Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euclidean balls, annuli and spheres as bounded smooth domains and hypersurfaces

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), the convention of the boundary-chart and surface-measure interfaces used below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Use the explicit coordinate labels xk:=x(k−1) for k=1,2,3; these relabel the zero-based coordinates of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. On R3 with its Euclidean structure (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space) let 0<ε<R and put BR:={x:∣x∣<R},B‾R:={x:∣x∣≤R},Aε,R:={x:ε<∣x∣<R},Sr:={x:∣x∣=r}. Then:

(a) [Domains] BR and Aε,R are bounded C1 domains in the sense of Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals; their boundaries are SR, respectively Sε∪SR, and the corresponding outward unit normals are ν(x)=x∣x∣  (x∈SR),ν(x)=−x∣x∣  (x∈Sε, boundary of Aε,R);

(b) [Spheres] each Sr is a compact embedded C1 (indeed C∞) hypersurface in the sense of Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces with two-sided unit normals ±x/∣x∣, and the boundary components Sε,SR, each subdivided into six compact signed-maximal-coordinate graph faces Fr,k,σ:={x∈Sr:σxk≥∣xj∣ for all j} (k=1,2,3, σ=±1), with the compact edge set consisting of their seams σxk=∣xj∣ for j≠k, give a finite piecewise C1 presentation of Aε,R in the sense of Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations;

(c) [Consequences used downstream] the divergence theorem and Green's first identity of Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain and First Green identity apply on BR and on Aε,R with the outward normals of (a), and Sr carries a finite Borel surface measure with the standard graph charts.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, reals 0<ε<R, the sets BR,B‾R,Aε,R,Sr above, and the Euclidean norm N(x)=∣x∣ on R3.

[F2]

The interior, closure, and boundary of a subset of a metric space are the sets determined by its open balls; BR is the open ball of radius R and B‾R its closed ball (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F4]

A bounded C1 domain is a nonempty bounded open set whose boundary is locally, after a rigid coordinate change, a graph z=h(y) of a C1 function with the set locally the subgraph; the outward normal in these coordinates is ν=(−Dh,1)/1+∣Dh∣2, transported by the orthogonal coordinate map, and ∣⋅∣ enters through the Euclidean inner product (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[F6]

The chart surface integral on a compact embedded C1 hypersurface is a finite Borel measure independent of charts and partitions; in graph coordinates its density is 1+∣Dh∣2, and outward unit normals agree on chart overlaps (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Chart and partition independence of surface measure).

[F7]

A finite piecewise C1 presentation of a bounded open set consists of compact faces covering its boundary, each inside a regular C1 patch and carrying the actual outward normal off the compact edge set E, with Sj∩E of surface measure zero, and E containing the relative face boundaries and all overlaps (Specified finite piecewise C1 boundary presentations).

[F8]

For a bounded Borel function on a compact parameter rectangle the iterated planar integral of its indicator vanishes when almost every section is a null set, and coordinate hyperplanes and degenerate boxes are Lebesgue null; the Borel product sigma-algebra of R2 is the Euclidean one and the product measure agrees with λ2 there (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in Rn, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}).

[F9]

The nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous and the integral of an indicator is the measure of the set (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F10]

On a bounded C1 domain the divergence theorem holds for C1 fields up to the closure and Green's first identity holds for real u∈C2(Ω‾), v∈C1(Ω‾), both with the outward normal on each boundary component (Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain, First Green identity).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

Because N is continuous and (0,R) and (ε,R) are open, BR=N−1((−∞,R)) and Aε,R=N−1((ε,R)) are open, nonempty (they contain the origin, respectively a point of norm (ε+R)/2) and bounded, being contained in the closed ball of radius R ([F1], [F2]). If ∣x∣>R, continuity of N gives a ball about x on which ∣y∣>R, so no point outside B‾R is a limit of points of BR; if ∣x∣=R, the points (1−1/n)x lie in BR and converge to x; hence the closure of BR is B‾R and, since BR is open, its boundary is SR ([F1], [F2]). The same argument with N−1((ε,R)), together with the identification of its closure with {x:ε≤∣x∣≤R}, gives that the boundary of Aε,R is Sε∪SR, and both sets have nonempty interior equal to themselves because they are open.

2.1step 1.1F3F4

Fix k∈{1,2,3} and σ∈{±1}, let z=σxk and let y collect the two remaining coordinates in a fixed order, labelled y=(y1,y2); the map x↦(y,z) is a rigid change of coordinates (a permutation with one sign change). For r>0 put Ur,k,σ:={x:σxk>r/(23)} and h(y):=R2−∣y∣2, which is C∞ on the open set ∣y∣<R with Dh(y)=−y/h(y) ([F3]). On UR,k,σ∩{∣y∣<R} one has z>0 and ∣x∣2<R2  ⟺  z2<R2−∣y∣2  ⟺  z<h(y), so SR∩UR,k,σ is the graph z=h(y) over the open parameter set VR:={y:∣y∣<R, h(y)>R/(23)} and BR∩UR,k,σ∩{∣y∣<R} is its subgraph; this is the local presentation required of a bounded C1 domain ([F4]). The graph normal of [F4] is (−Dh(y),1)1+∣Dh(y)∣2=(y,h(y))R, because −Dh=y/h and 1+∣Dh∣2=R2/h2; transporting back through the rigid coordinate map gives ν(x)=x/R=x/∣x∣ on SR. The six coordinate neighbourhoods UR,k,σ cover the sphere SR: for x≠0 some coordinate satisfies ∣xk∣≥∣x∣/3, so with σ:=sign⁡(xk) one has σxk=∣xk∣≥R/3>R/(23) whenever ∣x∣≥R, and in particular the sphere SR is covered by the six graph patches.

3.1step 2.1F3F4

Fix again k,σ and put hε(y)=ε2−∣y∣2 on ∣y∣<ε. In the coordinates (y,z) of step 2.1 the complement of the closed ball satisfies z>hε(y) inside the patch Uε,k,σ with ∣y∣<ε, and the second rigid change w=−z turns this into the subgraph w<−hε(y) of the smooth function g(y):=−hε(y) with Dg(y)=y/hε(y) ([F3]). The graph normal of [F4] in the (y,w) coordinates is (−Dg(y),1)1+∣Dg(y)∣2=(−y,hε(y))ε, and transporting back through w=−σxk gives ν(x)=−x/ε=−x/∣x∣ on Sε. Near a point of Sε the ball BR occupies a full neighborhood because ∣x∣=ε<R, so Aε,R=BR∖B‾ε is locally exactly the subgraph just described, while near a point of SR it is locally the subgraph of h from step 2.1 with normal x/∣x∣. Hence Aε,R is a bounded C1 domain with boundary Sε∪SR and the stated outward normals ([F4]).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F3F5F6

Each Sr is closed, being the preimage of the closed set {r} under the continuous norm, and bounded, hence compact ([F1], [F5]). The restrictions of the six maps y↦(y,hr(y)) from steps 2.1 and 3.1, composed with the inverse rigid coordinate maps, are regular injective C∞ parametrizations of the open patches Sr∩Ur,k,σ with C∞ transitions (each transition is the coordinate projection from one graph chart composed with the other smooth graph parametrization) ([F3]). Therefore each Sr is a compact embedded C1 hypersurface in the sense of [F6], and the two graph normal computations of steps 2.1 and 3.1 exhibit both unit normals ±x/∣x∣: the positive sign from the ball chart and the negative sign from the complement chart, continuously across overlaps.

5.1step 4.1F5

For r=ε,R define the twelve compact faces Fr,k,σ={x∈Sr:σxk≥∣xj∣ for all j}, k=1,2,3, σ=±1. They cover Sr: choose k with ∣xk∣=max⁡j∣xj∣; then xk≠0 and σ=sign⁡(xk) gives σxk≥∣xj∣ for all j. Each Fr,k,σ is closed in the compact Sr, hence compact, and on it σxk≥r/3>r/(23), so it is contained in the single regular patch Ur,k,σ of steps 2.1-3.1 with parameter set contained in the compact set {∣y∣≤r2/3}⊂{∣y∣<r} ([F5]).

6.1step 5.1F6F7F8F9

Let E be the union over r=ε,R of the seams {x∈Sr: σxk=∣xj∣ for some j≠k, σ=±1}, a finite union of closed subsets of the compact spheres, hence compact. Every relative boundary point of a face Fr,k,σ has σxk=∣xj∣ for some j, and every overlap Fr,k,σ∩Fr,k′,σ′ with (k,σ)≠(k′,σ′) lies in such a seam, so E contains all relative face boundaries and all overlaps ([F7]). To see that Fr,k,σ∩E has zero surface measure, work in the chart z=σxk=hr(y) of Fr,k,σ: a seam involving the maximal coordinate reads either ∣y1∣=hr(y) or ∣y2∣=hr(y). The first is y12=(r2−y22)/2, the second y22=(r2−y12)/2. For either case take the other coordinate as the fixed section parameter: the seam meets the vertical line in at most two points, a finite union of singletons and hence a λ1-null set ([F8]); Fubini applied to the bounded Borel indicator on a containing rectangle gives the planar measure of these parameter sets as zero ([F8]). The other seams in E equate the absolute values of the two nonmaximal coordinates; in this face chart they lie on y1=±y2, whose sections are again finite. The same argument gives planar measure zero for them. Thus the full finite union of seams meeting this face is planar null. The graph density 1+∣Dhr∣2=r/hr is continuous and bounded on the compact parameter set {∣y∣≤r2/3}, so integrating it against the indicator of a planar null set gives zero ([F9]); by the chart-independence of the surface measure this says exactly that Sj∩E has zero surface measure in each face, as required by [F7].

7.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1F6F7F10∎

Statement (a) is steps 2.1 and 3.1; statement (b) is steps 4.1, 5.1 and 6.1, the twelve compact faces with their null compact seam set satisfying exactly the requirements of [F7] for the annulus Aε,R, whose exposed faces carry the outward normals computed in steps 2.1 and 3.1 off E. Finally, (c): the divergence theorem and Green's first identity of [F10] apply on BR and on Aε,R because both are bounded C1 domains with the outward normals of (a), and Sr carries a finite Borel surface measure with the standard graph charts by [F6].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources