Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hall Algebra Modules, Fock Spaces, and Geometric Actions: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples distinguish ordinary Hall norms from Jordan Green norms, exhibit distinct Hall-module characters, and compute the framing-one specialization of the proved arbitrary-framing correspondence action.

Companion: hall-algebra-modules-and-geometric-actions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The A1 Nakajima correspondence in the fundamental sl2 representation

Example

For the one-vertex, no-arrow quiver with framing dimension one, the two nonempty Nakajima fibres are points at v=0 and v=1. On their fundamental classes e0,e1, the Hecke correspondence gives E=(0100),F=(0010),H=(100−1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The A1 quiver varieties and their point Hecke correspondence, with basis ordered (e0,e1) by dimension v=0,1.

[F1]

The A1 Nakajima Hecke correspondence gives the fundamental sl2 action: Ee0=0, Ee1=e0, Fe0=e1, Fe1=0, He0=e0 and He1=−e1.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

In the ordered basis (e0,e1), the six actions in [F1] give the displayed matrices column by column.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Direct multiplication gives EF=diag⁡(1,0), FE=diag⁡(0,1), HE−EH=2E and HF−FH=−2F. Therefore [E,F]=H, [H,E]=2E and [H,F]=−2F, the defining sl2 brackets.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Two distinct one-dimensional modules over the generic Jordan Hall algebra

Example

Let K=Q(t) and let HJ,K be the generic Jordan Hall algebra. By The generic Jordan-quiver Hall algebra is the symmetric-function ring, HJ,K=K[u1,u2,…] as an algebra, where ur is the generator corresponding to the class u(1r). The assignments ϵ0(ur)=0(r≥1),ϵ1(u1)=1,ϵ1(ur)=0(r≥2) give two different one-dimensional Hall modules on the same K-vector space K, by h⋅z=ϵi(h)z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The generic Jordan Hall algebra over K and the Hall-module definition.

[F1]

The generic Jordan-quiver Hall algebra is the symmetric-function ring: the generators ur=u(1r) freely generate the generic Hall algebra as a polynomial algebra, so any assignment of their values in a commutative K-algebra extends uniquely to a unital K-algebra homomorphism.

[F2]

Modules over a Hall algebra are unital algebra representations: a unital representation ρ:H→End⁡K(M) defines a Hall-module action by h⋅m=ρ(h)m.

Verification

1.1givenF1construct

By [F1], assigning values to the free polynomial generators ur extends uniquely to a unital K-algebra homomorphism for both ϵ0 and ϵ1.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1construct

For i∈{0,1} define ρi(h)(z)=ϵi(h)z. Multiplicativity and unit preservation from step 1.1 make ρi a unital representation, so [F2] gives a Hall-module action on K.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

The actions differ because ρ0(u1)=0 while ρ1(u1)=id⁡K. Thus the same one-dimensional vector space carries two different Hall-module structures.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Degree-one normalization for the Jordan Hall Green pairing and Fock action

Example

For p1r (r≥0), the ordinary symmetric-function Hall form has norm ⟨p1r,p1r⟩H=r!, while the transported Jordan Green pairing has norm (p1r,p1r)G=r!(t−1)−r. If X1 is multiplication by p1, its adjoints therefore satisfy X1†,Hp1r=rp1r−1,X1†,Gp1r=rt−1p1r−1(r≥1), and the normalized Fock operator P1=(t−1)X1†,G has the usual derivative action P1p1r=rp1r−1; both adjoints kill 1. Here X1† denotes the adjoint characterized by ⟨X1f,g⟩=⟨f,X1†g⟩ for the indicated bilinear form; the diagonal nonzero power-sum norms make these adjoints well-defined degree by degree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard Hall form, the transported Green pairing, and the normalized positive mode from the A-page Fock representation.

[F1]

The Hall inner product on symmetric functions and Power sums are orthogonal for the Hall form: ⟨pλ,pμ⟩H=δλμzλ for all partitions λ,μ, so ⟨p1r,p1r⟩H=r!.

[F2]

Jordan Hall classes are Hall–Littlewood functions with the transported Green pairing: the transported Green pairing is diagonal, (pλ,pμ)G=δλμzλ∏i(tλi−1)−1, so (p1r,p1r)G=r!(t−1)−r.

[F3]

The generic Jordan Hall regular module carries the normalized Heisenberg Fock action: P1=(t−1)X1†,G=∂/∂p1.

Verification

1.1F1F2algebra

The Hall norm formula in [F1] gives ⟨p1r,p1r⟩H=r! because z(1r)=r!; the Green norm in [F2] gives (p1r,p1r)G=r!(t−1)−r. At r=0 both are 1 by the empty-product convention.

1.2F1F2algebra

For either form and any power-sum monomial pμ of degree r−1, orthogonality makes the pairing of p1pμ with p1r vanish unless μ=(1r−1). Nondegenerate diagonal norms then force each adjoint image of p1r to be a multiple of p1r−1. Comparing against that monomial gives X1†,Hp1r=rp1r−1 and X1†,Gp1r=rt−1p1r−1.

2.1F2F3step 1.2algebra∎

By [F3], P1=(t−1)X1†,G, so P1p1r=rp1r−1, the same as the standard Hall adjoint. At r=0 the degree-lowering adjoints send 1 to zero.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources