Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conformal-net reconstruction of a VOA under generating and energy hypotheses

Statement

For an irreducible conformal net generated by a family F of quasi-primary vectors invariant under the stated anti-linear involution, assume the Fredenhagen–Jörß fields for F satisfy energy bounds and every L0 eigenspace is finite-dimensional. Then Hfin carries a simple unitary strongly local VOA structure whose associated net is the original net.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, already carried by the concrete net and modular suppliers: The Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Möbius and conformal nets on the circle fixes the net, genuine vacuum Möbius representation, positive energy, projective smooth-diffeomorphism representation and pointwise local diffeomorphism axiom. The double commutant theorem for concrete von Neumann algebras gives M′′=M for each concrete local von Neumann algebra M. Fredenhagen–Jörß fields and their energy bounds supplies the cyclic-separating local vacuum, raw Tomita/FJ construction, corrected antilinear test-function convention, the generating family, energy bounds, and the common invariant smooth-energy core. All these are the actual hypotheses, not universal conclusions about arbitrary nets.

[F2]

Quasi-primary translation series converges in the Hilbert space gives the vacuum series; Fredenhagen–Jörß local fields glue under refinement proves local refinement invariance. A joint finite refinement of two partitions gives their equality.

[F3]

Stress field from a continuous positive-energy diffeomorphism representation constructs the smooth stress modes, common smooth domain and propagators from the stated continuous representation, with energy bounds and preliminary affiliation only with the opposite commutant. It does not assume Haag duality.

[F4]

Strongly local unitary VOA data fixes the exact unitary and strong-locality interfaces. Reconstruction and uniqueness from creative local generating fields proves the field/state construction, Dong bounds, Jacobi and uniqueness. Hermitian quasi-primary generators determine the unitary PCT structure constructs the full invariant positive form and PCT from Hermitian quasi-primary generating fields.

[F5]

Under A1, Tomita graph and standard modular data, Involution and polar identities for the Tomita operator and Modular resolvent invariance and commutant equality give the exact closed Tomita operator S=JΔ1/2, JMJ=M′, modular invariance, and (x′Ω↦x′∗Ω)‾=S∗. Positive half-sided groups obey modular scaling and reflection proves the positive-semigroup scaling/reflection relations; Upper-semicircle imaginary-dilation identity on lowest-weight vectors proves the precise domain and vector identity for eK/2a(f), with K=iπ(L1−L−1).

[F6]

The closed-operator polar decomposition gives T=VT∣T∣ with ∣T∣=(T∗T)1/2 positive self-adjoint and D(∣T∣)=D(T); the unbounded Borel calculus supplies its spectral projections. Polar decomposition of a closed densely defined operator, Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping

Proof

Given: The unchanged Statement's irreducible net, quasi-primary generating family F, stated involution, energy bounds and finite-dimensional energy spaces. Write N=1+L0, D=Hfin, H∞=⋂kD(Nk); inner products are linear in the first argument. Each intermediate assertion below uses only the source-correct local diffeomorphism and Tomita conventions in F1; geometric modular action and Haag duality are proved later.

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5algebra

For a local algebra M=A(I), a∈D(S) and x′∈M′, define Ta0x′Ω=x′a. If xjΩ→a and xj∗Ω→Sa, commutation with x′,y′∈M′ and passage to these graph limits gives ⟨Ta0x′Ω,y′Ω⟩=⟨x′Ω,TSa0y′Ω⟩. Thus TSa0⊂(Ta0)∗ on the dense commutant-vacuum domain, proving closability. A commutant unitary preserves that domain and commutes with Ta0 there; closure and its inverse show affiliation of Ta0‾ with M. This proves the raw FJ operator assertion, with no unbounded commutator assumed from formal notation.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

Fix k≥0, v∈D(Nk), and an interval J with J‾⊂I′. By F1, A(J)Ω is dense in H. Choose a nonnegative χ∈Cc∞(R) with ∫χ(t) dt=1, set χϵ(t)=ϵ−1χ(t/ϵ), and define Kϵξ=∫χϵ(t)U(rt)ξ dt as a Bochner integral in H for each ξ∈H. Use the Fourier convention χ^ϵ(s)=∫χϵ(t)e−ist dt; the spectral theorem gives Kϵ=χ^ϵ(−L0). Integration by parts gives sup⁡λ≥0(1+λ)k∣χ^ϵ(−λ)∣<∞ for each fixed ϵ, so Kϵ maps H boundedly to D(Nk). Equip this domain with graph norm ∥w∥D(Nk)=∥w∥+∥Nkw∥. The multiplier commutes with N, and strong continuity of rotations gives Kϵv→v in this graph norm as ϵ↓0. Choose ϵm↓0 small enough that rtJ⊂I′ on supp⁡χϵm. For each m, density of A(J)Ω and boundedness of the fixed map Kϵm:H→D(Nk) allow a choice Xm∈A(J) with ∥Kϵm(XmΩ−v)∥D(Nk)<1/m. Set Bm equal to the weak-operator integral ∫χϵm(t)U(rt)XmU(rt)∗ dt, meaning its matrix coefficients are the integrals of those of the integrand. Covariance and isotony put every integrand in A(I′), so weak-operator closure gives Bm∈A(I′)⊂M′. Since rotations fix Ω, BmΩ=KϵmXmΩ∈H∞. The two approximation bounds imply BmΩ→v in graph norm. Thus M′Ω∩H∞ is dense in every D(Nk). Apply the energy inequality to differences and use closedness of the FJ operator: its domain contains D(Nk) and the same bound holds there.

3.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 2.1algebra

Raw FJ operators are covariant under the given Möbius representation: conjugation transports M′Ω, the Tomita graph and the vector a(f), and hence their closures. For rotations this follows directly termwise from the vacuum series, and for the three Möbius infinitesimals it follows from the lowest-weight ladder relations and the change of circle test density; differentiating these series gives [Lj,Y(a,z)]=zj+1∂zY(a,z)+(j+1)dzjY(a,z) for j=−1,0,1 and quasi-primary a∈Hd. The integrated identities follow first on the convergent lowest-weight vectors and then on the commutant-vacuum graphs by the same conjugation. In particular, differentiating rotation covariance gives [L0,Y(a,f)]=iY(a,f′). Repeated commutation with N and the preceding extended energy bound gives every Sobolev output bound, so these smearings act continuously H∞→H∞. Finite partitions and a joint refinement now glue them globally by F2.

4.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 3.1algebra

Global Fourier tests give energy modes an with anHk⊂Hk−n and polynomial estimates ∥anv∥≤C(1+∣n∣)s∥Nrv∥ on D. The state-field modes are a(m)=am−d+1. The vacuum series is exactly Y(a,z)Ω=ezL−1a, and the preceding Möbius relation gives [L−1,Y(a,z)]=∂zY(a,z). Applying the graph identity in the first step to the corrected Tomita relation, then the smooth commutant graph density, gives an†=(−1)d(θa)−n on the finite graded blocks. If θa has initially unspecified quasi-primary weight, comparison of this adjoint identity with the L1,L−1 covariance of its two nonzero fields forces that weight to equal d: the coefficients in [L−1,(θa)−n] differ by precisely the two weights. Zero states cause no restriction. Thus Hermitian quasi-primary combinations a+(−1)dθa and i(a−(−1)dθa) have Hermitian energy modes and span the same generating fields.

5.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 4.1algebra

For two generating fields, their polynomial mode energy estimates bound every commutator coefficient on H∞ by a fixed polynomial in the two mode numbers times one Sobolev norm of the input. Consequently their operator-valued distribution has finite order bounded independently of the input vector. Affiliation and net locality make it vanish for disjoint test supports, so its support is the diagonal. In a coordinate normal to that diagonal, an order-q distribution supported there is killed by every smooth function vanishing to order q+1: multiply a test function by a cutoff of width ϵ in the normal coordinate, subtract its normal Taylor polynomial through degree q, and bound every derivative through order q by O(ϵ); support permits this cutoff and the limit is zero. Since z−w is a nonvanishing unit times that normal coordinate, (z−w)q+1 kills the commutator. This proves formal locality with one finite exponent, not an input-dependent formal assertion.

6.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 5.1algebra

Let W be the algebraic span of finite generating-mode words on Ω. It is graded and stable under every generating mode and its graded adjoint. The orthogonal projection P onto its Hilbert closure preserves each finite-dimensional Hk, and PHk=W∩Hk, since that finite-dimensional subspace is closed. Hence PD=W. Adjoint invariance makes P commute with all generating modes on D. As P commutes with L0, it preserves H∞; energy bounds and Fourier convergence show commutation with every generating smearing on that core and hence with its closure and adjoint. By the net's F-generating hypothesis P lies in the global net commutant. Irreducibility and PΩ=Ω give P=1. Therefore W=D, establishing the algebraic spanning hypothesis that does not follow merely by writing the net generating condition.

7.1givenF1F4step 4.1step 6.1algebra

The creative translation-covariant local generating fields satisfy every hypothesis of F4, so they reconstruct the unique graded vertex algebra on D and its full Jacobi identity. For the energy bound fix homogeneous states A,B of weights dA,dB, an integer n, and C=A(n)B. If C≠0, its weight is dC=dA+dB−n−1. Keep the convention from 4.1: A(r)=Ar−dA+1 and B(r)=Br−dB+1, where parenthesized indices are vertex modes and unparenthesized indices are energy modes. The Jacobi coefficient formula in F4, with its first index zero, is the vertex-mode iterate identity. To compute the energy mode Ck, its vertex-mode index is k+dC−1. Substitution in each of the four mode indices gives (A(n)B)k=∑j≥0(−1)j(nj)(An−j−dA+1Bk+j+dA−n−1−(−1)nBk−j+dA−1Aj−dA+1). The notation on the left means the energy mode of the state A(n)B. Both products on the right have total energy index k, as they must. For A=B=ω, dA=dB=2 and n=0, this is [L−1,Lk+1]=−(k+2)Lk, the energy mode of L−1ω; it is not [L0,Lk]. The zero-state case has zero field and needs no estimate.

8.1givenF1F4step 4.1step 7.1algebra

On an input v∈Hh, the first product vanishes when its rightmost mode index k+j+dA−n−1 exceeds h, and the second vanishes when its rightmost index j−dA+1 exceeds h, because there are no negative-energy output spaces. Hence every nonzero term has 0≤j≤max⁡{0,h−k−dA+n+1,h+dA−1}≤h+∣k∣+CA,n. This proves vectorwise truncation of the correctly reindexed formula, including negative n. For fixed integer n, ∣(nj)∣ grows at most polynomially in j: for n≥0 it is zero for j>n, and for n<0 its absolute value is (j−n−1−n−1). Suppose the fields of A and B have polynomial mode bounds. In each surviving product, all mode indices and the intermediate nonnegative energy are at most a constant times 1+h+∣k∣ in absolute value. Apply the two mode bounds successively, then sum the polynomially many terms with their polynomial binomial coefficients. This gives ∥Ckv∥≤C(1+h+∣k∣)M∥v∥≤C′(1+∣k∣)M(1+h)M∥v∥, with constants depending on A,B,n but not h,k,v.

8.2givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 7.1algebra

F3 supplies Ln and ω=L−2Ω with creative field T(z)=∑Lnz−n−2. Before duality, real supported stress smearings are affiliated only with A(I′)′: their local diffeomorphism flows fix A(I′) pointwise. This suffices for commutation with opposite supported FJ fields. The same finite-order diagonal argument therefore makes T formally local with every generating field. It is translation covariant and creative with state ω, so the reconstruction uniqueness argument identifies it with Y(ω,z). The Virasoro identities and grading in F3 make this the required conformal vector; finite-dimensionality and nonnegative grading are inherited from H.

9.1givenF1F4step 8.1algebra

Each term of Ck sends Hh to Hh−k. For a finite sum v=∑hvh, these outputs are orthogonal; squaring the last estimate and summing therefore gives the full energy inequality ∥Ckv∥≤C′(1+∣k∣)M∥(1+L0)Mv∥. Starting from the generating fields and the identity field, induction on the finite bracketed field-product expressions in F4 proves polynomial energy bounds for every reconstructed state, rather than inserting unshifted modes into an energy estimate. The same estimates with additional powers of 1+L0 give continuity on H∞; closability follows after the adjoint identity below.

9.2givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 8.2algebra

Apply the Hermitian-generators lemma F4 to the real combinations above and the given positive Möbius form. It constructs an intrinsic antiunitary involution Θ, all descendant adjoints and the invariant bilinear form, fixes ω and gives Θa=θa on the original family F. Only this equality on F is used; global mode intertwining by the originally supplied θ is not presumed. For v∈V0, positivity gives ∥L−1v∥2=⟨v,L1L−1v⟩=0. Thus Y(v,z) is a constant field commuting with every generating field. The product v∗w=v(−1)w makes V0 a finite-dimensional commutative associative positive star algebra, faithfully represented on itself, with v↦Θv as star. Simultaneous diagonalization gives self-adjoint primitive idempotents. Their constant fields are self-adjoint idempotents on D, hence bounded orthogonal projections, since ∥Eu∥2=⟨Eu,u⟩≤∥Eu∥∥u∥. They commute with L0 and all closed generating fields, hence with the irreducible net. Only one primitive idempotent can remain; consequently V0=CΩ.

10.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 9.2algebra

The resulting VOA is simple. An ideal is graded by its L0 stability and finite spectral interpolation on each vector. Its graded orthogonal complement is stable under every mode because the full invariant adjoint is a finite sum of state modes preserving the ideal. A proper ideal has zero grade-zero space, so its orthogonal complement contains Ω and hence every generated state. It is therefore all of V, and the ideal is zero. This proves simplicity using positivity, rather than assuming it in reconstruction.

11.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 10.1algebra

It remains to prove equality of local algebras for all reconstructed fields. Fix the upper semicircle I0 and its standard data (M,Ω,S,J,Δ) from F5. In x=tan⁡(ϑ/2) coordinates the positive parabolic groups have velocities 1+cos⁡ϑ and 1−cos⁡ϑ. Their generators on H∞ are P±=L0±B, where B=(L1+L−1)/2. Put D0=(L1−L−1)/(2i) and V(t)=eitD0‾, the supplied Möbius dilation group. The brackets give i[D0,L0]=B and i[D0,B]=L0; equivalently, the adjoint action of this genuine group on its Lie algebra gives V(t)L0V(t)∗=cosh⁡(t)L0+sinh⁡(t)B on its common invariant smooth core. Thus, for every ξ∈H∞, 2e−tV(±t)L0V(±t)∗ξ=P±ξ+e−2tP∓ξ→P±ξ in norm as t→+∞. Each left-hand quadratic form is nonnegative, since L0≥0 and V(±t)∗ξ∈D(L0). Hence ⟨P±ξ,ξ⟩≥0. F3 makes these real stress smearings essentially self-adjoint on H∞; approximating any vector in a closure domain in graph norm preserves this inequality. Their self-adjoint generators are therefore nonnegative. Positive translations preserve I0; negative special-conformal parameters preserve it. Apply the half-sided lemma to M for translations, and to M′ for the positive special-conformal group (the reversed inclusion follows by taking commutants). The modular operator for M′ is Δ−1. It follows that Δit has the same conjugation on both parabolic groups as eitK, where K=iπ(L1−L−1) dilates x by e−2πt; J implements their parameter reflection. The two groups generate the Möbius group, so these assertions hold for that group, including JLnJ=Ln for n=−1,0,1 on the invariant core.

12.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 11.1algebra

Set Z(t)=Δite−itK. The preceding conjugation relations imply that Z(t) commutes with the Möbius representation, forms a strongly continuous unitary group and fixes Ω. Both factors normalize M by F5 and Möbius covariance; since every local interval is a Möbius image of I0, Z(t) normalizes every local algebra. It is therefore a global net gauge, not yet assumed trivial. It commutes with L0 and preserves the finite-dimensional grades. The conjugated generating fields Z(t)Y(a,z)Z(t)∗ retain their energy bounds, creativity, translation covariance and net locality, and have state Z(t)a. Formal uniqueness with the original generating fields identifies them with Y(Z(t)a,z). Mode-word spanning extends this to all states; hence Z(t) is a unitary vertex automorphism commuting with the Möbius modes. It fixes the conformal vector by the same positive weight-two uniqueness argument in the PCT lemma, so it is a VOA automorphism.

13.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 12.1algebra

Write Z(t)=eitQ. Every unitary VOA automorphism commutes with the intrinsic Θ: conjugate its opposite-adjoint field construction by that unitary and take the vacuum state. Thus ΘQΘ=−Q. Also JZ(t)J=Z(t), by the polar identity JΔitJ=Δit and the reflected Möbius action on K, giving JQJ=−Q. Consequently W=JΘ is a unitary commuting with Q. All these statements restrict to ordinary finite matrices on each Hd, so no unbounded exponential is moved through an unrelated domain.

14.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 13.1algebra

Since Q commutes with the Möbius representation, Δ1/2=eK/2eQ/2 on its joint spectral domain. For a generating quasi-primary a∈Hd, eQ/2a is defined in the finite-dimensional Hd, and the upper-semicircle identity F5 applies to its entire lowest-weight descendants. The corrected Tomita identity for arbitrary complex upper-supported f therefore gives θa=JeQ/2a: explicitly eK/2b(f)=(−1)db(f∘j) and Jb(f∘j)=(Jb)(fˉ), with j(z)=z−1. Equality of these smeared vacuum vectors determines the underlying state by its Fourier coefficients. As Θa=θa on F, this reads Wa=eQ/2a. Decompose the finite-dimensional Hd into Q eigenspaces; W is unitary and commutes with Q, so each nonzero component aq satisfies ∥aq∥=eq/2∥aq∥. Hence Qa=0 for every a∈F. The VOA automorphism Z(t) fixes all generators and the vacuum, thus every mode word. Density gives Z(t)=1, Δit=eitK, and Ja=Θa on F. This proves the geometric modular action instead of adding it as an axiom.

15.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 14.1algebra

Möbius covariance and JMJ=M′ give JA(I)J=A((jI)′)′ for every interval I, without Haag duality. For a generating field form its reflected conjugate by J: on energy modes these are JanJ, and its smearing with f is JY(a,fˉ∘j)J, affiliated with A(I′)′ for support in I. It therefore commutes with the original FJ fields in I′. It has the same energy bounds, translation covariance and creative state Ja=Θa. Formal uniqueness gives JanJ=(Θa)n for every generating mode. Applying this to all mode words yields J=Θ on D and hence on H. On the other hand the intrinsic PCT maps the F-generated algebra A(I) onto A(jI). Combining these two conjugation formulas gives Haag duality A(I′)=A(I)′ for all I.

16.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 15.1algebra

The net is inner additive directly from its F-generating definition: each compactly supported test in I is a finite sum of tests supported in intervals compactly contained in I, so A(I)=⋁K⋐IA(K). Taking commutants and using Haag duality gives outer regularity A(I)=⋂J⊃I‾A(J). Here J ranges over slightly larger proper intervals; the complementary smaller intervals exhaust I′. These are algebra equalities, not assumptions about strong additivity at a removed interior point.

17.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 16.1algebra

For a nonempty interval I let PF(I)Ω be the linear span of finite products of smooth F-smearings compactly supported there, applied to Ω. This space is Hilbert dense. Indeed, if v is orthogonal to it, pair v with eit1L0A1(f1)eit2L0⋯An(fn)Ω. Each relative time variable extends holomorphically into its upper half-plane and continuously to the boundary: positive energy gives contractions on every Sobolev space, and the field-product energy bounds lose only finitely many Sobolev orders starting from Ω∈H∞. For all sufficiently small real times the transported supports remain in I, so the boundary function is zero. In one variable, reflection across this zero boundary interval (or Morera on the upper function glued to zero) and the identity theorem make it vanish throughout the half-plane and its real boundary. Apply this successively to each relative variable, fixing the others first in their small real intervals; it then vanishes for all real relative times. Independent rotations and a finite partition of arbitrary tests into short supports show orthogonality to every global F-mode word. The already proved word spanning implies v=0.

18.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 17.1algebra

This local polynomial space is also a core for every Nk after an arbitrarily small enlargement of its interval. Choose I1⋐I and average common small rotations of PF(I1)Ω with a smooth time kernel. For fixed kernel, the resulting Fourier multiplier of L0 is bounded H→D(Nk). Hilbert density just proved, followed by an approximate identity in time, gives graph density. Each averaged product can itself be approximated in every Sobolev norm by finite sums of products with tests supported in I: write its common-rotation integral as a compact smooth test function in all field variables, approximate that function in every smooth seminorm by finite sums of separable tests (local Fourier series times cutoffs suffice), and use continuity of the energy-bounded product on H∞. Thus PF(I)Ω has the claimed graph density. Since every state field has an energy bound, it is a graph core for its closure as well.

19.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 18.1algebra

Fix a quasi-primary state a∈Vd and a test f compactly supported in I. By the upper-semicircle identity, J=Θ and Möbius covariance, a(f)∈D(SI) and SIa(f)=Y(a,f)†Ω=(−1)d(Θa)(fˉ). This is a proved relation for every reconstructed quasi-primary, not an extension of the original FJ hypothesis by notation. Fix J1⊃I‾ and a bounded A∈A(J1′). Smooth its conjugation orbit under sufficiently small rotations to obtain As∈A(I′), converging strongly with adjoints to A and mapping H∞ to itself. Derivatives of that orbit are bounded after smoothing; commuting powers of L0 then gives every asserted Sobolev-domain preservation.

20.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 19.1algebra

Put M=A(I), and let X1,X2∈PF(I′). On H∞ set η=X1†AsX2Ω and η′=X2†As†X1Ω. The closed polynomial operators are affiliated with M′ by locality and duality. For B∈M, bounded B and B∗ preserve their domains and commute with them; all displayed vectors are in the smooth domain. Moving these operators in the Hilbert pairing gives ⟨SIBΩ,η⟩=⟨B∗Ω,X1†AsX2Ω⟩=⟨X2†As†X1Ω,BΩ⟩. The defining antilinear adjoint relation and the Tomita graph core therefore prove η∈D(SI∗) and SI∗η=η′. This is the exact domain assertion used next.

21.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 20.1algebra

Use the preceding identity, the just-proved SIa(f)=Y(a,f)†Ω, and formal commutation of the reconstructed fields with Xi on H∞. The pairings are ⟨Y(a,f)AsX2Ω,X1Ω⟩=⟨η,SIa(f)⟩=⟨a(f),η′⟩=⟨AsY(a,f)X2Ω,X1Ω⟩. Hilbert density of the polynomial test vectors gives Y(a,f)Asu=AsY(a,f)u on the local polynomial core u∈PF(I′)Ω. Let s→0: strong convergence gives Asu→Au and AsY(a,f)u→AY(a,f)u, so closedness gives Au∈D(Y(a,f)) and Y(a,f)Au=AY(a,f)u. The polynomial graph-core result extends this to the whole closed field domain. Applying it to every commutant unitary A∈A(J1′)=A(J1)′ proves affiliation with A(J1). Outer regularity then gives affiliation with A(I).

22.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 21.1algebra

Every state is a finite sum of L−1 descendants of quasi-primaries. On each finite grade use the orthogonal decomposition Vd=ker⁡L1⊕L−1Vd−1, since L1=L−1†, and recurse to lower grades; at weight zero translation is zero. Translation of fields transfers L−1 to a test derivative, with the corresponding finite circle-coordinate density factors. These operations preserve support and smoothness. The same bounded-commutant/core argument therefore gives affiliation with A(I) for every reconstructed smooth state field supported in I, not only for the original F-generators.

23.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 22.1algebra∎

Fix an interval I and a reconstructed closed field T=Y(a,f) with f supported in I. By Step 22.1 it is affiliated with M=A(I). Thus for every unitary u∈M′, uTu∗=T as closed operators; taking adjoints gives uT∗u∗=T∗. Consequently uT∗Tu∗=T∗T, and uniqueness of the positive square root gives u∣T∣u∗=∣T∣. Uniqueness of the spectral resolution then gives uE∣T∣(B)u∗=E∣T∣(B) for every Borel B⊆[0,∞), and uniqueness of polar decomposition gives uVTu∗=VT. Each bounded generator used to define AV(I) therefore commutes with every unitary in M′. Every element of a unital von Neumann algebra is a linear combination of unitaries: a self-adjoint contraction h is the real part of the unitary h+i(1−h2)1/2, and arbitrary elements split into real and imaginary self-adjoint parts and are rescaled. Hence these generators commute with all of M′, so lie in M′′=M by the concrete double-commutant theorem in F1. Taking the generated weak-operator closed algebra gives AV(I)⊆A(I). Conversely the original FJ fields equal the reconstructed F-fields on their common smooth core and hence as closed operators; the F-generating hypothesis gives A(I)⊆AV(I). Thus equality holds for every interval. Original net locality gives strong locality of the reconstructed VOA. It is simple, unitary and of CFT type by the earlier steps, and its associated net is the original one, proving the full unchanged Statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources