Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tetrads, Lorentz connections and spin interfaces — model 1

Statement

On M=R4 with coordinates (x0,x1,x2,x3), metric g=−(dx0)2+(dx1)2+(dx2)2+(dx3)2, and Cartesian coframe e=(dx0,dx1,dx2,dx3)T, set θ(x)=x1 and let

Λ(x)=(10000cos⁡θ−sin⁡θ00sin⁡θcos⁡θ00001).

The changed coframe e′=Λe has the same metric, and its connection matrix ω′=−dΛ Λ−1=−Jdθ, where J12=−1, J21=1 and all other entries vanish, is nonzero while its curvature is zero. This is a pure-gauge local Lorentz connection. The rotation has the local spin lift A(x)=exp⁡(−iθ(x)σ3/2)∈SL(2,C).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Minkowski metric, Cartesian coframe, smooth function θ, local Lorentz transformation convention, Lorentz spin covering, and Clifford compatibility from the referenced A-page items. Assume ACω.

[F1]

Local Lorentz tetrad and connection: e′=Λe and ω′=ΛωΛ−1−dΛ Λ−1; torsion and curvature are T=de+ω∧e and F=dω+ω∧ω.

[F2]

Torsion-free tetrad equivalence to Levi-Civita: an η-skew connection with zero coframe torsion induces the unique Levi-Civita connection, and F′=ΛFΛ−1, T′=ΛT.

[F3]

The Lorentzian spin double cover from Hermitian matrices: A↦(X↦AXA†) is the covering homomorphism SL(2,C)→SO+(1,3) with kernel {I,−I}.

[F4]

Lorentzian spin-lift interface: a global spin structure and a lifted global connection are additional bundle data; for an open set U⊆M, a local lift of Λ:U→SO+(1,3) means a map A:U→SL(2,C) satisfying ρ∘A=Λ.

[F5]

Local spin-connection Clifford compatibility: for smooth local fields and constant gamma matrices satisfying the stated Clifford relation, the displayed D satisfies a local matrix identity; that proposition does not assert compatibility with a separately supplied group representation.

Verification

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Let J be the stated generator, so Λ=exp⁡(θJ). Its spatial block is an ordinary rotation, hence ΛTηΛ=η, det⁡Λ=1, and Λ00=1; thus Λ(x)∈SO+(1,3). Since dΛ Λ−1=Jdθ, [F1] with initial ω=0 gives ω′=−Jdθ. Because dθ=dx1≠0 and J≠0, this connection matrix is nonzero. The metric is unchanged because ΛTηΛ=η.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Initially T=0 and F=0. By [F2], T′=ΛT=0 and F′=ΛFΛ−1=0. The connection is η-skew since JTη+ηJ=0; the torsion calculation and [F2] therefore identify it as the Levi-Civita connection in the rotated tetrad.

3.1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

The matrix A=diag⁡(e−iθ/2,eiθ/2) has determinant one. Conjugating σ1,σ2 by A gives Aσ1A†=cos⁡θ σ1+sin⁡θ σ2 and Aσ2A†=−sin⁡θ σ1+cos⁡θ σ2, while I and σ3 are fixed. Thus [F3] sends A(x) to Λ(x), so A is a local lift of this Lorentz-valued map; this asserts no global spin structure. In any chosen local Cn trivialization with constant gamma matrices satisfying the Clifford relation, [F5] gives the local matrix identity for D=d+14ωIJ′γIγJ, without asserting group-representation compatibility.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources