How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tetrads, Lorentz connections and spin interfaces — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Cotangent phase data, observables and action dimensions
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gauge Groups and Representation-Theoretic Interfaces
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Lie Subgroups, Actions, and Homogeneous Spaces
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Moment Maps and Symplectic Reduction
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensors And Observers
- Tetrads, Lorentz connections and spin interfaces
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Tetrads, Lorentz connections and spin interfaces — model 1
Statement
On with coordinates , metric , and Cartesian coframe , set and let
The changed coframe has the same metric, and its connection matrix , where , and all other entries vanish, is nonzero while its curvature is zero. This is a pure-gauge local Lorentz connection. The rotation has the local spin lift .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Minkowski metric, Cartesian coframe, smooth function , local Lorentz transformation convention, Lorentz spin covering, and Clifford compatibility from the referenced A-page items. Assume .
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Local Lorentz tetrad and connection: and ; torsion and curvature are and .
Torsion-free tetrad equivalence to Levi-Civita: an -skew connection with zero coframe torsion induces the unique Levi-Civita connection, and , .
The Lorentzian spin double cover from Hermitian matrices: is the covering homomorphism with kernel .
Lorentzian spin-lift interface: a global spin structure and a lifted global connection are additional bundle data; for an open set , a local lift of means a map satisfying .
Local spin-connection Clifford compatibility: for smooth local fields and constant gamma matrices satisfying the stated Clifford relation, the displayed satisfies a local matrix identity; that proposition does not assert compatibility with a separately supplied group representation.
Verification
Let be the stated generator, so . Its spatial block is an ordinary rotation, hence , , and ; thus . Since , [F1] with initial gives . Because and , this connection matrix is nonzero. The metric is unchanged because .
Initially and . By [F2], and . The connection is -skew since ; the torsion calculation and [F2] therefore identify it as the Levi-Civita connection in the rotated tetrad.
The matrix has determinant one. Conjugating by gives and , while and are fixed. Thus [F3] sends to , so is a local lift of this Lorentz-valued map; this asserts no global spin structure. In any chosen local trivialization with constant gamma matrices satisfying the Clifford relation, [F5] gives the local matrix identity for , without asserting group-representation compatibility.
Tetrads, Lorentz connections and spin interfaces — model 2
Statement
Assume . Let with standard coordinates , metric for , time orientation , and the standard orientation. The Cartesian tetrad on all of is , with dual coframe . Connections below are smooth affine connections on . Define the positive-definite form and its orientation-preserving orthogonal group . Let and consider the constant Lorentz boost
It belongs to but not to . Consequently, for any set and map , no satisfies as matrices. With , the Lorentzian covering sends to in the Hermitian matrix model. In the Cartesian tetrad, zero is the connection matrix of the unique torsion-free metric-compatible affine connection, and the Clifford interface uses the Lorentzian matrix , not .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The explicitly specified Minkowski manifold, coordinates, tetrad, quadratic forms, comparison group, and nonzero real boost parameter from the Statement. All coframes and connections are defined on .
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()); maps with codomain are comparison data only.
Local Lorentz tetrad and connection: Lorentz coframes use , with and .
Torsion-free tetrad equivalence to Levi-Civita: zero torsion and -skewness give the unique metric-selected Levi-Civita connection.
Lorentzian spin-lift interface: the Lorentzian spin group is and its structure map targets the oriented time-oriented frame bundle through .
The Lorentzian spin double cover from Hermitian matrices: the action on Hermitian matrices preserves and covers .
Local spin-connection Clifford compatibility: under its stated local matrix hypotheses, the Clifford identity uses and ; it does not assert compatibility with a separately supplied group representation.
Verification
Put and . Multiplying the upper-left block gives , because and the off-diagonal time-space terms cancel. The determinant of that block is , the remaining block is identity, and is future timelike since . Hence . For the Euclidean form, however, for , so . Thus is not in the image of any map with codomain .
Write . Its eigenvalues are and , so . Pauli multiplication gives , , and for ; thus its Hermitian action is exactly . By [F4] it is the Lorentzian spin lift, consistent with the target group in [F3].
On the Cartesian tetrad , , so gives zero torsion and is -skew. By [F2] it induces the unique Levi-Civita connection. The boost is constant on spacetime, so also has and its transformed connection is by [F1]; the torsion remains zero. The local matrix identity from [F5] uses the same ; it does not identify this operator as one induced by a group representation. Thus the Euclidean orthogonal comparison group does not supply this Lorentzian interface.
Sources
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Chapter 3, tetrads and non-coordinate bases, printed pp. 88–95 (PDF pp. 95–102)
- Blagoje Oblak, From the Lorentz Group to the Celestial Sphere, arXiv:1508.00920 (2015)
- David Tong, General Relativity, Cambridge Part III lecture notes, §4.5.6 Spinors