Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth graph section with a genuine end has a compact inside core

Statement

Assume the preceding radius and collar data, with S a connected two-sphere. For each R>1, let BR=S∪G({1<∣x∣≤R}). Then BR is compact in Σ and contains a neighborhood of S. Its boundary away from S is exactly the compact sphere G({∣x∣=R}). For sufficiently small η>0, BR∩{ρ≥η} is compact in Σ∘, where ρ is distance to S.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Use the preceding connected smooth Riemannian manifold with compact boundary, interior graph diffeomorphism G, radius r(G(x))=∣x∣, and bounded far-end ∣dr∣h. Its radius is bounded on every fixed compact smooth collar without any boundary extension of the graph map. The radius of a graph section is bounded on a compact boundary collar

[F3]

Work in ZFC, as in the preceding collar data; in particular ACω holds by applying choice to a countable family. A smooth collar is an embedding c:S×[0,b)→Σ with c(s,0)=s and open image. Under countable choice the collar theorem supplies such a collar. math:def-axiom-of-choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω) Smooth collars of a manifold boundary Collar neighborhood theorem

[F5]

The length-defined Riemannian distance dh induces the manifold topology, also at the boundary. Set ρ(p)=dh(p,S)=inf⁡s∈Sdh(p,s). Since Σ is connected and S is nonempty, this function is finite and 1-Lipschitz, hence continuous, and it vanishes on S. Riemannian distance on a connected manifold The riemannian distance topology is the manifold topology Distance from a point to a subset Distance to a nonempty subset is one lipschitz

[F6]

A Riemannian metric is a smooth positive-definite tensor, with smoothness up to the boundary here. A diffeomorphism and its inverse are smooth and continuous. For a smooth real-valued function, drp(v)=v([r]); the inherited bound on ∣dr∣h uses this differential and the metric. Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds The differential of a smooth real-valued function

[F7]

Connected means admitting no separation into two nonempty relatively open pieces. A path is a continuous map from [0,1] with the specified endpoints; path-connected spaces are connected. The unit two-sphere is path connected. A component through a point is the largest connected subset containing that point. Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets Paths, path-connected spaces and path components For n≥2, the sphere Sⁿ⁻¹ is path-connected and connected Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces

[F9]

The manifold boundary is S=∂Σ, defined by zero last coordinate in boundary charts; Σ∘=Σ∖S is the manifold interior. These are distinct from the boundary of a subset A in an ambient metric space X, which is ∂XA=A‾ X∖int⁡XA: every neighborhood of a boundary point meets both A and X∖A. For subset boundaries in the proof use the indicated ambient space with its restricted Riemannian metric; [F5] identifies that metric topology with the manifold subspace topology. Interior and boundary of a manifold with boundary Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement, with the inherited ZFC convention in [F3].

Goal: Establish the stated conclusion.

1.1givenF1F2F3F4F5F6F7F9

By [F3], take a smooth collar c:S×[0,b)→Σ and restrict to 0<a<b. Identify W=c(S×[0,a]), U=c(S×(0,a)), and Γ=c(S×{a}) with their collar coordinates. The model S2×[0,a]⊂R4 is closed and bounded, so [F4] and the smooth two-sphere parameterization of S make W and Γ compact by [F2]. In particular W is closed in Σ. By [F1] and [F6], the continuous map G−1 sends Γ to a nonempty compact set; its radius has minimum m>1 and finite maximum by [F4]. Inside Σ∘∖Γ, U is open and closed, since its only boundary in Σ∘ is Γ. For any s0,s1∈S, transfer a sphere path from [F7] through a smooth identification S2≅S, obtaining a path α from s0 to s1. For u0,u1∈(0,a), the continuous path t↦c(α(t),(1−t)u0+tu1) stays in U and joins the corresponding collar points. Composing with G−1 proves that H=G−1(U) is path connected and hence connected by [F7]; it is nonempty and clopen in X={r>1}∖G−1(Γ). Any connected subset of X meeting H cannot also meet X∖H, since its intersections with these two open sets would be a separation. Consequently the component of any point of H contains H by maximality and cannot leave H, so equals H. Thus G−1(U) is a component of X.

2.1F1F3F4F5F6F7F9step 1.1

Fix s∈S and let uj↓0. The points c(s,uj) converge to s in Σ. Their inverse graph coordinates cannot have a subsequence confined to a closed annulus 1+ϵ≤r≤M: this annulus is closed bounded and hence compact by [F4], and the bounded-sequence assertion in [F4] gives a further convergent subsequence with limit in that annulus. By [F6], continuity of G would give its image a limit in Σ∘, contradicting uniqueness of limits in the Riemannian metric topology and the boundary limit s. The radii are bounded above by [F1], so they tend to one: otherwise a subsequence would lie in such an annulus. The inner tail {1<r<m} is path connected: write two points as r0ω0 and r1ω1, choose a unit-sphere path β between ω0 and ω1 by [F7], and use the continuous path t↦((1−t)r0+tr1)β(t), whose radius remains in (1,m). It is connected by [F7], is disjoint from G−1(Γ), and intersects G−1(U) because the preceding collar sequence has radii tending to one. The clopen separation argument of step 1.1 forces the entire tail to lie in G−1(U).

3.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F8F9step 1.1step 2.1

Choose 0<ϵ<min⁡(m−1,R−1). Step 2.1 gives G({1<r<1+ϵ})⊂U. Hence BR is contained in W∪G({1+ϵ≤r≤R}), a compact set: the annulus is closed bounded in R3 by [F4], its image is compact by [F2], and [F8] gives a finite subfamily of any ambient open cover covering each compact piece. Combining these two finite subfamilies covers their union, which is compact by the converse in [F8]. The complement of BR is G({r>R}), an open subset of the open interior, so BR is closed in Σ and is compact by [F2]. It contains a neighborhood of S. Indeed, otherwise choose collar points c(sj,uj) outside BR with 0<uj≤a/(j+1). Their inverse radii exceed R and are uniformly bounded by [F1]. By [F4], the inverse points have a subsequence converging in a closed annulus R≤r≤M. Also, using the smooth identification S≅S2 and [F4], pass to a further subsequence with sj→s∈S. Collar continuity gives c(sj,uj)→s, whereas graph continuity by [F6] gives an interior limit, the same contradiction as in step 2.1. The countable selections here are permitted by [F3].

4.1F1F2F4F5F6F8F9step 3.1∎

Away from S, the diffeomorphism G from [F6] identifies the relative boundary of BR with r=R, whose sphere is closed bounded in R3 and therefore has compact image by [F4] and [F2]. By [F5], ρ is continuous, so BR∩{ρ≥η} is closed in compact BR. For every η>0 it avoids S, because ρ=0 on S. By [F8], its compactness therefore also holds in the interior subspace topology, which agrees with the Riemannian distance topology. In particular the stated conclusion holds for sufficiently small positive η.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.