Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Self-adjoint Segal fields and explicit Weyl unitaries

Statement

Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let H be a separable complex Hilbert space with the second-variable-linear convention of Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions, and let Fs(H) and Dfin be its bosonic Fock space and finite-particle domain. For h∈H define on Dfin the Segal field ϕ0(h):=2−1/2(a†(h)+a(h)). For h≠0, this symmetric operator is essentially self-adjoint; write Φ(h)=ϕ0(h)‾. If r=∥h∥, e=h/r, K=e⊥, G=Fs(K), choose a countable orthonormal basis (uj) of G whose vectors are finite-particle, and use the one-mode splitting of One-mode factorization of symmetric Fock space followed by the Hermite unitary ∣n⟩↦gn into L2(R,dx;C) with pairing ⟨f,g⟩2=∫f‾g to write a vector as (fj)j∈J∈ℓ2(J;L2(R,dx;C)). Then the exact domain and action are D(Φ(h))={(fj):∑j∈J∫R(1+r2x2)∣fj(x)∣2 dx<∞},(Φ(h)f)j(x)=rxfj(x). For h=0, ϕ0(0) closes to the zero operator on all of Fs(H).

Define ϵ(z)=⨁n≥0z⊗n/n! for z∈H. There are unitaries W(h) determined on these total exponential vectors by W(h)ϵ(z)=exp⁡ ⁣(−∥h∥24+i2⟨h,z⟩2)ϵ ⁣(z+ih2). They obey W(h)W(k)=exp⁡ ⁣(−i2Im⁡⟨h,k⟩2)W(h+k),⟨Ω,W(h)Ω⟩2=e−∥h∥2/4, and h↦W(h) is strongly continuous. For every h, the one-parameter group t↦W(th) has norm derivative at zero exactly on D(Φ(h)), with derivative iΦ(h) (for h=0 this is the zero generator). Thus the displayed bounded Weyl operators have precisely the closed Segal fields as their generators; no point-field or measurement claim is included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a separable complex Hilbert space H; its bosonic Fock sectors, vacuum, finite-particle domain and creation/annihilation maps; and the Hermite functions gn.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the choice assumption of the Fock tensor and sector constructions. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

On finite sectors, a(h) is conjugate-linear in h, a†(h) is linear, and they are mutual adjoints between adjacent sectors; their sector norms are at most n∥h∥ and n+1∥h∥. Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains

[F2]

For a unit vector e, H=Ce⊕e⊥ and the map J(∣k⟩⊗ψm)=(k+mk)Ps,k+m(e⊗k⊗ψm) extends to a unitary from Fs(Ce)⊗^Fs(e⊥) to Fs(H); a(e) and a†(e) become the one-mode lowering and raising maps. One-mode factorization of symmetric Fock space

[F3]

The real Hermite functions gn=Hng0/2nn! form an orthonormal basis of Lebesgue L2(R,dx;C), with H0=1, H1(x)=2x, Hn+1=2xHn−2nHn−1, and xgn=(n gn−1+n+1 gn+1)/2. Hermite completeness Hermite recurrence

[F4]

Multiplication Qf(x)=xf(x) is self-adjoint, and the finite Hermite span is a core in its graph norm. The graph, adjoint, and core terms have the definitions in Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension, Adjoint of a densely defined operator, and Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores. The cited core result uses first-variable-linear L2; complex conjugation transfers it to the second-variable-linear pairing used here, because Q and every gn are real. Hermite functions form a graph core for position multiplication

[F5]

For a densely defined operator T, y∈D(T∗) exactly when there is w with ⟨Tx,y⟩2=⟨x,w⟩2 for all x∈D(T); the real multiplication operator is symmetric when its multiplier is real. This is the adjoint convention of Adjoint of a densely defined operator after reversing the pairing, together with Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators.

[F6]

The complex exponential has its everywhere-convergent power series; its addition law and the Cauchy product for absolutely convergent series justify the expansion of e2xs−s2. The modulus formula gives ∣eiy∣=1 for real y. For ∣y∣≤1, the absolute series gives ∣eiy−1∣≤∣y∣∑n≥11/n!≤2∣y∣; for ∣y∣>1, the triangle inequality gives ∣eiy−1∣≤2<2∣y∣. Thus ∣eiy−1∣≤2∣y∣ for all real y. The complex exponential by its power series The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0 Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive

[F7]

Dominated convergence and Fatou's lemma apply to the Lebesgue measure; for an L2 function u, the estimate μ{∣u∣>δ}≤δ−2∥u∥22 follows by integrating ∣u∣2≥δ2 on that set. Countable subadditivity then implies that an L2-convergent sequence has an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence by choosing squared errors summable after thresholds tending to zero. Measure spaces The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions Dominated convergence Fatou's lemma

[F8]

The span of elementary tensors is dense in a Hilbert tensor completion, and a complete orthonormal family in each factor gives a complete product orthonormal family. Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases

Proof

1.1A1F2F8construct

Put K=e⊥ and G=Fs(K) for a unit vector e. Since H is separable, its continuous orthogonal projection v↦v−⟨e,v⟩2e sends a countable dense subset of H to a countable dense subset of K. Finite elementary tensors from that subset have dense span in each tensor power by [F8]; applying the bounded symmetrizer gives a countable dense subset of each Ks(m). Rational complex finite sums over the countably many sectors give a countable dense subset of G consisting of finite-particle vectors. Gram–Schmidt, omitting zero residuals, therefore gives a finite or countable orthonormal basis (uj)j∈J of G whose vectors are all finite-particle.

1.2F2F3F4F8construct

Map the one-mode basis ∣n⟩=e⊗n to gn. The map V:Fs(Ce)→L22(R) is a linear unitary: the two displayed families are complete orthonormal families, and both pairings are second-variable-linear. Here L22 has pairing ⟨f,g⟩2=∫f‾g; the core and self-adjointness of Qf=xf transfer from [F4] by complex conjugation. The recurrence [F3] shows that V 2−1/2(a†(e)+a(e))V−1 equals Q on the finite Hermite span. Together with J [F2], the full field for h=re acts in L22(R)⊗^G as multiplication by rx on the dense span of gn⊗uj.

1.3F5F8givenalgebra

Under the product-basis unitary of [F8], identify L22(R)⊗^G with ℓ2(J;L22(R)). Define Mr(fj)=(rxfj) on D(Mr)={(fj):∑j∫r2x2∣fj(x)∣2dx<∞}. Its domain is dense because finite coordinates supported in [−m,m] are dense. It is symmetric since rx is real. If g∈D(Mr∗) and k=Mr∗g, test the adjoint identity in coordinate j against fj=(rxgj−kj)1[−m,m] and set all other coordinates to zero. This vector lies in D(Mr) because rx is bounded on [−m,m]; the identity then gives 0=∫−mm∣rxgj−kj∣2dx. Letting m→∞ yields rxgj=kj almost everywhere for each j, so ∑j∫r2x2∣gj∣2=∑j∥kj∥2<∞ and g∈D(Mr). Conversely, for g∈D(Mr), reality of rx gives ⟨Mrf,g⟩2=⟨f,Mrg⟩2 for every f∈D(Mr), hence Mr∗g=Mrg. Thus Mr is self-adjoint with the displayed domain.

1.4F6F8givenalgebra

The series defining ϵ(z) converges in Fock norm because ∥ϵ(z)∥2=∑n≥0∥z∥2n/n!=e∥z∥2 [F6]. Its inner products are ⟨ϵ(z),ϵ(w)⟩2=e⟨z,w⟩2. These vectors are total: if Ψ=(Ψn) is orthogonal to all of them, then for every z and scalar t the entire power series ⟨Ψ,ϵ(tz)⟩2 vanishes, so each coefficient ⟨Ψn,z⊗n⟩2 is zero. For fixed n, the coefficient of t1⋯tn in ⟨Ψn,(t1z1+⋯+tnzn)⊗n⟩2 is n!⟨Ψn,Ps,n(z1⊗⋯⊗zn)⟩2; it too vanishes. The symmetrized elementary tensors have dense span in Hs(n) by [F8], hence every Ψn=0 and Ψ=0.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3given

The finite Hermite span is graph dense in D(Q) by [F4]. The vectors uj from step 1.1 are finite-particle, so every gn⊗uj belongs to the image of Dfin under J−1 and V⊗I. For any (fj)∈D(Mr), truncating the countable coordinate sum converges in the graph norm of Mr because both ∑j∥fj∥2 and ∑j∥rxfj∥2 converge. For each retained coordinate, if r>0 then fj∈D(Q) and we approximate it in the graph norm of Q by finite Hermite sums using [F4]; multiplying the graph component by the fixed scalar r preserves convergence. If r=0, finite Hermite sums are dense in L2 by [F3], and the operator graph norm is just the L2 norm. Hence the image of Dfin is graph dense in D(Mr). Step 1.2 identifies the restriction with ϕ0(e), and scaling gives the same for h=re. Therefore ϕ0(h) is essentially self-adjoint and its closure is the self-adjoint Mr transported through these unitaries, with exactly the domain stated. When h=0, it is the zero operator on the dense Dfin and its closure is zero on all Fock space.

