Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-boson spectrum, modular partition function, and T-duality

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let r>0, τ∈H, q=e2πiτ, and qˉ=e−2πiτˉ. For the compact-boson data in the Ginsparg normalization, define η(τ)=eπiτ/12∏k=1∞(1−e2πikτ),pL=m2r+nr,pR=m2r−nr. The trace over the left/right oscillator state space and all momentum-winding sectors is Zr(τ,τˉ)=1∣η(τ)∣2∑m,n∈ZqpL2/2qˉpR2/2. It converges absolutely for Im⁡τ>0 and is invariant under τ↦τ+1 and τ↦−1/τ. The full local operator products are preserved by the radius duality r⟼(2r)−1,(m,n)⟼(n,m), with the cocycle phase (−1)mn and a sign reversal of all right-moving oscillator modes. The self-dual radius in this convention is r=1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: r>0, τ∈H, the compact-boson state space and cocycle, and countable choice.

[F1]

Compact free boson as a full local CFT fixes the state space, left/right weights, and full local field data, conditional on its stated analytic requirements.

[F2]

Charged rank-one Fock spaces carry a central-charge-one Virasoro action proves the charged oscillator weights p2/2+N and the central-charge-one Virasoro action.

[F3]

The compact-boson lattice is even, unimodular, and mutually local proves B(λr(q),λr(q′))=mn′+nm′, where λr(q)=(pL(q;r),pR(q;r)), integral spin, the cocycle identity, mutual locality, and the target-radius lattice isometry with phase χ(m,n)=(−1)mn.

[F4]

The rank-one Heisenberg vacuum space is a conformal VOA of central charge one gives one bosonic oscillator per positive integer mode, its nonnegative integral oscillator weights, and central charge 1.

[F5]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) is the axiom used by the imported Poisson and theta transformation suppliers.

[F6]

Poisson summation for Schwartz functions states countable-choice Poisson summation for Schwartz functions on Rd with the Fourier factor e−2πix⋅ξ.

[F7]

Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization gives F(e−πt∣x∣2)(ξ)=t−d/2e−π∣ξ∣2/t for real t>0 and countable choice.

[F8]

Transformation laws of the Jacobi theta function gives the Jacobi theta S-transformation and the shifted θ2,θ4 relation, under countable choice.

[F9]

Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant gives the locally normally convergent Jacobi product for Θ(z∣τ).

[A1]

Assume ACω as in [F5]. The imported Poisson and Jacobi transformations use this exact countable-choice strength; no stronger choice principle is used in this proof.

[A2]

Use the torus-trace convention Zr(τ,τˉ)=Tr⁡Hr(qL0−1/24qˉLˉ0−1/24), with qt=e2πiτt and qˉt=e−2πiτˉt for real t. The shift is part of the trace convention, as in Mnev–Reshetikhin, Section 6.1.5.2, equation (6.40), and is not a conclusion of [F4].

[L1]

Put Ar=((2r)−1r(2r)−1−r) and Cτ=ArT(−iτ00iτˉ)Ar=(τ2/(2r2)−iτ1−iτ12r2τ2), where τ=τ1+iτ2.

[L2]

For ∣q∣<1, define θ3(τ)=∑j∈Zqj2/2, θ4(τ)=∑j∈Z(−1)jqj2/2, and θ2(τ)=∑j∈Zq(j+1/2)2/2.

Proof

Given: r>0, τ∈H, and countable choice.

1.1A2F1F2F4L2algebra

Put ρ=∣q∣<1 and choose K so ∣q∣k≤12 for k≥K. For ∣w∣<1, the absolutely convergent series L(w)=−∑j≥1wj/j has L′(w)=−1/(1−w), so eL(w)/(1−w) has derivative 0 and value 1 at w=0; hence eL(w)=1−w. Also ∣L(w)∣≤∣w∣/(1−∣w∣), so ∑k≥K∣L(qk)∣≤2∑k≥Kρk<∞; the tail product is the nonzero exponential exp⁡(∑k≥KL(qk)), each earlier factor 1−qk is nonzero, and eπiτ/12≠0. The product defining η is locally uniformly convergent on H, since ∣q∣ is bounded by a constant less than 1 on each compact subset, and η(τ)≠0. In one chiral Fock sector, the oscillator at mode k≥1 has occupation number s∈Z≥0 and contributes ∑s≥0qks=(1−qk)−1. Multiplying the independent modes and the vacuum factor q−1/24 from [A2] gives q−1/24∏k≥1(1−qk)−1=η(τ)−1. The right-moving modes give ηˉ−1. Each charge sector contributes the zero-mode factor qpL2/2qˉpR2/2.

1.2A1F5F6L1givenalgebra

The zero-mode theta sum is Θr(τ)=∑x∈Z2e−πxTCτx by [L1]. The real part of Cτ is the positive diagonal matrix diag⁡(τ2/(2r2),2r2τ2), so x↦e−πxTCτx is a Schwartz function on R2. Applying [F6] at zero is therefore valid under the exact countable-choice assumption [F5].

1.3F9L2algebra

The product formulas from [F9] give θ3=∏k≥1(1−qk)(1+qk−1/2)2, θ4=∏k≥1(1−qk)(1−qk−1/2)2, and θ2=2q1/8∏k≥1(1−qk)(1+qk)2. Absolute convergence permits regrouping; ∏k≥1(1+qk)∏k≥1(1−q2k−1)=1 because ∏(1+qk)=∏(1−q2k)/∏(1−qk). Therefore θ2θ3θ4=2q1/8∏k≥1(1−qk)3=2η(τ)3.

1.4F1F2F3algebra

Put r′=(2r)−1, T(m,n)=(n,m) and χ(m,n)=(−1)mn. On the algebraic charge-q0 summand define Drf(x,xˉ)=χ(q0)f(x,−xˉ) in the charge-Tq0 summand at radius r′. Here f∈P⊗Pˉ is a polynomial and −xˉ replaces every xˉk by −xˉk. This preserves the monomial norms, and Dr′Dr=I, so it extends to a unitary map Hr→Hr′. Denote target operators by primes. Multiplication and differentiation give DrajDr−1=aj′ and DraˉjDr−1=−aˉj′ for j≠0; for j=0 the same identities follow from pL(Tq;r′)=pL(q;r) and pR(Tq;r′)=−pR(q;r). The identity χ(q+q0)ε(q,q0)=χ(q)χ(q0)ε(Tq,Tq0) gives DrUqDr−1=χ(q)UTq′. Substitution into the oscillator exponentials and zero-mode powers in the lattice definition therefore gives DrVq(z,zˉ)Dr−1=χ(q)VTq′(z,zˉ) on their declared radial branches. The same identities intertwine every finite Heisenberg descendant, so the convergent radial operator products in [F3] are preserved.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Since pL2+pR2=m2/(2r2)+2n2r2, the absolute value of each zero-mode summand is e−πτ2(pL2+pR2), a product of two convergent Gaussian series for every r,τ2>0. The oscillator products converge because ∑k≥1∣q∣k<∞. Thus the trace is absolutely convergent and equals the displayed expression.

2.2F1F3L2step 1.1algebra

The spin of a state with oscillator levels N,Nˉ is h−hˉ=12(pL2−pR2)+N−Nˉ=mn+N−Nˉ∈Z. Under τ↦τ+1, every summand therefore acquires phase e2πi(h−hˉ)=1. Directly from the product definition, η(τ+1)=eπi/12η(τ), whose modulus is unchanged. This proves T-invariance.

2.3F7F10F11step 1.2algebra

For d∈C with Re⁡d>0 and ξ∈R, let Gd(ξ)=∫Re−πdu2−2πiuξ du. For ∣h∣<Re⁡d/2, the difference quotient in d is dominated by πu2e−π(Re⁡d)u2/2, which is integrable by [F7]; dominated convergence [F10] makes Gd(ξ) holomorphic in d. The function d−1/2e−πξ2/d is holomorphic on the right half-plane using the principal logarithm [F11]. They agree for real d>0 by [F7], so the identity theorem [F11] gives Gd(ξ)=d−1/2e−πξ2/d throughout that half-plane.

2.4F5F8L2step 1.3algebra

The theta transformation [F8] gives θ3(−1/τ)=s(τ)θ3(τ) and θ4(−1/τ)=s(τ)θ2(τ), where s(τ)=−iτ is the branch positive at τ=i. Applying the second relation at −1/τ gives θ2(−1/τ)=s(τ)θ4(τ) because s(τ)s(−1/τ)=1. Thus η(−1/τ)3=s(τ)3η(τ)3. The ratio η(−1/τ)/(s(τ)η(τ)) is holomorphic, nonzero, and takes values in the three cube roots of 1, so it is constant on the connected upper half-plane; at τ=i it equals 1. Hence ∣η(−1/τ)∣2=∣τ∣∣η(τ)∣2. The transformations are used with the countable-choice hypothesis [F5].

3.1F6F10F11L1step 1.2step 2.3algebra

Change variables y=Arx in the Fourier integral of the function in step 1.2. The Jacobian has absolute value ∣det⁡Ar∣=1. The two factors are the one-dimensional transforms in step 2.3 with d1=−iτ′, d2=iτˉ′ and τ′=−1/τ. Their real parts are τ2/∣τ∣2>0, and d1d2=∣τ∣−2 with conjugate principal roots. Hence the Poisson prefactor is ∣τ∣. Matrix multiplication gives det⁡Cτ′=∣τ∣−2 and Cτ′−1=PCτP, where P=(0110). Since PZ2=Z2, [F6] yields Θr(−1/τ)=∣τ∣Θr(τ).

4.1step 1.1step 3.1step 2.4algebra

Combining steps 3.1 and 2.4, the zero-mode theta factor gains ∣τ∣ under S, while ∣η∣−2 gains ∣τ∣−1. The full Zr is therefore invariant under τ↦−1/τ.

5.1A2F1F2step 1.4algebra∎

The charge squares and oscillator levels in each chiral weight are unchanged by Dr. Consequently DrHr=Hr′Dr, so Dr also preserves the common-domain seminorms of [F1]. It fixes the vacuum and bijects the trace summands, including the shifts in [A2]. Finally r=(2r)−1 has the unique positive solution r=1/2.

Remarks

The Poisson and theta inputs use ACω exactly as stated in [F5]. No step uses full AC. The result is conditional on the mathematical compact-boson data and proves a torus trace identity; it does not use a formal path integral as a measure.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources