How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The three edge integrals of around the triangle with vertices , , and sum to zero
Example
For the positively oriented boundary of ,
More precisely, the integrals along the directed edges , , and are respectively
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The oriented triangle and the integrand .
The oriented triangle boundary follows the directed edges (Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter).
Complex polynomials are entire and obey the power derivative rule (Complex polynomials are entire with the power-rule derivative, and rational functions are holomorphic wherever their denominator is nonzero).
If is holomorphic with continuous derivative on an open set containing a rectifiable contour from to , then (The line integral of a continuous function admitting a primitive is that primitive's endpoint increment along every rectifiable path).
Goursat's theorem gives zero integral for a holomorphic function around every filled triangle contained in its domain (Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain).
A holomorphic function is continuous (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
Verification
The polynomial is entire with ; this derivative is holomorphic by [L2] and continuous by [L5], so every hypothesis of [L3] holds on each edge.
In the orientation of [L1], the endpoint increments are , , and .
Their sum is zero, proving the displayed integral directly; [L4] gives the same value because is entire.
The four midpoint subtriangles of the triangle display all three cancelling interior edges
Example
For , , and , the side midpoints are
The midpoint subdivision, with the orientation of Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter, consists of , , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed vertices and midpoints, with every triangle carrying the orientation fixed by its ordered vertices.
If are the side midpoints of and is continuous on that filled triangle, then (Midpoint subdivision of a triangle cancels every interior edge and preserves its outer boundary integral).
Verification
The directed edge lists are , , , and .
The interior segment pairs are , , and ; each pair consists of one directed edge and its reversal, so the formal oriented edges cancel.
The surviving half-edges concatenate as , , and , which is the positive outer boundary ; for every continuous integrand, this is exactly the integral identity in [L1].
The circle integral of over is
Example
If for , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positively oriented radius- circle and the integrand .
The complex exponential is entire (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself).
If is holomorphic on , , , and for , then (Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy).
Verification
The point lies strictly inside , while on the circle, so the denominator has no zero on the contour; by [L1], the numerator is holomorphic on every disc.
Apply [L2] with centre , radius , interior point , and to obtain the displayed value .
The circle integral of over is
Example
If for , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positively oriented radius- circle and the displayed integrand.
If is holomorphic on , , , , and for , then (All higher complex derivatives exist and satisfy Cauchy's integral formula on an interior circle).
The complex cosine is entire, with and (Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine are entire with their standard derivatives).
Verification
The point lies strictly inside the radius- circle and the denominator is nonzero on it; by [L2], is entire and .
Apply [L1] with and : the integral is .
A holomorphic function on an annulus can have a nonzero closed-contour integral
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: If is a complex domain, is holomorphic on , and is a closed rectifiable contour in , then .
Take
and let , , be the positively oriented unit circle. Then is a complex domain, is holomorphic on , and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The annulus , the function , and the unit circle .
The modulus is multiplicative and satisfies the triangle inequality, hence (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
A rational function is holomorphic wherever its denominator is nonzero (Complex polynomials are entire with the power-rule derivative, and rational functions are holomorphic wherever their denominator is nonzero).
Every nonzero complex number has a polar representation with , and for real (Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and , , , and ).
A space is path-connected when each pair of points is joined by a continuous path, and every path-connected space is connected (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components, Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of ).
The integral of around the positively oriented unit circle is (On a positively oriented circle about a, the integral of (z-a)^m is zero for every integer m except -1, and is 2 pi i for m=-1).
The complex exponential is entire and therefore continuous (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
Refutation
The point lies in . For , let ; if , [L1] gives , so is open.
Given and in as in [L3], the radial paths and stay in , and the unit-circle arc joins their unit endpoints. By [L7] these paths are continuous; the first, the arc, and the reversal of the second concatenate to join to , so [L4] makes path-connected and connected.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that is nonempty, open, and connected, hence a complex domain by [L5]; since , [L2] makes holomorphic on .
The unit circle is a closed rectifiable contour in , while [L6] gives its integral as . Thus the displayed domain, function, and contour refute the claim.
A connected complex domain need not be star-shaped
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: Every complex domain is star-shaped.
The punctured plane
is a complex domain, but it has no star centre.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured complex plane under the Euclidean identification of as the Euclidean plane and as a normed real algebra: what the identification preserves.
For , the punctured Euclidean space is polygonally connected (For , the punctured space is polygonally connected).
Polygonal connectedness supplies paths, and every path-connected space is connected (Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of , Paths, path-connected spaces and path components, Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of ).
A set is star-shaped with respect to only if the segment lies in the set for every member and every (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space).
The complex modulus satisfies and vanishes exactly at zero (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Refutation
The set is nonempty. If , the ball avoids by [L5], so is open; under , [L1] and [L2] make it connected. Hence [L3] makes a complex domain.
For any proposed centre , the point also lies in , but the segment from to contains . By [L4], is not a star centre, so no star centre exists and the claim is false.
FALSE: Goursat's triangle conclusion requires a separate continuity hypothesis on
Statement
False claim: To conclude that a holomorphic function has zero integral around the boundary of every filled triangle in its open domain, one must separately assume that its derivative is continuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The asserted need for a separate continuity hypothesis on the derivative.
Goursat's triangle theorem assumes only that is holomorphic on an open set containing the filled triangle and concludes that its boundary integral is zero; it explicitly makes no continuity assumption on (Goursat's triangle theorem: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every triangle contained in its domain).
Refutation
Under the holomorphy and containment hypotheses, [L1] already gives the claimed zero boundary integral.
Since continuity of is absent from the hypotheses of [L1], it is not a separately required assumption for that conclusion, and the claim is false.
FALSE: every continuous complex-valued function on a convex domain has a primitive
Statement
False claim: Every continuous function on a convex complex domain has a primitive.
On , the continuous function is a counterexample.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The whole complex plane , the function , and the positively oriented unit circle .
Complex conjugation preserves differences and modulus, and (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
The whole Euclidean plane is convex, since every segment between two of its points remains in the plane (A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points).
The integral of around the positively oriented unit circle is (On a positively oriented circle about a, the integral of (z-a)^m is zero for every integer m except -1, and is 2 pi i for m=-1).
A primitive of is holomorphic and satisfies (A primitive of a complex function on an open set).
If is holomorphic, is continuous, and is closed and rectifiable, then (The integral of a continuous complex derivative over every closed rectifiable contour is zero).
The Euclidean plane is connected ( is polygonally connected, connected, locally path-connected and locally connected).
A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of ).
Refutation
By [L1], , so is continuous; by [L2], its domain is convex. The complex plane is nonempty and open, and it is connected under its Euclidean identification by [L6], so [L7] makes it a complex domain.
On the unit circle, , so and [L3] gives .
Suppose, for contradiction, that has a primitive on .
By [L4], is holomorphic and ; step 1.1 makes this derivative continuous, and the unit circle is closed and rectifiable, so [L5] gives , contradicting step 1.2. Hence no primitive exists and the claim is false.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 2, Theorem 1.1
- Richard Howell and John Mathews, Complex Analysis, Example 6.5.3
- Richard Howell and John Mathews, Complex Analysis, Example 6.4.9
- Richard Howell and John Mathews, Complex Analysis, Section 6.3
- Lars Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, third edition, Ch. 4, Section 1.4
- Richard Howell and John Mathews, Complex Analysis, Example 6.2.16