2.2F6step 1.4givenalgebra

Write λh(z)=exp⁡(−∥h∥2/4+i⟨h,z⟩2/2). Using the exponential-vector inner product from step 1.4 and ⟨z+ih/2,w+ih/2⟩2 =⟨z,w⟩2+i⟨z,h⟩2/2−i⟨h,w⟩2/2+∥h∥2/2, direct cancellation gives ⟨λh(z)ϵ(z+ih/2),λh(w)ϵ(w+ih/2)⟩2=e⟨z,w⟩2. Thus the formula in the Statement preserves inner products on the span of total exponential vectors and extends uniquely to an isometry W(h). Substituting the formula twice, using ⟨h,ik/2⟩2=i⟨h,k⟩2/2, gives the left-hand scalar exp⁡ ⁣(−∥h∥2+∥k∥24+i⟨h+k,z⟩22−12⟨h,k⟩2). Since ∥h+k∥2=∥h∥2+∥k∥2+2Re⁡⟨h,k⟩2, this scalar is exactly the right-hand scalar below, including its Weyl phase: W(h)W(k)ϵ(z)=e−iIm⁡⟨h,k⟩2/2W(h+k)ϵ(z). Taking k=−h shows W(−h)W(h)=W(h)W(−h)=I, so each isometry is unitary and the Weyl identity holds on all Fock space. The vacuum case z=0 gives ⟨Ω,W(h)Ω⟩2=e−∥h∥2/4.

3.1F2F3F6F7step 1.3step 2.1step 1.4algebra∎

The formula for W(h)ϵ(z) is norm-continuous in h for every z. Since the exponential vectors have dense span and ∥W(h)∥=1, this implies strong continuity: approximate an arbitrary vector by a vector in that span and bound the two remaining errors by twice the approximation error. To identify its generator, write h=re, z=αe+w with w∈e⊥. Expanding the permutation average in the one-mode splitting [F2] gives ϵ(z)=J(ϵ(αe)⊗ϵ(w)). The absolutely convergent exponential series and their Cauchy product [F6] give e2xs−s2=∑n≥0cn(x)sn/n!, where cn(x)=n!∑j=0⌊n/2⌋(−1)j(2x)n−2j/((n−2j)!j!). Here c0=1 and c1=2x. In 2xcn−2ncn−1, reindex the second finite sum by j↦j+1; for each common power (2x)n+1−2j, the combined numerator is (n+1−2j)+2j=n+1, giving cn+1=2xcn−2ncn−1. The recurrence and initial values in [F3] therefore give cn=Hn by induction, so ∑nHn(x)sn/n!=e2xs−s2. Since gn=Hng0/2nn!, substituting s=α/2 shows that the Hermite series for Vϵ(αe) converges pointwise to g0(x)e2αx−α2/2. Let SN(x)=∑n=0Nαngn(x)/n!. The SN also converge in L2 by the Fock norm series. To identify these limits, choose a subsequence SNj whose squared L2 errors from the Hilbert-space limit are below 2−3j. The sets where ∣SNj−Vϵ(αe)∣>2−j have measure at most 2−j, by integrating the squared error; their tail unions have measure at most ∑j≥J2−j→0. Thus this subsequence converges almost everywhere to the L2 limit, which must equal the pointwise generating-function limit. Multiplication by eitrx sends this function to eitrα/2−t2r2/4g0(x)e2(α+itr/2)x−(α+itr/2)2/2, which is exactly the image of W(th)ϵ(z) under J−1 and V⊗I. By totality, W(th) is the coordinate multiplier eitrx for every real t. Its difference quotient converges on the displayed domain to iMr: if rxfj∈L2, [F6] gives ∣(eitrx−1)/t∣≤2r∣x∣, so the squared error from irxfj is bounded by 9r2x2∣fj∣2 and dominated convergence gives the norm limit; conversely, if a difference quotient converges, Fatou's lemma along tn=1/n gives ∑j∫r2x2∣fj∣2<∞. Thus its exact generator domain is D(Mr) and the derivative is iMr=iΦ(h); h=0 is immediate.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources