Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 8 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 8 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Finite Abelian Groups: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The cyclic group of order six in elementary-divisor and invariant-factor forms

Example

The Chinese remainder isomorphism gives C6≅C2×C3. Thus the elementary divisors are 2 and 3, while the invariant-factor list is the single entry 6.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L2]

For every finite abelian group G there is a unique list 1<n1∣⋯∣nr such that G≅Cn1×⋯×Cnr. Moreover ∣G∣=n1⋯nr. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

[L3]

Let n0,…,nr−1 be a finite pairwise-coprime list of positive integers and let N:=∏i<rni. The map Φ:Z/N⟶∏i<rZ/ni,[x]N⟼([x]ni)i<r, is a bijection. It preserves addition, multiplication, [0], and [1] componentwise. For the empty list, N=1 and both sides have one element. (Chinese remainder theorem for a finite pairwise-coprime list: simultaneous residues determine one class modulo the product, and the resulting bijection preserves addition and multiplication).

[L4]

For every n∈N, view n as its canonical nonnegative integer and put nZ:={nk:k∈Z}. Then the left cosets of nZ in (Z,+) are exactly the congruence classes modulo n, and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus (Z,+)/nZ=(Z/n,+) as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes n=0 and n=1. (For every n∈N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The residue map [x]6↦([x]2,[x]3) is an isomorphism by the Chinese remainder theorem.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

The factors C2,C3 have prime-power orders, so {2,3} is the elementary-divisor multiset; regrouping the coprime factors gives the invariant factor 6.

step 1.1∎
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The five abelian groups of order sixteen

Example

The abelian groups of order 16 are, up to isomorphism, C16,C8×C2,C4×C4,C4×C2×C2,C24.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

For a prime p and n>0, isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order pn are in bijection with partitions of n. For n=0, the unique group is the trivial group and corresponds separately to the empty partition. (Isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order p^n are counted by partitions of n).

[L2]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L3]

For n>0, a partition of n is a finite nondecreasing list of positive integers (e1,…,er) with e1+⋯+er=n, using finite natural sums as in def-nat-finite-sum-and-product and naturals as in def-natural-numbers. Equality is equality of these lists. The nondecreasing convention removes permutations from the data. (Partitions of a positive integer).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The partitions of 4 are 4, 3+1, 2+2, 2+1+1, and 1+1+1+1.

givenL1L2L3
2.1

Replacing each part e by C2e gives the displayed groups. The partition bijection makes the list exhaustive and prevents repetitions.

step 1.1∎
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Successive p-multiple layers recover the summands of C_p^2 times C_{p^3} times C_{p^4}^2

Example

For G=Cp2×Cp3×Cp42, the dimensions di defined by ∣piG/pi+1G∣=pdi are 5,3,3,2,0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Suppose G≅∏j<rCpej with ej≥1, and in additive notation write piG={pig:g∈G}. Define di by ∣piG/pi+1G∣=pdi. Then di=∣{j:ej≥i+1}∣. Consequently, for every k≥1, the number of summands of order pk is dk−1−dk, so the elementary divisors are intrinsic. (The successive quotients p^iG/p^{i+1}G recover the cyclic summand multiplicities of a finite abelian p-group).

[L2]

If G and H are finite groups, then their external direct product is finite and has order ∣G×H∣=∣G∣ ∣H∣. (For finite groups G and H, ∣G×H∣=∣G∣ ∣H∣).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

At layers i=0,1,2,3,4, the numbers of exponents among 1,1,3,4,4 that exceed i are respectively 5,3,3,2,0.

givenL1L2
2.1

The differences d0−d1=2, d1−d2=0, d2−d3=1, and d3−d4=2 recover two Cp factors, no Cp2 factor, one Cp3 factor, and two Cp4 factors.

step 1.1∎
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The six abelian groups of order 360 in both classification forms

Example

Since 360=23⋅32⋅5, there are six abelian groups of order 360. Their elementary-divisor forms are obtained by choosing one of C8, C4×C2, C23 and one of C9, C32, together with C5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

[L2]

For every finite abelian group G there is a unique list 1<n1∣⋯∣nr such that G≅Cn1×⋯×Cnr. Moreover ∣G∣=n1⋯nr. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

[L3]

Let n≥1, and write its canonical prime factorisation as n=∏i<rpiai, with the pi distinct and ai>0. Then the number of isomorphism classes of abelian groups of order n is ∏i<rP(ai), where P(a) is the number of partitions of a. For n=1 one has r=0, so the empty product is 1. (The number of finite abelian groups of order n is the product of the partition numbers of the prime exponents of n).

[L4]

Powers are the natural powers of def-group-power and finite products those of def-monoid-finite-product, both taken in the commutative monoid (Z,⋅,1) of lem-units-of-z. Call p:r→Z an injective list of primes when every pi is prime (def-prime) and pi=pj forces i=j (def-injection-surjection-bijection). Let n∈Z with n≥1 and let p:r→Z be an injective list of primes such that every prime divisor of n equals pi for some i<r. Then, with vq as in def-p-adic-valuation: 1. n  =  ∏i<rpi vpi(n); 2. vq(n)=0 for every prime q that is not among p0,…,pr−1; 3. the exponents are determined by n: if e:r→N and n=∏i<rpi ei, then ej=vpj(n) for every j<r. Clause 3 needs only injectivity of the list, not the covering hypothesis. (For n≥1 and any injective list p:r→Z of primes containing every prime divisor of n, one has n=∏i<rpi vpi(n); the exponents are determined by n, and vq(n)=0 for every prime q outside the list).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The prime exponents are 3,2,1, whose partition counts are 3,2,1; their product is 6.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

The six elementary forms are (C8,C9,C5), (C8,C3,C3,C5), (C4,C2,C9,C5), (C4,C2,C3,C3,C5), (C2,C2,C2,C9,C5), and (C2,C2,C2,C3,C3,C5).

step 1.1
3.1

Columnwise regrouping gives invariant-factor lists (360), (3,120), (2,180), (6,60), (2,2,90), and (2,6,30), respectively.

step 2.1∎
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Complements of a maximal cyclic subgroup in C_p times C_p need not be unique

Example

In Cp×Cp, fix A=Cp×{0}. For every t∈Cp, the subgroup Bt={(tx,x):x∈Cp} is a complement of A, and distinct t give distinct complements.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Let G be a finite abelian p-group and let a∈G have maximal element order. Then there is a subgroup H≤G such that G=⟨a⟩⊕H. (A maximal-order cyclic subgroup splits off a finite abelian p-group).

[L2]

Let G be a group and let N0,…,Nr−1 be normal subgroups, where r∈N. They form an internal direct product when they generate G and, for each i<r, Ni∩⟨Nj:j<r, j≠i⟩={e}. The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says G=HK and H∩K={e}; in additive notation one writes G=H⊕K. Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).

[L3]

Let N0,…,Nr−1⊴G. The following are equivalent: the Ni form an internal direct product of G; every g∈G has a unique expression g=n0⋯nr−1 with ni∈Ni; and the multiplication map μ:∏i<rNi→G is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).

[L4]

For every n∈N, view n as its canonical nonnegative integer and put nZ:={nk:k∈Z}. Then the left cosets of nZ in (Z,+) are exactly the congruence classes modulo n, and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus (Z,+)/nZ=(Z/n,+) as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes n=0 and n=1. (For every n∈N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each Bt is an order-p subgroup, and A∩Bt={(0,0)} because (tx,x)∈A forces x=0.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

For (u,v)∈Cp2, one has (u,v)=(u−tv,0)+(tv,v) with the summands in A and Bt, so A+Bt=G.

step 1.1
3.1

Internal-product recognition gives G=A⊕Bt. Since (t,1)∈Bt distinguishes the slope, the complement promised by the splitting theorem need not be unique.

step 2.1∎
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The unit group modulo one hundred is isomorphic to C_20 times C_2

Example

In the unit group U(100), the class of 3 has order 20 and the class of −1 has order 2. Their subgroups form an internal direct product, so U(100)≅C20×C2, with invariant factors 2∣20.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Let n≥1 be an integer. Multiplication makes Z/n a commutative monoid with identity [1]n by thm-integers-modulo-n-basic-algebra. A class u∈Z/n is a unit when it is invertible in that monoid (def-invertible-element). The set of all units is (Z/n)×:={ u∈Z/n:some v∈Z/n satisfies uv=[1]n }. By lem-monoid-units-form-a-group, multiplication restricts to a group operation on (Z/n)×, called the unit group modulo n. The quotient Z/n is finite with cardinality n by thm-standard-representatives-modulo-n, and its unit set is a finite subset by thm-subset-of-a-finite-set. Euler's totient function is therefore defined for every positive integer n by φ(n):=∣(Z/n)×∣∈N (def-finite-cardinality). For n=1, the quotient has one element, which is its multiplicative identity and hence a unit, so φ(1)=1 follows from the definition. (The unit group (Z/n)× and Euler's totient φ(n)=∣(Z/n)×∣ for n≥1).

[L2]

Let G be a group and let N0,…,Nr−1 be normal subgroups, where r∈N. They form an internal direct product when they generate G and, for each i<r, Ni∩⟨Nj:j<r, j≠i⟩={e}. The empty family is an internal direct product of the trivial group. For two subgroups of an abelian group this says G=HK and H∩K={e}; in additive notation one writes G=H⊕K. Normal subgroups and generated subgroups are those of def-normal-subgroup and def-generated-subgroup, and the comparison product is def-external-direct-product-of-groups. (Internal direct products of finitely many normal subgroups).

[L3]

Let N0,…,Nr−1⊴G. The following are equivalent: the Ni form an internal direct product of G; every g∈G has a unique expression g=n0⋯nr−1 with ni∈Ni; and the multiplication map μ:∏i<rNi→G is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).

[L4]

For every finite abelian group G there is a unique list 1<n1∣⋯∣nr such that G≅Cn1×⋯×Cnr. Moreover ∣G∣=n1⋯nr. The trivial group corresponds to the empty list and empty product. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: invariant-factor form).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Successive powers of 3 modulo 100 are 3,9,27,81,43,29,87,61,83,49,47,41,23,69,7,21,63,89,67,1. Thus the first positive exponent giving 1 is 20, so ord⁡(3)=20.

givenL1
2.1

The class of −1, represented by 99, has order 2. The list in step 1.1 contains all 20 elements of ⟨3⟩ and does not contain 99, so −1∉⟨3⟩. Hence the two cyclic subgroups intersect trivially.

step 1.1
3.1

Trivial intersection makes the 20⋅2=40 products distinct. A unit representative modulo 100 is divisible by neither 2 nor 5, since a multiple of either prime cannot have a product congruent to 1 modulo 100. Among 0,…,99, inclusion-exclusion leaves 100−50−20+10=40 representatives divisible by neither. Thus U(100) has at most 40 elements, so the displayed products exhaust it. The two subgroups therefore form an internal direct product; recognition gives the isomorphism, and 2∣20 gives the invariant-factor order.

step 2.1L1L2L3L4∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The additive rationals do not decompose as a product of finite cyclic prime-power groups

Statement refuted

The additive group (Q,+) is abelian but is not a direct product of finite cyclic groups of prime-power order. This refutes the finite structure theorem after its finiteness hypothesis is deleted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.

[L1]

On the set of pairs (a,b) with a,b∈Z and b≠0, define (a,b)∼(c,d)  ⟺  ad=cbin Z. This is an equivalence relation (lem-rat-equivalence). The rationals are the quotient Q, and [(a,b)] is written a/b. (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

[L2]

Natural exponents, in a monoid. Let (M,⋅,e) be a monoid (def-semigroup-and-monoid) and g∈M. By the recursion theorem (thm-recursion), applied with the set M, the element e and the function x↦x⋅g from M to M, there is exactly one function N→M, written n↦gn, with g0=e,gσ(n)=gn⋅g(n∈N). In particular g0=e for every g, including g=e, and g1=gσ(0)=e⋅g=g. Since N contains 0 (def-natural-numbers), the exponent 0 is a genuine value of the definition and not a separate convention. Integer exponents, in a group. Let G be a group (def-group) and g∈G. Write ι:N→Z for the embedding k=[(k,0)] of lem-nat-embeds-int, which is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and has as image exactly the nonnegative integers. For x∈Z define - gx:=gk, the natural power, when 0≤x and x=k; - gx:=(gk)−1 when x<0 and −x=k. Why this is well defined. The order on Z is total and antisymmetric (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-order), so exactly one of 0≤x and x<0 holds and the two clauses never both apply. In the first clause x is nonnegative, so x=k for some k∈N, and k is unique because ι is injective. In the second clause x<0 gives 0=x+(−x)<0+(−x)=−x by compatibility of the order with addition (thm-int-ordered-ring, def-int-operations), so −x is a positive integer and again −x=k for a unique k. The inverse (gk)−1 is a single determined element by lem-inverse-unique and def-invertible-element. Finally the two readings of gk, as a natural power and as an integer power, agree by construction, so no ambiguity is introduced. Abbreviation. In an exponent we write k for the integer k when a natural number k is used where an integer is expected; this is unambiguous because ι is injective and preserves the arithmetic and the order, and because the two readings of gk agree as just noted. Additive notation. When the group is written additively the same object is written ng or n⋅g rather than gn, with 0g=0 and σ(n)g=ng+g; the definitions are identical, only the symbols differ. (Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e).

[L3]

Every finite abelian group is isomorphic to a finite direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order. The multiset of their orders is uniquely determined by the group, up to permutation of the factors. (Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups: elementary-divisor form).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

If q∈Q is nonzero and n>0, then nq≠0, so (Q,+) is nontrivial and torsion-free.

givenL1L2L3
2.1

Any nontrivial product of nontrivial finite cyclic prime-power groups contains a nonzero element of finite order, obtained from a generator in one factor and identities elsewhere.

step 1.1
3.1

Therefore no such product is isomorphic to (Q,+), while the finite theorem makes no claim about this infinite group.

step 2.1∎
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

FALSE: every finite group is a direct product of cyclic prime-power groups

Statement

False claim: every finite group is isomorphic to a direct product of cyclic groups of prime-power order.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let X be a set. A permutation of X is a bijection f:X→X (def-injection-surjection-bijection). The symmetric group of X is the set of all permutations of X, Sym⁡(X)  :=  { f:X→X  :  f is a bijection }, equipped with composition as its operation, (f∘g)(x)  =  f(g(x))(x∈X), and with the identity map idX, given by idX(x)=x, as distinguished element. Composition of two bijections of X is again a bijection of X (def-injection-surjection-bijection), so Sym⁡(X) is closed under ∘ and ∘ is a binary operation on it (def-binary-operation); and idX is a bijection of X, so it is an element of Sym⁡(X), and it is a two-sided identity for composition (def-identity-element) because f∘idX=f=idX∘f holds pointwise for every f. That (Sym⁡(X),∘,idX) is a group is lem-symmetric-group-is-a-group. Cycle notation for a finite list of distinct points. For distinct elements x0,x1,…,xk−1 of X with k≥2, the symbol (x0 x1 ⋯ xk−1) denotes the permutation sending xi to xi+1 for i<k−1, sending xk−1 to x0, and fixing every element of X outside {x0,…,xk−1}. It is a bijection, because the map described sends the set {x0,…,xk−1} onto itself by a rule with an evident inverse (send each xi+1 back to xi and x0 back to xk−1) and fixes the complement pointwise. A transposition is such a symbol with k=2, that is (a b) with a≠b: it exchanges a and b and fixes everything else, and it satisfies (a b)∘(a b)=idX. A product of cycle symbols means their composite, so (a b)(c d) is (a b)∘(c d). (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition).

[L2]

For every set X, the triple (Sym⁡(X),∘,idX) of def-symmetric-group is a group (def-group); the inverse of a permutation f is its inverse function f−1. If X contains three distinct elements a, b, c, then Sym⁡(X) is not abelian: the transpositions τ=(a b) and ρ=(b c) satisfy τ∘ρ≠ρ∘τ. (Sym⁡(X) is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever X has at least three distinct elements).

[L3]

Let A be a finite set with n:=∣A∣ and write Bij⁡(A):={ f:A→A : f is a bijection }. Then Bij⁡(A) is finite and ∣Bij⁡(A)∣=n! (def-factorial-and-falling-factorial). More generally, for finite sets X and Y write Bij⁡(X,Y) for the set of bijections X→Y. If ∣X∣=∣Y∣=n then Bij⁡(X,Y) is finite with n! elements, and if ∣X∣≠∣Y∣ then Bij⁡(X,Y)=∅. (A finite set A with ∣A∣=n has exactly n! bijections onto itself, and n! bijections onto any set of the same cardinality).

[L4]

Let G be a group and g∈G, with integer powers as in def-group-power. Then ⟨g⟩  =  { gn  :  n∈Z }, the cyclic subgroup generated by g (def-generated-subgroup) being exactly the set of integer powers of g. Consequently every cyclic group is abelian, and so is every cyclic subgroup of any group. (⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L5]

Let G and H be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set G×H:={(g,h):g∈G, h∈H} and componentwise operation (g,h)(g′,h′):=(gg′,hh′). The fact that this operation makes G×H a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in thm-external-direct-product-is-a-group. Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation. (The external direct product G×H with componentwise multiplication).

[L6]

For groups G and H, the componentwise operation of def-external-direct-product-of-groups makes G×H a group. Its identity is (eG,eH), and (g,h)−1=(g−1,h−1). Moreover the coordinate maps πG(g,h)=g and πH(g,h)=h are group homomorphisms. (G×H is a group with identity (eG,eH), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Let X have three distinct elements. The symmetric group Sym⁡(X) is finite, with 3!=6 elements.

givenL1L2L3L4L5L6
2.1

Two transpositions sharing one point do not commute, so Sym⁡(X) is nonabelian.

step 1.1
3.1

Every cyclic group is abelian, and a direct product of abelian groups is abelian under componentwise multiplication. Hence this finite nonabelian group cannot have the asserted form, and the claim is false.

step 2.1∎

Sources