How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Abelian Groups: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The cyclic group of order six in elementary-divisor and invariant-factor forms
Example
The Chinese remainder isomorphism gives Thus the elementary divisors are and , while the invariant-factor list is the single entry .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).
For every finite abelian group there is a unique list such that . Moreover . The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).
Let be a finite pairwise-coprime list of positive integers and let . The map is a bijection. It preserves addition, multiplication, , and componentwise. For the empty list, and both sides have one element. (Chinese remainder theorem for a finite pairwise-coprime list: simultaneous residues determine one class modulo the product, and the resulting bijection preserves addition and multiplication).
For every , view as its canonical nonnegative integer and put . Then the left cosets of in are exactly the congruence classes modulo , and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes and . (For every , the congruence-class group is the quotient group ).
Verification
The residue map is an isomorphism by the Chinese remainder theorem.
The factors have prime-power orders, so is the elementary-divisor multiset; regrouping the coprime factors gives the invariant factor .
The five abelian groups of order sixteen
Example
The abelian groups of order are, up to isomorphism,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
For a prime and , isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order are in bijection with partitions of . For , the unique group is the trivial group and corresponds separately to the empty partition. (Isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order p^n are counted by partitions of n).
Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).
For , a partition of is a finite nondecreasing list of positive integers with , using finite natural sums as in def-nat-finite-sum-and-product and naturals as in def-natural-numbers. Equality is equality of these lists. The nondecreasing convention removes permutations from the data. (Partitions of a positive integer).
Verification
The partitions of are , , , , and .
Replacing each part by gives the displayed groups. The partition bijection makes the list exhaustive and prevents repetitions.
Successive p-multiple layers recover the summands of C_p^2 times C_{p^3} times C_{p^4}^2
Example
For the dimensions defined by are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
Suppose with , and in additive notation write . Define by . Then Consequently, for every , the number of summands of order is , so the elementary divisors are intrinsic. (The successive quotients p^iG/p^{i+1}G recover the cyclic summand multiplicities of a finite abelian p-group).
If and are finite groups, then their external direct product is finite and has order . (For finite groups and , ).
Verification
At layers , the numbers of exponents among that exceed are respectively .
The differences , , , and recover two factors, no factor, one factor, and two factors.
The six abelian groups of order 360 in both classification forms
Example
Since , there are six abelian groups of order . Their elementary-divisor forms are obtained by choosing one of , , and one of , , together with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).
For every finite abelian group there is a unique list such that . Moreover . The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).
Let , and write its canonical prime factorisation as , with the distinct and . Then the number of isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order is where is the number of partitions of . For one has , so the empty product is . (The number of finite abelian groups of order n is the product of the partition numbers of the prime exponents of n).
Powers are the natural powers of def-group-power and finite products those of def-monoid-finite-product, both taken in the commutative monoid of lem-units-of-z. Call an injective list of primes when every is prime (def-prime) and forces (def-injection-surjection-bijection). Let with and let be an injective list of primes such that every prime divisor of equals for some . Then, with as in def-p-adic-valuation: 1. ; 2. for every prime that is not among ; 3. the exponents are determined by : if and , then for every . Clause 3 needs only injectivity of the list, not the covering hypothesis. (For and any injective list of primes containing every prime divisor of , one has ; the exponents are determined by , and for every prime outside the list).
Verification
The prime exponents are , whose partition counts are ; their product is .
The six elementary forms are , , , , , and .
Columnwise regrouping gives invariant-factor lists , , , , , and , respectively.
Complements of a maximal cyclic subgroup in C_p times C_p need not be unique
Example
In , fix . For every , the subgroup is a complement of , and distinct give distinct complements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
Let be a finite abelian -group and let have maximal element order. Then there is a subgroup such that (A maximal-order cyclic subgroup splits off a finite abelian p-group).
Let be a group and let be normal subgroups, where . They form an internal direct product when they generate and, for each , The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says and ; in additive notation one writes . Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).
Let . The following are equivalent: the form an internal direct product of ; every has a unique expression with ; and the multiplication map is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).
For every , view as its canonical nonnegative integer and put . Then the left cosets of in are exactly the congruence classes modulo , and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes and . (For every , the congruence-class group is the quotient group ).
Verification
Each is an order- subgroup, and because forces .
For , one has with the summands in and , so .
Internal-product recognition gives . Since distinguishes the slope, the complement promised by the splitting theorem need not be unique.
The unit group modulo one hundred is isomorphic to C_20 times C_2
Example
In the unit group , the class of has order and the class of has order . Their subgroups form an internal direct product, so with invariant factors .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.
Let be an integer. Multiplication makes a commutative monoid with identity by thm-integers-modulo-n-basic-algebra. A class is a unit when it is invertible in that monoid (def-invertible-element). The set of all units is By lem-monoid-units-form-a-group, multiplication restricts to a group operation on , called the unit group modulo . The quotient is finite with cardinality by thm-standard-representatives-modulo-n, and its unit set is a finite subset by thm-subset-of-a-finite-set. Euler's totient function is therefore defined for every positive integer by (def-finite-cardinality). For , the quotient has one element, which is its multiplicative identity and hence a unit, so follows from the definition. (The unit group and Euler's totient for ).
Let be a group and let be normal subgroups, where . They form an internal direct product when they generate and, for each , The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says and ; in additive notation one writes . Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).
Let . The following are equivalent: the form an internal direct product of ; every has a unique expression with ; and the multiplication map is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).
For every finite abelian group there is a unique list such that . Moreover . The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).
Verification
Successive powers of modulo are Thus the first positive exponent giving is , so .
The class of , represented by , has order . The list in step 1.1 contains all elements of and does not contain , so . Hence the two cyclic subgroups intersect trivially.
Trivial intersection makes the products distinct. A unit representative modulo is divisible by neither nor , since a multiple of either prime cannot have a product congruent to modulo . Among , inclusion-exclusion leaves representatives divisible by neither. Thus has at most elements, so the displayed products exhaust it. The two subgroups therefore form an internal direct product; recognition gives the isomorphism, and gives the invariant-factor order.
The additive rationals do not decompose as a product of finite cyclic prime-power groups
Statement refuted
The additive group is abelian but is not a direct product of finite cyclic groups of prime-power order. This refutes the finite structure theorem after its finiteness hypothesis is deleted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.
On the set of pairs with and , define This is an equivalence relation (lem-rat-equivalence). The rationals are the quotient , and is written . (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).
Natural exponents, in a monoid. Let be a monoid (def-semigroup-and-monoid) and . By the recursion theorem (thm-recursion), applied with the set , the element and the function from to , there is exactly one function , written , with In particular for every , including , and . Since contains (def-natural-numbers), the exponent is a genuine value of the definition and not a separate convention. Integer exponents, in a group. Let be a group (def-group) and . Write for the embedding of lem-nat-embeds-int, which is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and has as image exactly the nonnegative integers. For define - , the natural power, when and ; - when and . Why this is well defined. The order on is total and antisymmetric (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-order), so exactly one of and holds and the two clauses never both apply. In the first clause is nonnegative, so for some , and is unique because is injective. In the second clause gives by compatibility of the order with addition (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-operations), so is a positive integer and again for a unique . The inverse is a single determined element by lem-inverse-unique and def-invertible-element. Finally the two readings of , as a natural power and as an integer power, agree by construction, so no ambiguity is introduced. Abbreviation. In an exponent we write for the integer when a natural number is used where an integer is expected; this is unambiguous because is injective and preserves the arithmetic and the order, and because the two readings of agree as just noted. Additive notation. When the group is written additively the same object is written or rather than , with and ; the definitions are identical, only the symbols differ. (Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with ).
Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).
Counterexample
If is nonzero and , then , so is nontrivial and torsion-free.
Any nontrivial product of nontrivial finite cyclic prime-power groups contains a nonzero element of finite order, obtained from a generator in one factor and identities elsewhere.
Therefore no such product is isomorphic to , while the finite theorem makes no claim about this infinite group.
FALSE: every finite group is a direct product of cyclic prime-power groups
Statement
False claim: every finite group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Let be a set. A permutation of is a bijection (def-injection-surjection-bijection). The symmetric group of is the set of all permutations of , equipped with composition as its operation, and with the identity map , given by , as distinguished element. Composition of two bijections of is again a bijection of (def-injection-surjection-bijection), so is closed under and is a binary operation on it (def-binary-operation); and is a bijection of , so it is an element of , and it is a two-sided identity for composition (def-identity-element) because holds pointwise for every . That is a group is lem-symmetric-group-is-a-group. Cycle notation for a finite list of distinct points. For distinct elements of with , the symbol denotes the permutation sending to for , sending to , and fixing every element of outside . It is a bijection, because the map described sends the set onto itself by a rule with an evident inverse (send each back to and back to ) and fixes the complement pointwise. A transposition is such a symbol with , that is with : it exchanges and and fixes everything else, and it satisfies . A product of cycle symbols means their composite, so is . (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
For every set , the triple of def-symmetric-group is a group (def-group); the inverse of a permutation is its inverse function . If contains three distinct elements , , , then is not abelian: the transpositions and satisfy . ( is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements).
Let be a finite set with and write Then is finite and (def-factorial-and-falling-factorial). More generally, for finite sets and write for the set of bijections . If then is finite with elements, and if then . (A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality).
Let be a group and , with integer powers as in def-group-power. Then the cyclic subgroup generated by (def-generated-subgroup) being exactly the set of integer powers of . Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group. (, and every cyclic group is abelian).
Let and be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set and componentwise operation The fact that this operation makes a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in thm-external-direct-product-is-a-group. Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation. (The external direct product with componentwise multiplication).
For groups and , the componentwise operation of def-external-direct-product-of-groups makes a group. Its identity is , and Moreover the coordinate maps and are group homomorphisms. ( is a group with identity , coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections).
Refutation
Let have three distinct elements. The symmetric group is finite, with elements.
Two transpositions sharing one point do not commute, so is nonabelian.
Every cyclic group is abelian, and a direct product of abelian groups is abelian under componentwise multiplication. Hence this finite nonabelian group cannot have the asserted form, and the claim is false.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.