Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stability gives finite grand normalization and an exponential particle cutoff

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let d≥1, let ϕ be a stable pair potential as in Stable power-tempered pair-potential model with stability constant B, and fix a,β>0. In fixed reference length and energy units, put ΛL=[0,L]d and define, for N≥1, ZL,N:=aNN!∫ΛLNe−βUN(q1,…,qN) dλd⊗N, where λd is Lebesgue measure restricted to the Borel subsets of Rd, λd⊗N is its N-fold product measure. The integrand uses the ordinary real exponential when UN<+∞ and is defined to be 0 when UN=+∞. Also, ∫ΛLNf dλd⊗N abbreviates the nonnegative integral of f1ΛLN on the full product space, using Measure space and integral. Set ZL,0=1. Define ΞL:=∑N=0∞ZL,N as the nonnegative extended sum of Series in the nonnegative extended real line. For L≥1 put Q:=aeβB. Choose any real K>eQ+1 and set nL:=⌊KLd⌋+1. which satisfies KLd<nL≤KLd+1 by the integer-part lemma Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1. Let ΞLcut:=∑N=0nLZL,N. Then 1≤ΞL≤eQLd,∑N>nLZL,N≤e−Ld,ΞLcut≥(1−e−Ld)ΞL.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a dimension d≥1, the model in Stable power-tempered pair-potential model, its stability constant B, a,β>0, and L≥1.

[A1]

Stability means UN≥−BN for every finite configuration and every N≥1 (Stable power-tempered pair-potential model).

[L1]

Measure space and integral defines the nonnegative integral as the supremum of simple minorants. This current batch-11 definition is draft text; its exact interface is inspected in the batch dependency evidence.

[F1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) states ACω; the standard Lebesgue measure and box suppliers used here state this assumption explicitly.

[F2]

Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn defines λd as Lebesgue measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra. Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable gives B(Rd)⊆L(Rd) under ACω, so restricting λd to Borel sets gives a measure. A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included gives λd([0,L]d)=Ld and λd([−k,k]d)=(2k)d for integers k≥1. For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique gives the rectangle formula for finite products of sigma-finite measures.

[F3]

Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure gives sigma-finiteness of Lebesgue measure. For its Borel restriction, the Borel boxes [−k,k]d (k≥1) cover Rd and have finite measure by [F2], so the restricted factors are sigma-finite and their finite product measures in the Statement exist.

[F4]

The real exponential function and the number e by a power series defines ex=∑N=0∞xN/N!, with integer powers as in Integer powers am; The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument proves convergence for every real x.

[F6]

The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N defines 0!=1 and the ordinary factorial recursion; Series in the nonnegative extended real line defines the series sum as the supremum of its nonnegative partial sums, allowing +∞.

[F7]

The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n} identifies the finite product Borel sigma-algebra, and extended-real measurability means measurability of preimages of extended-real Borel sets (Extended-real-valued measurable functions). Coordinate-difference maps are continuous, hence Borel under ACω (Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable); composition with the Borel potential preserves measurability (Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability). Finite sums of the resulting extended-real measurable terms are measurable whenever defined (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral). On finite energy values u, u↦e−βu is continuous; assigning the value 0 at u=+∞ remains Borel because {+∞} is Borel (The extended real line R‾=R∪{−∞,+∞}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined, The Borel sigma-algebra on the extended real line, The exponential function is strictly increasing). The box indicator is measurable, so the integrand extended by zero off ΛLN is product-measurable.

[F8]

Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1 gives, for every real x, an integer ⌊x⌋ with ⌊x⌋≤x<⌊x⌋+1.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F7L1algebra

By [A1] and β>0, every configuration satisfies 0≤e−βUN≤eβBN, with the value 0 when UN=+∞. Fact [F7] makes the integrand and its restriction to ΛLN measurable. Let s=∑j=1rcj1Aj be any nonnegative simple minorant of e−βUN1ΛLN, written with disjoint measurable sets and finite coefficients cj≥0 as in [L1]. Every Aj with cj>0 is contained in ΛLN, and on it cj≤eβBN. For any measurable E⊆ΛLN, countable additivity applied to ΛLN=E⊔(ΛLN∖E) gives λd⊗N(E)≤λd⊗N(ΛLN)<∞. Applying this first to each Aj and then to their finite disjoint union gives ∫s dλd⊗N=∑cj>0cjλd⊗N(Aj)≤eβBN∑cj>0λd⊗N(Aj)=eβBNλd⊗N ⁣(⋃cj>0Aj)≤eβBNλd⊗N(ΛLN). Taking the supremum over these minorants in [L1] proves the same bound for the restricted integrand's nonnegative integral.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The box and product-measure formulas [F2, F3] give λd⊗N(ΛLN)=LdN. Thus ZL,N≤(aeβBLd)N/N!=(QLd)N/N! for N≥1, and this also holds for N=0 since ZL,0=1.

3.1F4F6step 2.1

Summing the nonnegative terms by [F6] and using [F4] gives 1≤ΞL≤∑N=0∞(QLd)N/N!=eQLd; the lower bound is the empty-configuration term.

3.2F4F5F8step 2.1algebra

By [F8], KLd<nL≤KLd+1. If N>nL, then N>KLd, so 1≤eN−KLd. Therefore ∑N>nLZL,N≤e−KLd∑N>nL(eQLd)NN!≤e−KLdeeQLd=e(eQ−K)Ld≤e−Ld. The second inequality extends a nonnegative partial tail to the full exponential series; the equality uses [F5], and the last inequality follows from K>eQ+1 and [F5].

4.1F6step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

For each M>nL, split the Mth partial sum into the fixed finite prefix ΞLcut and the finite tail from nL+1 through M. Taking suprema over M in the nonnegative-series definition [F6] gives ΞL=ΞLcut+∑N>nLZL,N; subtraction is valid because step 3.1 proves ΞL<∞. Since ΞL≥1, step 3.2 implies ΞLcut≥ΞL−e−Ld≥(1−e−Ld)ΞL.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources