Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 12 results · all verified · 10 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

A finite, ordered treatment of exterior constructions, Koszul homology, regular sequences, and their local finite consequences. All regularity claims retain their stated terminal-quotient and local hypotheses.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Complex One And Two Elements

Example

Let k be a field and R=k[u,v]. With coefficients M=R, the one-element complex is K(u;R)=[0→R→uR→0], with the displayed copies in degrees 1,0. It has H0≅k[v] and zero homology in every other degree.

The two-element complex is K(u,v;R)=[0→R→d2R2→d1R→0], in degrees 2,1,0, where degree-two 1 corresponds to e1∧e2, and

d2(c)=−vc e1+uc e2,d1(ae1+be2)=au+bv.

Its degree-zero homology is k, and all other homology vanishes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the polynomial ring R=k[u,v], coefficients R, and the ordered standard exterior bases. The prerequisites are Basic Koszul Homology, One Element Koszul Complex, and Koszul Differential Coordinate Formula.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The one-element lemma gives the displayed complex. Multiplication by u on k[u,v] is injective by comparison of polynomial coefficients, so H1=0 and H0=R/uR≅k[v]; all other terms vanish.

1.2givenalgebra

For two elements the coordinate formula gives d2(c)=(−vc,uc) and d1(a,b)=ua+vb, with d1d2(c)=−uvc+vuc=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

If ua+vb=0, reduction modulo u gives vb‾=0 in k[v]. Multiplication by v is injective, so b=uc for some c∈R. Substitution gives u(a+vc)=0, hence a=−vc. Thus every degree-one cycle is d2(c), proving H1=0.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

If d2(c)=0, then uc=0, so c=0 and H2=0. Finally H0=R/(u,v)≅k, and there are no terms outside degrees 0,1,2. This proves both computations.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Complex Polynomial Variables

Example

For S=k[x1,…,xn], the variables form a regular sequence and K(x1,…,xn;S) is a finite free resolution of k=S/(x1,…,xn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The polynomial ring and its variable sequence stated in the claim. The declared prerequisite used here is Koszul Complex Resolves A Regular Quotient.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Successive quotients by the variables are polynomial rings, so each next variable is injective.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The regular-quotient resolution theorem gives a finite free resolution of k.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Resolution Complete Intersection

Example

In k[x,y], the regular sequence x2,y3 gives 0→R→R2→R→R/(x2,y3)→0 with ranks 1,2,1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Complex Resolves A Regular Quotient, Complete Intersection Betti Numbers Binomial.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

x2 is regular in k[x,y], and y3 is regular modulo (x2).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The Koszul complex resolves the quotient with exterior ranks 1,2,1, whose alternating sum is zero.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Homology Zero Divisor

Example

For R=k[t]/(t2), K(t;R) has H0≅k and H1=(t)≅k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are One Element Koszul Homology.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

In k[t]/(t2), multiplication by t has kernel and image (t).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The one-element formula gives H0≅k and H1≅(t)≅k.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Nonpermutable Regular Sequence

Example

In R=k[x,y,z]/((x−1)z), x,(x−1)y is regular, whereas the reverse order is not: (x−1)yz=0 with z≠0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Regular Sequence On A Module, Regularity Notions And Permutation Invariance Local.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Modulo x, the relation becomes z=0, leaving k[y] where (x−1)y becomes −y; also x is a non-zero-divisor.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

In reverse order z≠0 is killed by x−1, so the first regularity condition fails; the ring is not local.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Homology After Localisation

Example

For R=k[t], M=R/(t), and sequence (t), localization at S={1,t,t2,…} makes both the Koszul complex and its homology zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Homology Localises.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

After inverting t, the module R/(t) is zero, so every term of the complex localizes to zero.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Exact localization gives zero homology, agreeing with the localized Koszul complex.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Empty And Unit Koszul Boundaries

Example

For nonzero M, compare K(∅;M), K(0;M), and K(1;M); the first is M, the second has H0=H1=M, and the third is acyclic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Empty Koszul Complex Is The Coefficient Module, One Element Koszul Homology, Regular Sequence On A Module.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The empty complex is M; for 0 the two-term differential is zero, and for 1 it is an isomorphism.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Thus H0=H1=M in the zero case and the unit case is acyclic; the unit fails the proper-quotient regularity convention.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul D Square Sign Check Three Elements

Example

For e1∧e2∧e3, expand d2 and pair the two appearances of each xixjek with opposite signs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Differential Coordinate Formula, Koszul Differential Square Pairwise Cancellation.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

After one differential the three terms are x1e2∧e3−x2e1∧e3+x3e1∧e2.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The second differential produces each xixjek twice with opposite signs, so the total is zero.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Homology Of A Zero Divisor

Example

For R=k[s,t]/(st) and x=s, H0=R/(s), H1=(t), and both are supported on V(s).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are One Element Koszul Homology, Koszul Homology Supported On Sequence Vanishing Set.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The annihilator of s in k[s,t]/(st) is (t).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Thus H0=R/(s) and H1=(t); both are killed by s and supported on V(s).

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Generator Change Koszul Isomorphism

Example

For (x,y) and (x+y,y), the matrix (1101) induces the chain isomorphism sending the new first basis vector to e1+e2 and the second to e2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Koszul Generator Matrix Chain Map, Koszul Complex Invariant Under Invertible Generator Change.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The displayed upper-triangular matrix is invertible and expresses (x+y,y) in terms of (x,y).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Its exterior action intertwines differentials, and the inverse matrix supplies the inverse chain map.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Regular Sequence Powers And Permutation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. In k[x,y](x,y), (x,y), (x2,y3), and (y3,x2) are regular sequences.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and a field k. The declared prerequisites used here are Positive Powers Of A Regular Sequence Remain Regular and Regular Sequences Permutable Local.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

x,y are regular in the local polynomial ring because the successive quotients are domains.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Under the assumed AC, Positive Powers Of A Regular Sequence Remain Regular applied to (x,y) gives (x2,y3); Regular Sequences Permutable Local then swaps its two entries to give (y3,x2). These two applications are the uses of Choice.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Koszul Resolution Betti Table Complete Intersection

Example

For R=k[x,y,z](x,y,z) and (x2,y2,z2), the minimal Koszul resolution of the quotient has Betti table 1,3,3,1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rings, finite sequences, modules, and local hypotheses stated in the claim. The declared prerequisites used here are Complete Intersection Betti Numbers Binomial, Koszul Resolution Minimality Maximal Ideal Sequence.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The squared variables are a regular sequence in the local polynomial ring and lie in its maximal ideal.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The minimal Koszul ranks are (30),(31),(32),(33)=1,3,3,1.

Sources