Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

No full discrete eigenbasis

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on H2(R3;C) be as above, and fix g∈Cc∞((0,∞);C) with ∫0∞φ0(1,r)g(r) dr=1, where φ0(1,⋅) is the regular solution of Coulomb Jost Volterra solution at k=1, l=0. Such a g exists because φ0(1,⋅) is nonzero and locally square-integrable. Put ψ(x):=g(r)rY00(Ω)(x=rΩ). This example verifies concretely that:

(a) ψ∈L2(R3;C) and the coefficients of ψ in the polar decomposition of Angular radial unitary reduction vanish except in the (0,0)-block, where they equal g;

(b) ⟨EC((0,∞))ψ,ψ⟩=∫0∞ρ0(E)∣∫0∞φ0(E,r)g(r)dr∣2dE>0;

(c) consequently the closed span of the bound states (ψnlm) of Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy is a proper subspace of L2(R3;C): the bound states alone are not a complete eigenbasis, and the nonnegative continuous spectral projection is indispensable.

Verification

Given: γ>0, the source g with the displayed normalization, the function ψ, and the operators C,A0 with their spectral measures.

Proof technique: explicit computation with the unitary polar decomposition and the spectral density; positivity of a continuous nonzero integrand.

[F1] The polar unitary U of Angular radial unitary reduction maps the block function r−1g(r)Y00(Ω) to the vector with (0,0)-entry g and all other entries 0, and ∥r−1gY00∥2=∥g∥2; Cc∞((0,∞))⊆L2(0,∞) is dense and φ0(1,⋅)≠0 (Coulomb Jost Volterra solution, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

[F2] Spectral density of A0 for compactly supported sources: for every 0<a<b, ⟨EA0((a,b))g,g⟩=∫abρ0(E)∣∫0∞φ0(E,r)g(r)dr∣2dE with ρ0(E)>0; the identity of measures extends to all Borel sets in (0,∞) (Coulomb continuum spectral density).

[F3] The block identity UCU∗=⨁(l,m)Al; the negative spectral subspace of C is the closed span of the bound states, which is U−1 of the corresponding direct sum of negative eigenspaces of the Al (Transported radial endpoint realization, Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, Coulomb essential spectrum).

[F4] Complex conjugation and continuity: E↦∫0∞φ0(E,r)g(r)dr is continuous on (0,∞) (it is a pairing against a smooth family of solutions, Coulomb Jost Volterra solution, Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point), and Cauchy-Schwarz bounds the expression (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Hilbert space).

1.1F1givenalgebra

[The vector and its coefficients] Since g is compactly supported in (0,∞) and Y00 is bounded, ψ is a finite-block element in L2; by [F1] its polar transform is supported in the (0,0)-block with entry g, so ∥ψ∥2=∥g∥2<∞ and ψ≠0. This is (a).

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4algebra

[Positive continuous-spectrum component] The function h(E):=∫0∞φ0(E,r)g(r)dr is continuous by [F4] and satisfies h(1)=1 by the choice of g; hence there is δ>0 with ∣h(E)∣≥1/2 on (1−δ,1+δ). By [F2] and the block identity [F3], ⟨EC((0,∞))ψ,ψ⟩=⟨EA0((0,∞))g,g⟩=∫0∞ρ0(E)∣h(E)∣2dE≥∫1−δ1+δρ0(E)∣h(E)∣2dE≥14∫1−δ1+δρ0(E)dE>0, because ρ0>0 and the interval has positive length. This is (b).

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

[The bound states do not span L2] The negative spectral subspace EC((−∞,0))L2 is exactly the closed span of the bound states by [F3]; since (0,∞) and (−∞,0) are disjoint Borel sets, the spectral projections are orthogonal, so the component EC((0,∞))ψ≠0 of step 2.1 is orthogonal to the whole negative spectral subspace. Hence ψ is not in the closed span of the bound states, which is therefore a proper subspace of L2(R3;C). This is (c).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

[Conclusion] Parts (a), (b), (c) are steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources