Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

8 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 8 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Finite Abelian Groups: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The cyclic group of order six in elementary-divisor and invariant-factor forms

Example

The Chinese remainder isomorphism gives C6C2×C3.C_6\cong C_2\times C_3. Thus the elementary divisors are 22 and 33, while the invariant-factor list is the single entry 66.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L2]

For every finite abelian group GG there is a unique list 1<n1nr1<n_1\mid\cdots\mid n_r such that GCn1××CnrG\cong C_{n_1}\times\cdots\times C_{n_r}. Moreover G=n1nr|G|=n_1\cdots n_r. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

[L3]

Let n0,,nr1n_0,\ldots,n_{r-1} be a finite pairwise-coprime list of positive integers and let N:=i<rniN:=\prod_{i<r}n_i. The map Φ:Z/Ni<rZ/ni,[x]N([x]ni)i<r,\Phi:\mathbb Z/N\longrightarrow\prod_{i<r}\mathbb Z/n_i,\qquad[x]_N\longmapsto([x]_{n_i})_{i<r}, is a bijection. It preserves addition, multiplication, [0][0], and [1][1] componentwise. For the empty list, N=1N=1 and both sides have one element. (Chinese remainder theorem for a finite pairwise-coprime list: simultaneous residues determine one class modulo the product, and the resulting bijection preserves addition and multiplication).

[L4]

For every nNn\in\mathbb N, view nn as its canonical nonnegative integer and put nZ:={nk:kZ}n\mathbb Z:=\{nk:k\in\mathbb Z\}. Then the left cosets of nZn\mathbb Z in (Z,+)(\mathbb Z,+) are exactly the congruence classes modulo nn, and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus (Z,+)/nZ=(Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z=(\mathbb Z/n,+) as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes n=0n=0 and n=1n=1. (For every nNn\in\mathbb N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The residue map [x]6([x]2,[x]3)[x]_6\mapsto([x]_2,[x]_3) is an isomorphism by the Chinese remainder theorem.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

The factors C2,C3C_2,C_3 have prime-power orders, so {2,3}\{2,3\} is the elementary-divisor multiset; regrouping the coprime factors gives the invariant factor 66.

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The five abelian groups of order sixteen

Example

The abelian groups of order 1616 are, up to isomorphism, C16,C8×C2,C4×C4,C4×C2×C2,C24.C_{16},\quad C_8\times C_2,\quad C_4\times C_4,\quad C_4\times C_2\times C_2,\quad C_2^4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

For a prime pp and n>0n>0, isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order pnp^n are in bijection with partitions of nn. For n=0n=0, the unique group is the trivial group and corresponds separately to the empty partition. (Isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order p^n are counted by partitions of n).

[L2]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L3]

For n>0n>0, a partition of nn is a finite nondecreasing list of positive integers (e1,,er)(e_1,\ldots,e_r) with e1++er=ne_1+\cdots+e_r=n, using finite natural sums as in def-nat-finite-sum-and-product and naturals as in def-natural-numbers. Equality is equality of these lists. The nondecreasing convention removes permutations from the data. (Partitions of a positive integer).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The partitions of 44 are 44, 3+13+1, 2+22+2, 2+1+12+1+1, and 1+1+1+11+1+1+1.

givenL1L2L3
2.1

Replacing each part ee by C2eC_{2^e} gives the displayed groups. The partition bijection makes the list exhaustive and prevents repetitions.

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Successive p-multiple layers recover the summands of C_p^2 times C_{p^3} times C_{p^4}^2

Example

For G=Cp2×Cp3×Cp42,G=C_p^2\times C_{p^3}\times C_{p^4}^2, the dimensions did_i defined by piG/pi+1G=pdi|p^iG/p^{i+1}G|=p^{d_i} are 5,3,3,2,0.5,3,3,2,0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Suppose Gj<rCpejG\cong\prod_{j<r}C_{p^{e_j}} with ej1e_j\ge1, and in additive notation write piG={pig:gG}p^iG=\{p^ig:g\in G\}. Define did_i by piG/pi+1G=pdi|p^iG/p^{i+1}G|=p^{d_i}. Then di={j:eji+1}.d_i=|\{j:e_j\ge i+1\}|. Consequently, for every k1k\ge1, the number of summands of order pkp^k is dk1dkd_{k-1}-d_k, so the elementary divisors are intrinsic. (The successive quotients p^iG/p^{i+1}G recover the cyclic summand multiplicities of a finite abelian p-group).

[L2]

If GG and HH are finite groups, then their external direct product is finite and has order G×H=GH|G\times H|=|G|\,|H|. (For finite groups GG and HH, G×H=GH|G\times H|=|G|\,|H|).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

At layers i=0,1,2,3,4i=0,1,2,3,4, the numbers of exponents among 1,1,3,4,41,1,3,4,4 that exceed ii are respectively 5,3,3,2,05,3,3,2,0.

givenL1L2
2.1

The differences d0d1=2d_0-d_1=2, d1d2=0d_1-d_2=0, d2d3=1d_2-d_3=1, and d3d4=2d_3-d_4=2 recover two CpC_p factors, no Cp2C_{p^2} factor, one Cp3C_{p^3} factor, and two Cp4C_{p^4} factors.

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The six abelian groups of order 360 in both classification forms

Example

Since 360=23325360=2^3\cdot3^2\cdot5, there are six abelian groups of order 360360. Their elementary-divisor forms are obtained by choosing one of C8C_8, C4×C2C_4\times C_2, C23C_2^3 and one of C9C_9, C32C_3^2, together with C5C_5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L2]

For every finite abelian group GG there is a unique list 1<n1nr1<n_1\mid\cdots\mid n_r such that GCn1××CnrG\cong C_{n_1}\times\cdots\times C_{n_r}. Moreover G=n1nr|G|=n_1\cdots n_r. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

[L3]

Let n1n\ge1, and write its canonical prime factorisation as n=i<rpiain=\prod_{i<r}p_i^{a_i}, with the pip_i distinct and ai>0a_i>0. Then the number of isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order nn is i<rP(ai),\prod_{i<r}P(a_i), where P(a)P(a) is the number of partitions of aa. For n=1n=1 one has r=0r=0, so the empty product is 11. (The number of finite abelian groups of order n is the product of the partition numbers of the prime exponents of n).

[L4]

Powers are the natural powers of def-group-power and finite products those of def-monoid-finite-product, both taken in the commutative monoid (Z,,1)(\mathbb{Z},\cdot,1) of lem-units-of-z. Call p:rZp : r \to \mathbb{Z} an injective list of primes when every pip_i is prime (def-prime) and pi=pjp_i = p_j forces i=ji = j (def-injection-surjection-bijection). Let nZn \in \mathbb{Z} with n1n \ge 1 and let p:rZp : r \to \mathbb{Z} be an injective list of primes such that every prime divisor of nn equals pip_i for some i<ri < r. Then, with vqv_q as in def-p-adic-valuation: 1. n  =  i<rpivpi(n)\displaystyle n \;=\; \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,v_{p_i}(n)}; 2. vq(n)=0v_q(n) = 0 for every prime qq that is not among p0,,pr1p_0,\dots,p_{r-1}; 3. the exponents are determined by nn: if e:rNe : r \to \mathbb{N} and n=i<rpiein = \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,e_i}, then ej=vpj(n)e_j = v_{p_j}(n) for every j<rj < r. Clause 3 needs only injectivity of the list, not the covering hypothesis. (For n1n \ge 1 and any injective list p:rZp : r \to \mathbb{Z} of primes containing every prime divisor of nn, one has n=i<rpivpi(n)n = \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,v_{p_i}(n)}; the exponents are determined by nn, and vq(n)=0v_q(n) = 0 for every prime qq outside the list).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The prime exponents are 3,2,13,2,1, whose partition counts are 3,2,13,2,1; their product is 66.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

The six elementary forms are (C8,C9,C5)(C_8,C_9,C_5), (C8,C3,C3,C5)(C_8,C_3,C_3,C_5), (C4,C2,C9,C5)(C_4,C_2,C_9,C_5), (C4,C2,C3,C3,C5)(C_4,C_2,C_3,C_3,C_5), (C2,C2,C2,C9,C5)(C_2,C_2,C_2,C_9,C_5), and (C2,C2,C2,C3,C3,C5)(C_2,C_2,C_2,C_3,C_3,C_5).

step 1.1
3.1

Columnwise regrouping gives invariant-factor lists (360)(360), (3,120)(3,120), (2,180)(2,180), (6,60)(6,60), (2,2,90)(2,2,90), and (2,6,30)(2,6,30), respectively.

step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Complements of a maximal cyclic subgroup in C_p times C_p need not be unique

Example

In Cp×CpC_p\times C_p, fix A=Cp×{0}A=C_p\times\{0\}. For every tCpt\in C_p, the subgroup Bt={(tx,x):xCp}B_t=\{(tx,x):x\in C_p\} is a complement of AA, and distinct tt give distinct complements.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Let GG be a finite abelian pp-group and let aGa\in G have maximal element order. Then there is a subgroup HGH\le G such that G=aH.G=\langle a\rangle\oplus H. (A maximal-order cyclic subgroup splits off a finite abelian p-group).

[L2]

Let GG be a group and let N0,,Nr1N_0,\ldots,N_{r-1} be normal subgroups, where rNr\in\mathbb N. They form an internal direct product when they generate GG and, for each i<ri<r, NiNj:j<r, ji={e}.N_i\cap\langle N_j:j<r,\ j\ne i\rangle=\{e\}. The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says G=HKG=HK and HK={e}H\cap K=\{e\}; in additive notation one writes G=HKG=H\oplus K. Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).

[L3]

Let N0,,Nr1GN_0,\ldots,N_{r-1}\trianglelefteq G. The following are equivalent: the NiN_i form an internal direct product of GG; every gGg\in G has a unique expression g=n0nr1g=n_0\cdots n_{r-1} with niNin_i\in N_i; and the multiplication map μ:i<rNiG\mu:\prod_{i<r}N_i\to G is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).

[L4]

For every nNn\in\mathbb N, view nn as its canonical nonnegative integer and put nZ:={nk:kZ}n\mathbb Z:=\{nk:k\in\mathbb Z\}. Then the left cosets of nZn\mathbb Z in (Z,+)(\mathbb Z,+) are exactly the congruence classes modulo nn, and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus (Z,+)/nZ=(Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z=(\mathbb Z/n,+) as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes n=0n=0 and n=1n=1. (For every nNn\in\mathbb N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each BtB_t is an order-pp subgroup, and ABt={(0,0)}A\cap B_t=\{(0,0)\} because (tx,x)A(tx,x)\in A forces x=0x=0.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

For (u,v)Cp2(u,v)\in C_p^2, one has (u,v)=(utv,0)+(tv,v)(u,v)=(u-tv,0)+(tv,v) with the summands in AA and BtB_t, so A+Bt=GA+B_t=G.

step 1.1
3.1

Internal-product recognition gives G=ABtG=A\oplus B_t. Since (t,1)Bt(t,1)\in B_t distinguishes the slope, the complement promised by the splitting theorem need not be unique.

step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The unit group modulo one hundred is isomorphic to C_20 times C_2

Example

In the unit group U(100)U(100), the class of 33 has order 2020 and the class of 1-1 has order 22. Their subgroups form an internal direct product, so U(100)C20×C2,U(100)\cong C_{20}\times C_2, with invariant factors 2202\mid20.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Let n1n\ge1 be an integer. Multiplication makes Z/n\mathbb Z/n a commutative monoid with identity [1]n[1]_n by thm-integers-modulo-n-basic-algebra. A class uZ/nu\in\mathbb Z/n is a unit when it is invertible in that monoid (def-invertible-element). The set of all units is (Z/n)×:={uZ/n:some vZ/n satisfies uv=[1]n}.(\mathbb Z/n)^\times:=\{\,u\in\mathbb Z/n:\text{some }v\in\mathbb Z/n\text{ satisfies }uv=[1]_n\,\}. By lem-monoid-units-form-a-group, multiplication restricts to a group operation on (Z/n)×(\mathbb Z/n)^\times, called the unit group modulo nn. The quotient Z/n\mathbb Z/n is finite with cardinality nn by thm-standard-representatives-modulo-n, and its unit set is a finite subset by thm-subset-of-a-finite-set. Euler's totient function is therefore defined for every positive integer nn by φ(n):=(Z/n)×N\varphi(n):=\big|(\mathbb Z/n)^\times\big|\in\mathbb N (def-finite-cardinality). For n=1n=1, the quotient has one element, which is its multiplicative identity and hence a unit, so φ(1)=1\varphi(1)=1 follows from the definition. (The unit group (Z/n)×(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times and Euler's totient φ(n)=(Z/n)×\varphi(n)=\lvert(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times\rvert for n1n\ge1).

[L2]

Let GG be a group and let N0,,Nr1N_0,\ldots,N_{r-1} be normal subgroups, where rNr\in\mathbb N. They form an internal direct product when they generate GG and, for each i<ri<r, NiNj:j<r, ji={e}.N_i\cap\langle N_j:j<r,\ j\ne i\rangle=\{e\}. The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says G=HKG=HK and HK={e}H\cap K=\{e\}; in additive notation one writes G=HKG=H\oplus K. Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).

[L3]

Let N0,,Nr1GN_0,\ldots,N_{r-1}\trianglelefteq G. The following are equivalent: the NiN_i form an internal direct product of GG; every gGg\in G has a unique expression g=n0nr1g=n_0\cdots n_{r-1} with niNin_i\in N_i; and the multiplication map μ:i<rNiG\mu:\prod_{i<r}N_i\to G is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).

[L4]

For every finite abelian group GG there is a unique list 1<n1nr1<n_1\mid\cdots\mid n_r such that GCn1××CnrG\cong C_{n_1}\times\cdots\times C_{n_r}. Moreover G=n1nr|G|=n_1\cdots n_r. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Successive powers of 33 modulo 100100 are 3,9,27,81,43,29,87,61,83,49,47,41,23,69,7,21,63,89,67,1.3,9,27,81,43,29,87,61,83,49,47,41,23,69,7,21,63,89,67,1. Thus the first positive exponent giving 11 is 2020, so ord(3)=20\operatorname{ord}(3)=20.

givenL1
2.1

The class of 1-1, represented by 9999, has order 22. The list in step 1.1 contains all 2020 elements of 3\langle3\rangle and does not contain 9999, so 13-1\notin\langle3\rangle. Hence the two cyclic subgroups intersect trivially.

step 1.1
3.1

Trivial intersection makes the 202=4020\cdot2=40 products distinct. A unit representative modulo 100100 is divisible by neither 22 nor 55, since a multiple of either prime cannot have a product congruent to 11 modulo 100100. Among 0,,990,\ldots,99, inclusion-exclusion leaves 1005020+10=40100-50-20+10=40 representatives divisible by neither. Thus U(100)U(100) has at most 4040 elements, so the displayed products exhaust it. The two subgroups therefore form an internal direct product; recognition gives the isomorphism, and 2202\mid20 gives the invariant-factor order.

step 2.1L1L2L3L4
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The additive rationals do not decompose as a product of finite cyclic prime-power groups

Statement refuted

The additive group (Q,+)(\mathbb Q,+) is abelian but is not a direct product of finite cyclic groups of prime-power order. This refutes the finite structure theorem after its finiteness hypothesis is deleted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.

[L1]

On the set of pairs (a,b)(a,b) with a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z} and b0b \ne 0, define (a,b)(c,d)    ad=cbin Z.(a,b) \sim (c,d) \iff ad = cb \quad \text{in } \mathbb{Z}. This is an equivalence relation (lem-rat-equivalence). The rationals are the quotient Q\mathbb{Q}, and [(a,b)][(a,b)] is written a/ba/b. (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

[L2]

Natural exponents, in a monoid. Let (M,,e)(M,\cdot,e) be a monoid (def-semigroup-and-monoid) and gMg \in M. By the recursion theorem (thm-recursion), applied with the set MM, the element ee and the function xxgx \mapsto x \cdot g from MM to MM, there is exactly one function NM\mathbb{N} \to M, written ngnn \mapsto g^{n}, with g0=e,gσ(n)=gng(nN).g^{0} = e, \qquad g^{\sigma(n)} = g^{n} \cdot g \quad (n \in \mathbb{N}). In particular g0=eg^{0} = e for every gg, including g=eg = e, and g1=gσ(0)=eg=gg^{1} = g^{\sigma(0)} = e \cdot g = g. Since N\mathbb{N} contains 00 (def-natural-numbers), the exponent 00 is a genuine value of the definition and not a separate convention. Integer exponents, in a group. Let GG be a group (def-group) and gGg \in G. Write ι:NZ\iota : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z} for the embedding k=[(k,0)]k = [(k,0)] of lem-nat-embeds-int, which is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and has as image exactly the nonnegative integers. For xZx \in \mathbb{Z} define - gx:=gkg^{x} := g^{k}, the natural power, when 0x0 \le x and x=kx = k; - gx:=(gk)1g^{x} := (g^{k})^{-1} when x<0x < 0 and x=k-x = k. Why this is well defined. The order on Z\mathbb{Z} is total and antisymmetric (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-order), so exactly one of 0x0 \le x and x<0x < 0 holds and the two clauses never both apply. In the first clause xx is nonnegative, so x=kx = k for some kNk \in \mathbb{N}, and kk is unique because ι\iota is injective. In the second clause x<0x < 0 gives 0=x+(x)<0+(x)=x0 = x + (-x) < 0 + (-x) = -x by compatibility of the order with addition (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-operations), so x-x is a positive integer and again x=k-x = k for a unique kk. The inverse (gk)1(g^{k})^{-1} is a single determined element by lem-inverse-unique and def-invertible-element. Finally the two readings of gkg^{k}, as a natural power and as an integer power, agree by construction, so no ambiguity is introduced. Abbreviation. In an exponent we write kk for the integer kk when a natural number kk is used where an integer is expected; this is unambiguous because ι\iota is injective and preserves the arithmetic and the order, and because the two readings of gkg^{k} agree as just noted. Additive notation. When the group is written additively the same object is written ngn g or ngn \cdot g rather than gng^{n}, with 0g=00 g = 0 and σ(n)g=ng+g\sigma(n) g = n g + g; the definitions are identical, only the symbols differ. (Powers gng^{n}: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=eg^{0} = e).

[L3]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

If qQq\in\mathbb Q is nonzero and n>0n>0, then nq0nq\ne0, so (Q,+)(\mathbb Q,+) is nontrivial and torsion-free.

givenL1L2L3
2.1

Any nontrivial product of nontrivial finite cyclic prime-power groups contains a nonzero element of finite order, obtained from a generator in one factor and identities elsewhere.

step 1.1
3.1

Therefore no such product is isomorphic to (Q,+)(\mathbb Q,+), while the finite theorem makes no claim about this infinite group.

step 2.1
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

FALSE: every finite group is a direct product of cyclic prime-power groups

Statement

False claim: every finite group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let XX be a set. A permutation of XX is a bijection f:XXf : X \to X (def-injection-surjection-bijection). The symmetric group of XX is the set of all permutations of XX, Sym(X)  :=  {f:XX  :  f is a bijection},\operatorname{Sym}(X) \;:=\; \{\, f : X \to X \;:\; f \text{ is a bijection} \,\}, equipped with composition as its operation, (fg)(x)  =  f(g(x))(xX),(f \circ g)(x) \;=\; f(g(x)) \qquad (x \in X), and with the identity map idX\mathrm{id}_X, given by idX(x)=x\mathrm{id}_X(x) = x, as distinguished element. Composition of two bijections of XX is again a bijection of XX (def-injection-surjection-bijection), so Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) is closed under \circ and \circ is a binary operation on it (def-binary-operation); and idX\mathrm{id}_X is a bijection of XX, so it is an element of Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X), and it is a two-sided identity for composition (def-identity-element) because fidX=f=idXff \circ \mathrm{id}_X = f = \mathrm{id}_X \circ f holds pointwise for every ff. That (Sym(X),,idX)(\operatorname{Sym}(X), \circ, \mathrm{id}_X) is a group is lem-symmetric-group-is-a-group. Cycle notation for a finite list of distinct points. For distinct elements x0,x1,,xk1x_0, x_1, \dots, x_{k-1} of XX with k2k \ge 2, the symbol (x0x1xk1)(x_0\,x_1\,\cdots\,x_{k-1}) denotes the permutation sending xix_i to xi+1x_{i+1} for i<k1i < k-1, sending xk1x_{k-1} to x0x_0, and fixing every element of XX outside {x0,,xk1}\{x_0,\dots,x_{k-1}\}. It is a bijection, because the map described sends the set {x0,,xk1}\{x_0,\dots,x_{k-1}\} onto itself by a rule with an evident inverse (send each xi+1x_{i+1} back to xix_i and x0x_0 back to xk1x_{k-1}) and fixes the complement pointwise. A transposition is such a symbol with k=2k = 2, that is (ab)(a\,b) with aba \ne b: it exchanges aa and bb and fixes everything else, and it satisfies (ab)(ab)=idX(a\,b) \circ (a\,b) = \mathrm{id}_X. A product of cycle symbols means their composite, so (ab)(cd)(a\,b)(c\,d) is (ab)(cd)(a\,b) \circ (c\,d). (The symmetric group Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X): the bijections of a set XX under composition).

[L2]

For every set XX, the triple (Sym(X),,idX)(\operatorname{Sym}(X), \circ, \mathrm{id}_X) of def-symmetric-group is a group (def-group); the inverse of a permutation ff is its inverse function f1f^{-1}. If XX contains three distinct elements aa, bb, cc, then Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) is not abelian: the transpositions τ=(ab)\tau = (a\,b) and ρ=(bc)\rho = (b\,c) satisfy τρρτ\tau \circ \rho \ne \rho \circ \tau. (Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever XX has at least three distinct elements).

[L3]

Let AA be a finite set with n:=An := \lvert A\rvert and write Bij(A):={f:AA : f is a bijection}.\operatorname{Bij}(A) := \{\, f : A \to A \ :\ f \text{ is a bijection} \,\}. Then Bij(A)\operatorname{Bij}(A) is finite and Bij(A)=n!\lvert\operatorname{Bij}(A)\rvert = n! (def-factorial-and-falling-factorial). More generally, for finite sets XX and YY write Bij(X,Y)\operatorname{Bij}(X,Y) for the set of bijections XYX \to Y. If X=Y=n\lvert X\rvert = \lvert Y\rvert = n then Bij(X,Y)\operatorname{Bij}(X,Y) is finite with n!n! elements, and if XY\lvert X\rvert \ne \lvert Y\rvert then Bij(X,Y)=\operatorname{Bij}(X,Y) = \varnothing. (A finite set AA with A=n\lvert A\rvert = n has exactly n!n! bijections onto itself, and n!n! bijections onto any set of the same cardinality).

[L4]

Let GG be a group and gGg \in G, with integer powers as in def-group-power. Then g  =  {gn  :  nZ},\langle g \rangle \;=\; \{\, g^{n} \;:\; n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\} , the cyclic subgroup generated by gg (def-generated-subgroup) being exactly the set of integer powers of gg. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group. (g={gn:nZ}\langle g \rangle = \{\, g^{n} : n \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L5]

Let GG and HH be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set G×H:={(g,h):gG, hH}G\times H:=\{(g,h):g\in G,\ h\in H\} and componentwise operation (g,h)(g,h):=(gg,hh).(g,h)(g',h') := (gg',hh'). The fact that this operation makes G×HG\times H a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in thm-external-direct-product-is-a-group. Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation. (The external direct product G×HG\times H with componentwise multiplication).

[L6]

For groups GG and HH, the componentwise operation of def-external-direct-product-of-groups makes G×HG\times H a group. Its identity is (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H), and (g,h)1=(g1,h1).(g,h)^{-1}=(g^{-1},h^{-1}). Moreover the coordinate maps πG(g,h)=g\pi_G(g,h)=g and πH(g,h)=h\pi_H(g,h)=h are group homomorphisms. (G×HG\times H is a group with identity (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Let XX have three distinct elements. The symmetric group Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) is finite, with 3!=63!=6 elements.

givenL1L2L3L4L5L6
2.1

Two transpositions sharing one point do not commute, so Sym(X)\operatorname{Sym}(X) is nonabelian.

step 1.1
3.1

Every cyclic group is abelian, and a direct product of abelian groups is abelian under componentwise multiplication. Hence this finite nonabelian group cannot have the asserted form, and the claim is false.

step 2.1

Sources