=ε1E on Ω− and D=ε2E on Ω+ with constants ε1,ε2>0, the elementary branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch.

[A2] The assumed local distributional macroscopic equations with ρf=ρv+σfδS and Jf=Jv, in the equation forms of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources; this is a hypothesis of the Example, not a conclusion of the item.

[L1] One-dimensional integration by parts: for differentiable u,v on [a,b] with integrable derivatives, ∫abu v′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′ v (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v); the integral of a derivative is the difference of endpoint values (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[L2] For L1 functions on sigma-finite product spaces the iterated and multiple integrals agree (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[L3] There are smooth compactly supported cutoffs equal to one on a neighbourhood of a compact set (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization), and if fn→f almost everywhere with ∣fn∣≤g for a single integrable g, then ∫fn→∫f (Dominated convergence).

[L4] The coordinate hyperplane {z=0} in R4 is Lebesgue-null, being the graph of a measurable function (The graph of a measurable function R^n to R is Lebesgue null).

[L5] If g∈Lloc1 on an open set satisfies ∫gφ=0 for every test function φ, then g=0 almost everywhere (The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations).

[L6] The Euclidean dot and cross products on R3: ⟨x,y⟩=∑kxkyk (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn) and the antisymmetric cross product with ez×(F1,F2,F3)=(−F2,F1,0) (The cross product in R3).

1.1L1L2L3L4L6

Localize a test by a smooth partition of unity [L3] to finitely many rectangular boxes compactly contained in U; for boxes meeting the plane choose the height interval to straddle z=0. It suffices to prove the identity for each localized test and sum. Let F∈{E,B,D,H} and let ψ be supported in one such box. For fixed (x,y,t) with z≠0 the map z↦F(x,y,z,t) is C1 on each part of that height interval and has the stated one-sided C1 extensions at zero; applying [L1] on the two closed height subintervals and summing gives ∫RF ∂zψ dz=−[F](x,y,0,t) ψ(x,y,0,t)−∫R{∂zF}ψ dz, because the outer boundary terms vanish by compact support; integrating over x,y,t by [L2], with the plane {z=0} null by [L4] so that the split into the two half-spaces is exact, gives ⟨∂zF,ψ⟩=∫U{∂zF}ψ+⟨[F]δS,ψ⟩ componentwise, i.e. div⁡F={div⁡F}+ez⋅[F] δS and curl⁡F={curl⁡F}+ez×[F] δS by [L6], the tangential derivatives contributing no sheet term.

1.2L1L2L4

The same per-line integration by parts in t, with ψ of compact t-support and the plane stationary and null by [L4], gives ⟨∂tF,ψ⟩=∫U{∂tF}ψ for every test ψ: time differentiation at the fixed plane contributes no sheet term, and the piecewise derivatives are locally bounded by the joint one-sided C1 hypothesis.

2.1A2step 1.1step 1.2

Substituting the spatial identities of step 1.1 and the temporal identity of step 1.2 into the assumed equations [A2] gives four distributional identities of the form ug+aδS=0 on the local region, with locally integrable volume parts g: u{div⁡D}−ρv+(n⋅[D]−σf)δS=0, u{div⁡B}+n⋅[B]δS=0, u{curl⁡E}+{∂tB}+n×[E]δS=0 and u{curl⁡H}−Jv−{∂tD}+n×[H]δS=0, where the two half-space fields are C1 with locally bounded derivatives and ρv,Jv are locally integrable.

3.1step 2.1L3L4L5

[Coefficient extraction] Let b∈Cc∞((−1,1)), extended by zero to R, with b(0)=1, 0≤b≤1 [L3] and put ψh:=ψ b(z/h) for a test ψ; testing an identity ug+aδS=0 of step 2.1 with ψh gives 0=∫Ugψh+∫{z=0}aψh, whose second term tends to ∫{z=0}aψ because b(z/h)→b(0)=1 everywhere on the plane and the integrands are dominated by ∣aψ∣ on the compactly supported part of the plane, while the first term tends to 0 because ∣∫Ugψh∣≤∫U∣gψ∣1{∣z∣≤h} with integrands converging to 0 almost everywhere, dominated by the integrable ∣gψ∣, the exceptional set {z=0} being null [L4]. Hence ∫{z=0}aψ=0 for every test ψ; taking ψ(x,y,z,t)=η(x,y,t)β(z) with η supported in the tangential/time part of one of those local boxes and β supported in its height interval with β(0)=1 reduces this to ∫a(x,y,0,t)η(x,y,t) dx dy dt=0 for every η, so the continuous function (x,y,t)↦a(x,y,0,t) vanishes identically by [L5]. All four coefficients of step 2.1 therefore vanish pointwise on the plane.

4.1step 3.1A1L6∎

Applying step 3.1 and the constitutive relations [A1]: (a) n×[E]=0, so the tangential parts agree, E2t=E1t; (b) n⋅[D]=σf with Dj=εjEj on the two sides gives ε2E2n−ε1E1n=σf and, since ε2>0, E2n=(ε1/ε2)E1n+σf/ε2; (c) if σf=0 the previous identity reads ε2E2n=ε1E1n, so E2n=(ε1/ε2)E1n has the same sign as E1n and vanishes with it, and E2n=E1n holds if and only if (ε1−ε2)E1n=0, i.e. when E1n=0 or ε1=ε2; (d) n⋅[B]=0 and n×[H]=0, and in the nonmagnetic case H=μ0−1B on both sides the two identities give [Bn]=0 and [Bt]=0, hence B2n=B1n and B2t=B1t by the decomposition of [L6]. The scope (e) holds: the computation uses only the assumed local equations and the declared linear branch, asserts no global configuration, no existence, no further constitutive law and no empirical claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources