How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked checks of the wave Cauchy formula: source non-compactness, support propagation and linear growth
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (), inherited from The three-dimensional wave Cauchy problem: Kirchhoff representation, uniqueness, domain of dependence and compact support and its suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). All three computations use the notation of that theorem: , with the spherical mean of The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation, and the solution displayed there.
(i) (The compact-support clause needs its hypothesis.) Take , and the spatially constant source on . Then the theorem's solution is , which is independent of ; it satisfies and , hence , with . For every the function is a nonzero constant on , so it is not compactly supported: the hypothesis in clause (d) that vanish off one fixed compact set cannot be dropped, and the corresponding hypothesis of Duhamel's principle for the wave equation (source compactly supported in for each fixed ) is genuinely used by that item.
(ii) (Support propagation made explicit.) Take , and with vanishing off . Then , and for every with ; hence whenever . This is clause (d) with and , exhibited from the explicit formula.
(iii) (The class contains non-decaying data with divergent total energy.) Take , and . Since the first moment of the unit-sphere measure vanishes, (Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure, with the surface measure identified with the polar measure of Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure), so the theorem's solution is : it satisfies , hence , with and . The solution is unbounded on every time slice . Moreover its total energy at time in the sense of Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy is whenever : the energy density is , and for every the box gives (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral). Hence the finite-initial-energy hypothesis of Energy uniqueness for the wave Cauchy problem fails for this smooth datum while the theorem's local uniqueness (b) still applies; the theorem asserts no decay at spatial infinity and no finite-energy property, and needs none.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ; a speed ; the data of clause (i) , , on ; of clause (ii) , , with vanishing off ; and of clause (iii) , , , with arbitrary.
Wave Cauchy problem: for , , and of class on in the extension sense, the function where and , is of class on in the extension sense and satisfies , and with ; every extension-sense solution with the same data equals it (clause (b)); and if vanishes off a compact , off a compact and every off one fixed compact , with , then whenever (clause (d)) (The three-dimensional wave Cauchy problem: Kirchhoff representation, uniqueness, domain of dependence and compact support).
For , is smooth for with the normalisation of [F1] and no decay hypotheses; for each fixed the function is the one used in [F1] (The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation).
The reflection preserves the surface measure , , , and the chart surface measure on is the polar surface measure (Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure, The Euclidean inner product on ). Consequently and for every and every , since the sphere integral of the constant is and the sphere integral of is .
Energy: for a function the energy density is with and the spatial gradient; for measurable with the total energy is , and when the integral is infinite the total energy is (Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy).
Energy uniqueness for the wave Cauchy problem: under , if a classical solution of has Cauchy data with differentiable and the total energy has a finite initial value and is conserved in the sharp form , then vanishing data force (Energy uniqueness for the wave Cauchy problem).
For nonnegative measurable one has ; Tonelli's theorem permits the iterated integral of a nonnegative measurable function on a product of -finite spaces to be computed in either order; the box has Lebesgue measure with (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).
The published Duhamel principle for the forced wave equation assumes a source continuous and compactly supported in for each fixed , with all spatial derivatives through order jointly continuous; its launched-solution construction applies to the admissible slices of the source (Duhamel's principle for the wave equation).
The Euclidean norm obeys the triangle inequality and hence (Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation).
Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate Euclidean rectangle is Riemann integrable (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable); under , a bounded Borel Riemann integrand on such a rectangle has the same Lebesgue integral (Borel Darboux integrands in finite dimension). In particular these apply to the continuous polynomial on .
Under , equals on Borel sets for (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}). Applying this with and identifies the iterated product integral of the continuous nonnegative energy density on with its Euclidean Lebesgue integral. The factor measures are sigma-finite because the finite-measure intervals exhaust by [F6].
The Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
Setting and clause (i). With , and , [F1] gives with by [F3]; hence for . Then , by [F1], so , and , by the same formula. For every the function is a nonzero constant on , so it does not vanish off any compact subset of : the hypothesis of clause (d) that the source vanish off one fixed compact set cannot be dropped.
Clause (ii). With , and , [F1] gives . Fix and with ; for every and every with one has by the reverse triangle inequality [F8], so and the integrand vanishes identically on the sphere ; hence and . At the threshold , the same inequalities give , and vanishes also on by continuity from the exterior; hence the integral is zero there as well. This exhibits clause (d) with and from the displayed formula of the theorem, including the closed support boundary.
Clause (iii). With , and , [F1] gives by [F3]; then and , so , while and . The solution is unbounded on every time slice . Its energy density is by [F4] and [F1]; for every the box integral is by [F6], [F9] and [F10], which tends to ; monotonicity of the nonnegative integral over therefore gives total energy for every , and in particular the initial energy . So the finite-initial-energy hypothesis of the energy-uniqueness corollary [F5] fails for this smooth datum, while clause (b) of [F1] still supplies uniqueness, since it assumes no finite-energy or decay hypothesis.
The two hypothesis boundaries and the published Duhamel principle. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that in the wave Cauchy theorem the compact-support hypothesis of clause (d) is a genuine hypothesis and that it yields the propagation bound for a source supported in ; step 2.2 shows that smooth data of unbounded energy are admitted by the theorem's existence, uniqueness and representation clauses, although they are outside the energy-uniqueness corollary. The published Duhamel principle [F7] carries the per-slice compact-support hypothesis by which its own statement places each source slice in the admissible velocity-data class, so that hypothesis does real work in the item; the constant source of step 1.1 has no compact spatial support on any slice, so [F7] is not applicable to that witness, while the theorem of this pair is defined for it and yields the non-compactly-supported solution displayed in step 1.1.
Depends on
Borel Darboux integrands in finite dimension
Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in is Riemann integrable
On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
Energy uniqueness for the wave Cauchy problem
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Euclidean inner product on
The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field
Wave energy density, energy flux and total energy
The spherical mean identity behind the wave equation
Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure
Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The three-dimensional wave Cauchy problem: Kirchhoff representation, uniqueness, domain of dependence and compact support
A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Duhamel's principle for the wave equation
Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation