Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Parameterized regular-zero counting for a full-rank linear family

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let d≥1 and k≥d be integers and U⊂Rd open. Let A:U→GLd(R) and B:U→Mat⁡d×(k−d)(R) be C1. Write N=(a,b)∈Rd×Rk−d and define F(z,N)=A(z)a+B(z)b,a0(z,b)=−A(z)−1B(z)b,Ψ(z,b)=(a0(z,b),b). If k=d, interpret R0 as a one-point measure space of mass one. A root is regular when the derivative DzF(z,N):Rd→Rd, holding N fixed, is invertible. For a bounded nonnegative Borel function φ:U×Rk→[0,∞) define Cφ(N)=∑z∈U:F(z,N)=0det⁡DzF(z,N)≠0φ(z,N), where the nonnegative sum over the discrete regular root set may be infinite. This is a Borel function. Outside a Lebesgue-null parameter set every root is regular. For every bounded nonnegative Borel w:Rk→[0,∞) one has, with both sides allowed to be infinite, ∫Rkw(N)Cφ(N) dN=∫Udz∫Rk−ddb w(Ψ(z,b))φ(z,Ψ(z,b))∣det⁡DzF(z,Ψ(z,b))∣∣det⁡A(z)∣. The right side is the precise meaning of integrating w(N)φ(z,N)∣det⁡DzF(z,N)∣δ0(d)(F(z,N)) first in N and then in z. It is invariant under the choice of an invertible parameter minor. Local versions glue by a countable Borel partition of the base subordinate to the chosen open cover, using the partition indicators as weights. Consequently the same regularity, measurability and identity hold locally for any C1 linear family F(z,N)=C(z)N whose parameter matrix C(z) has rank d, by choosing invertible minors on a countable open cover. After restricting the roots to any Lebesgue-measurable subset S⊆U, the restricted count is Lebesgue measurable and satisfies the same identity with 1S(z) on the right; regularity refers to the derivative on the ambient open U. No interchange of an approximate-delta limit with a parameter integral and no domination hypothesis is part of this assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The dimensions, open set, C1 matrices, bounded nonnegative Borel weights and conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps gives a null critical-value set for a Cr map from an open subset of Rs to Rt when r>max⁡(s−t,0); in particular it applies to C1 maps between equal-dimensional Euclidean open sets.

[F2]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem gives a local C1 diffeomorphism at every invertible derivative. A C1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions gives the nonnegative change-of-variables identity on such a diffeomorphism under countable choice.

[F3]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product gives nonnegative integration and countable summation on sigma-finite products. Euclidean Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite by Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure.

[F4]

A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets makes compositions with continuous maps Borel; applying it to a homeomorphism's inverse also shows that the homeomorphism sends Borel sets to Borel sets. Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume makes subsets of Lebesgue-null sets measurable.

[F5]

Q is countably infinite gives countability of rational centers and radii, and The rationals embed densely in the reals gives rational density. Coordinatewise rational approximation therefore makes their Euclidean balls a countable basis: for x∈B(x,r) choose a rational center q sufficiently close to x and a positive rational radius s with ∣x−q∣<s<r−∣x−q∣, so x∈B(q,s)⊂B(x,r). The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) is the choice hypothesis of the measure suppliers; the cube-cover null sets in [F1] are Lebesgue-null by A subset of Rm has Lebesgue outer measure zero if and only if it is null in the sense of countable closed-cube covers, and countable unions are null by countable subadditivity of Lebesgue measure.

[F6]

L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets gives, for every Lebesgue-measurable S⊂U, Borel S0,Z⊂U with S△S0⊂Z and Z null. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral gives monotonicity, while The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions identifies the integral of an indicator with the measure of its set.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Matrix inversion is C1 on invertible matrices by its adjugate-over-determinant formula, so a0 and Ψ are C1. The entire incidence set is the graph (z,N)=(z,Ψ(z,b)): solving F=0 is exactly solving a=a0(z,b). Differentiating F(z,Ψ(z,b))=0 in z, with b fixed, gives A(z)Dza0=−DzF(z,Ψ(z,b)). Thus DΨ=(−A−1DzFDba00Ik−d),∣det⁡DΨ∣=∣det⁡A∣−1∣det⁡DzF∣. In particular an incidence point is critical for Ψ exactly when its root is not regular.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The open domain U×Rk−d has dimension k, equal to the target dimension of Ψ. By [F1], its critical-value set E is Lebesgue null. If N∉E, no root can be irregular by step 1.1. This proves almost-everywhere regularity, including all roots in a noncompact U, not just a finite preselected root set.

2.2F2F4F5step 1.1construct

Let R be the open regular locus of Ψ. Every point of R lies in a rational open ball contained in a local inverse domain from [F2]. Take all rational balls on which Ψ is injective with invertible derivative; they form a countable cover (Vj) of R by [F5]. On each Vj, local inverses agree by injectivity, so Ψ∣Vj is a C1 diffeomorphism onto its open image. Put Ej=Vj∖⋃i<jVi. These are disjoint Borel sets covering R; their images under the corresponding diffeomorphisms are Borel by [F4]. No images of arbitrary noninjective Borel maps are asserted to be Borel.

3.1F4F5step 2.1step 2.2algebra

Write Ψj−1 for the inverse on Ψ(Vj). The regular preimages of each N are discrete, hence countable: each has a basis ball containing no other preimage and the first such rational ball gives an injection into a countable basis. Each regular root corresponds to exactly one point of R, which belongs to exactly one Ej. Therefore Cφ(N) is the sum over j of the Borel functions equal to φ(z,N) at (z,b)=Ψj−1(N) for N∈Ψ(Ej) and zero elsewhere. This proves its Borel measurability. By step 2.1 it counts all roots for N∉E; any alternative extension on E is Lebesgue measurable by [F4].

4.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

Apply [F2] on Vj to the nonnegative Borel function obtained from w(N)φ(z(Ψj−1N),N) and the indicator of Ψ(Ej). It gives ∫Ψ(Ej)w(N)φ(z(Ψj−1N),N) dN=∫Ejw(Ψ(z,b))φ(z,Ψ(z,b))∣det⁡DΨ(z,b)∣ dz db. Sum over j by [F3]. Step 3.1 identifies the left side with ∫wCφ. The right side is the integral on R; adding its critical complement changes nothing because ∣det⁡DΨ∣=0 there and the other factors are finite. Substitute step 1.1 and use Tonelli [F3] for the nonnegative integrand to obtain exactly the displayed identity. All these are equalities of nonnegative integrals, so no finiteness assumption or limit-interchange theorem is needed.

5.1F2step 4.1algebra

For fixed z, the affine linear map (a,b)↦(y,b)=(A(z)a+B(z)b,b) is invertible with real determinant det⁡A(z). Its change-of-variables formula gives dN=∣det⁡A(z)∣−1dy db. Taking the ordinary Dirac point mass at y=0 produces the inner integral of the Statement. For a second minor, write its full coordinates as (y,b′). The transition from (y,b) has block matrix (I0CD); its absolute determinant is ∣det⁡D∣=∣det⁡A′∣/∣det⁡A∣, since the two full coordinate maps have absolute determinants ∣det⁡A′∣ and ∣det⁡A∣. On y=0 this gives db′/∣det⁡A′∣=db/∣det⁡A∣. Thus the two weighted fibre integrals agree exactly. Thus this delta notation is a well-defined parameter-fibre measure, rather than an unjustified limit under the outer integral.

6.1F3F5step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1algebra

For a rank-d C1 matrix C(z), the sets where a specified d-column minor is nonzero are open and cover U. Refine them by rational coordinate balls; this is a countable cover by [F5], with an invertible fixed minor on each member. The preceding construction applies on each member. Enumerate this open cover as (Oj) and use the disjoint Borel pieces Sj=Oj∖⋃i<jOi. The indicators χj=1Sj are bounded Borel weights and sum to one; no smooth-partition theorem is required. On each open Oj, replace φ by χjφ. Every root receives total weight ∑jχj=1; [F3] sums both sides exactly. The exceptional parameter sets have null union by [F5]. The minor independence in step 5.1 gives the same fibre integral on overlaps. Hence the local identities glue and prove all remaining assertions.

7.1F3F4F5F6step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1algebra∎

For a Lebesgue-measurable S⊂U, choose S0,Z as in [F6]. Apply the already proved Borel identity to φ(z,N)=1Z(z) and w=1. Its right side is zero by Tonelli [F3], because the outer z-support is null; the Jacobian and all other factors are finite at each (z,b), and an infinite inner integral on that null set also has zero outer integral. Thus ∫C1Z(N) dN=0. For every integer j≥1, monotonicity and the indicator formula [F6] give j−1λk({C1Z≥j−1})≤∫C1Z=0. Their countable union is {C1Z>0}, so it is null. Outside this null parameter set there is no regular root in Z, and the root counts restricted to S and S0 agree for every bounded Borel weight. The S0 count is Borel by step 3.1, and completeness in [F4] makes the S count Lebesgue measurable. Their weighted parameter integrals agree; their right-hand integrals also agree, since 1S−1S0 is supported on the null set Z and Tonelli applies to the two nonnegative integrands separately. With the exceptional set from step 2.1 removed as well, this proves the claimed completed-measure extension for all roots and finishes the proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources