How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact free Gaussian propagation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The Axiom of Choice). Fix , , and real , and let
Let be the free operator of clause (b) of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators with and , i.e.
which is self-adjoint with and for . Let be the momentum transform of Momentum Fourier Jacobian: the unitary momentum representation, the surjective isometry with on . For put and
where is the principal branch of Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers, legitimate at because . Let and act on . Then:
(a) , , and for every one has ; the map is continuously differentiable with and , and consequently , where with denotes the unitary group generated by the self-adjoint operator (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).
(b) Position density. ; it is a probability density of mean and variance .
(c) Momentum density. for almost every ; it is a probability density of mean and variance , independent of .
(d) Standard deviations. With and one has , and
with equality exactly at ; the lower bound is the one supplied by clause (d) of Weak-form Robertson uncertainty on a common domain with .
(e) Scope. These are exact conditional calculations for the free model defined by ; no measurement, instrument or laboratory preparation is described, and nothing here asserts that a physical wave packet is Gaussian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , the vector above, the operator and the transform .
consists of the functions all of whose polynomial-weighted derivatives are bounded; every Schwartz function lies in (Schwartz space and its seminorms).
is a surjective complex-linear isometry with on , where ; being a surjective isometry, preserves inner products and (Momentum Fourier Jacobian: the unitary momentum representation).
If then for the branch , and for one has (Complex Gaussian continuation(a),(b)).
is self-adjoint, with equivalent norms on this set, and for (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators(b)). Here is the Plancherel transform extending the transform ; it is a surjective isometry preserving inner products (Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform on complex L1 classes).
For a self-adjoint operator the operators form a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group with , on , and exactly for (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).
Dominated convergence: if pointwise and for a fixed integrable , then (Dominated convergence). A continuous real function on an interval has a primitive and for it (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ); the integral over is the limit of the compact-interval integrals when it exists (Improper integrals over unbounded intervals); (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ); for differentiable with integrable derivatives on , (If are differentiable on with integrable, then ). Substitutions: an invertible linear scales Lebesgue measure by (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not), and for every Lebesgue measurable and (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation); hence for every nonnegative measurable and every real , , by approximation with simple functions and monotone convergence (Monotone convergence for the integral).
For every unit and every , with and , one has , the differences being centered norms (Weak-form Robertson uncertainty on a common domain(d)).
Proof
[The initial packet is a unit Schwartz vector] The derivative equals for a polynomial : this follows by induction with the product rule [F6] applied to the three factors , and the bounded factor , each differentiation of the last factor multiplying it by the constant . Since is bounded for all (the exponential decays faster than any polynomial), [F1]. By [F6] , using [F3] with and the substitution .
[The complex shift identity] For and one has with : setting (absolutely convergent since is integrable) and , the fundamental theorem and [F6] give , and since is integrable, pointwise with the difference quotients converging, so is differentiable with ; integrating over gives , of modulus at most , so [F6] as gives with , hence and ; the product rule [F6] gives , so the product is constant (fundamental theorem applied to real and imaginary parts [F6]) and its value at is by [F3].
[The free operator in momentum coordinates] Let be the multiplication operator on ; then with , and , because and for every Borel and every in the domain of , so with one has as operators [F2, F4]; for the domains, means , which by is equivalent to (the substitution and the constants preserve -membership), i.e. to , so , the identity holds on it, and multiplying on the right by gives .
[Fourier transform of the initial packet] Since [step 1.1], is computed by the integral [F4]; substituting [F6] and using gives by step 1.2 with and ; since , [F2], so satisfies with and .
[The packet is Schwartz and its modulus is the spreading Gaussian] Putting (so ) and , one has ; the remaining -dependent phase is , which has modulus one. By the product rule, each -derivative of is a polynomial in times , so the displayed decaying modulus makes every polynomial-weighted derivative bounded and ; in particular and by [F4].
[Momentum coordinates of the packet] With , and , substituting [F6] in the integral [F4] of the packet [step 2.2] gives by step 1.2 with (legal since ); since , [F2], and with , , and one gets with as in step 2.1.
[Position density, mean and variance] By step 2.2, with and ; substituting and using (that is [F3] with ) gives , while the centering and , since by [F3]; hence the density has mean and variance , which is clause (b).
[The packet is the free evolution of the momentum Gaussian] With and , steps 2.1 and 3.1 give for every , because the two exponents differ by ; hence and, being a surjective isometry [F2], .
[Momentum density, mean and variance] By steps 2.1 and 3.1, with and ; substituting as in step 3.2 gives total mass , mean and variance , and the density does not depend on ; this is clause (c).
[The momentum path solves the momentum equation] Put and . The Gaussian formula of step 2.1 gives and , so for every . For fixed and , tends pointwise to . Since , the difference between the quotient and its limit has squared modulus at most , an integrable function; dominated convergence [F6] therefore gives convergence in . Also and in by pointwise convergence and the respective integrable square majorants and . Thus is continuously differentiable with . Consequently [step 4.1] is in , lies in , and , using that is an isometry [F2] and from step 1.3; at the formula of the Statement reduces to .
[Uniqueness of the Cauchy problem] Let with [F5]; since [step 1.1, F4], one has for all and is with , because [F5] gives as and is bounded, and on by [F5]; by step 5.1, is with and , and since and the Statement's formula at is the initial packet; for the real function one has , the last term tending to ; now, since the inner product is conjugate-linear in its second argument, . The number is real because is self-adjoint, hence symmetric, on [F4], so and has vanishing derivative, hence is constant by the fundamental theorem [F6] and equals ; thus for every , which is clause (a).
[Operator standard deviations] For one has with , because by integration by parts, the boundary terms vanishing at as [F6], and applying with gives the claim [F2]; the unit vector of step 6.1 is the packet of steps 3.2 and 4.2, and for it this gives , a real number, and by step 4.2, while and by step 3.2; hence .
[Robertson comparison and scope] By [F7] with , applied to the unit Schwartz vector of step 7.1, one has ; the exact value of step 7.1 is , which equals exactly when , i.e. exactly at since , and is strictly larger otherwise; thus clause (d) holds, and clause (e) records that all of the above are computations inside the free model defined by , with no measurement interpretation.
Depends on
Weak-form Robertson uncertainty on a common domain
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Complex Gaussian continuation
Momentum Fourier Jacobian: the unitary momentum representation
A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
Schwartz space and its seminorms
Dominated convergence
Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Improper integrals over unbounded intervals
If are differentiable on with integrable, then
A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not
Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation
Monotone convergence for the integral
Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers
The Axiom of Choice
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()