Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed-form diagonalization with free longitudinal motion

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, m,ℏ>0, and real q,B with qB≠0. Let c=ℏ2/(2m), ωc=∣qB∣/m, and En=ℏωc(n+12) for n∈N0. On L2(Rx,y,z3;C) close the nonnegative form qB(3)[u]=12m(∥−iℏ∂xu∥22+∥(−iℏ∂y−qBx)u∥22+∥−iℏ∂zu∥22),u∈Cc∞(R3;C). Use the wave-number Fourier convention Fyg(ky)=(2π)−1/2∫e−ikyyg(y) dy,Fzg(kz)=(2π)−1/2∫e−ikzzg(z) dz. and set U3u(ξ,ky,kz)=Fz ⁣[Fyu ⁣(ξ+ℏkyqB,ky,z)](kz). Then U3 extends to a unitary map onto L2(Rky,kz2;ℓ2(N0)) by expansion in the complete transverse oscillator basis ψn(ξ). If U3u(ξ,ky,kz)=∑n=0∞fn(ky,kz)ψn(ξ), the form closure domain and value are exactly D(q‾B(3))={u:∑n=0∞∫R2(En+ckz2)∣fn(ky,kz)∣2 dky dkz<∞}, q‾B(3)[u]=∑n=0∞∫R2(En+ckz2)∣fn(ky,kz)∣2 dky dkz.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and Dependent Choice, m,ℏ>0, real q,B with qB≠0, and the three-dimensional core form in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis of the transverse form, product Fourier, and compactly-supported L2 density inputs. The transverse form lemma also assumes Dependent Choice because its integration-by-parts supplier does (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, Closed-form diagonalization in Landau gauge).

[F1]

The displayed core form is the d=3, A=(0,Bx,0) instance of the magnetic form definition; in d=2 the planar core form closes to the oscillator coefficient form with energies En and complete normalized functions ψn (Magnetic quadratic-form data, Closed-form diagonalization in Landau gauge).

[F2]

The partial Fourier transforms in y,z are unitary on L2 and send −i∂y,−i∂z to multiplication by ky,kz on Schwartz functions; the product-space identifications and their iterated use are valid (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space, Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}), Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions).

[F3]

Translation of the x variable preserves Lebesgue measure (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F4]

Cc∞(R2) is dense in L2(R2), and smooth cutoffs equal to one on expanding boxes with first derivatives bounded by C/R can be built from the standard smooth step function (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), The standard smooth step function).

[F5]

Fubini and Tonelli apply to Lebesgue product spaces, including the nonnegative oscillator-energy series (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F6]

The weighted coefficient space is complete: identify it with L2 on N0×R2 for the measure (n,ky,kz)↦(En+ckz2) d#(n) dky dkz. This measure is sigma-finite because the weight is finite on each bounded box and finite index set, and L2 on a measure space is Hilbert under Countable Choice (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F7]

The oscillator eigenfunctions (ψn) are normalized Hermite functions, hence polynomial times Gaussian and Schwartz (Oscillator scaling and exact realization).

[F8]

Dominated convergence applies to the integrable weighted coefficient tails and to the L2 tails of Schwartz functions (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3construct

First apply the unitary planar map from [F1] at each fixed z, then the partial Fourier transform in z from [F2]. On the dense product core both maps are unitary; the Euclidean L2 product identifications in [F2] extend their composition uniquely to a unitary on L2(R3). The inverse uses the inverse Fourier transforms and the opposite translation, which is measure preserving by [F3]. The coefficient map in the transverse variable is unitary because (ψn) is a complete orthonormal basis. Thus U3 is unitary onto the stated coefficient space.

1.2A1F4F8constructalgebra

Let f=(fn) have finite weighted norm and fix ε>0. Since the defining nonnegative series converges, choose N so the norm of its tail over n>N is below ε/3. For the finitely many indices n≤N, the weighted integrals outside KR=[−R,R]ky×[−R,R]kz tend to zero as R→∞ by dominated convergence, so choose one R making their combined tail norm below ε/3. Define ηR(ky,kz)=∏s∈{ky,kz}σ(R+1−s)σ(R+1+s). It equals one on KR, is between zero and one, and has support in KR+1 by [F4]. For each n≤N, truncate fn to KR and approximate that truncation in unweighted L2 by φn∈Cc∞(R2) using [F4]. The function gn=ηRφn is smooth and supported in KR+1, and on that box En+ckz2≤En+c(R+1)2. Since ηR=1 on KR and 0≤ηR≤1, choose each of the finitely many L2 errors small enough that the weighted norm difference between gn and the truncation has combined norm below ε/3. Set gn=0 for n>N. The triangle inequality then gives a finite family g0,…,gN∈Cc∞(R2) within ε of f in the weighted coefficient norm.

2.1A1F1F2F5step 1.1algebra

For u∈Cc∞(R3), every z-slice u(⋅,⋅,z) is a planar test function. Apply the form identity in [F1] on those slices and integrate in z by Fubini. The z derivative commutes with the planar transform; after Fourier transformation in z, Plancherel and the derivative identity in [F2] turn ∥−iℏ∂zu∥22/(2m) into the multiplier ckz2. Tonelli [F5] permits summing the nonnegative transverse energies and integrating in (ky,kz). Therefore qB(3)[u]=∑n=0∞∫R2(En+ckz2)∣fn(ky,kz)∣2 dky dkz. This makes the transformed core an isometric subspace of the stated weighted coefficient space.

2.2A1F2F4F7F8step 1.2constructalgebra

For the finite family from step 1.2 put G(ξ,ky,kz)=∑n=0Ngn(ky,kz)ψn(ξ). Its inverse is v(x,y,z)=12π∑n=0N∫R2ei(kyy+kzz)gn(ky,kz)ψn ⁣(x−ℏkyqB)dky dkz. Each coefficient is smooth and compactly supported in (ky,kz), and each ψn is a polynomial times a Gaussian by [F7]. Every derivative of the integrand is smooth with compact wave-number support and has uniformly rapid decay in x because ky remains in a bounded set. Repeated integration by parts in ky,kz gives arbitrary polynomial decay in y,z; the same estimates hold after any fixed x,y,z derivatives. Thus v is Schwartz. Define χR(x,y,z)=∏s∈{x,y,z}σ(2−s/R)σ(2+s/R), using the smooth step from [F4]. These cutoffs equal one on [−R,R]3, vanish outside [−2R,2R]3, and satisfy ∣∇χR∣≤C/R. For each covariant derivative, Πj(χRv)=χRΠjv−iℏ(∂jχR)v, where Πx=−iℏ∂x, Πy=−iℏ∂y−qBx, and Πz=−iℏ∂z. Dominated convergence [F8] sends (χR−1)Πjv and (χR−1)v to zero in L2, while the added term has norm at most Cℏ∥v∥2/R. Hence χRv approximates v in the form norm and belongs to the original compactly supported core. Thus each finite smooth coefficient family from step 1.2 lies in the transformed form closure.

3.1F1F6step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Step 2.1 embeds the transformed core isometrically into the weighted coefficient space. Because the form completion is complete and the weighted target is complete by [F6], the isometric image of the completion is closed in that target. Steps 1.2 and 2.2 show that a dense subspace of the entire weighted space lies in the image, so the image is the whole target. This identifies the completion and its quadratic form as stated.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources